Utah
Utah Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Utah imposes strict liability on dog owners under Utah Code 18-1-1, meaning owners are responsible for bite injuries regardless of whether the dog has ever bitten before. Victims only need to show that the defendant owned or kept the dog and that the dog caused the injury; no proof of owner negligence is required.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Utah Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Utah's liability rule.
Overview of Utah Dog Bite Laws
Utah is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bite injuries. Under Utah Code § 18-1-1, a dog owner is liable for injuries caused by their dog regardless of whether the dog has ever shown aggressive behavior before. There is no "one-bite rule" in Utah.

This means a victim does not need to prove the owner was careless or that the owner had any prior warning about the dog's temperament. The law places the financial responsibility squarely on the person who owns or keeps the dog.
The statute was most recently amended by Chapter 311 of the 2025 General Session, effective May 7, 2025. The update clarified exceptions for injuries occurring on fenced private property and refined the law enforcement dog exemption.
What the Strict Liability Standard Means
Strict liability removes the biggest hurdle victims face in many other states: proving the owner knew the dog was dangerous. In Utah, the injured person only needs to establish two facts.
- The defendant owned or kept the dog.
- The dog bit or otherwise injured the victim.
Lawful presence is not an element of a Utah dog bite claim. Section 18-1-1(1)(a) makes the owner liable for "an injury caused by the dog" and then carves out only the certified law enforcement dog exemption in Subsection (2) and the two private-property exceptions in Subsection (3), each of which requires that the dog was "reasonably secured within a fence or other enclosure." A trespasser bitten by a dog that was loose or running at large can still bring a claim.
The statute specifically states that owners are liable "regardless of whether the dog is vicious or mischievous" and "regardless of whether the owner knows the dog is vicious or mischievous." This language eliminates any argument that the owner had no reason to expect an attack.
Strict liability applies whether the bite happens in a public park, on a sidewalk, inside someone's home, or on the owner's own property, unless one of the narrow statutory exceptions in Subsections (2) and (3) applies.
Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Even under strict liability, Utah law recognizes several situations where the dog owner may avoid or reduce liability.

Provocation
If the victim provoked the dog through teasing, hitting, tormenting, or other aggressive actions, the owner may have a valid defense. The provocation must be significant enough that a normally calm dog would react. Accidentally stepping on a dog's tail, for example, is generally not considered sufficient provocation.
Trespassing and the Fenced-Property Exception
The 2025 amendment to Section 18-1-1 added a specific exception for injuries to trespassers. An owner is not liable for injuries to a person who is trespassing in violation of Utah Code § 76-6-206(2) if the dog was "reasonably secured within a fence or other enclosure" on the owner's private property.
This means a dog owner who keeps their dog behind a fence on their own land has strong legal protection if a trespasser enters and gets bitten.
Comparative Fault (The 50% Rule)
Utah follows a modified comparative fault system under Utah Code § 78B-5-818. If the victim was partly responsible for the incident, their compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault.
However, if the victim is found to be 50% or more at fault, they lose all right to recover damages. For example, if a jury determines the victim was 30% at fault for approaching a clearly agitated dog, the victim would receive 70% of the total damages. But if the victim was 50% or more at fault, they would receive nothing.
Assumption of Risk
People who voluntarily accept a known risk of being bitten may have reduced claims. This defense most commonly applies to veterinarians, dog groomers, kennel workers, and dog trainers who interact with unfamiliar animals as part of their jobs.
Law Enforcement Dog Exception
Utah Code § 18-1-1 provides a specific exemption for law enforcement dogs. Neither the state, a county, a city, nor a town is liable for injuries caused by a police dog if the dog and handler are trained and certified under Title 53, Chapter 6, Part 4, the law enforcement agency has adopted a written policy on dog use, the handler follows that policy, and the injury occurs while the dog is being used in the apprehension, arrest, or location of a suspected offender.
Statute of Limitations
Victims must file a dog bite lawsuit within the time frame set by Utah's statute of limitations. Missing this deadline almost always bars the claim permanently.
| Situation | Filing Deadline | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Adult personal injury | 4 years from the date of the bite | Utah Code § 78B-2-307 |
| Minor (under 18) | 4 years from the victim's 18th birthday | Tolling provisions |
| Property damage | 4 years from the date of the incident | Utah Code § 78B-2-307 |
| Claims against government entities | Shorter notice periods may apply | Utah Governmental Immunity Act |
For minors, the four-year clock does not start running until the child turns 18. This tolling provision gives children and their families additional time to pursue a claim.
Victims who are mentally incapacitated at the time of the injury may also qualify for tolling until competency is restored.
Damages Victims Can Recover
Dog bite victims in Utah can pursue both economic and non-economic damages through a personal injury claim or lawsuit.
Economic Damages
These cover measurable financial losses directly tied to the injury.
- Emergency room visits, surgery, and hospitalization
- Ongoing medical treatment and rehabilitation
- Prescription medications
- Future medical expenses for scarring or reconstructive surgery
- Lost wages from missed work
- Reduced earning capacity if the injury causes long-term disability
- Property damage (torn clothing, broken glasses, damaged belongings)
Non-Economic Damages
These compensate for subjective harm that does not have a fixed dollar amount.
- Physical pain and suffering
- Emotional distress, anxiety, and PTSD
- Scarring and disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Fear of dogs (cynophobia) that develops after the attack
Utah does not cap non-economic damages in standard personal injury cases, including dog bite claims. The jury determines the appropriate amount based on the evidence presented.
Arbitration Option Under Section 18-1-4
Utah Code § 18-1-4 provides an optional binding arbitration process for dog bite injury claims. Key features of this process include the following.
- Only the injured claimant may elect arbitration, by serving notice within 14 days after the complaint has been answered. A dog owner cannot force the claim into arbitration.
- Arbitration awards are capped at $50,000 plus medical benefits.
- Claimants who choose arbitration waive the right to pursue punitive damages or personal asset recovery.
- Discovery is limited to 150 days.
- Either party may request a trial de novo (new trial) within 20 days of the arbitration award.
- Cost sanctions apply if the trial verdict does not substantially exceed the arbitration award.
This arbitration track can resolve smaller claims more quickly and with lower legal costs than a full trial.
Dog Owner Responsibilities
Utah places several obligations on dog owners to protect public safety.
Leash and Confinement Laws
Utah does not have a statewide leash law. Instead, Utah Code § 10-8-65 authorizes municipalities to "license, tax, regulate, or prohibit the keeping of dogs" and to allow the destruction of dogs found "at large contrary to ordinance." This means leash requirements vary by city and county.
Most major Utah municipalities, including Salt Lake City, Provo, and Ogden, require dogs to be leashed in public areas. Dog owners should check their local ordinances for specific requirements.
Rabies Vaccination
While Utah does not impose a single statewide rabies vaccination mandate through one statute, Utah Code § 26B-7-210 authorizes quarantine orders during rabies outbreaks that require owners to confine or muzzle all dogs to prevent biting. Most local jurisdictions require proof of rabies vaccination for dog licensing.
Secure Containment
Owners must keep their dogs securely confined on their property. The 2025 amendment to Section 18-1-1 reinforced the importance of reasonable fencing or enclosures, providing legal protection to owners whose dogs are "reasonably secured within a fence or other enclosure" on private property.
Multiple Dogs Acting Together
Utah Code § 18-1-2 addresses situations where dogs owned by different people cause injury while acting together. All owners may be joined as defendants in a single lawsuit, and the court will apportion damages among the liable parties with separate judgments for each owner.
This provision is important in cases where a pack of loose dogs attacks a person or animal, as it allows the victim to hold each dog's owner accountable for their share of the damages.
Breed-Specific Legislation Is Banned in Utah
Utah is one of the states that prohibits breed-specific legislation (BSL) at the municipal level. Utah Code § 18-2-101 states clearly:
- "A municipality may not adopt or enforce a breed-specific rule, regulation, policy, or ordinance regarding dogs."
- "Any breed-specific rule, regulation, policy, or ordinance regarding dogs is void."
This means no city or county in Utah can ban or restrict ownership of specific breeds such as pit bulls, Rottweilers, or German Shepherds. All dogs are evaluated based on their individual behavior, not their breed.
This preemption law was enacted in 2014 and remains in effect as of 2026.
Landlord Liability for Dog Bites
Landlords in Utah may face liability for a tenant's dog bite under limited circumstances. A landlord can be held responsible if all three of the following conditions are met.
- The landlord knew the tenant's dog was dangerous (had bitten before or shown aggressive behavior).
- The landlord had the legal authority to remove the dog or terminate the tenancy.
- The landlord failed to take reasonable action to protect others.
Landlords who allow tenants to keep pets should include clear pet policies in lease agreements, require proof of renter's insurance with liability coverage, and act promptly if they receive complaints about a tenant's dog.
Criminal Penalties for Dog Owners
Beyond civil liability, dog owners in Utah can face criminal charges in serious cases.
Misdemeanor Charges
Running at large and failure-to-enclose violations are handled through local animal control ordinances rather than a single statewide dangerous-dog statute. Under Utah Code § 10-3-703, a municipality may criminally punish an ordinance violation by no more than the maximum Class B misdemeanor penalty: up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. For a violation involving a pet, that Class B-level charge is only available if the violation both is a private nuisance as that term is defined in Utah Code § 78B-6a-101 and threatens the health, safety, or welfare of the individual or an identifiable third party, or if the municipality has already imposed a fine on the owner for a violation involving the same pet on three previous occasions within the past 12 months; otherwise the violation is capped at an infraction.
Violating local animal control ordinances, such as leash laws or licensing requirements, can result in citations, infractions, or Class B misdemeanor charges depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances above.
Escalated Charges
Utah Code § 10-3-703 caps every municipal ordinance violation at the Class B misdemeanor level, so a running-at-large or failure-to-enclose charge cannot itself escalate into a Class A misdemeanor. When a dog causes serious bodily injury or death, or an owner uses the dog as a weapon, prosecutors instead bring separate state criminal charges under Title 76, such as assault or reckless endangerment, which can carry Class A misdemeanor penalties (up to 364 days in jail, or up to one year for certain offenses under Title 76, Chapter 5, plus a fine of up to $2,500) or felony-level charges depending on the harm and intent involved.
Courts may also order the dog to be humanely euthanized in cases involving severe attacks.
Quarantine Violations
Under Utah Code § 26B-7-211, possessing animals in violation of a quarantine order is a Class C misdemeanor.
Dogs Attacking Livestock or Other Animals
Utah Code § 18-1-3 allows any person to injure or kill a dog that is actively attacking domestic animals with commercial value, service animals, hoofed protected wildlife, or domestic fowl. This right also extends to pursuing such a dog after an attack.
Additionally, Section 18-1-1 provides that a dog owner is not liable for injury to another person's animal if the dog was reasonably secured within a fence or enclosure on the owner's private property and the other animal entered without consent.
How to File a Dog Bite Claim in Utah
If you are bitten by a dog in Utah, take these steps to protect your legal rights.
- Get medical treatment immediately. Even minor bites can lead to infection. Keep all medical records and receipts.
- Report the bite to local animal control. This creates an official record of the incident and may trigger a quarantine period for the dog.
- File a police report. A police report provides additional documentation that supports your claim.
- Photograph your injuries. Take pictures of the bite wounds, any torn clothing, and the location where the attack happened.
- Identify witnesses. Collect names and contact information from anyone who saw the attack.
- Get the owner's information. Record the dog owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's or renter's insurance information.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn clothing, damaged personal items, and any other physical evidence.
- Contact a personal injury attorney. An experienced dog bite lawyer can evaluate your case, handle insurance negotiations, and file suit within the four-year statute of limitations.
More Utah Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Utah a strict liability state for dog bites?
Yes. Under Utah Code § 18-1-1, dog owners are liable for bite injuries regardless of whether the dog has bitten before or shown aggressive behavior. Victims do not need to prove the owner was negligent or had prior knowledge of the dog's dangerous tendencies.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Utah?
You have four years from the date of the bite to file a personal injury lawsuit under Utah Code § 78B-2-307. If the victim is a minor, the four-year clock does not start until the child turns 18.
Can I still recover damages if I was partly at fault for the dog bite?
Yes, as long as your fault is less than 50%. Utah follows a modified comparative fault rule under Utah Code § 78B-5-818. Your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. However, if you are found 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover any damages.
Can a city in Utah ban specific dog breeds like pit bulls?
No. Utah Code § 18-2-101 prohibits municipalities from adopting or enforcing breed-specific rules, regulations, or ordinances regarding dogs. Any such breed-specific measures are void under state law.
What happens if a dog bites a trespasser in Utah?
Under the 2025 amendment to Utah Code § 18-1-1, a dog owner is not liable for injuries to a trespasser if the dog was reasonably secured within a fence or other enclosure on the owner's private property and the trespasser was violating Utah Code § 76-6-206(2).
Injured in Utah? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Utah personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the Utah strict liability elements (lawful presence is not one of them), clarified that only the injured claimant may elect arbitration under Section 18-1-4, and restated the municipal pet penalty test in Section 10-3-703 to match the statute’s conjunctive requirements.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the criminal-penalties section: running-at-large/failure-to-enclose violations are local-ordinance offenses capped at Class B misdemeanor under Utah Code 10-3-703 (and often only chargeable as an infraction), and Class A misdemeanor exposure comes from a separate state charge (e.g., assault/reckless endangerment under Title 76), not an automatic escalation of the ordinance violation.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 18: Dogs
§ 18-1-1Liability and damages for dog injury -- Exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) (a) Except as provided in Subsections (2) and (3), an individual who owns or keeps a dog is liable for an injury caused by the dog, regardless of whether: (i) the dog is vicious or mischievous; or (ii) the owner knows the dog is vicious or mischievous. (b) Damages for an injury described in Subsection (1)(a) shall be determined in accordance with Section 78B-5-818. (2) Neither the state nor any county, city, or town in the state nor any peace officer employed by the state, a county, a city, or a town is liable in damages for an injury caused by a dog, if: (a) the dog and the dog's law enforcement handler are trained to assist in law enforcement and are certified according to the standards adopted in Title 53, Chapter 6, Part 4, Law Enforcement Canine Team Certification Act; (b) the governmental agency has adopted a written policy on the necessary and appropriate use of dogs in official law enforcement duties; (c) the actions of the dog's handler do not violate the agency's written policy; and (d) the injury occurs while the dog is reasonably and carefully being used in the apprehension, arrest, or location of a suspected offender or in maintaining or controlling the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Utah courts read section 18-1-1 as strict liability confined to dogs. Neztsosie v. Meyer (1994) held that a keeper must assume custody, management, and control, so a relative who only checked that the owners' dog had food and water while they traveled was not a keeper. Jackson v. Mateus (2003) declined to extend it to cat owners.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Neztsosie v. Meyer (Utah Supreme Court 1994, 250 Utah Adv. Rep. 10)✓A boy riding his bicycle was attacked by a dog whose vacationing owners had asked a relative to check its food and water; the court held that relative was not a "keeper" under Section 18-1-1, because keeping requires assuming custody, management, and control.
- Waters v. Powell (Court of Appeals of Utah 2010, 655 Utah Adv. Rep. 24)“…Utah’s strict liability dog bite statute, see Utah Code Ann. § 18-1-1 (2007); Jackson v. Mateus,…”
- Jackson v. Mateus (Utah Supreme Court 2003, 473 Utah Adv. Rep. 3)✓A woman was bitten by a roaming house cat she had mistaken for one of her own and asked the court to extend Utah's dog-bite statute to cats; the court held Section 18-1-1 applies only to dogs under its plain language and left any extension to the legislature.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Dog Bite Laws by State: Liability and Victim Rights
§ 18-2-101Regulation of dogs by a municipality.In force
(1) A municipality may not adopt or enforce a breed-specific rule, regulation, policy, or ordinance regarding dogs. (2) Any breed-specific rule, regulation, policy, or ordinance regarding dogs is void.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 18-1-4Use of arbitration in personal injury from dog attack cases.In force
(1) A person injured as a result of a dog attack may elect to submit all third party bodily injury claims to arbitration by filing a notice of the submission of the claim to binding arbitration in a court if: (a) the claimant or the claimant's representative has: (i) previously and timely filed a complaint in a court that includes a third party bodily injury claim; and (ii) filed a notice to submit the claim to arbitration within 14 days after the complaint has been answered; and (b) the notice required under Subsection (1)(a)(ii) is filed while the action under Subsection (1)(a)(i) is still pending. (2) (a) If a party submits a bodily injury claim to arbitration under Subsection (1), the party submitting the claim or the party's representative is limited to an arbitration award that may not exceed $50,000 in addition to any medical premise benefits and any claim for property damage. (b) A party who elects to proceed against a defendant under this section: (i) waives the right to obtain a judgment against the personal assets of the defendant; and (ii) is limited to recovery only against available limits of insurance coverage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 18-1-2Dogs acting together -- Actions -- Parties -- Judgment.In force
Where any injury has been committed by two or more dogs acting together and such dogs are owned or kept by different persons, all such persons may be joined as defendants in the same action to recover damages therefor, and the amount found by the court or jury as damages for such injury shall be apportioned among the several defendants found liable and judgment shall be entered severally against them for the amount so apportioned.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gamble v. Hansen (District Court, D. Utah 2025)“…ltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-49722 (last visited Jan. 2, 2025), and Utah Code Ann. § 18-1-2, Dogs acting together. allegations ab…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 18-1-3Dogs attacking domestic animals, service animals, hoofed protected wildlife, or domestic fowls.In force
Any person may injure or kill a dog while: (1) the dog is attacking, chasing, or worrying: (a) a domestic animal having a commercial value; (b) a service animal, as defined in Section 26B-6-801; or (c) any species of hoofed protected wildlife; (2) the dog is attacking domestic fowls; or (3) the dog is being pursued for committing an act described in Subsection (1) or (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2000
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Crisman v. Hallows (Court of Appeals of Utah 2000, 393 Utah Adv. Rep. 9)“…or worrying any ... species of hoofed protected wildlife.” Utah Code Ann. § 18-1-3 (1998). . Although the notice of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Utah Code, Title 78B: Judicial Code
§ 78B-5-818Comparative negligence.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) The fault of a person seeking recovery may not alone bar recovery by that person. (2) A person seeking recovery may recover from any defendant or group of defendants whose fault, combined with the fault of persons immune from suit and nonparties to whom fault is allocated, exceeds the fault of the person seeking recovery prior to any reallocation of fault made under Subsection 78B-5-819(2). (3) No defendant is liable to any person seeking recovery for any amount in excess of the proportion of fault attributed to that defendant under Section 78B-5-819. (4) (a) The fact finder may, and when requested by a party shall, allocate the percentage or proportion of fault attributable to each person seeking recovery, to each defendant, to any person immune from suit, and to any other person identified under Subsection 78B-5-821(4) for whom there is a factual and legal basis to allocate fault. In the case of a motor vehicle accident involving an unidentified motor vehicle, the existence of the vehicle shall be proven by clear and convincing evidence which may consist solely of one person's testimony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2015, 779 Utah Adv. Rep. 82)“…rtionment, holding that the ―fault‖ to be apportioned under Utah Code section 78B-5-818 is not limited to negligence but extend…”
- Graves v. No. E. Services Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2015, 2015 UT 28)“…rtionment, holding that the “fault” to be apportioned under Utah Code section 78B-5-818 is not limited to negligence but extend…”
- Bylsma v. R.C.WilleyHumanTouch (Utah Supreme Court 2017, 2017 UT 85)“…14 added) (emphasis omitted) (citation omitted). 15 UTAH CODE § 78B-5-818(3). 16 See id. § 78B-5-817(2); see a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Motorcycle Accident Laws (2026): Deadlines & Helmets, Utah Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability as an Invitee, Truck Accident Laws in Utah (2026): Deadlines & Liability
§ 78B-2-307Within four years.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
An action may be brought within four years: (1) after the last charge is made or the last payment is received: (a) upon a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing; (b) on an open store account for any goods, wares, or merchandise; or (c) on an open account for work, labor or services rendered, or materials furnished; (2) for a claim for relief or a cause of action under the following sections of Title 25, Chapter 6, Uniform Voidable Transactions Act: (a) Subsection 25-6-202(1)(a), except in specific situations where the time for action is limited to one year under Section 25-6-305; (b) Subsection 25-6-202(1)(b); or (c) Subsection 25-6-203(1); (3) for a claim involving personal property damage to the aggrieved party's motor vehicle, as defined in Section 41-6a-102, or personal property from an accident involving a motor vehicle; and (4) for relief not otherwise provided for by law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 64 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Asset Acceptance LLC v. Stocks (Court of Appeals of Utah 2016, 811 Utah Adv. Rep. 5)“…s barred by the four-year statute of limitations set out in Utah Code section 78B-2-307. ¶4 After receiving Stocks’s answe…”
- Fehr v. Stockton (Court of Appeals of Utah 2018, 427 P.3d 1190)“…was barred by the four-year statute of limitations found in Utah Code section 78B-2-307. That section states, in relevant part:…”
- Grillone v. Peace Officer Standards (Court of Appeals of Utah 2023, 529 P.3d 1026)“…the four-year catch-all statute of limitations set forth in Utah Code section 78B-2-307(3), which he asserts applied to this ad…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, Tort Threshold, and Your Claim, Utah Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Utah Debt Collection Laws: The 25% Cap, the 15% Student Loan Break, and What Third-Party Payments Do
Utah Code, Title 10: Utah Municipal Code
§ 10-8-65Regulation of dogs -- Service animals permitted.In force
(1) Subject to Section 18-2-101, a municipality may: (a) license, tax, regulate, or prohibit the keeping of dogs; and (b) authorize the destruction, sale, or other disposal of a dog if the dog is at large contrary to ordinance. (2) (a) As used in this Subsection (2): (i) "Retired service animal" means a dog that: (A) at one time was a service animal for the current owner; and (B) no longer provides service animal services for the owner because of the dog's age or other factors limiting the dog's service capability. (ii) "Service animal" means a dog that: (A) is used by a law enforcement agency; (B) is specially trained or is in training for law enforcement work; and (C) assists a law enforcement agency in the performance of law enforcement duties. (b) If a municipality adopts a limit as to the number of dogs a person may keep, the municipality shall allow a person to keep a service animal, a retired service animal, or both in addition to that limit.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Utah Code, Title 26B: Utah Health and Human Services Code
§ 26B-7-210Rabies or other animal disease -- Investigation and order of quarantine.In force
(1) As used in this section, "quarantine" means strict confinement upon the private premises of the owners, under restraint by leash, closed cage or paddock of all animals specified by the order. (2) (a) Whenever rabies or any other animal disease dangerous to the health of human beings is reported, the department shall investigate to determine whether such disease exists, and the probable area of the state in which man or beast is thereby endangered. (b) If the department finds that such disease exists, a quarantine may be declared against all animals designated in the quarantine order and within the area specified in the order. (c) If the quarantine is for the purpose of preventing the spread of rabies or hydrophobia, the order shall contain a warning to the owners of dogs within the quarantined area to confine or muzzle all dogs to prevent biting. (d) Any dog not muzzled found running at large in a quarantined area or any dog known to have been removed from or escaped from such area, may be killed by any person without liability therefor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 26B-7-211Rabies or other animal disease -- Possession of animal in violation of part a misdemeanor.In force
Any person in possession of any animal being held in violation of Sections 26B-7-201 through 26B-7-223 is guilty of a class C misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Utah Code, Title 76: Criminal Offenses
§ 76-6-206Criminal trespass.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) (a) As used in this section: (i) "Enter" means intrusion of the entire body or the entire unmanned aircraft. (ii) "Graffiti" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-101. (iii) "Remain unlawfully," as that term relates to an unmanned aircraft, means remaining on or over private property when: (A) the private property or any portion of the private property is not open to the public; and (B) the person operating the unmanned aircraft is not otherwise authorized to fly the unmanned aircraft over the private property or any portion of the private property. (b) Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-201 apply to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Salt Lake City v. Grotepas (Court of Appeals of Utah 1994, 238 Utah Adv. Rep. 13)“…raised the statutory defense to criminal trespass found at Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-206 (4) (1990) [2] nor introduced any evid…”
- State v. Hamilton (Utah Supreme Court 2003, 473 Utah Adv. Rep. 18)“…oyance or injury to any person or damage to any property." Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-206 (@2)(a) (1999). 10 Under t…”
- State v. Kitches (Court of Appeals of Utah 2021, 484 P.3d 415)“…presence [would] cause fear for the safety of another.” Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-206(2)(a); see also id. § 76-2-103(2) (“A p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Utah Squatters Rights and Adverse Possession Laws (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Utah Code, Title 53: Public Safety Code § 53-6-101 (Short title.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Utah Code § 18-1-1 - Liability and damages for dog injury(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 18-1-2 - Dogs acting together(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 18-1-3 - Dogs attacking domestic animals(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 18-1-4 - Arbitration of claims(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 78B-2-307 - Statute of limitations for personal injury(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 78B-5-818 - Comparative negligence(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 18-2-101 - Breed-specific legislation preemption(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 10-8-65 - Municipal authority to regulate dogs(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 26B-7-210 - Quarantine orders for rabies(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 26B-7-211 - Quarantine violation penalties(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 76-6-206 - Criminal trespass(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code Title 53, Chapter 6, Part 4 - Law enforcement dog certification(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 78B-6a-101 - Private nuisance definitions(le.utah.gov)
- Utah Code § 10-3-703 - Penalties for violation of municipal ordinances(le.utah.gov)