Wisconsin
Wisconsin Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wisconsin holds dog owners strictly liable for bite injuries under Wis. Stat. § 174.02, even if the dog has never bitten before. If the owner knew of a prior unprovoked bite that broke the skin and caused scarring, damages double for any subsequent bite causing similar injuries.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Wisconsin Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Wisconsin's liability rule.
Understanding Wisconsin's Strict Liability Dog Bite Law
Wisconsin holds dog owners strictly liable for injuries their dogs cause. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02, the owner of a dog is liable for the full amount of damages caused by the dog injuring or causing injury to a person, domestic animal, or property. This applies regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was dangerous or whether the dog had ever bitten anyone before.

This strict liability framework means that dog bite victims in Wisconsin do not need to prove:
- The owner acted negligently in controlling or restraining the dog
- The owner had any knowledge of prior aggressive behavior
- The dog had a history of biting or threatening people
Instead, the victim only needs to establish two facts: (1) the defendant owned or kept the dog, and (2) the dog caused injury to the victim. Wisconsin's statute contains no requirement that the victim prove they were lawfully present where the bite happened. Liability under § 174.02(1)(a) is expressly qualified only by the comparative negligence rule in Wis. Stat. § 895.045 and by a narrow exception in Wis. Stat. § 895.57(4).
Wisconsin's statute covers more than just bites. If a dog knocks someone down and causes a broken bone, or if a dog runs into the road and causes a bicycle crash, the owner is liable for the full amount of resulting damages.
Exception for Law Enforcement Dogs
Strict liability is not absolute. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(4), the owner of a dog used by a law enforcement agency is not liable under subsection (1) for damages the dog causes to a crime suspect while the dog is performing law enforcement functions. The forfeiture penalties in subsection (2) and the court-ordered destruction procedure in subsection (3) also do not apply in that situation. A police K-9 bite therefore falls outside this statute when the person bitten was a suspect and the dog was working.
Double Damages: Wisconsin's "Second Bite" Rule
One of the most important provisions in Wisconsin's dog bite law is the double damages rule for repeat offenders. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(1)(b), the owner of a dog is liable for two times the full amount of damages if specific conditions are met.
Requirements for Double Damages
For double damages to apply, all of the following must be true:
- The dog previously bit a person without provocation
- The prior bite was forceful enough to break the skin
- The prior bite caused permanent physical scarring or disfigurement
- The owner was notified of or knew about the prior bite
- The new bite also breaks the skin and causes permanent physical scarring or disfigurement
2015 Amendments Tightened the Standard
Before 2015, the double damages provision was broader. 2015 Wisconsin Act 112 made significant changes to the law (published November 12, 2015, effective November 13, 2015). The amendments added the requirement that the prior bite must have been unprovoked, must have broken the skin, and must have caused permanent scarring or disfigurement. The law also eliminated double damages claims for injuries to domestic animals or property. Only injuries to people qualify for the doubled penalty.
These changes narrowed the circumstances under which dog owners face double liability, giving owners more protection when a prior incident was provoked or did not cause lasting physical harm.
Comparative Negligence in Wisconsin Dog Bite Cases
Wisconsin applies a modified comparative negligence standard to dog bite claims. Under Wis. Stat. § 895.045, a victim's damages will be reduced in proportion to their share of fault. If the victim is found to be more than 50% responsible for the injury, they cannot recover any damages at all.
For example, if a jury determines that a dog bite victim suffered $100,000 in damages but was 30% at fault for provoking the dog, the victim would receive $70,000. However, if the victim was found 51% or more at fault, they would receive nothing.
This rule applies even though Wisconsin uses strict liability for dog bites. The strict liability standard means the owner cannot escape all responsibility, but the victim's own conduct can still reduce or eliminate the award.
Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Even under Wisconsin's strict liability system, dog owners can raise several defenses to reduce or eliminate their liability.
Provocation
If the victim teased, tormented, hit, or otherwise provoked the dog, the owner may argue that the victim bears significant fault. Provocation must be the type of conduct that would cause a normally calm dog to react aggressively. Courts evaluate provocation on a case-by-case basis.
Trespassing
Wisconsin's statute does not make lawful presence an element of the claim, so trespassing is not an automatic bar to recovery. It matters through the comparative negligence rule instead: a victim who was on the property unlawfully may have their award reduced by their share of fault, or barred entirely if a jury assigns them more than 50%. Courts may weigh child trespassers differently, recognizing that young children may not understand property boundaries.
Assumption of Risk
Professionals who work with animals, such as veterinarians, groomers, and kennel workers, may have their claims limited if they knowingly accepted the risk of being bitten as part of their occupation.
