Vermont
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Vermont? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Vermont sets a maximum of life in prison for murder under 13 V.S.A. § 2303, which sets the penalties for the first- and second-degree murder offenses defined in §§ 2301 and 2302. First-degree murder carries life or a minimum of 35 years; second-degree murder carries a minimum of 20 years, also up to life without parole. Courts have wide discretion within those ranges, and parole eligibility depends on the specific term imposed.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, and sentencing data have been verified against current Vermont government sources.
In Vermont, a life sentence for first-degree murder means either life in prison or a term of 35 years to life. For second-degree murder, the sentencing range is broader — from a minimum of 20 years up to life without parole, with some cases carrying minimums as low as 10 years depending on the circumstances.
Vermont stands apart from most states in its approach to criminal justice. The state abolished the death penalty in 1965, has one of the lowest incarceration rates in the country, and has embraced restorative justice principles more fully than most jurisdictions. Vermont's small population and low crime rates mean that murder cases are relatively rare, and life sentences are imposed infrequently.
Despite its reputation for progressive criminal justice policies, Vermont retains life without parole as a sentencing option for the most serious offenses. The state's sentencing framework reflects a balance between accountability for violent crime and a rehabilitative philosophy.
Vermont Life Sentence Statutes
Vermont's criminal code defines murder and its penalties in Title 13 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated.

First-Degree Murder (13 V.S.A. § 2301): Murder committed with willful, deliberate, and premeditated intent, or murder committed during the perpetration of arson, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or burglary (felony murder). First-degree murder is punishable under 13 V.S.A. § 2303 by life imprisonment or a term of not less than 35 years.
Second-Degree Murder (13 V.S.A. § 2302): All murder that is not first-degree murder. Second-degree murder carries a sentence under 13 V.S.A. § 2303 of not more than life imprisonment and not less than 20 years. The sentencing range provides significant judicial discretion.
Manslaughter (13 V.S.A. § 2304): A person who commits manslaughter shall be fined not more than $3,000 or imprisoned for not less than one year nor more than 15 years, or both.
Attempted Murder (13 V.S.A. § 9(a)): Under Vermont's general attempt statute, attempted murder is punishable the same as completed murder, up to life imprisonment, with the same 35-year minimum for attempted first-degree murder or 20-year minimum for attempted second-degree murder under 13 V.S.A. § 2303.
Sentencing Discretion
Vermont judges have considerable discretion in sentencing for murder. For second-degree murder, the statutory range spans from 20 years to life without parole — an enormous gap that allows the court to tailor the sentence to the specific circumstances of each case.
Factors that influence where a sentence falls within this range include the defendant's criminal history, the nature and circumstances of the killing, the presence of mitigating or aggravating factors, victim impact, and the defendant's potential for rehabilitation.
Vermont does not have statutory aggravating factors comparable to those in death penalty states. Instead, the sentencing judge weighs all relevant factors in an individualized determination.
Parole Eligibility
Vermont's parole system is administered by the Vermont Parole Board, which operates under the Vermont Department of Corrections.
First-degree murder (life sentence): For inmates sentenced to life, parole eligibility depends on the specific sentence imposed. A sentence of "35 years to life" means the inmate becomes parole-eligible after serving 35 years. A sentence of "life" without a specified minimum term is effectively LWOP.
Second-degree murder: The minimum sentence of 20 years means the inmate may become parole-eligible after serving a portion of that term, typically after serving the minimum sentence minus any good-time credits or earned reductions.
Good-time credits: Vermont allows inmates to earn sentence reductions through good behavior and participation in rehabilitative programs. These credits can advance a parole eligibility date, though the specific impact on life sentences varies.
Vermont Parole Board
The Vermont Parole Board is a five-member body that reviews eligible inmates for release. The board considers the nature of the offense, the inmate's institutional record, participation in treatment programs, risk assessment, victim concerns, and the inmate's reentry plan.
Vermont's parole system emphasizes rehabilitation and community safety. The state's relatively small prison population — approximately 1,400 inmates — allows for more individualized attention than in larger state systems.
Parole hearings for life-sentenced inmates are scheduled based on their eligibility date. If denied, the board sets a new hearing date, which is typically one to three years later.
Abolition of the Death Penalty
Vermont abolished the death penalty in 1965, making it one of the earliest states to do so in the modern era. The last execution in Vermont was carried out on January 8, 1954, when Donald Demag was executed for murder.
Historical Abolition Timeline
Vermont's path to abolition was gradual:
- 1957: The Vermont Legislature significantly restricted the death penalty, limiting it to specific circumstances.
- 1965: Governor Philip Hoff signed legislation abolishing the death penalty entirely, replacing it with life imprisonment as the maximum sentence.
Vermont was among a small group of states — including Michigan (1846), Wisconsin (1853), and Maine (1887) — that abolished capital punishment long before the national reckoning with the death penalty in the 1970s.
Since abolition, there have been no serious legislative efforts to reinstate the death penalty in Vermont. The issue occasionally arises in political debate but has never gained significant traction in the legislature.
Federal Death Penalty
While Vermont has no state death penalty, federal crimes committed in Vermont could theoretically be prosecuted as capital offenses under federal law. However, no federal death penalty prosecution has been brought in Vermont in the modern era, and President Biden's 2021 moratorium on federal executions (which has been maintained by subsequent policy) further reduces this possibility.
Notable Cases
Jacques Brousseau — Longest-Serving Lifer in Vermont History
Jacques Brousseau was convicted of first-degree murder in 1982 and sentenced to life imprisonment. His case has been cited in discussions about the meaning of "life" in Vermont and the practical reality of serving decades in the state's small prison system. Brousseau's repeated parole denials highlight the fact that even in a state known for progressive criminal justice, life sentences can and do mean natural life in practice.
State v. Herring (2019)
In State v. Herring, 2019 VT 33, the Vermont Supreme Court reviewed a challenge to a life-without-parole sentence, considering whether the trial court properly weighed mitigating factors, including the defendant's history of trauma, in exercising its sentencing discretion. The court found no reversible error, illustrating the individualized, factor-by-factor approach Vermont courts apply within the statutory sentencing ranges.
State v. Webster (2017)
In State v. Webster, 2017 VT 98, the Vermont Supreme Court affirmed a sentence of 40 years to life for second-degree murder, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting the minimum term based on the circumstances of the killing. The case illustrates how trial courts exercise discretion within the 20-years-to-life statutory range for second-degree murder.
Recent Legislative Changes
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2025 | Continued expansion of restorative justice programs for non-violent and certain violent offenses |
| 2020 | Legislature expanded earned good-time credits, potentially affecting parole eligibility dates for long-term inmates |
| 2018 | Juvenile justice reforms enacted, including ban on JLWOP |
| 1965 | Death penalty abolished |
| 1954 | Last execution carried out (Donald Demag) |
Vermont has focused its recent criminal justice reforms on reducing incarceration rates, expanding alternatives to imprisonment, and investing in restorative justice programs. The state has not significantly altered its murder sentencing framework in recent years.
The legislature has been more active on issues like drug policy reform, mental health diversion, and juvenile justice than on changes to violent crime sentencing.
Juvenile Life Sentences
Vermont has banned juvenile life without parole (JLWOP), going beyond the minimum requirements of federal constitutional law.
Under U.S. Supreme Court precedent:
Miller v. Alabama (2012): Mandatory LWOP for juveniles is unconstitutional.
Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016): The Miller rule applies retroactively.
Vermont went further by enacting legislation that prohibits any sentence of LWOP for a person who was under 18 at the time of the offense. This means that juveniles convicted of even the most serious crimes in Vermont must receive a sentence that includes the possibility of eventual release.
Vermont's ban on JLWOP aligns with the state's broader philosophy that young people have a greater capacity for rehabilitation and should not be condemned to die in prison for crimes committed as minors. The state joins approximately 25 other states and the District of Columbia that have banned or effectively eliminated JLWOP.
Vermont has very few juveniles tried as adults for violent offenses, reflecting both the state's low crime rate and its emphasis on keeping young people in the juvenile justice system.
Historical Context
Vermont's criminal justice history reflects the state's unique character as one of the smallest and most rural states in the nation.
Early statehood: Vermont became the 14th state in 1791. The state constitution of 1777 — adopted when Vermont was an independent republic — was the first in America to partially abolish slavery. This progressive founding ethos has influenced the state's approach to criminal justice.
19th century: Vermont carried out executions by hanging throughout the 1800s, but the state had one of the lowest execution rates in the nation even during this period. The small population and relatively low crime rate meant that capital cases were rare.
Early abolition movement: Vermont was part of the northeastern abolitionist movement that questioned capital punishment throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. The state gradually restricted the death penalty before abolishing it entirely in 1965.
Modern incarceration: Vermont has consistently maintained one of the lowest incarceration rates in the country. As of March 2026, the state incarcerates approximately 1,400 people in its corrections system — fewer than most individual prisons in larger states. The state's incarceration rate is approximately 200 per 100,000 residents, compared to the national average of approximately 350.
Low homicide rate: Vermont's murder rate has historically been among the lowest in the nation. In most years, the state records fewer than 15 homicides — sometimes as few as 5 or 6. This means that murder prosecutions and life sentences are relatively rare events, and each case tends to receive significant public attention.
Restorative justice emphasis: Vermont has been a national leader in restorative justice, which brings offenders, victims, and community members together to address the harm caused by crime. While restorative justice is primarily used for non-violent offenses, Vermont has experimented with applying its principles to more serious cases, including some involving violence.
Vermont Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| First-degree murder sentence | Life or 35 years to life |
| Second-degree murder sentence | 20 years to life (range: 10 years to LWOP) |
| LWOP available | Yes (second-degree murder maximum; first-degree life) |
| Death penalty | No (abolished 1965) |
| Last execution | Donald Demag (January 1954) |
| JLWOP banned | Yes |
| Incarceration rate | ~200 per 100,000 (among lowest in nation) |
| Prison population | ~1,400 |
| Annual homicides | Typically fewer than 15 |
| Parole board | Vermont Parole Board (5 members) |
| Key distinction | Among earliest states to abolish death penalty; one of lowest incarceration rates |
Related Pages
- How Long Is a Life Sentence? State-by-State Guide
- Murder Sentencing Guidelines for Every State
- States Without the Death Penalty
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Vermont?
In Vermont, a life sentence for first-degree murder means either life in prison or a term of 35 years to life. For second-degree murder, the range is 20 years to life, with the judge having broad discretion to set the sentence. Parole eligibility depends on the specific term imposed by the court.
Does Vermont have the death penalty?
No. Vermont abolished the death penalty in 1965, making it one of the earliest states to do so. The last execution in Vermont was carried out on January 8, 1954. There have been no serious legislative efforts to reinstate capital punishment.
Can a juvenile get life without parole in Vermont?
No. Vermont has banned juvenile life without parole (JLWOP), going beyond the minimum requirements of federal constitutional law. Any person who was under 18 at the time of the offense must receive a sentence that includes the possibility of eventual release.
How does parole work for life sentences in Vermont?
The Vermont Parole Board, a five-member body, reviews eligible inmates for release. For inmates sentenced to a specific term like 35 years to life, parole eligibility begins after the minimum term is served. The board considers the offense, institutional record, risk assessment, victim impact, and reentry plan. If denied, a new hearing is typically scheduled within one to three years.
Why does Vermont have such a low incarceration rate?
Vermont has one of the lowest incarceration rates in the nation — approximately 200 per 100,000 residents. This reflects the state's small population, low crime rate (typically fewer than 15 homicides per year), early abolition of the death penalty, emphasis on restorative justice, and investment in alternatives to incarceration.
Updates
Corrected the attempted-murder citation and penalty (Vermont punishes attempted murder the same as completed murder under 13 V.S.A. § 9(a), not a flat 20-year cap under the misidentified § 2305), added the actual penalty statute (§ 2303) as the source for the first- and second-degree murder sentencing ranges, fixed the manslaughter fine cap ($3,000, not $7,500) and its 1-year minimum term, and replaced two misattributed case citations with the real controlling Vermont Supreme Court decisions (State v. Webster, 2017 VT 98, and State v. Herring, 2019 VT 33).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 13: Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Chapter 53: Homicide
§ 2301Murder; degrees definedIn force
Murder committed by means of poison, or by lying in wait, or by willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or committed in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate arson, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, kidnapping, robbery, or burglary shall be murder in the first degree. All other kinds of murder shall be murder in the second degree. (Amended 1983, No. 23, § 1; 2018, No. 8 (Sp. Sess.), § 12, eff. June 28, 2018.)
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 74 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bacon (Supreme Court of Vermont 1995, 163 Vt. 279)“…g felony; rather, only murderous consequences are punished. 13 V.S.A. § 2301 ("murder" committed during perpetration…”
- State v. Doucette (Supreme Court of Vermont 1983, 143 Vt. 573)“…ny murder rule is contained in the statute covering murder, 13 V.S.A. § 2301. The rule provides that a murder “commi…”
- State v. Wright (Supreme Court of Vermont 1989, 154 Vt. 512)“…uel Wright, was convicted by a jury of first degree murder, 13 V.S.A. § 2301, for killing Kimberly Giroux during the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2302Determination of degreeIn force
The jury by whom a person is tried for murder, if it finds such person guilty thereof, shall state in its verdict whether it is murder in the first or in the second degree. If such person is convicted on confession in open court, the court, by examination of witnesses, shall determine the degree of the crime and give sentence accordingly.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2000
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Plante (Supreme Court of Vermont 2000, 171 Vt. 310)“…to seek submission to jury on lesser-included offenses) and 13 V.S.A. § 2302 (“The jury by whom a person is tried fo…”
- State v. Battick (Supreme Court of Vermont 1975, 133 Vt. 558)“…guilty to first-degree murder. The trial court, pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 2302, then held a hearing and made findings…”
- In Re Murray (Supreme Court of Vermont 1972, 131 Vt. 4)“…o determine the degree of the crime at the time he pleaded. 13 V.S.A. § 2302 states: “. . . If such person is…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2303Penalties for first and second degree murderIn force
(a)(1) The punishment for murder in the first degree shall be imprisonment for: (A) a minimum term of not less than 35 years and a maximum term of life; or (B) life without the possibility of parole. (2) The punishment for murder in the second degree shall be imprisonment for: (A) a minimum term of not less than 20 years and a maximum term of life; or (B) life without the possibility of parole. (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this subsection shall apply only if the murder was committed on or after the effective date of this act. (b) The punishment for murder in the first degree shall be imprisonment for life and for a minimum term of 35 years unless a jury finds that there are aggravating or mitigating factors which justify a different minimum term. If the jury finds that the aggravating factors outweigh any mitigating factors, the court may set a minimum term longer than 35 years, up to and including life without parole. If the jury finds that the mitigating factors outweigh any aggravating factors, the court may set a minimum term at less than 35 years but not less than 15 years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 60 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gibney (Supreme Court of Vermont 2003, 175 Vt. 180)“…avating factor that the murder “involved multiple victims.” 13 V.S.A. § 2303(d)(6). He argues that the trial court e…”
- State v. Provost (Supreme Court of Vermont 2005, 179 Vt. 337)“…statute under which defendant was convicted and sentenced, 13 V.S.A. § 2303, states in relevant part: (a) The pun…”
- State v. Ovitt (Supreme Court of Vermont 2005, 178 Vt. 605)“…s a statutory presumptive sentence of twenty years to life. 13 V.S.A. § 2303(b). At trial, the court excluded eviden…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2304Manslaughter—PenaltiesIn force
A person who commits manslaughter shall be fined not more than $3,000.00 or imprisoned for not less than one year nor more than 15 years, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 205 (Adj. Sess.), § 3.)
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Stanislaw (Supreme Court of Vermont 1990, 153 Vt. 517)“…The information charged defendant with the violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2304, which provides: “A person who commits…”
- State v. Valley (Supreme Court of Vermont 1989, 153 Vt. 380)“…stice. Defendant appeals her conviction for manslaughter, 13 V.S.A. § 2304, in the death of her infant daughter. W…”
- State v. Brooks (Supreme Court of Vermont 1995, 163 Vt. 245)“…ged with involuntary manslaughter by reckless endangerment. 13 V.S.A. § 2304; State v. Stanislaw, 153…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2305Justifiable homicideIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
(a) If a person kills or wounds another under any of the circumstances enumerated below, the person shall be guiltless: (1) in the just and necessary defense of the person’s own life or the life of any other person; (2) if the person reasonably believed that the person, or any other person, was in imminent peril and that it was necessary to repel that peril with deadly force in the forceful or violent suppression of a person attempting to commit murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, burglary, or robbery; or (3) in the case of a law enforcement officer as defined in 20 V.S.A. § 2351(a) using force in compliance with 20 V.S.A. § 2368(b)(1)–(2) and (5) or deadly force in compliance with 20 V.S.A. § 2368(c)(1)–(4) and (6). (b) This section shall not be construed to limit or infringe upon defenses granted at common law. (Amended 1983, No. 23, § 2; 2019, No. 165 (Adj. Sess.), § 2, eff. July 1, 2021; 2021, No. 27, § 4, eff. Oct. 1, 2021; 2021, No. 95 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. April 21, 2022.)
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Vermont treats 13 V.S.A. Section 2305(1) as the self-defense justification in homicide. Under State v. Wheelock (1992), a killing is just and necessary only if the defendant's belief of imminent peril was reasonable, judged with his individual attributes; Wheelock held voluntary intoxication is not one of them.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ovitt (Supreme Court of Vermont 2005, 178 Vt. 605)✓Ovitt shot his mother's ex-husband in the head and buried the body, claiming self-defense. Addressing that claim under Section 2305(1), the court restated that a defendant must reasonably believe he faced imminent peril, and upheld excluding a violent act seven to nine years old.
- State v. Wheelock (Supreme Court of Vermont 1992, 158 Vt. 302)✓Wheelock shot a man at close range during a drug and alcohol binge, believing the victim had a knife. Applying Section 2305(1)'s just and necessary defense standard, the court held a jury may weigh the defendant's traits but must disregard voluntary intoxication, and affirmed.
- State v. Camley (Supreme Court of Vermont 1981, 140 Vt. 483)“…f Manosh had been done in self-defense, and was thus, under 13 V.S.A. § 2305, justifiable homicide for which he shou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Self-Defense Laws by State: Stand Your Ground & Castle Doctrine (2026), Vermont Self-Defense Laws: Stand Your Ground by Case Law & Castle Doctrine (2026), Stand Your Ground States: Rules in All 50 States and DC
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 13: Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Chapter 1: General Provisions
§ 9AttemptsIn force
(a) A person who attempts to commit an offense and does an act toward the commission thereof, but by reason of being interrupted or prevented fails in the execution of the same, shall be punished as herein provided unless other express provision is made by law for the punishment of the attempt. If the offense attempted to be committed is murder, aggravated murder, kidnapping, arson causing death, human trafficking, aggravated human trafficking, aggravated sexual assault, or sexual assault, a person shall be punished as the offense attempted to be committed is by law punishable. (b) If the offense attempted to be committed is a felony other than those set forth in subsection (a) of this section, a person shall be punished by the less severe of the following punishments: (1) imprisonment for not more than 10 years or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both; or (2) as the offense attempted to be committed is by law punishable. (c) If the offense attempted to be committed is a misdemeanor, a person shall be imprisoned or fined, or both, in an amount not to exceed one-half the maximum penalty for which the offense so attempted to be committed is by law punishable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. DEVOID (Supreme Court of Vermont 2010, 188 Vt. 445)“…s instruction was the statutory definition of attempt from 13 V.S.A. § 9: Under Vermont law, a person who atte…”
- State v. Jack Sawyer (Supreme Court of Vermont 2018, 187 A.3d 377)“…dily injury to another with a deadly weapon in violation of 13 V.S.A. §§ 9 and 1024(a)(2). The second count allege…”
- State v. James Rivera-Martinez (Supreme Court of Vermont 2021, 273 A.3d 655)“…without consent in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 3252(a)(1) and 13 V.S.A. § 9, which is also punishable by life impri…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 13 V.S.A. § 2301(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- 13 V.S.A. § 2302(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- 13 V.S.A. § 2304(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- 13 V.S.A. § 9(a)(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- Vermont Parole Board(doc.vermont.gov).gov
- Miller v. Alabama(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Montgomery v. Louisiana(law.cornell.edu).gov
- 13 V.S.A. § 2303(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- State v. Herring, 2019 VT 33(law.justia.com)
- State v. Webster, 2017 VT 98(law.justia.com)