South Dakota Medical Recording Laws

South Dakota patients have the legal right to record their own medical appointments. Under SDCL 23A-35A-20, the state's one-party consent law, you can audio record any conversation you participate in, including conversations with doctors, nurses, therapists, and other healthcare providers.

This guide explains your rights to record medical visits, how HIPAA interacts with recording, healthcare facility policies, provider recording of patients, telehealth recording, and how medical recordings serve as evidence.

Patient Recording Rights

Your Right to Record Medical Appointments

As a participant in conversations during medical appointments, South Dakota's one-party consent law allows you to record:

• Doctor visits. Discussions about diagnoses, treatment options, and prognosis.
• Specialist consultations. Complex medical information that is difficult to absorb in a single visit.
• Informed consent conversations. Discussions about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of proposed procedures or treatments.
• Pharmacy consultations. Instructions about medication dosages, interactions, and side effects.
• Nursing interactions. Instructions about wound care, medication schedules, and follow-up procedures.
• Mental health sessions. Conversations with therapists, counselors, or psychiatrists (though therapeutic relationships may be affected).
• Physical therapy and rehabilitation appointments.
• Insurance-related conversations. Discussions about coverage, pre-authorization, and billing.

You do not need to inform the healthcare provider that you are recording. Your presence and participation in the conversation satisfies the one-party consent requirement.

Why Patients Record Medical Appointments

Research published in medical journals has found that patients retain only 40-80% of medical information provided during appointments, and nearly half of what they do retain is incorrect. Recording helps patients:

• Remember complex instructions. Treatment plans, medication schedules, and post-procedure care instructions can be reviewed later.
• Share accurate information. Recordings allow family members and caregivers to hear exactly what the doctor said.
• Document informed consent. A recording captures the full discussion about risks, benefits, and alternatives before a procedure.
• Preserve evidence. If a medical error occurs, the recording documents what the provider communicated.
• Reduce misunderstandings. Listening to a recording eliminates the "he said/she said" problem in medical disputes.

Medical Advocacy Organizations Support Patient Recording

Several healthcare organizations have recognized the value of patient recording. Studies show that patients who record their appointments have better understanding of their conditions and higher adherence to treatment plans. Some providers now actively encourage patients to record visits as a tool for improved health outcomes.

HIPAA and Patient Recording

What HIPAA Does and Does Not Restrict

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is often misunderstood in the context of recording. Here is what HIPAA actually does:

HIPAA restricts healthcare providers and health plans. The HIPAA Privacy Rule regulates how covered entities (hospitals, doctors, insurers) collect, use, and disclose protected health information (PHI).

HIPAA does not restrict patients. You are not a "covered entity" under HIPAA. The law does not prevent you from recording your own medical appointment, sharing that recording with family, or using it in legal proceedings.

Common misconceptions:

Misconception	Reality
"HIPAA says you can't record your doctor"	False. HIPAA does not address patient recording.
"It's a HIPAA violation for patients to have recordings of medical conversations"	False. HIPAA only applies to covered entities, not patients.
"Your doctor can cite HIPAA to stop you from recording"	Incorrect as a legal matter, though they may have a facility policy.
"Sharing a [recording of your own medical visit violates HIPAA"	False for the patient. The provider sharing your information without consent](/us-laws/is-it-illegal-to-record-someone) would be a violation.

Provider Obligations Under HIPAA

While HIPAA does not restrict patients, it does create obligations for providers:

• Providers must protect your PHI from unauthorized disclosure
• Providers cannot share your medical information without your consent (with limited exceptions)
• If a provider records a visit, that recording becomes part of your medical record subject to HIPAA protections
• You have the right to access your own health information, including any recordings the provider has made

Healthcare Facility Recording Policies

Can a Hospital or Clinic Ban Recording?

Healthcare facilities can adopt internal policies that restrict or prohibit recording on their premises. These policies are enforceable as a condition of receiving services, similar to how a business can set its own rules for conduct on private property.

Common healthcare facility recording policies include:

• Prohibiting recording in waiting rooms to protect other patients' privacy
• Requiring patients to ask permission before recording a visit
• Banning recording in operating rooms and procedure areas
• Restricting photography in the facility

Important distinction: A facility policy against recording is not the same as a law against recording. Violating a facility policy is not a crime under South Dakota law. However, the facility could:

• Ask you to stop recording
• Decline to continue the appointment
• In extreme cases, ask you to leave (though they must still provide emergency care)

The facility cannot call the police and have you arrested simply for recording your own medical appointment, because one-party consent makes the recording legal under state law.

Balancing Patient Rights and Provider Concerns

While you have the legal right to record, informing your healthcare provider can maintain a good relationship. Many patients find that a simple statement like "I'd like to record this so I can review it later" is well received by providers who understand the health benefits of patient recording.

Healthcare Provider Recording of Patients

Can Doctors Record Patients?

Healthcare providers participating in conversations with patients can record those conversations under one-party consent. However, providers face additional obligations:

• HIPAA applies to provider recordings. Any recording a provider makes becomes part of the medical record and must be protected under the Privacy Rule.
• SDCL 22-21-1 applies in examination rooms. Placing a hidden camera in a medical examination room where patients undress violates the hidden camera statute. Patients have a reasonable expectation of privacy during physical examinations.
• Informed consent. While one-party consent does not require notification, medical ethics guidelines generally encourage providers to inform patients about recording.

Security Cameras in Healthcare Facilities

Hospitals and clinics can install security cameras in:

• Lobbies and waiting areas
• Hallways and corridors
• Parking areas
• Emergency department common areas

Cameras cannot be placed in:

• Patient examination rooms
• Restrooms
• Changing areas
• Anywhere patients undress for treatment

Telehealth Recording

Recording Virtual Medical Appointments

With the expansion of telehealth in South Dakota, recording rules apply to virtual medical visits. Under one-party consent:

• You can record a telehealth appointment you participate in
• Many telehealth platforms (Zoom, Doxy.me, MyChart Video) have built-in recording features that notify both parties
• If your provider is in a two-party consent state, the stricter law may apply
• Some telehealth platforms prohibit third-party recording in their terms of service

Interstate Telehealth

If your healthcare provider is located in a two-party consent state but providing telehealth services to you in South Dakota, the question of which state's recording law applies is complex. The safest approach is to inform the provider if you plan to record a telehealth visit with an out-of-state provider.

Medical Recordings as Evidence

Malpractice Claims

Recordings of medical appointments can be powerful evidence in malpractice cases. A recording can establish:

• What the provider told you about risks and benefits before a procedure
• Whether adequate informed consent was obtained
• What diagnosis was communicated and when
• Whether the provider's instructions were clear and complete
• Statements that contradict later claims about what was communicated

Insurance Disputes

Recordings can support insurance claims by documenting:

• The provider's recommendation for specific treatments
• Discussions about medical necessity
• Pre-authorization conversations
• Billing disputes and coding discussions

Admissibility

Medical recordings made under one-party consent are generally admissible in South Dakota courts. Standard authentication requirements apply: you must establish that the recording is genuine, unaltered, relevant, and that its probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect.

More South Dakota Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to South Dakota Recording Laws

More South Dakota Laws

• South Dakota Dog Bite Laws
• South Dakota Recording Laws
• South Dakota Recording Laws
• [South Dakota Data Privacy Laws](/us-laws/data-privacy-laws/south-dakota-data-privacy-laws)
• South Dakota Sexting Laws
• South Dakota Lemon Laws
• South Dakota Child Support Laws
• South Dakota Hit and Run Laws