Vermont
Vermont Public Records Act: How to Request Records (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

The Vermont Public Records Act, 1 V.S.A. §§ 315-320, gives any person the right to inspect or copy records held by a Vermont public agency. Custodians generally have three business days to respond, and the agency carries the burden of justifying any withholding.
This page covers Vermont state law only. Requests to a federal agency run under the federal Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and follow different deadlines and fee rules. For the federal process, see our guide to filing a FOIA request, and for every other state see the public records laws by state hub.
What the Vermont Public Records Act Covers
Vermont opens with a statement of purpose rather than a list of exceptions. 1 V.S.A. § 315(a) declares that officers of government are trustees and servants of the people, that it is in the public interest to enable any person to review and criticize their decisions even where that causes inconvenience or embarrassment, and that the subchapter shall be liberally construed to implement that policy. The operative burden rule that decides contested cases sits in the enforcement section: under § 319(a), in a court challenge the burden of proof shall be on the public agency to sustain its action. That framing matters in practice, because when a Vermont custodian argues an exemption applies, it is the agency that has to carry the point.
A "public record" reaches written or recorded information produced or acquired in the course of agency business, regardless of physical form. Email, spreadsheets, contracts, inspection reports, meeting materials, and databases are all in scope. The exemptions live in 1 V.S.A. § 317, which runs to a long list of specific categories including records dealing with the detection and investigation of crime (exempt only to the extent that release would cause one of six specific harms, discussed below), personnel files, and records made confidential by another statute.
Who Can File a Vermont Public Records Request
1 V.S.A. § 316(a) provides that any person may inspect or copy any public record of a public agency. Nothing in §§ 315 through 319 conditions access on Vermont residency, citizenship, or membership in the press.
That puts Vermont with the majority of states. A minority restrict their records acts to their own residents, and Virginia is the clearest example: Virginia FOIA opens records to "citizens of the Commonwealth," a limit the Supreme Court upheld in McBurney v. Young, 569 U.S. 221 (2013). Vermont has no equivalent clause, so an out-of-state researcher, journalist, or business may file directly.
You also do not have to explain why you want the record. The Act conditions access on the record being public, not on the requester having a good reason.
The Three Business Day Deadline
1 V.S.A. § 318 requires the custodian to act promptly, and it defines promptly for you: immediately, with little or no delay, and not more than three business days from receipt of the request. Within that window the custodian must produce the record for inspection, provide a copy, or certify a denial in writing.
The extension is narrow. Under unusual circumstances the custodian may give written notice setting a later date, but the statute caps that date so it cannot result in an extension of more than ten business days from receipt of the request. There is no open-ended "we are still processing" option in the text.
The enforcement mechanism is the useful part. Section 318 states that a custodian or head of agency who fails to comply with the applicable time limit is deemed to have denied the request or the appeal when the time limit expires. Silence converts into an appealable denial on its own, so a Vermont requester never has to wait indefinitely for a written answer before moving to the next step.
What a Vermont Records Request Costs
As of August 2026, 1 V.S.A. § 316 allows an agency to charge the actual cost of providing a copy, plus the cost of mailing the record or transmitting it by fax or other electronic means. Section 316(d) defines actual cost narrowly: the paper or electronic media, a prorated amount for maintenance and replacement of the copying equipment, and utility charges directly associated with copying.
Staff time is a separate and limited charge. An agency may bill for the cost of staff time only when the time directly involved in complying with the request exceeds 30 minutes, when the agency agrees to create a public record, or when the agency agrees to provide a record in a nonstandard format and that work exceeds 30 minutes. The Secretary of State sets uniform cost schedules that state agencies use to calculate these charges.
Watch out: Vermont has no general fee waiver. Sections 315 through 319 contain no public-interest waiver and no indigency waiver of the kind federal FOIA provides at 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). If cost is a concern, the practical tools are narrowing the request, asking for electronic delivery instead of paper, and asking to inspect the records in person rather than buying copies.
How to File a Vermont Public Records Request
Vermont has no central records portal. Requests go directly to the agency, town, school district, or department that holds the record, which means identifying the right custodian is the first real step.
- Find the custodian. State agencies list a public records officer on their websites. For municipal records, the town clerk is usually the correct starting point.
- Put the request in writing. A written request creates a dated record that starts the three business day clock and preserves your appeal timeline.
- Describe the records, not the subject. "All emails between the Town Manager and Acme Paving LLC from January 1 to June 30, 2026" is far more likely to be filled than "everything about the paving contract."
- Say how you want to receive them. Ask for electronic copies where possible, since that avoids per-page copying cost entirely.
- Set a cost ceiling. Ask the custodian to contact you before incurring charges above an amount you name.
Our free FOIA request generator builds a Vermont-formatted request letter with the correct statutory citation in your browser. Nothing you enter is saved or transmitted.
If Vermont Denies Your Request
A denial under 1 V.S.A. § 318 must be certified in writing. The certification has to identify the records withheld, state the asserted statutory basis for the denial with a brief statement of the reasons and supporting facts, name the persons responsible for the denial, and tell you that you may appeal to the head of the agency.
The administrative appeal goes to the head of the agency, who must issue a written determination within five business days of receiving the appeal. If that deadline passes without a decision, the deemed-denial rule applies to the appeal as well.
After the administrative appeal, 1 V.S.A. § 319(a) allows any person aggrieved by the denial of a request to apply to the Civil Division of the Superior Court, in the county where the complainant lives or has a place of business, where the records are situated, or in Washington County, to enjoin the agency from withholding and to order production of records improperly withheld.
Section 319 is more requester-friendly than most state enforcement provisions, and the three features below are the reason a Vermont records case is worth taking seriously rather than writing off as too expensive.
Attorney's fees are the default, not a long shot. Section 319(d)(1) provides that, except as stated in subdivision (2), the court shall assess against the public agency reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in any case under the section in which the complainant has substantially prevailed. Note the trigger: substantially prevailed, not total victory, and the word is shall. The one carve-out in subdivision (2) makes the award discretionary rather than mandatory where the agency, within the time allowed for service of an answer under V.R.C.P. 12(a)(1), concedes that the contested records are public and provides them to the complainant. In other words, an agency that folds immediately can avoid a mandatory fee award; an agency that litigates and loses generally cannot. Subdivision (3) runs the other way and lets a court assess fees against a complainant who has violated V.R.C.P. 11, so the provision is not a free option to file anything.
Review is de novo and the burden sits with the agency. Under § 319(a) the court shall determine the matter de novo and may examine the records in camera to decide whether they or any part of them may be withheld under a § 317 exemption, and the burden of proof shall be on the public agency to sustain its action. The court looks at the records itself rather than accepting the agency's characterization of them.
The case gets to the front of the line. Section 319(b) provides that, except as to cases the court considers of greater importance, these proceedings and appeals from them take precedence on the docket over all cases and shall be assigned for hearing and trial or for argument at the earliest practicable date and expedited in every way. That is the answer to an agency strategy of running out the clock on a time-sensitive record. Section 319(c) is the counterweight: where the agency shows exceptional circumstances and due diligence in responding, the court may retain jurisdiction and allow it more time to finish its review.
Police Reports and Body Camera Footage in Vermont
Vermont handles law enforcement records through the general exemption structure rather than a dedicated statute. The provision agencies most often cite when withholding an open case file is 1 V.S.A. § 317(c)(5)(A), and it is narrower than the shorthand suggests. It covers records dealing with the detection and investigation of crime but only to the extent that producing them would do one of six specific things: interfere with enforcement proceedings, deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, disclose the identity of a confidential source, disclose law enforcement techniques and procedures or investigative guidelines where that could risk circumvention of the law, or endanger the life or physical safety of any individual. Subdivision (c)(5)(C) reinforces the design by directing Vermont courts to follow federal construction of the parallel FOIA exemption at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7). So a bare assertion that a case is open does not end the analysis. The agency has to tie the specific records to one of those six harms, and under § 319(a) it is the agency that carries the burden of proof if you litigate.
Section 317(c)(5)(B) then carves several things back out. Notwithstanding that exemption, records relating to management and direction of a law enforcement agency, records reflecting a person's initial arrest, including any ticket, citation, or complaint issued for a traffic violation, and records reflecting the charge against a person shall be public.
The Public Records Act sections reviewed here contain no body-worn camera provision. That is a genuine gap rather than a rule in your favor or against it: Vermont has not built the kind of detailed camera-footage track that Washington codified at RCW 42.56.240(14) or that Wyoming created at Wyo. Stat. § 16-4-203(d)(xviii). In Vermont, a footage request is analyzed as an ordinary records request against the § 317 exemptions, and individual departments may also have their own release policies. Ask the department in writing what policy it applies, and ask it to cite the exemption if it refuses. Asking for the policy is not asking for a favor: a department's release policy is a record relating to the management and direction of a law enforcement agency, which § 317(c)(5)(B) makes public notwithstanding the crime-investigation exemption.
If you are trying to find out whether charges were filed rather than to obtain the file itself, court records are often the faster path. See our guide to Vermont warrant searches.
Records the Public Records Act Does Not Reach
Two categories trip up Vermont requesters regularly.
Vital records. Birth, death, and marriage certificates are not obtained through a Public Records Act request. They run through the Vermont Department of Health and town clerks under their own eligibility and fee rules. See Vermont death records for that process.
Land records. Deeds, mortgages, and liens are recorded and searched at the town clerk level, not requested under §§ 315-320. See Vermont property records.
Emergency call audio sits between the two. Whether a 911 recording is releasable depends on the state and on whether an investigation is open, and we cover the general framework in are 911 calls public records.
This article is general legal information about Vermont public records law as of August 2026. It is not legal advice, and RecordingLaw.com is not a law firm. Statutes and agency fee schedules change. Consult an attorney licensed in Vermont about a specific records dispute.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to be a Vermont resident to file a public records request?
No. 1 V.S.A. § 316(a) gives any person the right to inspect or copy a public record, and no residency limitation appears in the Act. This distinguishes Vermont from states such as Virginia, whose FOIA opens records to citizens of the Commonwealth.
How long does a Vermont agency have to respond?
Three business days from receipt of the request. Under unusual circumstances the custodian may extend by written notice, but the extension cannot push the response beyond ten business days from receipt (1 V.S.A. § 318).
What happens if the agency simply never answers?
Section 318 provides that a custodian or head of agency who fails to comply with the applicable time limit is deemed to have denied the request when the limit expires. You do not need a written denial to appeal, though it is worth sending a short follow-up noting the deemed denial before you escalate.
Can a Vermont agency charge me for staff time?
Only in the situations listed in 1 V.S.A. § 316: when the time directly involved in complying with the request exceeds 30 minutes, when the agency agrees to create a record, or when the agency agrees to supply a nonstandard format and that work exceeds 30 minutes. Otherwise the charge is limited to the actual cost of the copy plus mailing or transmission.
Is there a fee waiver for journalists or nonprofits in Vermont?
The Public Records Act sections reviewed here contain no public-interest or hardship fee waiver, unlike federal FOIA. As of August 2026 the practical alternatives are narrowing the request, inspecting records in person rather than buying copies, and asking for electronic delivery.
How do I appeal a Vermont denial?
File a written appeal with the head of the agency, who must decide within five business days (1 V.S.A. § 318). If that fails, 1 V.S.A. § 319(a) lets any person aggrieved by the denial apply to the Civil Division of the Superior Court, which determines the matter de novo, may inspect the records in camera, and puts the burden of proof on the public agency to sustain its action.
Will Vermont pay my attorney's fees if I win?
Usually, yes. 1 V.S.A. § 319(d)(1) provides that the court shall assess against the public agency reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in any case under that section in which the complainant has substantially prevailed. You do not have to win everything, only substantially prevail. The exception in § 319(d)(2) makes the award discretionary instead of mandatory where the agency, within the time allowed to serve an answer under V.R.C.P. 12(a)(1), concedes the contested records are public and provides them. A court may also assess fees against a complainant who violated V.R.C.P. 11.
How fast does a Vermont public records case get heard?
Faster than an ordinary civil case. Under 1 V.S.A. § 319(b), except as to cases the court considers of greater importance, these proceedings and any appeals take precedence on the docket over all cases and shall be assigned for hearing and trial or argument at the earliest practicable date and expedited in every way. Section 319(c) lets the court allow an agency additional time where it shows exceptional circumstances and due diligence.
Does Vermont law give the public a right to body camera footage?
The Public Records Act does not contain a body-worn camera provision. Footage requests are analyzed as ordinary records requests against the exemptions in 1 V.S.A. § 317. The investigation exemption is not categorical: § 317(c)(5)(A) reaches records dealing with the detection and investigation of crime only to the extent that release would interfere with enforcement proceedings, deprive a person of a fair trial or impartial adjudication, constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, disclose a confidential source, disclose techniques or guidelines in a way that risks circumvention of the law, or endanger the life or physical safety of any individual. Individual departments may also apply their own release policies, and § 317(c)(5)(B) makes records relating to the management and direction of a law enforcement agency public notwithstanding that exemption.
Updates
Corrected the description of the law enforcement exemption in 1 V.S.A. 317(c)(5): it applies only to the extent release would cause one of six specific harms, and records relating to the management and direction of a law enforcement agency are public notwithstanding it.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added 1 V.S.A. Sec. 317(c)(5)(B)'s carve-out to the police-records section: arrest and charge records stay public in Vermont notwithstanding the crime-investigation exemption in Sec. 317(c)(5)(A).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 1: General Provisions, Chapter 5: Common Law; General Rights, Subchapter: ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS
§ 316Access to public records and documentsIn force
(a) Any person may inspect or copy any public record of a public agency, as follows: (1) For any agency, board, department, commission, committee, branch, instrumentality, or authority of the State, a person may inspect a public record on any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, between the hours of nine o’clock and 12 o’clock in the forenoon and between one o’clock and four o’clock in the afternoon. (2) For any agency, board, committee, department, instrumentality, commission, or authority of a political subdivision of the State, a person may inspect a public record during customary business hours. (b) If copying equipment maintained for use by a public agency is used by the agency to copy the public record or document requested, the agency may charge and collect from the person requesting the copy the actual cost of providing the copy. The agency may also charge and collect from the person making the request, the costs associated with mailing or transmitting the record by facsimile or other electronic means.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 28 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Reed Doyle v. City of Burlington Police Department (2019) held 1 V.S.A. section 316(c) authorizes staff time charges only for copy requests, so agencies may not charge staff time to inspect. Riffon v. Conway (1980) held specific DMV certified copy fee statutes controlled over general section 316.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Reed Doyle v. City of Burlington Police Department (Supreme Court of Vermont 2019, 2019 VT 66)✓A man who reported officer misconduct asked to inspect body camera footage and was told redaction staff time would cost him hundreds of dollars. The court held section 316(c) authorizes staff time charges only for requests for copies, not requests to inspect, and reversed.
- Aclu v. Essex Sheriff (Vermont Superior Court 2025)✓A sheriff's department copied the requested records but insisted the requester collect them in person at its office. The court declined to read section 316 as limiting requesters to onsite inspection or copying as a matter of law, and let the challenge survive dismissal.
- Doyle v. City of Burlington Police Department (Vermont Superior Court 2018)✓A man asking to inspect police body camera footage was billed for redaction staff time. The trial court read section 316(c) to permit staff time charges whether the request is to inspect or to copy, and denied his motion; the Vermont Supreme Court reversed that reading in 2019.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 318ProcedureIn force
(a)(1) As used in this section, “promptly” means immediately, with little or no delay, and, unless otherwise provided in this section, not more than three business days: (A) from receipt of a request under this subchapter; or (B) in the case of a reversal on appeal by a head of the agency pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, from the date of the determination on appeal. (2) A custodian or head of the agency who fails to comply with the applicable time limit provisions of this section shall be deemed to have denied the request or the appeal upon the expiration of the time limit. (b) Upon request, the custodian of a public record shall promptly produce the record for inspection or a copy of the record, except that: (1) If the record is in active use or in storage and therefore not available for use at the time the person asks to examine it, the custodian shall promptly certify this fact in writing to the applicant and, in the certification, set a date and hour within one calendar week of the request when the record will be available.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Shlansky v. City of Burlington (Supreme Court of Vermont 2010, 188 Vt. 470)“…nket denial to the Chief of Police on October 13, 2008. See 1 V.S.A. § 318(c). Pursuant to the appeal, on October…”
- Price v. Town of Fairlee (Supreme Court of Vermont 2011, 190 Vt. 66)“…to the “head of the agency” from the adverse determination. 1 V.S.A. § 318(a)(2). If the denial is upheld, the age…”
- Reed Doyle v. City of Burlington Police Department (Supreme Court of Vermont 2019, 2019 VT 66)“…a second, redacted version of the requested material.2 See 1 V.S.A. § 318(e) (providing that agency must produce…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 319EnforcementIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Any person aggrieved by the denial of a request for public records under this subchapter may apply to the Civil Division of the Superior Court in the county in which the complainant resides, or has his or her personal place of business, or in which the public records are situated, or in the Civil Division of the Superior Court of Washington County, to enjoin the public agency from withholding agency records and to order the production of any agency records improperly withheld from the complainant. In such a case, the court shall determine the matter de novo, and may examine the contents of such agency records in camera to determine whether such records or any part thereof shall be withheld under any of the exemptions set forth in section 317 of this title, and the burden of proof shall be on the public agency to sustain its action. (b) Except as to cases the court considers of greater importance, proceedings before the Civil Division of the Superior Court, as authorized by this section, and appeals there from, take precedence on the docket over all cases and shall be assigned for hearing and trial or for argument at the earliest practicable date and expedited in every way.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27 (Supreme Court of Vermont 1993, 160 Vt. 101)“…l court, the burden is on the agency to sustain its action. 1 V.S.A. § 319(a). In relying on an exception to discl…”
- Rutland Herald v. City of Rutland and AFSCME Council 93, Local 1201 (Supreme Court of Vermont 2012, 191 Vt. 387)“…159 Vt. 431, 438 , 623 A.2d 979, 983 (1992); see also 1 V.S.A. § 319(a) (agency bears burden of justifying i…”
- Energy Policy Advocates v. Attorney General's Office (Supreme Court of Vermont 2023, 2023 VT 43)“…arguing that it had substantially prevailed under the PRA, 1 V.S.A. § 319(d)(1). The trial court partially grante…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Public Records Laws by State: FOIA Guide for All 50 States (2026)
§ 317Definitions; public agency; public records and documents; exemptionsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) As used in this subchapter: (1) “Business day” means a day that a public agency is open to provide services. (2) “Public agency” or “agency” means any agency, board, department, commission, committee, branch, instrumentality, or authority of the State or any agency, board, committee, department, branch, instrumentality, commission, or authority of any political subdivision of the State. (b) As used in this subchapter, “public record” or “public document” means any written or recorded information, regardless of physical form or characteristics, which is produced or acquired in the course of public agency business. Individual salaries and benefits of and salary schedules relating to elected or appointed officials and employees of public agencies shall not be exempt from public inspection and copying. (c) The following public records are exempt from public inspection and copying: (1) Records that by law are designated confidential or by a similar term. (2) Records that by law may only be disclosed to specifically designated persons.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 113 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27 (1993) limited 1 V.S.A. 317's personal-documents exemption to records revealing intimate details, wherever filed; Wesco, Inc. v. Sorrell (2004) read the litigation exemption to reach records relevant, not just discoverable, in pending litigation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wesco, Inc. v. Sorrell (Supreme Court of Vermont 2004, 177 Vt. 287)✓Gas station operators facing state criminal and environmental cases filed records requests for documents denied them in discovery; the court held section 317(c)(14) exempts records relevant to pending litigation, a wider class than discoverable ones, until that litigation ends.
- Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27 (Supreme Court of Vermont 1993, 160 Vt. 101)✓Town residents sought a teachers' grievance and the school board's decision on it; the court read section 317(b)(7) to shield only genuinely personal documents wherever filed, found the board had not met its burden, and remanded for in camera review.
- Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of Transportation (Supreme Court of Vermont 2002, 174 Vt. 341)✓A losing bidder for state rail freight service sought competitors' financial data submitted with their proposals; the court held section 317(c)(9) can exempt internal corporate financial information as a compilation of information, and voluntary submission waives no protection.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Are 911 Calls Public Records? State Access Guide (2026), Vermont Police Body Camera Laws: Mandate & Access, Vermont Police Report: How to Get a Crash Report, Incident Report, or Body Camera Video
§ 315Statement of policy; short titleIn force
(a) It is the policy of this subchapter to provide for free and open examination of records consistent with Chapter I, Article 6 of the Vermont Constitution. Officers of government are trustees and servants of the people and it is in the public interest to enable any person to review and criticize their decisions even though such examination may cause inconvenience or embarrassment. All people, however, have a right to privacy in their personal and economic pursuits, which ought to be protected unless specific information is needed to review the action of a governmental officer. Consistent with these principles, the General Assembly hereby declares that certain public records shall be made available to any person as hereinafter provided. To that end, the provisions of this subchapter shall be liberally construed to implement this policy, and the burden of proof shall be on the public agency to sustain its action. (b) The General Assembly finds that public records are essential to the administration of State and local government.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 98 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wesco, Inc. v. Sorrell (Supreme Court of Vermont 2004, 177 Vt. 287)“…ANR pursuant to Vermont’s Access to Public Records Act. See 1 V.S.A. § 315. In the requests, appellants sought man…”
- Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of Transportation (Supreme Court of Vermont 2002, 174 Vt. 341)“…uiring VTrans to produce the withheld documents pursuant to 1 V.S.A §§ 315-320, Vermont’s Access to Public Records…”
- Caledonian-Record Publishing Co. v. Walton (Supreme Court of Vermont 1990, 154 Vt. 15)“…nd that pursuant to Vermont’s Access to Public Records Act, 1 V.S.A. §§ 315-320 (Act), citation records are public…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 5
§ 552Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedingsIn forcecited in 38 of our articles
Each agency shall make available to the public information as follows: Each agency shall separately state and currently publish in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public— descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees (and in the case of a uniformed service, the members) from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions; statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 11,434 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (1989) held categorically that releasing a private citizen's FBI rap sheet to a third party is an unwarranted privacy invasion under Exemption 7(C). Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (1980) applied Exemption 3, 552(b)(3).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…Pub. L. 93-502, § 1 (b) (2), 88 Stat. 1561 (amending 5 U. S. C. § 552 (a)); Packers and Stockyards Act, 42…”
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 102)✓Consumer groups filed FOIA requests for accident reports manufacturers had given the CPSC as confidential; the Court held that the Consumer Product Safety Act's section 6(b)(1) applies to FOIA requests and that its standards fall within Exemption 3, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3).
