Mississippi
Mississippi Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi follows the one-bite rule under common law rather than a specific dog bite statute. To recover damages, a victim must prove the dog owner knew or reasonably should have known of the dog's dangerous propensities before the attack, as established in Poy v. Grayson, 273 So.2d 491 (Miss. 1973).
Estimate your claim: Use our free Mississippi Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Mississippi's liability rule.
How Mississippi Dog Bite Liability Works
Mississippi is one of a small number of states that does not have a specific statute governing dog bite liability. Instead, Mississippi relies on the one-bite rule, a framework built entirely on common law and court decisions rather than a written statute.

Under this rule, a dog owner is not automatically liable when their dog injures someone. The victim must prove that the owner knew or should have known about the dog's dangerous propensities before the incident occurred. This stands in contrast to strict liability states, where an owner is responsible for a bite regardless of prior knowledge.
The landmark Mississippi Supreme Court case Poy v. Grayson, 273 So.2d 491 (Miss. 1973) set the standard still used today. The court held that "there must be some proof that the animal has exhibited some dangerous propensity or disposition prior to the attack complained of, and, moreover, it must be shown that the owner knew or reasonably should have known of this propensity or disposition and knew or reasonably should have foreseen that the animal was likely to attack someone."
What Counts as Prior Knowledge
A previous bite is not the only way to establish that an owner had prior knowledge. Mississippi courts have recognized several types of evidence that can demonstrate a dog's dangerous propensities:
- Growling, snarling, or lunging at people
- Previous complaints from neighbors about aggressive behavior
- A history of chasing pedestrians, cyclists, or other animals
- The dog escaping its enclosure multiple times
- The owner keeping the dog chained or muzzled due to known aggression
- Warning signs posted on the property about the dog
If any of these facts can be proven, a victim may establish that the owner knew or should have known the dog posed a risk, even without a prior bite on record.
Negligence as an Alternative Theory
Beyond the one-bite rule, victims can also pursue a negligence claim. If a dog owner failed to exercise reasonable care in controlling their animal, the owner may be liable even without proof of prior dangerous behavior. Examples of negligence include:
- Allowing a dog to roam freely in violation of local leash ordinances
- Failing to secure a fence or gate
- Leaving a known aggressive dog unsupervised around visitors
- Failing to warn guests about a dog's temperament
Violating a local animal control ordinance can serve as evidence of negligence per se in some Mississippi courts, strengthening the victim's case.
Pure Comparative Negligence in Mississippi
Mississippi applies a pure comparative negligence standard under Miss. Code Ann. 11-7-15. This means that if the victim's own actions contributed to the bite, the court will reduce the damages award by the victim's percentage of fault.
For example, if a jury finds the victim was 30% at fault for approaching a clearly agitated dog after being warned, the damages award would be reduced by 30%. Under Mississippi's pure comparative negligence system, even a victim who is 99% at fault can still recover 1% of their damages. However, a high degree of fault on the victim's part will significantly weaken the case as a practical matter.
Actions that might increase a victim's share of fault include:
- Ignoring warning signs posted on the property
- Teasing, hitting, or provoking the dog
- Entering a fenced yard without permission
- Attempting to pet a dog that was growling or showing signs of aggression
Damages Available to Dog Bite Victims
Dog bite victims in Mississippi may recover both economic and non-economic damages, depending on the severity of the injury and the strength of their case.

Economic Damages
- Emergency room visits, surgery, and hospitalization costs
- Ongoing medical treatment and physical rehabilitation
- Prescription medications and medical devices
- Lost wages from missed work during recovery
- Reduced future earning capacity if injuries are permanent
- Property damage (torn clothing, broken personal items)
Non-Economic Damages
- Physical pain and suffering
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma, including anxiety around dogs
- Permanent scarring and disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of daily activities
Mississippi does cap non-economic damages. Under Miss. Code Ann. 11-1-60(2)(b), in any civil action filed on or after September 1, 2004 other than a medical malpractice action, the trier of fact "shall not award the plaintiff more than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for noneconomic damages." A dog bite claim is such a civil action, so the $1 million limit applies to the pain and suffering, permanent scarring and disfigurement, and emotional distress categories listed above.
Two things this cap does not touch:
- Economic damages are not capped by this section. Medical bills, lost wages, and lost earning capacity are recoverable in the amount proven.
- Punitive damages are governed separately by Miss. Code Ann. 11-1-65, which sets its own limits tied to the defendant's net worth and requires clear and convincing evidence of malice, gross negligence, or fraud.
