Ohio
Ohio Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Ohio allows video-only surveillance cameras on your own property with no permit or registration required. Audio recording is also legal under ORC 2933.52 because Ohio is a one-party consent state, meaning you may record conversations you participate in. Hidden cameras aimed at private areas violate ORC 2907.08 and carry criminal penalties.
Ohio does not have a single, standalone law that governs all uses of surveillance cameras. Instead, the state relies on a combination of statutes covering wiretapping, voyeurism, and general privacy principles to determine what is legal and what is not.
Whether you are installing a home security system, placing cameras in a workplace, or dealing with a neighbor who has a camera pointed at your property, understanding how these laws interact is essential. This guide breaks down every major area of Ohio surveillance camera law based on the current Ohio Revised Code.
Home Security Cameras in Ohio
Ohio law generally permits homeowners to install security cameras on their own property. There is no state statute that requires you to register cameras, obtain a permit, or notify anyone before setting up a residential surveillance system.

The core legal principle is the reasonable expectation of privacy. You are free to record areas of your own property, including your front porch, driveway, garage, backyard, and interior common areas like living rooms, kitchens, and hallways.
However, cameras must not be placed in locations where household members or guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under ORC 2907.08, it is illegal to secretly record someone in a place where they reasonably expect privacy, such as a bathroom, bedroom, or changing area, for the purpose of viewing their private areas.
Where You Can Place Home Cameras
- Front door and porch areas
- Driveways and walkways
- Garage interiors and exteriors
- Living rooms, kitchens, and other shared spaces
- Backyard and side yard areas
- Entryways and mudrooms
Where You Cannot Place Cameras
- Bathrooms
- Bedrooms used by guests or other household members (without their knowledge)
- Changing areas or private spaces
- Any location aimed directly into a neighbor's private interior spaces
The key distinction is purpose and placement. A camera on your back porch that happens to capture a portion of your neighbor's yard is different from a camera deliberately aimed into their bedroom window.
Audio Recording and One-Party Consent
Ohio is a one-party consent state for audio recording. This is governed by ORC 2933.52, which makes it a crime to intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications without proper authorization.
The statute creates an exception under Division (B)(4) that permits a person who is not a law enforcement officer to intercept a communication if:
- The person is a party to the communication, or
- One of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception
There is one critical condition: the recording must not be made for the purpose of committing a criminal offense, a tortious act, or any other injurious act.
What This Means in Practice
You may legally record a phone call or in-person conversation that you are part of without telling the other person. You may also record a conversation if someone involved in that conversation has given you permission to record it.
What you cannot do is secretly record a conversation between two other people when none of them know they are being recorded and none have given you consent.
Penalties for Illegal Wiretapping
Violating ORC 2933.52 is classified as a felony of the fourth degree in Ohio. Two different sentencing statutes set the penalty: ORC 2929.14 supplies the prison term and ORC 2929.18 supplies the maximum fine.
| Penalty | Range | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Prison term | 6 to 18 months | ORC 2929.14(A)(4) |
| Maximum fine | Up to $5,000 | ORC 2929.18(A)(3)(d) |
Additionally, victims of illegal wiretapping may bring a civil lawsuit under ORC 2933.65. The statute does not stack the damage measures. Under division (A)(2), a plaintiff recovers whichever of the following two amounts is greater, not both:
- Liquidated damages computed at $200 per day for each day of the violation, or liquidated damages of $10,000, whichever of those two is greater
- The sum of the actual damages the plaintiff suffered plus any profits the violator made as a result of the violation
On top of that greater amount, the court may award equitable or declaratory relief, punitive damages if appropriate, and reasonable attorney fees and other litigation expenses.
The statute of limitations for filing a civil wiretapping claim is two years from the date the victim first had a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation.
How This Affects Surveillance Cameras
Many modern security cameras, doorbell cameras, and baby monitors include built-in microphones. If your camera records audio, the one-party consent rule applies to any conversations it captures.
If you are present and part of the conversation being recorded, the audio recording is legal under one-party consent. However, if your camera is recording audio of conversations you are not part of, such as a doorbell camera recording a delivery driver's phone call on your porch, the legality becomes questionable.
To stay on the safe side, many Ohio homeowners choose to either disable the audio recording feature on outdoor cameras or post visible signage indicating that audio and video recording is in progress.
Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws
Ohio's voyeurism statute, ORC 2907.08, is the primary law that addresses the illegal use of hidden cameras. The statute contains four categories of prohibited conduct, each with its own penalty level.