- Taylor v. Sturgell (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 880)✓An aircraft enthusiast made a FOIA request for FAA records after a friend's identical suit failed; the Court disapproved preclusion by 'virtual representation' and read § 552(a)(3)(A) as directing agencies to release records to the requesting person, not the public at large.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a FOIA Request (Step by Step, 2026), Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Who Can Request and How (2026), West Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Requests and Fees (2026)
Revised Code of Washington
§ 42.56.240Investigative, law enforcement, and crime victims.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
The following investigative, law enforcement, and crime victim information is exempt from public inspection and copying under this chapter: (1) Specific intelligence information and specific investigative records compiled by investigative, law enforcement, and penology agencies, and state agencies vested with the responsibility to discipline members of any profession, the nondisclosure of which is essential to effective law enforcement or for the protection of any person's right to privacy; (2) Information revealing the identity of persons who are witnesses to or victims of crime or who file complaints with investigative, law enforcement, or penology agencies, other than the commission, if disclosure would endanger any person's life, physical safety, or property. If at the time a complaint is filed the complainant, victim, or witness indicates a desire for disclosure or nondisclosure, such desire shall govern.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 81 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept. (2013) held the effective law enforcement exemption in RCW 42.56.240(1) is not categorical once a case goes to a prosecutor, nor for internal investigation files; the agency must justify each withheld record. Bainbridge Island Police Guild v. City of Puyallup (2011) exempted only an officer's identity.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bainbridge Island Police Guild v. City of Puyallup (Washington Supreme Court 2011, 172 Wash. 2d 398)✓Police reports on an unsubstantiated sexual misconduct claim against an officer were withheld in full; the court held Section 42.56.240(1) exempts only the officer's identity, since its privacy analysis is the same, and ordered the rest produced with his name redacted.
- BAINBRIDGE POLICE GUILD v. City of Puyallup (Washington Supreme Court 2011, 259 P.3d 190)✓Police reports on an unsubstantiated sexual misconduct claim against an officer were withheld in full; the court held Section 42.56.240(1) exempts only the officer's identity, since its privacy analysis is the same, and ordered the rest produced with his name redacted.
- Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept. (Washington Supreme Court 2013, 179 Wash. 2d 376)✓Seattle police withheld criminal and internal affairs files from a man arrested after a scuffle with an off-duty officer; the court held Section 42.56.240(1) stops applying categorically once a case reaches a prosecutor and never applies categorically to internal investigations.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits (2026), Washington Police Body Camera Laws: Mandate & Access, Washington Public Records Act: Requests, Fees, and Body Camera Video (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Vermont Public Records Act, statement of policy and burden of proof, 1 V.S.A. § 315(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- Right to inspect or copy and fees for copies, 1 V.S.A. § 316(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- Exemptions from public inspection and copying, 1 V.S.A. § 317(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- Procedure, time limits, deemed denial, and administrative appeal, 1 V.S.A. § 318(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- Enforcement in the Civil Division of the Superior Court: de novo review, in camera inspection, and the burden of proof on the public agency (§ 319(a)); docket precedence and expedited hearing (§ 319(b)); additional time on exceptional circumstances (§ 319(c)); and mandatory assessment of reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs where the complainant substantially prevails, with the concede-and-produce exception (§ 319(d)), 1 V.S.A. § 319(legislature.vermont.gov).gov