Forfeiture Penalties for Dog Owners
Wisconsin imposes financial penalties on dog owners in addition to civil liability for damages. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(2), these forfeitures are mandatory when certain conditions are met.

First Offense Penalties
| Situation | Forfeiture Range |
|---|---|
| Dog injures a person, domestic animal, or property (no prior notice) | $50 to $2,500 |
| Dog injures a person, domestic animal, or property (owner had prior notice) | $200 to $5,000 |
These forfeitures are civil penalties, not criminal fines. They apply in addition to any damages the owner must pay to the victim. The amount within each range is determined by the court based on the severity of the incident and other relevant factors.
Court-Ordered Destruction of a Dog
Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(3), the state, any municipality, or an injured person may file a civil action asking a court to order the destruction of a dangerous dog. A court may grant this order if it finds that:
- The dog caused serious injury to a person or domestic animal on two separate occasions off the owner's property
- Both incidents occurred without reasonable cause
- The owner was notified of or knew about the first injury before the second occurred
Any officer enforcing such a judgment must carry out the order in a proper and humane manner.
Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims
Wisconsin law gives dog bite victims 3 years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. This deadline is set by Wis. Stat. § 893.54, which governs personal injury claims generally.
Key Deadlines and Exceptions
- Adults: Must file within 3 years of the date of the bite
- Minors: The statute of limitations is tolled (paused) during minority. A minor has until 2 years after turning 18 to file a claim
- Government entities: Claims against government agencies or employees often require shorter notice periods. Wisconsin's notice of claim statute may require written notice within 120 days of the injury
Missing the filing deadline almost always results in the permanent loss of the right to sue. Victims should consult an attorney well before the deadline approaches to preserve their legal options.
Dog Owner Responsibilities Under Wisconsin Law
Wisconsin imposes several obligations on dog owners beyond the general duty to prevent injuries.
Licensing and Vaccination
Under Wis. Stat. § 174.05 and § 174.07, all dogs over 5 months old must be licensed in their municipality. Dogs must also be vaccinated against rabies as required by state and local law.
Rabies Quarantine After a Bite
When a dog bites a person in Wisconsin, an officer must order the animal quarantined and kept under strict isolation for at least 10 days after the incident so it can be observed for signs of rabies, under Wis. Stat. § 95.21(5). The dog must be delivered to an approved isolation facility as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after the quarantine order is issued, which is not the same as 24 hours after the bite. The officer may instead order the dog quarantined at the owner's premises if the dog is currently immunized against rabies as shown by a valid certificate of rabies vaccination or other evidence, so a facility stay is not automatic for a vaccinated dog. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) oversees quarantine requirements. Refusing to comply with a quarantine order can result in a fine between $100 and $1,000, imprisonment for up to 60 days, or both.
Local Leash Laws and Confinement
No Wisconsin statute uses the word "leash," but the state does impose a control requirement. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.042, a dog is running at large if it is off its owner's premises and not under the control of the owner or some other person, and an owner who negligently or otherwise permits a dog to run at large forfeits $25 to $100 for a first offense and $50 to $200 for later offenses. An officer must attempt to capture and restrain any dog running at large. On top of that statewide rule, many Wisconsin municipalities enforce their own leash ordinances requiring dogs to be physically restrained in public areas. Violating either the state running-at-large law or a local leash or confinement ordinance can strengthen a victim's case and may result in additional citations.
Dangerous Dog Designations Are Local, Not Statewide
Wisconsin has no statewide dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog designation. Chapter 174 of the Wisconsin Statutes, which governs dogs, contains no section that classifies an individual animal as dangerous, and the two-tier structure used in some other states, where a dog is first labeled potentially dangerous and then escalated, does not exist in Wisconsin law.
The only state-level court mechanism aimed at a specific dog is the destruction judgment described above under Wis. Stat. § 174.02(3), and it is a one-time judgment rather than a designation or registry. A court may grant it only if the dog caused serious injury to a person or domestic animal on two separate occasions off the owner's property without reasonable cause, and the owner was notified or knew before the second injury that the dog had caused the first.
Dangerous dog classifications in Wisconsin therefore come from municipal ordinances, and both the criteria and the consequences vary by community. Local requirements for a dog declared dangerous can include:
- Maintaining liability insurance (often $100,000 or more)
- Keeping the dog in a secure, escape-proof enclosure
- Using a muzzle and leash whenever the dog is in public
- Posting visible warning signs on the property
- Having the dog microchipped for identification
Because these obligations are set locally, check the municipal code for the city, village, or town where the dog is kept.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Wisconsin
Wisconsin does not have a statewide preemption law preventing local governments from enacting breed-specific legislation (BSL). This means individual cities, villages, and counties can pass their own ordinances restricting or banning specific breeds.
Several Wisconsin municipalities have enacted breed-specific restrictions, particularly targeting pit bulls and pit bull mixes. Communities with BSL include St. Francis, the Village of Argyle, and others. Some ordinances include grandfather clauses for dogs that were already registered before the ban took effect.
However, many Wisconsin communities have moved away from breed-specific bans in favor of behavior-based dangerous dog ordinances that focus on the individual animal's conduct rather than its breed. Dog owners should check their local municipal code for breed restrictions in their area.
Landlord Liability for Dog Bites in Wisconsin
Wisconsin courts have addressed the question of whether landlords can be held liable when a tenant's dog bites someone. The general rule is that a landlord does not become an "owner" or "keeper" of a tenant's dog simply by allowing the tenant to have a pet on the premises.
Under Wisconsin law, liability for dog bites attaches to the person who owns, keeps, or harbors the dog. "Keeping" a dog requires exercising care and control over the animal, while "harboring" involves providing shelter or refuge. Simply leasing property to a tenant who owns a dog does not satisfy either standard.
Key points about landlord liability in Wisconsin:
- A lease clause prohibiting dangerous dogs does not make the landlord a "keeper" of the tenant's dog
- Landlords who take direct control of a tenant's dog (feeding it, walking it, managing it) could potentially be liable
- Landlords should include clear pet policies in lease agreements and require tenants to carry renter's insurance with liability coverage
Victim Rights and Available Compensation
Dog bite victims in Wisconsin may recover both economic and non-economic damages. Because Wisconsin uses strict liability, victims do not need to prove the owner was negligent to receive compensation.
Economic Damages
- Medical expenses, including emergency care, surgery, and rehabilitation
- Future medical costs for ongoing treatment or reconstructive procedures
- Lost wages during recovery
- Loss of future earning capacity if injuries cause lasting disability
- Property damage (torn clothing, broken personal items)
Non-Economic Damages
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma
- Scarring and permanent disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
Dog Bite Claim Values
Nationally, the average dog bite insurance claim payout reached $69,272 in 2024, according to the Insurance Information Institute. Wisconsin settlements vary widely based on the severity of injuries, ranging from approximately $10,000 for minor bites to several hundred thousand dollars for severe cases involving reconstructive surgery or permanent disability.
How to File a Dog Bite Claim in Wisconsin
If you are bitten by a dog in Wisconsin, take these steps to protect your legal rights:
- Seek medical attention immediately. Get treatment right away and keep all medical records, bills, and receipts.
- Report the incident. File a report with local animal control and law enforcement. This creates an official record of the bite.
- Document everything. Take photographs of your injuries, the location where the bite occurred, and the dog if possible.
- Gather the owner's information. Get the dog owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's insurance information.
- Identify witnesses. Collect names and contact information from anyone who saw the attack.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloodied clothing and any other damaged items.
- Contact a personal injury attorney. An attorney experienced in Wisconsin dog bite claims can evaluate your case, identify all potentially liable parties, and handle negotiations with insurance companies.
Many personal injury attorneys handle dog bite cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing upfront and the attorney's fee comes from the settlement or verdict.
More Wisconsin Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wisconsin a strict liability state for dog bites?
Yes. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02, Wisconsin holds dog owners strictly liable for injuries caused by their dogs. The victim does not need to prove the owner was negligent or knew the dog was dangerous. The owner is responsible for the full amount of damages simply because they owned or kept the dog at the time of the incident.
What are double damages for a dog bite in Wisconsin?
If a dog owner knew or was notified that their dog previously bit someone without provocation with enough force to break the skin and cause permanent scarring, the owner is liable for two times the full amount of damages if the dog bites again and causes similar injuries. This rule was tightened by 2015 Wisconsin Act 112 and only applies to injuries against people, not property or other animals.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Wisconsin?
You have 3 years from the date of the dog bite to file a personal injury lawsuit under Wis. Stat. § 893.54. For minors, the deadline is extended to 2 years after the child turns 18. Claims against government entities may have shorter notice requirements, so it is important to consult an attorney promptly.
Can I still recover damages if I was partially at fault for the dog bite?
Yes, as long as your share of fault does not exceed 50%. Wisconsin follows a modified comparative negligence rule under Wis. Stat. § 895.045. Your damages will be reduced by your percentage of fault. However, if you are found to be 51% or more responsible for the incident, you cannot recover any damages.
What penalties does a dog owner face in Wisconsin after their dog bites someone?
In addition to paying damages to the victim, the owner faces civil forfeiture penalties. For a first offense with no prior notice, the forfeiture ranges from $50 to $2,500. If the owner had prior notice that the dog caused injury, the forfeiture increases to $200 to $5,000. In severe cases involving two or more serious injuries off the owner's property, a court may order the dog to be humanely destroyed.
Injured in Wisconsin? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Wisconsin personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the Wisconsin dog bite page: removed an element the statute does not impose (that the victim prove lawful presence), replaced a described statewide dangerous-dog designation scheme that does not exist with the actual court-ordered destruction standard in Wis. Stat. § 174.02(3) and the municipal-ordinance reality, fixed the rabies quarantine deadline to run from the officer's order rather than the bite and added the home-quarantine option for a vaccinated dog, added the law enforcement dog exemption in § 174.02(4), and noted the statewide running-at-large control law in § 174.042.
Corrected the citation for Wisconsin's 2015 double-damages amendment from the unrelated 2015 Wisconsin Act 233 (an animal-seizure/custody law) to 2015 Wisconsin Act 112, the act that actually tightened the dog-bite double-damages standard, fixed the one-day-off effective date, and repaired a dead statute-of-limitations citation link.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 174: Dogs
§ 174.02Owner’s liability for damage caused by dog; penalties; court order to kill a dog.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Liability for injury. (a) Without notice. Subject to s. 895.045 and except as provided in s. 895.57 (4), the owner of a dog is liable for the full amount of damages caused by the dog injuring or causing injury to a person, domestic animal or property. (b) After notice. Subject to s. 895.045 and except as provided in s. 895.57 (4), the owner of a dog is liable for 2 times the full amount of damages caused by the dog biting a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement if the owner was notified or knew that the dog had previously, without provocation, bitten a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement. (2) Penalties imposed on owner of dog causing damage. (a) Without notice. The owner of a dog shall forfeit not less than $50 nor more than $2,500 if the dog injures or causes injury to a person, domestic animal, property, deer, game birds or the nests or eggs of game birds. (b) After notice.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Fandrey v. American Family Mutual Insurance (2004) held Wisconsin courts may use the six traditional public policy factors to preclude liability under 174.02 even where the statute's strict liability is otherwise established. Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. (2009) held a homeowner who harbored a dog was a statutory owner.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Fandrey v. American Family Mutual Insurance (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2004, 272 Wis. 2d 46)✓A three-year-old was injured by a dog after her mother walked uninvited into a friend's empty house; the court held public policy factors may limit liability under Section 174.02 and barred the claim, since keeping the dog indoors was all the owners could be required to do.
- Smaxwell v. Bayard (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2004, 274 Wis. 2d 278)✓A three-year-old was mauled by a tenant's wolf hybrids on her grandmother's land; the court limited landowner and landlord negligence liability to owners or keepers, reasoning broader liability would conflict with the statute's limit of liability to owners, keepers and harborers.
- Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2009, 322 Wis. 2d 21)✓A homeowner let an acquaintance and his two dogs live with her rent free, and one dog bit a woman walking past after its owner let it out unleashed; the court held she harbored the dog and so was a statutory owner, liable despite the legal owner's momentary control.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Dog Bite Laws by State: Liability and Victim Rights
§ 174.07Dog licenses and collar tags.In force
(1) (a) License required. Except as provided in s. 174.054, a dog license is necessary for the keeping of any dog over 5 months of age. (b) Licenses. Upon payment of the required dog license tax and, except as provided in s. 95.21 (9) (d), upon presentation of evidence that the dog is currently immunized against rabies, the collecting official shall complete and issue to the owner a license for the dog bearing a serial number and in the form prescribed by the department stating the date of its expiration, the owner’s name and address, and the name, sex, spayed or unspayed, neutered or unneutered, breed and color of the dog. (c) Copies. The collecting official shall keep a duplicate copy of the license on file. In counties having a population of 750,000 or more, the collecting official shall immediately send to the county clerk or whatever agency the county board may direct, a triplicate copy of the license. A collecting official who is not the official to whom license taxes are paid under s. 174.08 shall provide a copy of each license issued to the official to whom license taxes are paid under s. 174.08. (d) Tag.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
§ 174.05Dog license tax.In force
(1) Requirement. Except as provided in s. 174.054, the owner of a dog more than 5 months of age on January 1 of any year, or 5 months of age within the license year, shall annually, or on or before the date the dog becomes 5 months of age, pay the dog license tax and obtain a license. (2) Tax. The minimum dog license tax is $3 for a neutered male dog or spayed female dog, upon presentation of evidence that the dog is neutered or spayed, and $8 for an unneutered male dog or unspayed female dog, or one-half of these amounts if the dog became 5 months of age after July 1 of the license year. (3) Additional tax. The governing body of any county may by a majority vote of the members present at any regular meeting raise the minimum dog license tax on dogs within its jurisdiction and the governing body of any town, village or city may by resolution raise the minimum dog license tax on dogs within its jurisdiction. If the governing body of any county, town, village or city increases the minimum tax, it shall provide that the tax for unneutered male dogs and unspayed female dogs is greater than the tax for neutered male dogs and spayed female dogs.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2009