The jury is never told about the cap. If the verdict exceeds it, the judge reduces the non-economic portion afterward. The $1 million limit was upheld against a constitutional challenge in Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 710 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2013), and it remains in the current code.
Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims
Under Miss. Code Ann. 15-1-49, Mississippi sets a three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bite cases. The clock starts running on the date the bite occurs.
Key points about the filing deadline:
- Minors: Children who are bitten may have an extended deadline. The three-year period may not begin until the child turns 18, depending on the circumstances.
- Government claims: If the dog owner is a government employee or the bite occurred on government property, the Mississippi Tort Claims Act sets the schedule. Under Miss. Code Ann. 11-46-11, the action must be commenced within one year of the incident, and a written notice of claim must be delivered to the entity's chief executive officer at least 90 days before suit is filed. The 90 days is a pre-suit waiting period, not a 90-day deadline running from the injury. Filing a timely notice tolls the one-year clock for 95 days, and the claimant then has an additional 90 days to file suit after a denial or after the tolling period expires.
- Discovery rule: In rare cases where the full extent of injuries is not immediately apparent, the statute may begin running from the date the injury was discovered or should have been discovered through reasonable diligence.
Failing to file a lawsuit within the applicable deadline will bar the claim permanently. Victims should consult with an attorney promptly to protect their rights.
Rabies Quarantine and Vaccination Requirements
Mississippi has specific statutes governing rabies prevention and post-bite procedures that affect both dog owners and bite victims.
Mandatory Rabies Vaccination
Under Miss. Code Ann. 41-53-1, every dog and cat in Mississippi that is three months of age or older must be vaccinated against rabies. Owners who fail to comply are in violation of state law.
Post-Bite Quarantine
When a dog bites a person in Mississippi, the Mississippi State Board of Health requires a 10-day quarantine of the biting animal. During this period:
- The dog must not be vaccinated, because an adverse reaction to the vaccine could mimic early rabies symptoms and lead to unnecessary euthanasia
- The quarantine location is determined by local rabies control authorities
- If the dog is a stray or unwanted animal, it may be euthanized immediately and its head submitted for rabies testing
Dogs Running at Large
Under Miss. Code Ann. 41-53-11, law enforcement officers have the authority to seize and hold any dog over three months of age found running at large without a collar and rabies tag. Officers must hold the dog for five days and notify the county sheriff. If the dog remains unclaimed and unvaccinated, it may be destroyed.
Legal Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Even when a victim can demonstrate prior knowledge of dangerous propensities, Mississippi dog owners have several potential defenses.
Provocation
If the victim teased, tormented, hit, or otherwise provoked the dog before the bite, the owner may escape liability. The provocation must be significant enough that it would cause a normally calm dog to react aggressively.
Trespassing
Dog owners generally face reduced or no liability when their dog bites someone who was trespassing on their property without permission. However, this defense is weaker when the victim is a child, as courts recognize that young children may not understand property boundaries.
Assumption of Risk
If the victim voluntarily and knowingly assumed the risk of being bitten, such as a veterinarian, dog groomer, or kennel worker handling an unfamiliar animal, the owner's liability may be limited or eliminated entirely.
Lack of Knowledge
The most fundamental defense under the one-bite rule is that the owner had no reason to know the dog was dangerous. If the dog had never shown aggressive behavior and the owner took reasonable precautions, liability may not attach.
Dangerous Dog Designations
Mississippi does not have a uniform statewide dangerous dog statute. The Mississippi Legislature has considered bills such as HB 530 (2023) to create a "Mississippi Dangerous Dog Control Act," but no comprehensive statewide law has been enacted as of early 2026.
Instead, individual cities and counties in Mississippi set their own dangerous dog ordinances. These local laws typically allow a dog to be designated as "dangerous" or "vicious" if it has:
- Bitten a person without provocation
- Killed or seriously injured a domestic animal while off the owner's property
- Been previously designated as potentially dangerous and continued to exhibit threatening behavior
Owners of dogs designated as dangerous under local ordinances may face requirements such as:
- Maintaining liability insurance in whatever amount the local ordinance specifies
- Keeping the dog in a secure, escape-proof enclosure
- Using a muzzle and leash whenever the dog is in public
- Posting visible warning signs on the property
- Microchipping the dog for identification
Check with your local city or county animal control office for the specific ordinances in your area.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Mississippi
Some Mississippi municipalities have enacted breed-specific legislation (BSL) that restricts or bans certain dog breeds, most commonly pit bulls and pit bull mixes. However, many Mississippi communities have moved away from breed-specific bans in favor of behavior-based dangerous dog laws that focus on the individual animal's actions rather than its breed.
Mississippi does not have a statewide breed ban. Whether breed restrictions apply depends entirely on local ordinances in your city or county.
Landlord Liability for Dog Bites
In Mississippi, a landlord may be held liable for injuries caused by a tenant's dog under certain circumstances. Following the general principles of the one-bite rule, a landlord may face liability if:
- The landlord had actual knowledge that the tenant's dog was dangerous or had aggressive tendencies
- The landlord had the legal authority under the lease to require removal of the dog or to evict the tenant
- The landlord failed to take reasonable action to protect others from the known danger
Landlords who include pet policies in their lease agreements and require tenants with dogs to carry renter's insurance with adequate liability coverage can reduce their exposure to these claims.
Criminal Consequences for Dog Owners
Mississippi has no statewide criminal statute covering a non-fatal dog attack. Almost every dog bite case in the state is handled as a civil lawsuit. The one statewide criminal provision on point applies only when a dog kills someone.
Manslaughter When a Dog Kills a Person
Under Miss. Code Ann. 97-3-45, titled "Homicide; owner of dangerous animal," if the owner of a "mischievous animal, knowing its propensity, wilfully suffer it to go at large, or shall keep it without ordinary care, and such animal, while so at large, or not confined, kill any human being who shall have taken reasonable precautions to avoid the animal, such owner shall be guilty of manslaughter."
Three limits define how far this statute reaches:
- It requires a death. The statute is triggered only when the animal kills a person. It does not reach serious bodily injury or a non-fatal mauling, however severe.
- The owner must have known of the propensity and then either willfully let the animal go at large or kept it without ordinary care.
- The victim must have taken reasonable precautions to avoid the animal.
Everything Else Is Local
Below that threshold, criminal exposure in Mississippi comes from city and county ordinances rather than state law. Depending on the jurisdiction, an owner may face fines or a misdemeanor citation for violating a leash requirement, a running-at-large rule, or the confinement conditions imposed after a local dangerous-dog designation. The offenses and penalties are defined by the ordinance itself and vary widely from one city or county to the next, so the local animal control office is the place to check.
Any criminal charge is separate from, and does not replace, the owner's civil liability for the victim's damages.
Steps to Take After a Dog Bite in Mississippi
If you are bitten by a dog in Mississippi, taking the right steps immediately can protect both your health and your legal rights.
- Get medical treatment right away. Even minor bites can become infected. Keep all medical records and bills.
- Report the bite to your local animal control agency and law enforcement. This creates an official record and triggers the mandatory 10-day quarantine.
- Document the scene. Take photographs of your injuries, the location where the bite occurred, and the dog if possible.
- Collect the owner's information. Get the dog owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's or renter's insurance details.
- Identify witnesses. Gather contact information from anyone who saw the attack.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloody clothing and any other items damaged during the incident.
- Consult a personal injury attorney. A lawyer experienced in Mississippi dog bite cases can evaluate whether you have a viable claim and advise you on the best course of action.
More Mississippi Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Mississippi have a strict liability dog bite law?
No. Mississippi does not have a specific dog bite statute. The state follows the one-bite rule based on common law. Victims must prove that the dog owner knew or should have known about the dog's dangerous propensities, or that the owner was negligent in controlling the animal.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Mississippi?
You have three years from the date of the bite to file a personal injury lawsuit under Miss. Code Ann. 15-1-49. Claims involving a government entity run on a shorter schedule under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act: suit must be commenced within one year of the incident, and a written notice of claim must be filed with the entity at least 90 days before the lawsuit is filed. The 90 days is a waiting period before suing, not a deadline that runs from the date of the bite.
Can I still recover damages if I was partly at fault for the dog bite?
Yes. Mississippi follows a pure comparative negligence standard under Miss. Code Ann. 11-7-15. Your damages will be reduced by your percentage of fault, but you can still recover even if you were more than 50% at fault. For example, if you were 25% at fault and suffered $100,000 in damages, you could recover $75,000.
What happens to the dog after it bites someone in Mississippi?
The dog must be quarantined for 10 days under Mississippi State Board of Health regulations. The quarantine allows authorities to monitor the dog for signs of rabies. The dog should not be vaccinated during the quarantine period because an adverse vaccine reaction could be confused with rabies symptoms.
Can a landlord be held liable for a tenant's dog bite in Mississippi?
A landlord may be liable if they had actual knowledge that the tenant's dog was dangerous and had the authority to require the dog's removal but failed to act. Simply renting to a tenant who owns a dog is not enough to create landlord liability without evidence that the landlord knew about the specific danger.
Injured in Mississippi? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Mississippi personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the damages section to state Mississippi's $1,000,000 statutory cap on non-economic damages under Miss. Code Ann. 11-1-60(2)(b), rewrote the criminal-consequences section around the state's only statewide provision (the fatality-only manslaughter statute, Miss. Code Ann. 97-3-45) in place of offenses Mississippi law does not create, corrected the Mississippi Tort Claims Act timeline so the 90-day notice reads as a pre-suit requirement rather than a deadline from the injury, and removed an unsourced dangerous-dog insurance figure.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated
§ 11-7-15Contributory negligence no bar to recovery of damages; jury may reduce damages.In forcecited in 8 of our articles
In all actions hereafter brought for personal injuries, or where such injuries have resulted in death, or for injury to property, the fact that the person injured, or the owner of the property, or person having control over the property may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 67 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tharp v. Bunge Corp. (Mississippi Supreme Court 1994, 641 So. 2d 20)“…tiff must be one hundred percent (100%) negligent himself. Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-15 (1972). Mississippi Code Ann. § 11-7-1…”
- Downs v. Choo (Mississippi Supreme Court 1995, 656 So. 2d 84)“…ntiff must be one hundred percent (100%) negligent himself. Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-15 (1972). Mississippi Code Ann. § 11-7-…”
- Horton v. American Tobacco Co. (Mississippi Supreme Court 1995, 667 So. 2d 1289)“…pon the average person seeking legal redress. For example, Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-15 , 17 (1972), first enacted as Chapter…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Mississippi Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), Mississippi Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
§ 15-1-49Limitations applicable to actions not otherwise specifically provided for.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) All actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed shall be commenced within three (3) years next after the cause of such action accrued, and not after. (2) In actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed and which involve latent injury or disease, the cause of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 539 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stephens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of US (Mississippi Supreme Court 2003, 850 So. 2d 78)“…1. Statute of limitations, Miss.Code Ann. § 722 (1972) and Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-49 ¶11. In 1972, Miss.Code Ann. § 722,…”
- Stevens v. Lake (Mississippi Supreme Court 1993, 615 So. 2d 1177)“…on is time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-49 (1972). However, finding nothing to su…”
- PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. Lowery (Mississippi Supreme Court 2005, 909 So. 2d 47)“…UES. A. Historical Review of the Discovery Rule ¶ 9. Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-49(2) (Rev.2002) provides for a special ex…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Mississippi (2026): Helmets, Mississippi Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability in the Magnolia State
§ 41-53-11Dogs running at large.In force
(1) It shall be lawful and it shall be their duty for any sheriff, conservation officer or peace officer of a county or municipality to kill any dog above the age of three (3) months found running at large on whose neck there is no such collar and tag.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-07-08 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 41-53-1Rabies inoculation of dogs and cats required.In force
Every person in the State of Mississippi who owns, or has in his or her possession, any dog or cat of the age of three (3) months or over shall have said dog or cat inoculated (vaccinated) against rabies as provided herein with the recommended dosage of an anti-rabic virus (vaccine) approved by the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-07-08 · Read the full text in our law library
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Miss. Code Ann. 15-1-49 - Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 11-7-15 - Comparative Negligence(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 41-53-1 - Rabies Inoculation of Dogs and Cats Required(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 41-53-11 - Dogs Running at Large(law.justia.com)
- Mississippi Board of Animal Health - Rabies Laws(mbah.ms.gov).gov
- HB 530 (2023) - Mississippi Dangerous Dog Control Act (Introduced)(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us).gov
- Mississippi State Department of Health - Rabies Information(msdh.ms.gov).gov
- Miss. Code Ann. 11-1-60 - Limitation on Noneconomic Damages ($1,000,000 cap in civil actions other than medical malpractice)(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 11-1-65 - Punitive Damages; Limitations(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 11-46-11 - Mississippi Tort Claims Act: Statute of Limitations and Notice of Claim Requirements(law.justia.com)
- Miss. Code Ann. 97-3-45 - Homicide; Owner of Dangerous Animal (manslaughter when an animal kills a person)(law.justia.com)
- Animal Legal & Historical Center - Mississippi Dangerous Animal Statute (Miss. Code Ann. 97-3-45), last checked October 2025(www.animallaw.info)
- Mississippi Legislature - HB 413 (2024) bill history: passed House, died in Senate committee 04/02/2024 (no statewide dangerous dog act enacted)(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us)