Hawaii
Hawaii Pornography Laws (2026): No Age-Verification Law, Yet
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Adults may lawfully possess pornography privately in Hawaii, since the state's obscenity law reaches only commercial dissemination and production, not private viewing. Hawaii has no age-verification law for adult websites as of this writing, but it does have something few other states have: its own state-level recordkeeping law for performers in commercially produced sexual content.
Is Pornography Legal in Hawaii?
Adults may lawfully possess and privately view pornography in Hawaii. Hawaii's obscenity provisions, codified in Chapter 712 as "pornography" rather than "obscenity," apply the same three-part Miller test used nationally: whether the average person, applying community standards, would find the material appeals to prurient interest, whether it depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and whether it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value taken as a whole.
Under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1214 (Promoting Pornography), liability is limited to commercial conduct: disseminating pornographic material for monetary consideration, or producing, presenting, or directing a pornographic performance for monetary consideration, or participating for pay in the pornographic portion of a performance. The official commentary to the Hawaii Penal Code notes this penalty is limited to commercial exploitation. A conviction is a misdemeanor. No private-possession offense for adult pornography was found in this chapter, so simply owning lawful adult material for personal use is not a crime under Hawaii's obscenity law.
Distribution and Harmful-to-Minors Rules
Disseminating pornographic material to a minor while knowing its character or content, or exhibiting or selling admission to (or admitting a minor to) premises showing pornographic films or performances, is prohibited under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1215 (Promoting Pornography for Minors), a class C felony. Hawaii's own legislative history shows this offense was elevated from a misdemeanor to a felony by a 1988 act specifically to strengthen deterrence and give merchants a stronger incentive to verify a customer's age before selling.
Federal law, 18 U.S.C. section 2257, separately requires producers of sexually explicit content nationwide to maintain age and identity records for performers. Hawaii is unusual in that it layers its own, independent state-law recordkeeping duty on top of that federal one, discussed next.
Hawaii's Own Performer Recordkeeping Law
Since a 2002 act, Hawaii has required producers and distributors of sexually explicit material to create and maintain their own age-verification records for each performer, distinct from and in addition to the federal 18 U.S.C. 2257 regime. Under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1218 (Failure to Maintain Age Verification Records of Sexual Performers), records must be kept for each performer appearing in material produced after June 30, 2002, must remain accurate, and must be produced to law enforcement on request. Failing to comply is a class C felony. Related sections cover failing to maintain records of sexually exploited individuals (section 712-1218.5) and failing to affix, or disseminating without, required location-of-records information (sections 712-1219 and 712-1219.5). This makes Hawaii one of the few states in the country with a genuine state-law analog to the federal producer recordkeeping duty, rather than relying on federal law alone.

Hawaii Has No Age-Verification Law for Adult Websites
Unlike a growing number of states, Hawaii has not enacted a law requiring commercial adult websites to verify a visitor's age. Companion bills HB 1212 (the verification requirement) and HB 1198 (the penalty provisions) were introduced in the 2025-2026 legislative session on January 23, 2025, and carried over into the 2026 session on December 8, 2025. Neither bill received a floor vote in either chamber, and both died when the 33rd Legislature adjourned on May 8, 2026. Had they passed, the bills would have required commercial entities knowingly publishing pornographic material accessible in Hawaii to use reasonable age verification, barred retaining identifying information collected for that purpose, and set penalties up to $10,000 per day, $10,000 per retention violation, and up to $250,000 if a minor accessed content because of inadequate verification.
This is a documented negative, not a gap in research: no Hawaii age-verification trigger currently exists for adult sites, and mainstream adult sites do not geo-block Hawaii the way they block states with an enacted law. Whether a successor bill will be introduced when the next Legislature convenes in January 2027 is outside the scope of this article's research.