Division (A): Spying or Eavesdropping
It is illegal to trespass or otherwise surreptitiously invade another person's privacy for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying oneself by spying or eavesdropping on that person.
Penalty: Misdemeanor of the third degree, punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a fine of up to $500.
Division (B): Secret Recording in Private Places
It is illegal to knowingly trespass or otherwise secretly videotape, film, photograph, broadcast, stream, or record another person in a place where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, for the purpose of viewing the private areas of that person.
Penalty: Misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $750.
Division (C): Secret Recording of a Minor
It is illegal to knowingly trespass or otherwise secretly videotape, film, photograph, broadcast, stream, or record a minor in a place where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, for the purpose of viewing the private areas of the minor.
Penalty: Felony of the fifth degree, punishable by 6 to 12 months in prison and a fine of up to $2,500.
Division (D): Recording Under or Through Clothing ("Upskirting")
It is illegal to secretly videotape, film, photograph, or record another person under, above, or through the clothing being worn by that person for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that person.
Penalty: Misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Summary of Voyeurism Penalties
| Offense | ORC Division | Classification | Max Jail/Prison | Max Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spying/eavesdropping for sexual gratification | 2907.08(A) | M3 | 60 days | $500 |
| Secret recording in private place | 2907.08(B) | M2 | 90 days | $750 |
| Secret recording of a minor in private place | 2907.08(C) | F5 | 6-12 months prison | $2,500 |
| Recording under/through clothing | 2907.08(D) | M1 | 180 days | $1,000 |
Workplace Surveillance Cameras
Ohio does not have a specific statute that comprehensively regulates workplace video surveillance. Employers generally have broad authority to use cameras in the workplace, but that authority has boundaries rooted in privacy law and federal labor regulations.
What Employers Can Do
Employers may install cameras in areas where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Common locations include:
- Entrances and exits
- Hallways and corridors
- Sales floors and customer service areas
- Parking lots and loading docks
- Warehouses and storage rooms
- Cash register areas and point-of-sale stations
There must be a legitimate business reason for the surveillance, such as preventing theft, monitoring safety compliance, or documenting incidents.
What Employers Cannot Do
Cameras may not be placed in areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. These include:
- Restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Break rooms designated as private spaces
- Private offices where the door is routinely closed (depending on the circumstances)
Placing cameras in these locations could expose an employer to criminal charges under ORC 2907.08 and civil liability for invasion of privacy.
Audio Recording in the Workplace
Because Ohio follows one-party consent for audio, an employer who is a party to a workplace conversation may record it without notifying the other participants. However, recording conversations between employees in which no management representative is participating requires consent from at least one party to that conversation.
Secret audio recording of employees without any party's consent violates ORC 2933.52 and can result in felony charges.
Federal Considerations
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees' rights to discuss wages, working conditions, and union organizing. Employers cannot use surveillance cameras to monitor or discourage these protected activities. The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that surveillance targeting union-related discussions may constitute an unfair labor practice.
Best Practices for Ohio Employers
While Ohio law does not require employers to notify employees about video surveillance, doing so is strongly recommended. Best practices include:
- Posting visible signage in monitored areas
- Including surveillance policies in the employee handbook
- Informing employees of camera locations, types of monitoring, and footage retention policies
- Obtaining written acknowledgment from employees
These steps help prevent invasion of privacy claims and demonstrate good faith.
Nanny Cams in Ohio
Nanny cams are legal in Ohio. As a homeowner, you have the right to place cameras inside your own home to monitor the care of your children or the security of your property.
Video-Only Nanny Cams
Video-only nanny cams are legal in every U.S. state, including Ohio. You do not need to inform a babysitter, nanny, housekeeper, or other person in your home that video recording is taking place in shared living spaces.
You may place nanny cams in:
- Living rooms
- Kitchens
- Playrooms and nurseries
- Hallways and entryways
Audio-Equipped Nanny Cams
Because Ohio is a one-party consent state, you may also use nanny cams that record audio, provided you are one of the parties whose conversations are being captured. If you are at work and the camera is recording conversations between a nanny and your child (where neither the nanny nor the child has consented), the legality of the audio recording is less clear.
The safest approach is to either disable audio recording or inform the caregiver that recording is in place.
