EnglishEspañol
South Carolina flag

South Carolina

South Carolina Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a trade secret in South Carolina?

Under S.C. Code § 39-8-20, information qualifies as a trade secret if it derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by persons who could benefit from it, and the owner takes reasonable steps to maintain secrecy. Section 39-8-20(5)(b) requires considering the collective effect of items or procedures, not general knowledge of each individual item, while the economic-value and reasonable-secrecy requirements still apply. Customer lists, manufacturing formulas, proprietary processes, source code, and pricing strategies are common examples. Section 39-8-20 does not expressly name reverse engineering or independent development.

How long do I have to sue for trade secret misappropriation in South Carolina?

Three years from when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence, under S.C. Code § 39-8-70. Continuing misappropriation is treated as a single claim accruing from the first act that was or should have been discovered. Prompt investigation when misappropriation is suspected helps preserve the claim within this deadline.

What remedies are available under the South Carolina Trade Secrets Act?

The Act authorizes injunctions to stop actual or threatened misappropriation (§ 39-8-50), actual loss, nonduplicative unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty (§ 39-8-40), exemplary damages up to twice the actual damages awarded under § 39-8-40(A) upon a finding of wilful, wanton, or reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s rights (§ 39-8-40(C)), and reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party for a bad-faith misappropriation claim, a motion to terminate an injunction made or resisted in bad faith, or wilful misappropriation (§ 39-8-80). Federal DTSA claims also make available a civil ex parte seizure order in extraordinary circumstances.

Do South Carolina NDAs need to include a DTSA whistleblower notice?

Yes. Any nondisclosure or confidentiality agreement signed or updated after May 11, 2016 must notify employees or contractors of the DTSA whistleblower immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 1833(b). An employer that omits this notice forfeits the right to recover exemplary damages and attorney fees from that individual under the DTSA, even for willful misappropriation.

Can a combination of publicly known elements be a trade secret in South Carolina?

Potentially. Section 39-8-20(5)(b) recognizes that a simple fact, item, procedure, or series of items or procedures may collectively make a substantial difference to process efficiency, production, or commercial strategy. Courts must consider their collective effect, rather than general knowledge of each individual item; the economic-value and secrecy requirements still apply.

Updates

Corrected South Carolina’s collective-effect rule, statutory history, state remedy standards, and reverse-engineering attribution.

Corrected five scrambled pinpoint citations in South Carolina's Trade Secrets Act, including one that had misdirected readers to the chapter's criminal theft statute (§ 39-8-90) while labeling it the civil preemption clause; the real preemption section is § 39-8-110.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. South Carolina Trade Secrets Act, S.C. Code §§ 39-8-20 to 39-8-130(scstatehouse.gov).gov
  2. Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839(law.cornell.edu)
  3. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Uniform Law Commission)(uniformlaws.org)
  4. Economic Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1832(law.cornell.edu)
Share: