New Hampshire
Truck Accident Laws in New Hampshire (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A truck accident claim in New Hampshire runs on two tracks at once. State tort law sets the deadline to sue, decides how shared fault affects what you can recover, and governs auto coverage. Federal law, enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), regulates how commercial trucks and their drivers must operate, and those rules often supply the evidence of fault.
This page explains both. It is general legal information, not legal advice, and deadlines and outcomes turn on the specific facts, so confirm how the law applies to your situation with a licensed New Hampshire attorney.
Statute of Limitations in New Hampshire
Under RSA 508:4, all personal actions, including injuries from a truck crash, may be brought only within three years of the act or omission complained of. The clock generally starts on the date of the crash. If you file even one day late, the court can dismiss the case permanently, no matter how clear the trucking company's fault.
The statute contains a discovery rule: where the injury and its causal connection to the defendant's conduct could not reasonably have been discovered at the time, the action may be commenced within three years of when the plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the injury and its cause. A minor's deadline is also generally tolled. Because these are fact-specific, confirm your exact deadline with a licensed attorney.
Wrongful Death in New Hampshire
When a truck crash causes death, the claim proceeds through the estate under New Hampshire's survival and wrongful-death framework in RSA chapter 556. RSA 556:11 provides that a wrongful-death action may be brought at any time within six years after the death of the deceased party, subject to the provisions of RSA 508. Because of that cross-reference and the shorter periods that can apply, the safe course is to treat the deadline as early and confirm it with a licensed attorney rather than assume the full six years.
New Hampshire allows the estate to recover the decedent's losses, and certain surviving family members may recover relationship-loss damages under two separate provisions of RSA 556:12, as amended effective January 1, 2025. Paragraph II allows a surviving spouse to recover for the loss of the comfort, society, and companionship of the deceased, and caps those damages at $500,000. Paragraph III allows the minor children of a deceased parent, or the surviving parents of a deceased minor child, to recover for loss of familial relationship, capped at $300,000 per individual claimant. Both awards are reduced for comparative fault under RSA 507:7-d. The core compensatory damages in a wrongful-death claim are not capped.
Negligence Rule: Modified Comparative (51% Bar)
New Hampshire applies modified comparative fault under RSA 507:7-d. Contributory fault does not bar recovery if the plaintiff's fault was not greater than the fault of the defendant, or the defendants in the aggregate where there is more than one. If your fault crosses past the defendants' combined fault (more than 50 percent), recovery is barred entirely.

When you are allowed to recover, the statute directs that your damages be diminished in proportion to the fault attributed to you. A plaintiff found 25 percent responsible recovers 75 percent of proven damages. Because the dividing line sits at the 50/51 percent mark, how fault is allocated can decide both whether you recover at all and how much, which is one reason trucking-company defendants fight hard on fault.
No-Fault and PIP
New Hampshire is not a no-fault state. It uses a traditional fault-based (tort) system, so the party who caused the crash, along with that party's insurer or employer, is responsible for the resulting harm. New Hampshire does not require PIP coverage and imposes no injury threshold you must clear before filing suit. You pursue the at-fault driver and the motor carrier directly.
New Hampshire is also notable as the one state that does not generally mandate auto liability insurance for every driver. Drivers who choose not to insure must still be able to satisfy the state's financial-responsibility requirements, and if they cannot, they remain personally liable. Many drivers carry insurance, and if they do it must meet the state minimums discussed below.
Damage Caps and State Insurance
New Hampshire does not cap ordinary compensatory personal-injury damages, so economic and noneconomic damages in a typical truck-crash claim are limited only by proof. In a wrongful-death case, RSA 556:12 sets two separate relationship-loss limits, both as amended effective January 1, 2025: paragraph II caps a surviving spouse's damages for loss of comfort, society, and companionship at $500,000, and paragraph III caps loss-of-familial-relationship damages for a minor child or a parent at $300,000 per individual claimant. Neither cap reaches the core compensatory damages.
For context on coverage, when a New Hampshire driver carries insurance, RSA chapter 264 sets the financial-responsibility minimum at 25/50/25: $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury, and $25,000 for property damage. Commercial trucks are subject to far higher federal minimums, discussed below.
Federal FMCSA Rules That Shape Liability
Interstate trucking is governed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Violations are frequently the clearest proof of negligence in a truck case. Key areas include:

- Hours of service (49 CFR Part 395): a property-carrying driver may drive at most 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, cannot drive beyond the 14th hour on duty, must take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of driving, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 in 8. These limits target fatigue.
- Electronic logging devices (49 CFR Part 395, Subpart B): most drivers must use an ELD that connects to the engine and automatically records driving time, motion, and location, replacing easily falsified paper logs.
- Driver qualification and CDL (49 CFR Part 391): carriers must verify a driver's commercial license, medical certification, and record before putting that driver on the road.
- Drug and alcohol testing (49 CFR Part 382): pre-employment, random, and post-accident testing is mandatory.
- Inspection, repair, and maintenance (49 CFR Part 396): trucks must be systematically inspected and kept in safe operating condition, with records to prove it.
Who Can Be Liable
A truck crash usually involves more potential defendants than a car crash, and many are corporations. Depending on the facts, those who may share liability include:
- the truck driver, for negligent driving or hours-of-service violations;
- the motor carrier (trucking company), often vicariously for its driver and directly for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance;
- a broker or shipper that arranged or controlled the load;
- a cargo loader whose improper loading caused a shift or rollover; and
- a parts or truck manufacturer, if a defect contributed.
Identifying every responsible party matters because each may carry separate insurance, and because New Hampshire's comparative-fault rule makes the allocation of fault among all parties decisive.
Federal Minimum Insurance: $750,000
Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire carrier operating in interstate commerce with a vehicle rated over 10,001 pounds must maintain at least $750,000 in liability coverage for general (nonhazardous) freight. Carriers hauling certain hazardous materials must carry $1,000,000 or $5,000,000. These minimums dwarf the $25,000 bodily-injury minimum on a typical New Hampshire car policy, which is a major reason trucking cases are litigated differently.
Preserving Evidence
Much of the proof in a truck case lives on the truck and in company files, and it can disappear fast. ELD and logbook data, the engine control module or onboard "black box," dashcam footage, and maintenance and inspection records can be overwritten or routinely discarded. A timely written preservation (spoliation) letter to the carrier helps keep this evidence intact. Because New Hampshire's comparative rule turns on the fault details, this electronic evidence can decide both whether and how much you recover.

How to Evaluate a Potential Claim
Move quickly. Get the police crash report, photograph the scene and vehicles, keep all medical records and bills, and write down the date of the crash and of any later-discovered injury. Note any witness names and the truck and trailer company markings.
Most personal-injury attorneys offer a free initial consultation and work on a contingency fee, meaning they are paid only out of a recovery. No attorney can promise an outcome or a dollar amount, and only a licensed New Hampshire attorney can assess whether your specific facts support a claim within the deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in New Hampshire?
Generally three years from the date of the crash for an injury claim under RSA 508:4. A wrongful-death action may be brought within six years of the death under RSA 556:11, but that period remains subject to RSA 508, so the safe course is to confirm your exact deadline early with a licensed New Hampshire attorney.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in New Hampshire?
Often several parties: the driver, the motor carrier (both vicariously and for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance), a broker or shipper, a cargo loader, and a parts or truck manufacturer if a defect contributed. Truck cases routinely have multiple, often corporate, defendants.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident in New Hampshire?
Commercial trucks are regulated by the federal FMCSA rules in 49 CFR, so violations of hours-of-service, logging, maintenance, and testing requirements can prove negligence. Interstate carriers must also carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage, far more than a typical car policy, and there are usually more defendants and more electronic evidence to preserve.
How does New Hampshire's comparative fault rule affect my case?
New Hampshire follows modified comparative fault with a 51% bar under RSA 507:7-d. You can recover only if your fault was not greater than the defendants' fault in the aggregate, and your award is then reduced by your own percentage of fault. If your fault is greater than the defendants' combined fault, recovery is barred entirely.
Is New Hampshire a no-fault state for truck accidents?
No. New Hampshire uses a fault-based (tort) system, so you pursue the at-fault driver and trucking company directly. New Hampshire does not require PIP coverage and there is no injury threshold to clear before filing.
How much is a truck accident case worth in New Hampshire?
There is no fixed value. Compensation depends on the facts, the injuries, the available insurance, and the evidence. New Hampshire does not cap ordinary compensatory personal-injury damages. No attorney can guarantee an outcome or a particular dollar amount; a licensed attorney can assess your situation.
What is the minimum insurance a trucking company must carry?
Under 49 CFR 387.9, interstate for-hire carriers of general freight must carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage, with $1,000,000 or $5,000,000 required for certain hazardous materials. That is well above New Hampshire's 25/50/25 financial-responsibility minimum for cars.
Injured in New Hampshire? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a New Hampshire personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the New Hampshire wrongful-death damage caps: RSA 556:12 sets two separate limits, $500,000 for a surviving spouse's loss of comfort, society, and companionship under paragraph II and $300,000 per individual claimant for a minor child's or parent's loss of familial relationship under paragraph III, where the page had previously stated a single $300,000 cap for all family members.
Fixed a dead statute-citation link for RSA 508:4 (the underlying three-year deadline and discovery-rule description were already correct and are unchanged).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LII ACTIONS, PROCESS, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS, CHAPTER 507 ACTIONS
§ 507:7-dComparative Fault.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Contributory fault shall not bar recovery in an action by any plaintiff or plaintiff's legal representative, to recover damages in tort for death, personal injury or property damage, if such fault was not greater than the fault of the defendant, or the defendants in the aggregate if recovery is allowed against more than one defendant, but the damages awarded shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of fault attributed to the plaintiff by general verdict. The burden of proof as to the existence or amount of fault attributable to a party shall rest upon the party making such allegation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LII ACTIONS, PROCESS, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS, CHAPTER 508 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
§ 508:4Personal Actions.In forcecited in 8 of our articles
I. Except as otherwise provided by law, all personal actions, except actions for slander or libel, may be brought only within 3 years of the act or omission complained of, except that when the injury and its causal relationship to the act or omission were not discovered and could not reasonably have been discovered at the time of the act or omission, the action shall be commenced within 3 years of the time the plaintiff discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury and its causal relationship to the act or omission complained of. II. Personal actions for slander or libel, unless otherwise provided by law, may be brought only within 3 years of the time the cause of action accrued.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 304 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 813)“…96, and, therefore, even if the discovery rule exception to RSA 508:4, I (1997) applied, the plaintiff still…”
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2010, 160 N.H. 708)“…ver, because in that case we interpreted a prior version of RSA 508:4 (Supp. 1973), which did not expressly s…”
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1988, 131 N.H. 6)“…utes of limitations for many causes of action, see, e.g., RSA 508:4 (Supp. 1987), and our liberal discovery…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in New Hampshire (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Motorcycle Accident Laws in New Hampshire (2026): Deadlines, New Hampshire Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LVI PROBATE COURTS AND DECEDENTS' ESTATES, CHAPTER 556 SUITS BY AND AGAINST ADMINISTRATORS
§ 556:11New Action.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
If an action is not then pending, one may be brought for such cause at any time within 6 years after the death of the deceased party, subject to the provisions of RSA 508.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gould v. Concord Hospital (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1985, 126 N.H. 405)“…Temple, J.) held that the two-year limitations period in RSA 556:11 had run and dismissed the negligence an…”
- Wallace v. Wallace (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1980, 120 N.H. 675)“…is whether a death action may be *676 maintained under RSA 556:11 on behalf of an aborted nonviable fetus…”
- Cheever v. Southern New Hampshire Regional Medical Center (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1997, 141 N.H. 589)“…to dismiss, arguing that the action was time-barred because RSA 556:11 (Supp. 1996) provides for a three-year…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
§ 556:12Damages for Wrongful Death, Elements.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
I. If the administrator of the deceased party is plaintiff, and the death of such party was caused by the injury complained of in the action, the mental and physical pain suffered by the deceased in consequence of the injury, the reasonable expenses occasioned to the estate by the injury, the probable duration of life but for the injury, and the capacity to earn money during the deceased party's probable working life, may be considered as elements of damage in connection with other elements allowed by law, in the same manner as if the deceased had survived. II. In addition, the trier of fact may award damages to a surviving spouse of the decedent for the loss of the comfort, society, and companionship of the deceased; however, where fault on the part of the decedent or the surviving spouse is found to have caused, in whole or in part, the loss complained of, damages recoverable shall be subject to diminution to the extent and in the manner provided for in RSA 507:7-d. In no event shall damages awarded under this paragraph exceed $500,000. III.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 40 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1984, 124 N.H. 719)“…a realistic one. In addition, our wrongful death statute, RSA 556:12, does not in any way bar recovery by th…”
- Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School District (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 143 N.H. 331)“…Loss of Life Damages The majority concludes that under RSA 556:12 (1997) (amended 1997, 1998), the phrase…”
- Park v. Rockwell International Corp. (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1981, 121 N.H. 894)“…Brock, J. This appeal involves a wrongful death action (RSA 556:12) brought by the administrator of a dece…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE XXI MOTOR VEHICLES, CHAPTER 264 ACCIDENTS AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY § 264:1 (Director to Administer Chapter; Court Review.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- RSA 508:4 - Personal Actions (3-year limitation; discovery rule)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 507:7-d - Comparative Fault (recovery if plaintiff's fault not greater than defendants' in the aggregate; damages diminished in proportion to fault)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 556:11 - Wrongful Death, New Action (action may be brought within 6 years after death, subject to RSA 508)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 556:12, III - Damages for Wrongful Death (loss-of-familial-relationship damages capped at $300,000 per individual claimant; cap amount effective Jan. 1, 2025)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA Chapter 264 - Accidents and Financial Responsibility (25/50/25 minimum bodily-injury and property-damage limits)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- 49 CFR 387.9 - Financial responsibility, minimum levels ($750,000 general freight; $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 for hazardous materials)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 49 CFR Part 395 - Hours of Service of Drivers (11-hour driving limit, 14-hour window, 30-minute break, 60/70-hour limits, ELD requirement in Subpart B)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FMCSA - Summary of Hours of Service Regulations (property-carrying driver limits)(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- RSA 556:12 - Damages for Wrongful Death, Elements (para. II: surviving spouse's loss of comfort, society, and companionship capped at $500,000; para. III: loss of familial relationship for a minor child or parent capped at $300,000 per individual claimant; as amended 2024, 160:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2025)(gc.nh.gov)