Placement Restrictions
Even in your own home, you may not place a nanny cam in a bathroom, a bedroom that serves as the nanny's private quarters (if they live in your home), or any other area where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Using a hidden camera to record a caregiver in these private spaces could result in criminal charges under ORC 2907.08.
Neighbor Disputes Over Security Cameras
Conflicts between neighbors over security cameras are increasingly common in Ohio. While there is no specific Ohio statute addressing neighbor-to-neighbor camera disputes, several legal principles apply.
What Your Neighbor Can Legally Do
Your neighbor may:
- Install cameras on their own property
- Record video of their own yard, driveway, and exterior areas
- Capture footage that incidentally includes portions of your property visible from their property or from public spaces
- Use doorbell cameras that record their front door area
You generally have no expectation of privacy for activities visible from public areas or from your neighbor's property. Your front yard, driveway, and any areas visible from the street or sidewalk can legally be recorded.
What Your Neighbor Cannot Legally Do
Your neighbor may not:
- Aim a camera directly into your windows, particularly bedrooms or bathrooms
- Use telephoto lenses or zoom features to peer into private interior spaces
- Record audio of your private conversations without your consent (violates ORC 2933.52)
- Use cameras to harass, stalk, or intimidate you (may violate ORC 2903.211, menacing by stalking)
Legal Remedies for Camera Disputes
If a neighbor's camera is invading your privacy, you may:
- Talk to your neighbor directly. Many disputes can be resolved by asking the neighbor to reposition the camera.
- Contact local police. If the camera is clearly aimed at private areas or is being used for voyeuristic purposes, file a report.
- Consult an attorney. A lawyer can send a formal demand letter and advise you on whether you have grounds for a civil invasion of privacy claim.
- Seek a court order. In serious cases, a court may order the camera removed or repositioned.
- Check HOA rules. If you live in a planned community governed by a homeowners association, the HOA's covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) may include rules about camera placement, angles, and notification requirements.
HOA Camera Rules
Ohio planned communities are governed under ORC Chapter 5312. While state law does not set specific camera rules for HOAs, your association's governing documents may restrict where cameras can be placed, require approval before installation, or limit the field of view to prevent privacy conflicts.
Recording in Public Places
Ohio law does not prohibit recording video in public places. You may use a camera or smartphone to record in locations where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, including:
- Public streets, sidewalks, and parks
- Retail stores and shopping centers (as a customer)
- Government buildings open to the public
- Public meetings and hearings
The Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901-3-02 specifically permits any person to videotape, film, record, or photograph public commission meetings and hearings.
However, even in public, audio recording is subject to the one-party consent rule. You must be a participant in the conversation or have consent from a participant before recording audio.
Penalties Summary Table
The following table summarizes the key penalties for surveillance-related offenses in Ohio.
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Max Jail/Prison | Max Fine | Additional Consequences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illegal wiretapping | ORC 2933.52 | F4 | 6-18 months prison | $5,000 | Civil liability up to $10,000+ |
| Voyeurism (spying) | ORC 2907.08(A) | M3 | 60 days jail | $500 | None specified |
| Secret recording (private place) | ORC 2907.08(B) | M2 | 90 days jail | $750 | None specified |
| Secret recording of minor | ORC 2907.08(C) | F5 | 6-12 months prison | $2,500 | Sex offender registration may apply |
| Upskirting/downblousing | ORC 2907.08(D) | M1 | 180 days jail | $1,000 | None specified |
| Menacing by stalking | ORC 2903.211 | M1-F4 | Up to 18 months | Up to $5,000 | Protection order may be issued |
How to Stay Legally Compliant in Ohio
Following these guidelines will help you avoid legal problems when using surveillance cameras in Ohio.
-
Place cameras only where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Avoid bathrooms, bedrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas.
-
Be cautious with audio recording. If your cameras capture audio, make sure you are a party to the conversations being recorded, or disable the microphone.
-
Post signage. Visible signs stating that video and audio recording is in progress provide notice and reduce legal risk.
-
Point cameras at your own property. If cameras incidentally capture portions of neighboring properties, that is generally acceptable. Deliberately aiming cameras into a neighbor's private spaces is not.
-
Never use cameras for voyeuristic purposes. Any recording done for sexual gratification or to view another person's private areas is a crime under ORC 2907.08.
-
Inform employees. If you operate a business, notify workers about surveillance, include camera policies in handbooks, and never place cameras in private employee areas.
-
Check local ordinances and HOA rules. Some municipalities and homeowners associations have additional restrictions beyond state law.