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2009, 322 Wis. 2d 21)“…(emphasis added). Another provision of the 1923 statutes, Wis. Stat. § 174.05 (1923), sub-titled "Dog licenses; appl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 895: Damages, Liability, And Miscellaneous Provisions Regarding Actions In Courts
§ 895.045Contributory negligence.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(1) Comparative negligence. Contributory negligence does not bar recovery in an action by any person or the person’s legal representative to recover damages for negligence resulting in death or in injury to person or property, if that negligence was not greater than the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in the proportion to the amount of negligence attributed to the person recovering. The negligence of the plaintiff shall be measured separately against the negligence of each person found to be causally negligent. The liability of each person found to be causally negligent whose percentage of causal negligence is less than 51 percent is limited to the percentage of the total causal negligence attributed to that person. A person found to be causally negligent whose percentage of causal negligence is 51 percent or more shall be jointly and severally liable for the damages allowed. (2) Concerted action. Notwithstanding sub. (1), if 2 or more parties act in accordance with a common scheme or plan, those parties are jointly and severally liable for all damages resulting from that action, except as provided in s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 69 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2009, 318 Wis. 2d 148)“…g to Leavitt, the policy reasons for the 1995 amendment to Wis. Stat. § 895.045 , which changed the common law on joint…”
- Richards v. Badger Mutual Insurance (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2008, 309 Wis. 2d 541)“…me or plan" that invokes joint and several liability under Wis. Stat. § 895.045 (2) (2005-06). [2] We affirm the court…”
- Fuchsgruber v. Custom Accessories, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2001, 244 Wis. 2d 758)“…o the compara *763 tive negligence statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.045 (1) (1999-2000), 1 applies…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Medical Malpractice Laws in Wisconsin (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Wisconsin (2026): Deadlines
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 893: Limitations Of Commencement Of Actions And Proceedings; Procedure For Claims Against Governmental Units
§ 893.54Injury to the person.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1m) Except as provided in sub. (2m), the following actions shall be commenced within 3 years or be barred: (a) An action to recover damages for injuries to the person, including an action to recover damages for injuries to the person caused or sustained by or arising from an accident involving a motor vehicle. (b) An action brought to recover damages for death caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of another. (2m) An action brought to recover damages for death caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of another and arising from an accident involving a motor vehicle shall be commenced within 2 years after the cause of action accrues or be barred. Judicial Council Committee’s Note, 1979: This section is derived from previous s. 893.205 but was amended to eliminate language now covered by newly created s. 893.07. (See note to s. 893.07). [Bill 326-A] Cross-reference: See also the notes to s. 893.53 for additional treatments of 42 USC 1983.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 104 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sawyer v. Midelfort (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1999, 227 Wis. 2d 124)“…of emotional distress *155 against Lausted is barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.54 , [7] the three-year statute of limita…”
- John Doe 67C v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2005, 284 Wis. 2d 307)“…aim would be barred by the present statute of limitations, Wis. Stat. § 893.54 (1) (2001-02), [5] which bars actions…”
- Tews v. NHI, LLC (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2010, 330 Wis. 2d 389)“…y the three-year statute of limitations *431 contained in Wis. Stat. § 893.54 . 2 It is undisputed that Tews' second…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability, Wisconsin Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Truck Accident Laws in Wisconsin (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. § 174.02 - Owner's liability for damage caused by dog; penalties; court order to kill a dog(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 895.045 - Contributory negligence (comparative fault)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 893.54 - Injury to the person (3-year statute of limitations)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- 2015 Wisconsin Act 112 - Amendments to dog bite liability statute(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 174.05 - Dog license tax(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 174.07 - Dog licenses and tags(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DATCP - Rabies quarantine requirements(datcp.wi.gov).gov
- Insurance Information Institute - US dog-related injury claim payouts 2024(iii.org)
- Wis. Stat. § 174.042 - Dogs running at large and untagged dogs subject to impoundment; penalties(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. § 95.21 - Rabies control program (quarantine of a dog that bit a person)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov