Missouri
Missouri Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Consent
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Missouri's one-party consent law (Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.402) lets tenants record conversations with their landlord without notice. Missouri landlords may install cameras in building common areas but cannot place them inside individual rental units. Tenants who discover hidden cameras inside their unit can pursue criminal charges and civil remedies.
The relationship between landlords and tenants in Missouri involves important recording and privacy rights on both sides. Landlords need to protect their property from damage and liability, while tenants have a right to privacy inside their rented homes. Missouri law balances these interests through a combination of the wiretapping statute, voyeurism laws, property rights, and common law privacy protections.
This guide covers where landlords can and cannot place cameras, tenant recording rights, how to handle disputes, and the legal remedies available when privacy is violated.
Landlord Surveillance Rights
Where Landlords Can Install Cameras
Missouri landlords can install security cameras in areas of multi-unit properties where tenants do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Permissible locations include:
- Building entrances and lobbies
- Hallways and stairwells
- Parking lots and garages
- Laundry rooms and shared utility areas
- Building exteriors (dumpster areas, loading zones, perimeter)
- Pool, gym, and other shared amenity areas
- Mail room or package delivery area
These cameras serve legitimate security purposes: deterring break-ins, preventing package theft, documenting vandalism, and creating a safer environment for tenants.
Where Landlords Cannot Install Cameras
Landlords are prohibited from placing cameras in areas where tenants or their guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Inside individual rental units (apartments, houses, condos)
- On balconies or patios that are part of individual units (when the camera captures the private living space)
- Inside shared bathrooms in rooming houses or dormitory-style housing
- Inside individual storage units assigned to specific tenants
Placing cameras in these locations that capture nudity or record under or through a tenant's clothing violates Missouri's invasion of privacy statute under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 565.252, and can also create civil liability for invasion of privacy even outside those specific elements.
Audio Recording by Landlord Cameras
Security cameras with audio recording capability in common areas must comply with Missouri's one-party consent law under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.402. If landlord cameras capture conversations between tenants in a hallway, at least one party to the conversation must have consented to the recording for the audio to be legal.
Practical solutions for landlord audio compliance:
- Disable audio recording on common area cameras (record video only)
- Post clear signs stating "audio and video recording in progress" to provide constructive notice
- Include camera disclosure and audio recording notice in the lease agreement
Landlord Notification Requirements
Missouri does not have a specific statute requiring landlords to notify tenants about security cameras in common areas. However, best practices strongly support disclosure:
- Include camera locations and recording practices in the lease agreement
- Post visible signs in monitored areas
- Notify tenants in writing when new cameras are installed
- Disclose whether cameras record audio
Transparent communication about surveillance reduces tenant complaints and strengthens the landlord's legal position if recordings are challenged.
Tenant Recording Rights
Recording Conversations with Your Landlord
Missouri's one-party consent law gives tenants the right to record conversations they participate in with their landlord, property manager, maintenance staff, or anyone else. You do not need to tell your landlord that you are recording.
Situations where tenants commonly record include:
- Requesting repairs to document what was said and when
- Disputing charges for damages or fees
- Documenting harassment by the landlord or property management
- Recording lease negotiations or verbal agreements about rent, move-in/move-out terms, or pet policies
- Preserving evidence of illegal entry when the landlord enters without proper notice
- Recording conversations about security deposit disputes
What Tenants Cannot Record
As a tenant, you cannot:
- Place a recording device in a common area to capture conversations between other tenants that you are not part of
- Record inside your neighbor's unit without consent
- Use recordings for criminal or tortious purposes (harassment, blackmail, defamation)
- Bug your landlord's office or phone to capture conversations you are not participating in
Tenant Security Cameras
Tenants can install their own security cameras inside their rental units and at their front doors, subject to lease terms:
- Doorbell cameras (Ring, Nest Hello) are popular with tenants. Check your lease for restrictions on exterior modifications.
- Interior cameras (nanny cams, pet cams) are legal inside your own unit
- Window-mounted cameras that point outward are generally legal but should not be aimed at neighboring units' private spaces
- Wireless, battery-powered cameras typically do not require property modifications and are less likely to violate lease terms
Review your lease for any clauses about:
- Alterations to exterior walls, doors, or trim
- Drilling holes or running wires
- Equipment that draws additional power
- Devices that interfere with building systems
Landlord Entry and Recording Rights
Missouri Notice Requirements for Entry
Missouri's landlord-tenant law does not specify a required notice period for landlord entry in the general landlord-tenant statutes that apply to most rentals. However, common lease provisions and local ordinances (such as those in Kansas City and St. Louis) typically require:
- 24 to 48 hours written notice before entry for non-emergency purposes
- Immediate entry permitted for emergencies (fire, flooding, gas leak)
- Entry only during reasonable hours (typically 8 AM to 8 PM)
- Entry for specific purposes: repairs, inspections, showing the unit to prospective tenants
Recording Illegal Entry
If your landlord enters your unit without proper notice or consent, you can:
- Record the encounter if you are present (one-party consent applies)
- Set up a video camera inside your unit to document unauthorized entries (video-only avoids wiretapping concerns if you are not present)
- Document the entry with time-stamped photos or video of evidence (unlocked door, moved items, maintenance work done without notice)
This evidence can support claims of:
- Violation of the lease agreement
- Invasion of privacy
- Harassment (if entries are repeated and serve no legitimate purpose)
- Trespass (if the landlord has no legal right to enter)
Hidden Cameras in Rental Units
Criminal Consequences for Landlords
A landlord who places a hidden camera inside a tenant's rental unit faces serious criminal charges:
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invasion of privacy (voyeurism) | Section 565.252 | Class A misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail |
| Illegal wiretapping (if audio) | Section 542.402 | Class E felony | Up to 4 years in prison |
If the hidden camera captures a tenant in a state of nudity, the voyeurism charge can escalate to a Class E felony if the images are distributed or disseminated, if more than one person is recorded during the same course of conduct, or if the offender has a prior invasion of privacy conviction.
Civil Remedies for Tenants
Tenants who discover hidden cameras can pursue civil lawsuits against the landlord for:
- Intrusion upon seclusion (invasion of privacy tort): Requires intentional intrusion into private affairs in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress: When the landlord's conduct is extreme and outrageous
- Violation of the wiretapping statute: If the camera recorded audio, Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.418 provides minimum damages of $10,000 plus punitive damages and attorney fees
- Breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment: A landlord who invades tenant privacy violates the implied warranty of habitability and quiet enjoyment
Steps to Take If You Find a Hidden Camera
- Do not touch or move the camera if possible (it is evidence)
- Take photos of the camera and its location
- Call the police immediately to report the crime
- Contact a tenant rights attorney
- Notify your local housing authority if applicable
- Consider requesting an emergency protective order if you feel unsafe
Recording Security Deposit Disputes
Documenting Move-In Condition
Missouri law under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 535.300 requires landlords to return security deposits within 30 days of lease termination, minus legitimate deductions for damages beyond normal wear and tear. Video recording is a powerful tool for documenting the condition of a rental unit at move-in and move-out.
Move-in recording checklist:
- Record every room, showing walls, floors, ceilings, and fixtures
- Document any existing damage with close-up shots
- Record the condition of appliances and plumbing
- Include a verbal description of what you observe (date and time)
- Send a copy to the landlord or property manager
Move-out recording checklist:
- Record the same areas and angles as your move-in video
- Show the cleaned and empty unit
- Document any damage that occurred during your tenancy (with explanation)
- Include the date and time in the recording
Using Recordings in Security Deposit Disputes
Video evidence of unit condition is admissible in Missouri small claims court and circuit court proceedings. A side-by-side comparison of move-in and move-out videos can demonstrate that the unit was returned in proper condition, or can document pre-existing damage the landlord attempts to charge you for.
Recording for Housing Code Violations
Documenting Uninhabitable Conditions
Missouri tenants can use recording to document housing code violations, including:
- Mold, water damage, or plumbing leaks
- Pest infestations (rats, roaches, bedbugs)
- Broken heating or cooling systems
- Structural damage or safety hazards
- Faulty electrical systems
- Inadequate locks or security features
Using Evidence for Enforcement
Recordings of housing code violations can support:
- Complaints to local housing inspectors (St. Louis, Kansas City, and other municipalities have housing inspection departments)
- Complaints to the Missouri Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division
- Civil lawsuits for breach of the implied warranty of habitability
- Rent withholding or repair-and-deduct actions where permitted by local law
Lease Provisions About Recording
Common Lease Clauses
Some Missouri landlords include recording-related provisions in their leases:
- No-recording clauses: These may restrict tenants from recording in common areas. Such clauses cannot override Missouri's one-party consent law for conversations you participate in.
- Camera installation restrictions: Landlords can require approval before tenants install exterior cameras or doorbell cameras.
- Surveillance disclosure: Landlords may disclose the location and scope of building surveillance systems.
Enforceability of No-Recording Clauses
A lease clause that purports to prohibit tenants from exercising their statutory right to record their own conversations is likely unenforceable to the extent it conflicts with Missouri's one-party consent law. However, a clause restricting camera installation (requiring landlord approval before mounting hardware) is a reasonable property restriction that courts would likely enforce.
Eviction and Recording
Recording Eviction-Related Conversations
If you face eviction, recording conversations with your landlord can preserve evidence of:
- The reasons given for eviction (was it retaliatory?)
- Promises or agreements about cure periods
- Threats or intimidation tactics
- Verbal notice that may not comply with statutory requirements
Recording During the Eviction Process
You can record interactions with process servers, sheriff's deputies executing a court-ordered eviction, and your landlord during the eviction process. One-party consent applies as long as you are participating in the conversations being recorded.
Explore More Missouri Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Missouri Recording Laws
More Missouri Recording Topics
More Missouri Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my landlord put cameras inside my apartment in Missouri?
No. Tenants have a strong reasonable expectation of privacy inside their rental units. A landlord who places a camera inside your apartment that captures nudity or records under or through your clothing violates Missouri's invasion of privacy statute (Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 565.252) and faces criminal charges plus civil liability. Even outside those specific elements, a hidden camera inside a rental unit can support a civil invasion of privacy claim. Landlords can only install cameras in common areas like lobbies, hallways, and parking lots.
Can I record my landlord in Missouri?
Yes. Missouri is a one-party consent state under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.402. You can record any in-person conversation or phone call with your landlord without telling them, as long as you are participating in the conversation and your purpose is not criminal or tortious.
Can I install a Ring doorbell camera at my apartment?
Generally yes, but check your lease first. Some landlords restrict exterior modifications such as drilling into door frames or walls. Wireless, battery-powered doorbell cameras that do not require permanent installation are less likely to violate lease terms. Always review your lease and ask your landlord if you are unsure.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental unit?
Do not touch the camera. Take photos of it and its location, then call the police immediately to report the crime. Contact a tenant rights attorney about civil remedies including invasion of privacy claims. If the camera recorded audio, you may be entitled to minimum damages of $10,000 under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.418.
Can I use video to document my apartment condition for a security deposit dispute?
Yes, and you should. Video recordings of your unit at move-in and move-out are admissible in Missouri courts and can provide strong evidence of the condition you received and returned the unit in. Record every room, all fixtures, and any existing damage with clear timestamps.
Updates
Removed references to Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 565.253, which was repealed in 2017; corrected the criminal-penalties table and body text to describe the current invasion of privacy statute, Section 565.252, and noted that a hidden camera in a rental unit that does not meet that statute's specific elements can still support a civil invasion of privacy claim.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected an unsupported claim that recording a minor tenant automatically escalates the voyeurism charge; Mo. Rev. Stat. 565.252's actual aggravating factors are distribution, multiple victims, or a prior conviction, not the victim's age.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXXVII (CRIMINAL PROCEDURE), Chapter 542
§ 542.402Penalty for illegal wiretapping, permitted activities.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
1. Except as otherwise specifically provided in sections 542.400 to 542.422, a person is guilty of a class E felony and upon conviction shall be punished as provided by law, if such person: (1) Knowingly intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire communication; (2) Knowingly uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication; provided, however, that nothing in sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall be construed to prohibit the use by law enforcement officers of body microphones and transmitters in undercover investigations for the acquisition of evidence and the protection of law enforcement officers and others working under their direction in such investigations; (3) Knowingly discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire communication, when he knows or has reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire communication in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal courts in Missouri have applied section 542.402 to covert audio recording. Fotoohighiam v. The City of Columbia Missouri (2025) let a wiretap count over recorded attorney-client jail calls proceed, with no prior consent shown, and Ward (2026) found a claim over a secretly recorded workplace conversation would not be futile.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…nn. § 750 .539e (West 1991); Minn. Stat. § 626A.02 (2000); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402 (2000); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-702 (19…”
- Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463)“…p. 1995); Minn.Stat. Ann. §§ 626A.02, 626A.13 (West 1998); Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 542.402 , 542.418 (1996); Mont.Code Ann. § 45-8…”
- John Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2025, 126 F.4th 1329)✓Patients alleged a hospital's patient portal secretly sent health data to Facebook, pleading a Missouri wiretap claim under 542.402; the Eighth Circuit addressed only removal, held the wiretap count did not change that analysis, and affirmed remand without reaching its merits.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 542.418Use of contents of wiretap in civil action, limitations on — illegal wiretap, cause of action, damages, attorney fees and costs — good faith reliance on court order a prima facie defense.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
1. The contents of any wire communication or evidence derived therefrom shall not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any civil or administrative proceeding, except in civil actions brought pursuant to this section. 2. Any person whose wire communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall: (1) Have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use such communications; and (2) Be entitled to recover from any such person: (a) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of one hundred dollars a day for each day of violation or ten thousand dollars whichever is greater; (b) Punitive damages on a showing of a willful or intentional violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422; and (c) A reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. 3. A good faith reliance on a court order or on the provisions of section 542.408 shall constitute a prima facie defense to any civil or criminal action brought under sections 542.400 to 542.422.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Phillips v. American Motorist Insurance Co. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1999, 996 S.W.2d 584)“…int on appeal is that the trial court erred in holding that § 542.418, RSMo 1994, 1 of the Missouri Wi…”
- Ward (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2026)“…e Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402 is stated as a criminal statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.418 creates a private right of action in a…”
- Fotoohighiam v. The City of Columbia Missouri (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2025)“…red. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.418.2. However, it is not unlawful under th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXXVI (STATUTORY ACTIONS AND TORTS), Chapter 535
§ 535.300Security deposits, limitation — holding of security deposits, requirements — return of deposit or notice of damages, when — withholding deposit, when — tenant's right to damages — security deposit defined.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. A landlord may not demand or receive a security deposit in excess of two months' rent. 2. All security deposits shall be held by the landlord for the tenant, who is a party to the rental agreement, in a bank, credit union, or depository institution which is insured by an agency of the federal government. Any interest earned on a security deposit shall be the property of the landlord. A housing authority created under section 99.040 or any other government entity acting as a landlord shall not be subject to this subsection. 3. Within thirty days after the date of termination of the tenancy, the landlord shall: (1) Return the full amount of the security deposit; or (2) Furnish to the tenant a written itemized list of the damages for which the security deposit or any portion thereof is withheld, along with the balance of the security deposit.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co. (Missouri Court of Appeals 1987, 745 S.W.2d 703)“…ed for twice the amount of the security deposit pursuant to § 535.300 RSMo 1986 (effective September 18, 1983). Ap…”
- Opinion No. (1984) (Missouri Attorney General Reports 1984)“…Session) but only Section 1 of House Bill 175 (now found at Section 535.300 , RSMo Supp. 1983). Therefore, this opinion wi…”
- Paragon Group, Inc. v. Ampleman (Missouri Court of Appeals 1994, 878 S.W.2d 878)“…ord had wrongfully withheld the deposit in contravention of § 535.300, RSMo 1986. She requested damages in the amou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XXXVIII (CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS), Chapter 565
§ 565.252Invasion of privacy, penalty.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
1. A person commits the offense of invasion of privacy if he or she knowingly: (1) Photographs, films, videotapes, produces, or otherwise creates an image of another person, without the person's consent, while the person is in a state of full or partial nudity and is in a place where one would have a reasonable expectation of privacy; or (2) Photographs, films, videotapes, produces, or otherwise creates an image of another person under or through the clothing worn by that other person for the purpose of viewing the body of or the undergarments worn by that other person without that person's consent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Alexander (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2009, 574 F.3d 484)“…contends, because the Missouri invasioh-of-privacy statute, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 565.252, only prohibits the filming of a nude p…”
- T.S.H. v. Green (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2021, 996 F.3d 915)“…e where one would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.252.1(1). Reasonable officers could have be…”
- United States v. Michael Alexander (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2009)“…contends, because the Missouri invasion-of-privacy statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.252, only prohibits the filming of a nude p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 418 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.402 - Wiretapping(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 542.418 - Civil Remedies(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 565.252 - Voyeurism(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 535.300 - Security Deposits(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)