Related Ohio Camera and Privacy Laws
- Ohio Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Ohio.
- Ohio Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Ohio Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Ohio Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Ohio.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to have security cameras on your house in Ohio?
Yes. Ohio law permits homeowners to install security cameras on their own property. You may record video of your yard, driveway, porch, and interior common areas. Cameras must not be placed in locations where others have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as bathrooms or guest bedrooms. Audio recording is also permitted under Ohio's one-party consent rule (ORC 2933.52), but you must be a party to any conversation being recorded.
Can my neighbor legally point a security camera at my property in Ohio?
A neighbor may record video of areas visible from their own property or from public spaces, including portions of your property that are in plain view. However, they may not aim cameras directly into your windows, bathrooms, or other private interior spaces. Recording audio of your private conversations without consent violates ORC 2933.52. If a neighbor's camera is invading your privacy, you may contact police, consult an attorney, or seek a court order.
Is Ohio a one-party or two-party consent state for recording?
Ohio is a one-party consent state under ORC 2933.52. This means you may record a phone call or in-person conversation as long as you are a participant, or if one of the participants has given you prior consent to record. You do not need to notify the other parties. Recording a conversation where no party has consented is a fourth-degree felony, carrying 6 to 18 months in prison and fines up to $5,000.
Are nanny cams legal in Ohio?
Yes. You may use video-only nanny cams anywhere in your home except in areas where the caregiver has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a bathroom or a live-in nanny's private bedroom. Nanny cams with audio recording are also generally permitted under Ohio's one-party consent rule, though the safest practice is to inform the caregiver or disable audio when you are not present in the home.
What are the penalties for illegal surveillance in Ohio?
Penalties vary by offense. Illegal wiretapping under ORC 2933.52 is a fourth-degree felony with up to 18 months in prison and a $5,000 fine, plus potential civil damages of $10,000 or more. Voyeurism under ORC 2907.08 ranges from a third-degree misdemeanor (up to 60 days in jail) for basic spying, up to a fifth-degree felony (6 to 12 months in prison) when a minor is secretly recorded in a private place.
Updates
Corrected the civil wiretapping damages under ORC 2933.65 to the greater of liquidated damages or actual damages plus profits rather than a cumulative total, attributed the $5,000 fourth-degree-felony fine to ORC 2929.18(A)(3)(d) instead of ORC 2929.14, and removed an unsourced bill-number claim about the origin of the upskirting provision.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Ohio Revised Code
§ 2907.08VoyeurismIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
(A) No person, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying the person's self, shall commit trespass or otherwise surreptitiously invade the privacy of another, to spy or eavesdrop upon another.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 97 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Ohio courts have applied R.C. 2907.08 to conduct concealed from the victim. State v. Sipple (2021) held the state need not prove an image was actually captured to sustain an attempted-voyeurism conviction. State v. Goldblum (2014) held that acts committed while the victims slept satisfied the surreptitious-invasion element.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Sipple (Ohio Court of Appeals 2021, 170 N.E.3d 1273)✓Sipple put his phone under a woman's dress at an event without her knowledge. The court affirmed his attempted voyeurism conviction under R.C. 2907.08(D), holding the state need not prove a photo was taken and that stealth without her authority was surreptitious.
- State v. Goldblum (Ohio Court of Appeals 2014, 2014 Ohio 5068)✓Goldblum lifted the covers and clothing off girls sleeping at his home and stared at their genitals. Affirming convictions under R.C. 2907.08(C), the court held acts done while the victims slept surreptitiously invaded their privacy and that sexual purpose could be inferred.
- State v. Huffman (Ohio Court of Appeals 2006, 165 Ohio App. 3d 518)✓Huffman hid wireless cameras in his tanning salon rooms and recorded patrons, including a minor. Affirming convictions under R.C. 2907.08(B) and (C), the court held digital video is a series of photographs, so recording video counted as photographing under the statute.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Ohio Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Privacy, Cameras, and Rights, Ohio Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Privacy
§ 2933.52Interception of wire, oral or electronic communicationsIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(A) No person purposely shall do any of the following: (1) Intercept, attempt to intercept, or procure another person to intercept or attempt to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) Use, attempt to use, or procure another person to use or attempt to use an interception device to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 64 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Bidinost (1994) held R.C. 2933.52(A)'s ban on purposeful interception applies to cordless telephone conversations intercepted and recorded on a baby monitor, requiring suppression. State v. Childs (2000) held the party seeking to suppress bears the burden of proving a 2933.52(A)(1) violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Robb (Ohio Supreme Court 2000, 88 Ohio St. 3d 59)✓During a prison siege, FBI agents used tunnel microphones to record rioting inmates' conversations without a warrant; the court held those interceptions were exempt under former Section 2933.52(B)(1), Ohio's exception for interceptions made under federal wiretap law.