Minors: Child Sexual Abuse Material and Sexting
Hawaii tiers its child sexual abuse material offenses by conduct rather than a single undifferentiated statute. Promoting child abuse in the first degree, meaning production, is a class A felony under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 707-750. Promoting child abuse in the second degree, covering distribution, creating material with intent to distribute, or possessing 30 or more images where at least one depicts a minor under 12, sadomasochistic abuse of a minor, or bestiality involving a minor, is a class B felony under section 707-751. Promoting child abuse in the third degree, meaning possession of child sexual abuse material in any format, is a class C felony under section 707-752.
Minors who exchange sexual images of themselves or each other, without adult involvement, are handled under Hawaii's separate sexting framework rather than these production and distribution statutes. See Hawaii Sexting Laws for the rules that specifically apply to minors.
Non-Consensual Intimate Images (NCII)
Hawaii's violation of privacy statute, Haw. Rev. Stat. section 711-1110.9 (Violation of Privacy in the First Degree), makes it a class C felony to knowingly disclose, or threaten to disclose, an image or video of an identifiable person nude or engaged in sexual conduct, without consent, with intent to substantially harm the depicted person; the statute explicitly covers acts of revenge or retribution. A separate provision, subsection (1)(c), added by Act 59 (2021) specifically to address deepfake technology, extends the same felony to creating or disclosing a fabricated "composite fictitious person" image, built from a real person's recognizable features, made to appear as though that real person is nude or engaged in sexual conduct. A convicted defendant faces up to 5 years, and a court may order the offending recording destroyed. The statute exempts images voluntarily made while a person was nude or engaged in sexual conduct in public, or made pursuant to a voluntary commercial transaction, and it does not impose liability on internet service providers or platforms for a third party's disclosure. For a broader look at how these laws work across states, see Revenge Porn Laws by State.
Public Display
Hawaii separately addresses indecent exposure and indecent display of material. Intentionally exposing one's genitals to a person one is not married to, under circumstances likely to cause affront, is a petty misdemeanor under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 707-734; this offense was renamed from "sexual assault in the fifth degree" in 1991 and is meant for conduct like nude sunbathing or streaking rather than violent acts. Publicly displaying material offensive to a substantial segment of the public, meaning a less-than-fully-opaque covering over genitals or buttocks, or depictions of sexual excitement or conduct lacking serious merit, is a petty misdemeanor under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1211.
Adult Business Licensing
Hawaii has no dedicated statewide sexually-oriented-business zoning or licensing statute comparable to what some other states maintain. Live adult entertainment is instead regulated primarily through county liquor licensing, with each county's Liquor Commission setting its own license class and category rules for establishments that offer it. Readers should not assume Hawaii has a comprehensive statewide licensing scheme for adult businesses; the regulation that exists is narrower and handled at the county level.

Penalties at a Glance
| Offense | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Promoting pornography (adult, commercial) | Haw. Rev. Stat. 712-1214 | Misdemeanor |
| Promoting pornography for minors | Haw. Rev. Stat. 712-1215 | Class C felony |
| Failure to maintain performer age-verification records | Haw. Rev. Stat. 712-1218 | Class C felony |
| Promoting child abuse, 1st degree (production) | Haw. Rev. Stat. 707-750 | Class A felony |
| Promoting child abuse, 2nd degree (distribution) | Haw. Rev. Stat. 707-751 | Class B felony |
| Promoting child abuse, 3rd degree (possession) | Haw. Rev. Stat. 707-752 | Class C felony |
| Violation of privacy, 1st degree (NCII) | Haw. Rev. Stat. 711-1110.9 | Class C felony, up to 5 years |
| Indecent exposure | Haw. Rev. Stat. 707-734 | Petty misdemeanor |
| Display of indecent material | Haw. Rev. Stat. 712-1211 | Petty misdemeanor |
Practical Risk Caveats
Federal law applies in Hawaii regardless of state statutes: 18 U.S.C. section 2257 recordkeeping, separate from Hawaii's own section 712-1218 duty, along with the PROTECT Act and federal child sexual abuse material statutes, all operate independently of Hawaii's own framework.
Because Hawaii has no site-level age-verification law, a Hawaii resident will not encounter the identity-check walls that residents of states with enacted laws increasingly do. That absence is a fact about state law, not a guarantee about federal enforcement or a particular site's own policies.
Workplace and device policies can restrict access to lawful adult content independent of any Hawaii statute. This article addresses obscenity and pornography law in clinical, legal terms and does not describe or link to sexual content of any kind.
Disclaimer
This article provides general information about Hawaii's pornography, obscenity, and related statutes. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Whether a Hawaii age-verification bill is reintroduced in a future legislative session could change the information above; consult a licensed Hawaii attorney or the cited primary sources for advice specific to a particular situation.

More Hawaii Laws
- Hawaii Sexting Laws
- Hawaii Data Privacy Laws
- Hawaii Deepfake Laws
- Hawaii Self-Defense Laws
- Hawaii Expungement Laws
Explore how these rules compare across the country in our Pornography Laws by State hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to view pornography in Hawaii?
Yes. Hawaii's pornography statute, Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1214, applies only to commercial dissemination or production for monetary consideration. No private-possession offense for adult pornography exists in this chapter of Hawaii law.
Does Hawaii require adult websites to verify a visitor's age?
No. Hawaii has no enacted age-verification law for adult websites as of this writing. Companion bills HB 1212 and HB 1198 died at the end of the 2026 legislative session without a floor vote.
Does Hawaii have any age-verification requirement related to adult content?
Yes, but a different kind than most states discuss. Hawaii requires producers and distributors of sexually explicit material to keep their own age-verification records for each performer, under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1218, separate from the federal recordkeeping law. This applies to producers, not to site visitors or users.
What is Hawaii's penalty for child sexual abuse material?
Hawaii tiers these offenses by conduct: production is a class A felony, distribution (or possessing 30 or more qualifying images) is a class B felony, and possession is a class C felony, under Haw. Rev. Stat. sections 707-750 through 707-752.
What can someone do about revenge porn in Hawaii?
Hawaii's violation of privacy statute, Haw. Rev. Stat. section 711-1110.9, makes non-consensual disclosure, or threatened disclosure, of an intimate image a class C felony punishable by up to 5 years. It also covers AI-generated deepfake images built from a real person's recognizable features, added by Act 59 (2021), and a court may order the recording destroyed.
Is showing pornography to a minor illegal in Hawaii?
Yes. Disseminating pornographic material to a minor, or admitting a minor to a place showing pornographic films or performances, is a class C felony under Haw. Rev. Stat. section 712-1215.
Does Hawaii regulate strip clubs or adult businesses statewide?
Not through a dedicated statewide zoning or licensing statute. Live adult entertainment in Hawaii is regulated primarily through each county's own liquor licensing rules rather than a single state law.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 712: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH AND MORALS
§ 712-1214Promoting pornographyIn force
(1) A person commits the offense of promoting pornography if, knowing its content and character, the person: (a) Disseminates for monetary consideration any pornographic material; (b) Produces, presents, or directs pornographic performances for monetary consideration; or (c) Participates for monetary consideration in that portion of a performance which makes it pornographic. (2) Promoting pornography is a misdemeanor. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; gen ch 1993]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2007
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kam (Hawaii Supreme Court 1988, 69 Haw. 483)“…sexual content was pornographic. Appellants contend that 1) HRS § 712-1214(l)(a) A) is unconstitutionally vague an…”
- State v. Mallan (Hawaii Supreme Court 1998, 86 Haw. 440)“…and were charged with promoting pornography in violation of HRS § 712-1214(l)(a) (1985), ie., with having dissem…”
- State v. Bumanglag (Hawaii Supreme Court 1981, 63 Haw. 596)“…ave been charged with promoting pornography in violation of HRS § 712-1214(1)(a). 1 The questions rai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 712-1215Promoting pornography for minorsIn force
