California
How to Get a Police Report in California (2026): Crash & Incident Reports
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 11, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 11, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Which agency investigated your crash decides how you request a copy in California. The California Highway Patrol (CHP) covers state highways and areas under its jurisdiction, using its own form and its own fee schedule. A crash on a city street instead goes through that city's police department under the California Public Records Act (CPRA).
California's bodycam access rules are similarly two-layered. Penal Code 832.7, enacted through SB 1421 and later amendments, decides what categories of footage must be released. A separate statute, Government Code 7923.625, governs when it must be released. Reading only one of the two gives an incomplete picture, so both are covered below.
Information last verified on 2026-08-11. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
How to Get a California Crash Report
CHP-investigated crashes: Use CHP Form 190, 'Application for Release of Information,' available on the CHP's own page. Submit it in person at any CHP office, or by mail to the office that filed the report. CHP's page shows no online submission option; treat any secondary source describing an online CHP channel as unconfirmed until you check with the specific office.
Fee: Tiered by page count, confirmed directly on the CHP's own page: $10.00 for 1-25 pages, $20.00 for 26-50, $30.00 for 51-75, $40.00 for 76-100, plus $10.00 for each additional 25 pages beyond 100. By mail, CHP accepts personal check or money order only, no cash and no credit or debit cards.
Who may obtain a copy: Driver, passenger, property owner, vehicle owner, parent of a minor, or legal guardian, plus insurance companies, attorneys, coroners, and Caltrans, per CHP's own eligibility list. This mirrors California Vehicle Code 20012, which makes crash reports confidential for the department's own use while requiring disclosure of the full report, names, addresses, vehicle descriptions, diagrams, and witness statements included, to 'any person who may have a proper interest therein.'
Local-agency crashes: If a city police department investigated (rather than CHP), submit a California Public Records Act request to that department's own records unit instead.
Talk to a family-law attorney: free case review
Every case has details a formula cannot capture. Get a free, no-obligation review from a family-law attorney.
How to Get a California Police Incident Report
An incident report for an arrest, theft, or other non-crash offense goes through a standard California Public Records Act (CPRA) request to the investigating local agency.

The CPRA's law enforcement exemption, Government Code 7923.600 (renumbered in 2023 from former Government Code 6254(f)), does not require disclosure of 'records of complaints to, or investigations conducted by, or records of intelligence information or security procedures of' any state or local police agency, or investigatory or security files it compiles. That exemption is not the end of the analysis. Two sections in the same article impose disclosure duties that an agency cannot decline as a matter of discretion, and they cover most of what a requester actually wants.
Arrest information, Government Code 7923.610: a state or local law enforcement agency 'shall make public' the arrestee's full name and occupation, physical description, the time and date of arrest, the time and date of booking, the location of arrest, the factual circumstances surrounding the arrest, the amount of bail set, the time and manner of release or the location where the person is being held, and all charges, including any outstanding warrants and parole or probation holds. The carve-out is item by item, not blanket: a particular item may be withheld only to the extent its disclosure 'would endanger the safety of a person involved in an investigation or would endanger the successful completion of the investigation or a related investigation.' Blotter release is a statutory duty, not an agency courtesy.
Incident information for victims and insurers, Government Code 7923.605: where the incident was caused by arson, burglary, fire, explosion, larceny, robbery, carjacking, vandalism, vehicle theft, or a crime defined by Government Code 13951(b), the agency 'shall disclose' the names and addresses of persons involved and of witnesses (other than confidential informants), a description of any property involved, the date, time, and location of the incident, all diagrams, and the statements of the parties and witnesses. The people entitled to it are the victim, an authorized representative of the victim, an insurance carrier against which a claim has been or might be made, and anyone suffering bodily injury or property damage or loss. The same safety carve-out applies, and the article does not require release of the portion of the investigative file reflecting the investigating officer's analysis or conclusions.
What Government Code 7923.600 shields, then, is the narrative investigative work product around those mandatory disclosures, and it is permissive rather than prohibitive: an agency may release exempt material voluntarily.
For a large-city exemplar, the Los Angeles Police Department accepts CPRA requests through its Discovery Section, Records and Identification Division. Confirm LAPD's current fee schedule and any victim-specific fee waivers directly with that office, since specific figures circulating for LAPD were not independently confirmed against the department's own page during this research pass.
California Police Bodycam Footage
California's bodycam access framework works through two statutes together, not one.
What must be released, Penal Code 832.7: As amended by SB 1421 (2018) and subsequent legislation, peace-officer personnel records are confidential by default, but specific categories 'shall not be confidential and shall be made available for public inspection' under the CPRA. Those categories, confirmed directly against the statute's text, include a record relating to an incident involving the discharge of a firearm at a person by an officer, a use of force resulting in death or great bodily injury, a sustained finding of unreasonable or excessive force, and sustained findings of sexual assault, dishonesty directly relating to a criminal investigation, biased conduct, or an unlawful arrest or search. Records that must be released include investigative reports and 'photographic, audio, and video evidence.'
When it must be released, Government Code 7923.625: The timing rule enacted by AB 748 (2018) is codified at Government Code 7923.625, which is where a reader should look it up today. Disclosure of a recording related to a critical incident 'may be delayed for no longer than 45 calendar days after the date the agency knew or reasonably should have known about the incident.' An agency can delay past that window if disclosure would 'substantially interfere with the investigation,' and it must reassess the withholding and notify the requester every 30 days. After one year from the date the agency knew or reasonably should have known about the incident, it may continue to delay only if it demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that disclosure would substantially interfere with the investigation. One year is the point at which the agency's burden rises, not a ceiling after which the recording must be released.
An agency may redact a released record only for specific reasons, such as removing personal identifying information, protecting a whistleblower's or witness's anonymity, or addressing a genuine safety risk to an officer, not as a general discretionary edit. See California Police Bodycam Laws and our guide to requesting body camera footage for the fuller release-timing mechanics.
Corrections and Practical Notes
No California-specific statutory process for correcting a factual error on a crash report was found; contact the investigating agency (CHP or the local department) directly.

A request for a copy of a California accident report 'shall be accompanied by payment of a fee,' per Vehicle Code 20012, which caps that fee at the agency's actual cost of providing the copy, a useful figure to know if a fee schedule looks inflated.
For the aftermath of a crash beyond the report itself, see California Car Accident Laws. For the broader public-records framework, see California Public Records Laws and California Court Records. For the general process of filing or reading a report, see How to File a Police Report and How to Read a Police Report.
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about how to obtain a police crash report, incident report, or body camera footage in California as verified on 2026-08-11. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Readers with a specific records dispute, or who need advice about a specific incident, should consult a lawyer licensed in California.

Last updated: 2026-08-11. Fees and portals reflect their published status as of August 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a California crash report cost?
For a CHP-investigated crash, Form 190 fees are tiered by page count: $10 for 1-25 pages, up to $40 for 76-100 pages, plus $10 per additional 25 pages. For a local-agency crash, contact that department for its own California Public Records Act fee schedule.
What form do I use for a California Highway Patrol crash report?
CHP Form 190, 'Application for Release of Information.' Submit it in person at any CHP office or by mail to the office that filed the report. CHP's own page shows no online submission option.
How do I get a California police incident report?
Submit a California Public Records Act request to the investigating local agency's records unit. Government Code 7923.600 lets an agency withhold investigatory files, but Government Code 7923.610 requires it to make public the basic arrest facts, and Government Code 7923.605 requires disclosure of names, diagrams, and party and witness statements to victims, their representatives, insurers, and injured parties for incidents such as arson, burglary, robbery, vandalism, and vehicle theft.
How long does it take to get California bodycam footage of a critical incident?
Government Code 7923.625, enacted by AB 748, sets a base window of 45 calendar days after the agency knew or should have known of the incident. An agency can delay past that window if disclosure would substantially interfere with the investigation, reassessing every 30 days, and after one year it may keep withholding only on clear and convincing evidence of that interference.
What California bodycam footage must be released under SB 1421?