- State v. Childs (Ohio Supreme Court 2000, 88 Ohio St. 3d 558)✓A defendant sought to suppress tapes of her own conversations as intercepted in violation of Section 2933.52(A)(1), but no one proved whether the other party consented; the court held the party seeking suppression carries the burden of proof, so the motion failed.
- State v. Bidinost (Ohio Supreme Court 1994, 71 Ohio St. 3d 449)✓A neighbor's baby monitor began picking up the defendant's cordless phone calls, and at police direction she recorded them; the court held that was a purposeful interception barred by Section 2933.52(A) and that the recordings had to be suppressed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Audio Recording Laws: Consent, Devices, and Penalties, Ohio Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent, Ohio Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Privacy, and Penalties
§ 2933.65Civil and criminal actions for wiretapping and electronic surveillance violationsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(A) A person whose wire, oral, or electronic communications are intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of sections 2933.51 to 2933.66 of the Revised Code may bring a civil action to recover from the person or entity that engaged in the violation any relief that may be…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bidinost (Ohio Supreme Court 1994, 71 Ohio St. 3d 449)“…se of an interception warrant. See R.C. 2933.52(B)(1). 8 R.C. 2933.65 provides, in part: "(A) Any person…”
- Choby v. Aylsworth, 2006-L-144 (6-29-2007) (Ohio Court of Appeals 2007, 2007 Ohio 3375)“…ity), R.C. 2307.60 (civil recovery for criminal act), and R.C. 2933.65 (civil remedy for interception of wire…”
- John H. Nix v. Patrick J. O'Malley Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 160 F.3d 343)“…parties to the intercepted communications. See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2933.65 (Banks-Baldwin 1998) (reprinting the pr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules, Penalties, and Compliance, Ohio Security Camera Laws: Residential, Commercial, and Privacy Rules, Ohio Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights
§ 2903.211Menacing by stalkingIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(A)(1) No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause another person to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or a family or household member of the other person or cause mental distress to the other person or a family or household member of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 666 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Fry (Ohio Supreme Court 2010, 125 Ohio St. 3d 163)“…nderlying felony enhancements to the charge. {¶ 126} R.C. 2903.211 defines menacing by stalking:…”
- State v. Tichon (Ohio Court of Appeals 1995, 102 Ohio App. 3d 758)“…ally require psychiatric treatment.” *763 R.C. 2903.211(A) states that “[n]o person by engaging…”
- State v. Spaulding (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2016, 2016 Ohio 8126)“…e that he would cause her physical harm or mental distress. R.C. 2903.211(A)(1). Accordingly, as explained below…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections, Ohio GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
§ 2929.14Definite prison termsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(A) Except as provided in division (B)(1), (B)(2), (B)(3), (B)(4), (B)(5), (B)(6), (B)(7), (B)(8), (B)(9), (B)(10), (B)(11), (E), (G), (H), (J), or (K) of this section or in division (D)(6) of section 2919.25 of the Revised Code and except in relation to an offense for which a sentence of death or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 10,995 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Foster (Ohio Supreme Court 2006, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1)“…ts reasons for imposing the maximum sentence as required by R.C. 2929.14(C) and 2929.19(B)(2)(d), Quinones’s sen…”
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2016, 146 Ohio St. 3d 516)“…n-year prison term. The maximum possible term was 11 years. R.C. 2929.14(A)(1). {¶ 5} Marcum appealed her…”
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2014, 140 Ohio St. 3d 209)“…use the trial court failed to make the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). 2012-0hio-5150, ¶ 5. The appella…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Ohio Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Ohio Revised Code § 5312.01 (Definitions)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2933.52: Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2907.08: Voyeurism(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2933.65: Civil and Criminal Actions for Wiretapping Violations(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2903.211: Menacing by Stalking(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2929.14: Definite Prison Terms(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5312: Planned Community Law(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901-3-02: Public Hearings Recording(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Revised Code Section 2929.18: Financial Sanctions (felony fine amounts)(codes.ohio.gov)