(1) A person commits the offense of promoting pornography for minors if: (a) Knowing its character and content, the person disseminates to a minor material that is pornographic for minors; (b) Knowing its character and content, the person disseminates material that is pornographic for minors to a law enforcement officer who represents that officer's self as a minor; or (c) Knowing the character and content of a motion picture film or other performance that, in whole or in part, is pornographic for minors, the person: (i) Exhibits the motion picture film or other performance to a minor; (ii) Sells to a minor an admission ticket or pass to premises where there is exhibited or to be exhibited the motion picture film or other performance; or (iii) Admits a minor to premises where there is exhibited or to be exhibited the motion picture film or other performance. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a parent or legal guardian of the minor or to a sibling of the minor, or to a person who commits any act specified therein in the person's capacity and within the scope of the person's employment as a member of the staff of any public library.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Araki (Hawaii Supreme Court 1996, 82 Haw. 474)“…ffense of promoting pornography for minors, in violation of HRS § 712-1215(1)(a). On March 21, 1995, Araki filed…”
- Barnett v. State (Hawaii Supreme Court 1999, 91 Haw. 20)“…m. Three counts of Promoting Pornography for Minors, HRS § 712-1215(l)(a) (Supp. 1992), 7 agai…”
- State v. Alangcas. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2015, 134 Haw. 515)“…graphy for minors, in violation of HRS § 705-500(1)(a) and HRS § 712-1215(1)(b)(i).5 Alangcas filed two motions…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 712-1218Failure to maintain age verification records of sexual performersIn force
(1) A person commits the offense of failure to maintain age verification records of sexual performers if the person knowingly produces any pornographic performance, book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer image, or other matter that contains one or more pornographic visual depictions made after June 30, 2002, of sexual conduct and: (a) Knowingly fails to create and maintain age verification records for each sexual performer; (b) Knowingly makes or causes to be made any false entry into the age verification records of sexual performers required by this section; or (c) Knowingly fails to produce the age verification records of sexual performers required by this section, upon request by a law enforcement officer for the purpose of verifying the age of a sexual performer. (2) Failure to maintain age verification records of sexual performers is a class C felony. [L 2002, c 240, pt of §3]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
§ 712-1211Displaying indecent matterIn force
(1) A person commits the offense of displaying indecent matter if the person knowingly or recklessly displays on any sign, billboard, or other object visible from any street, highway, or public sidewalk, a photograph, drawing, sculpture, or similar visual representation of any person of the age of puberty or older: (a) Which reveals the person with less than a fully opaque covering over his or her genitals, pubic area, or buttocks, or depicting the person in a state of sexual excitement or engaged in an act of sexual conduct or sadomasochistic abuse; (b) Which is presented in such a manner as to exploit lust; and (c) Which lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. (2) Displaying indecent material is a petty misdemeanor. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; am L 1981, c 106, §2; am L 1982, c 147, §26; gen ch 1993] COMMENTARY ON §712-1211 Section 712-1211 restates previous Hawaii law regulating public display of matter which would be deemed offensive by a substantial segment of the public. Although nudity and near-nudity now have gained wide acceptance, many people would be affronted by a public display of the sort here prohibited.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1986
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Rodgers (Hawaii Supreme Court 1986, 68 Haw. 438)“…not hesitate to rule "sexual contact" has occurred. [1] HRS § 712-1211 prohibits certain public displays which…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 707: OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON
§ 707-751Promoting child abuse in the second degreeIn force
(1) A person commits the offense of promoting child abuse in the second degree if, knowing or having reason to know its character and content, the person: (a) Disseminates child pornography; (b) Reproduces child pornography with intent to disseminate; (c) Disseminates any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer disk, or any other material that contains an image of child pornography; (d) Disseminates any pornographic material which employs, uses, or otherwise contains a minor engaging in or assisting others to engage in sexual conduct; or (e) Possesses thirty or more images of any form of child pornography, and the content of at least one image contains one or more of the following: (i) A minor who is younger than the age of twelve; (ii) Sadomasochistic abuse of a minor; or (iii) Bestiality involving a minor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bunag (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)“…016); count 3, promoting child abuse in the second degree, HRS § 707-751(1)(a) (2014 & Supp. 2016); and count 4…”
- State v. Offerman (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2008, 188 P.3d 831)“…NOTES [1] The Honorable Steven S. Alm presided. [2] HRS § 707-751(1)(a) (Supp. 2007) provides: § 707-7…”
- New York v. Ferber (Supreme Court of the United States 1982, 458 U.S. 747)“…it. 11, §§1108, 1109 (1979); Fla. Stat. §847.014 (1981); Haw. Rev. Stat. §707-751 (Supp. 1981); Ky. Rev. Stat. §§531.320…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 711: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§ 711-1110.9Violation of privacy in the first degreeIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of violation of privacy in the first degree if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law: (a) The person intentionally or knowingly installs or uses, or both, in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, any device for observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting another person in a stage of undress or sexual activity in that place; (b) The person knowingly discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of another identifiable person either in the nude, as defined in section 712‑1210, or engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in section 712-1210, without the consent of the depicted person, with intent to harm substantially the depicted person with respect to that person's health, safety, business, calling, career, education, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships or as an act of revenge or retribution; or (c) The person intentionally creates or discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of a composite fictitious person depicted in the nude as defined in section 712-1210, or engaged in sexual conduct as defined in section 712-1210, that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii courts have construed HRS 711-1110.9 in the Kaakimaka litigation. State v. Kaakimaka (2026) held subsection (1)(a) requires the device, or the person using it, to be inside the private place, and reversed a conviction where the phone stayed outside. A 2025 Kaakimaka opinion upheld the charge as drawn.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kaakimaka (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)✓A man stood outside a vacation home and aimed his phone at a bathroom window where a 15-year-old was showering; the court held the statute requires the device or the person using it to be inside the private place, found the evidence insufficient, and reversed the conviction.
- State v. Kaakimaka. ICA s.d.o., filed 01/31/2025 [ada], 155 Haw. 297. Opinion by Hiraoka, J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Opinion by Guidry J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 05/16/2025. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025. S.Ct. Amended Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025 [ada]. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2025)✓Charged with recording a girl showering, the defendant argued his indictment was defective because it did not define "private place"; the court held that term is an attendant circumstance whose statutory definition need not be alleged, and upheld the charge.
- State v. Olive (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2025)“…and (b). These offenses are classified as Class C felonies. HRS § 711-1110.9(2) (2014 & 2018 Supp.). HR…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent State Rules, Hawaii Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Hawaii Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
United States Code Title 18
§ 2257Record keeping requirementsIn forcecited in 33 of our articles
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (1998) affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against section 2257. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012) reviewed it as content neutral under intermediate scrutiny, a standard the Third Circuit later replaced with strict scrutiny.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…rformers with independent penalties for failure to comply. 18 U. S. C. §§ 2257 (a) and (i) (1988 ed. and Supp. V); Am…”
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 154 F.3d 281)✓A swingers magazine that ran readers' sexually explicit ads challenged section 2257's age record and labeling duties; the court treated the statute as content neutral, found no substantial likelihood of First Amendment success, and affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction.
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2012, 677 F.3d 519)✓Adult film producers, photographers and sex educators challenged section 2257's recordkeeping duties; the court held the statutes content neutral and found they advance protecting children, but vacated dismissal of the First and Fourth Amendment claims for record development.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), West Virginia Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras and Privacy Violations, Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1214, Promoting pornography(onecle.com)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1215, Promoting pornography for minors(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1218, Failure to maintain age verification records of sexual performers(onecle.com)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-751, Promoting child abuse in the second degree(onecle.com)
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 711-1110.9, Violation of privacy in the first degree(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1211, Indecent exposure of pornographic material (display of indecent material)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- BillTrack50, HB 1212 (2025-2026) status detail(billtrack50.com)