Penal Code 832.7 requires release of records relating to an officer discharging a firearm at a person, a use of force causing death or great bodily injury, and sustained findings of excessive force, sexual assault, dishonesty tied to a criminal investigation, biased conduct, or an unlawful arrest or search.
Updates
Added California's two mandatory police-record disclosure statutes, Government Code 7923.610 and 7923.605, cited the bodycam release-timing rule to its current code section, Government Code 7923.625, and corrected a statement that withholding was capped at one year.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Vehicle Code
§ 20012In forcecited in 2 of our articles
All required accident reports, and supplemental reports, shall be without prejudice to the individual so reporting and shall be for the confidential use of the Department of Motor Vehicles and the Department of the California Highway Patrol, except that the Department of the California Highway Patrol or the law enforcement agency to whom the accident was reported shall disclose the entire contents of the reports, including, but not limited to, the names and addresses of persons involved or injured in, or witnesses to, an accident, the registration numbers and descriptions of vehicles involved, the date, time and location of an accident, all diagrams, statements of the drivers involved or occupants injured in the accident and the statements of all witnesses, to any person who may have a proper interest therein, including, but not limited to, the driver or drivers involved, or the guardian or conservator thereof, the parent of a minor driver, the authorized representative of a driver, or to any named person injured therein, the owners of vehicles or property damaged thereby, persons who may incur civil liability, including liability based upon a breach of warranty arising out of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):California courts confine section 20012's confidentiality to the required accident reports. Davies v. Superior Court (1984) held it does not reach depersonalized data generated from those reports, disapproving earlier decisions that read it broadly. Collins v. Navistar, Inc. (2013) followed Davies on federal crash database data.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Robinson v. Cable (California Supreme Court 1961, 55 Cal. 2d 425)✓Guests injured when a station wagon struck a tank truck appealed; guiding retrial, the court noted that Vehicle Code 20012's confidentiality for accident reports relaxes six months after the crash and saw no reason to bar the officer from using his report to refresh recollection.
- Collins v. Navistar, Inc. (California Court of Appeal 2013, 214 Cal. App. 4th 1486)✓A trucker injured when thrown concrete pierced his windshield sued the truck maker; the court read Vehicle Code 20012 to cover reports drivers and passengers must file, not officers' reports, and held it did not bar expert testimony on federal crash statistics from those reports.
- Davies v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court 1984, 36 Cal. 3d 291)✓A highway crash plaintiff sought state records of other accidents at the same location; the court held Vehicle Code 20012's confidentiality reaches the reports and identifying details only, so TASAS data and diagrams with identities excised are discoverable.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Read a Police Report: Sections, Codes, and Fault Language
California Government Code
§ 7923.600In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and 7929.610, this division does not require the disclosure of records of complaints to, or investigations conducted by, or records of intelligence information or security procedures of, the office of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice, the Office of Emergency Services and any state or local police agency, or any investigatory or security files compiled by any other state or local police agency, or any investigatory or security files compiled by any other state or local agency for correctional, law enforcement, or licensing purposes. (b) A customer list that an alarm or security company provides to a state or local police agency at the agency’s request is a record subject to this article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- City of Fresno v. Superior Court (California Court of Appeal 2026)“…stigatory records exemption set forth in subdivision (a) of Government Code section 7923.600, and subdivision (b) of Government Code…”
- First Amendment Coalition v. Super. Ct. (California Court of Appeal 2023)“…sure exemptions codified in the CPRA, with the exception of Government Code section 7923.600, which section 832.7(b)(1) expressly ov…”
- City of Vallejo v. Super. Ct. (California Court of Appeal 2025)“…quirement of disclosure. (Gov. Code, § 6254, subd. (f) [now Gov. Code, §§ 7923.600–7923.630]. . . .)” (Becerra, supra, 44…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Are 911 Calls Public Records? State Access Guide (2026)
California Penal Code
§ 832.7In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers and records maintained by a state or local agency pursuant to Section 832.5, or information obtained from these records, are confidential and shall not be disclosed in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery pursuant to Sections 1043 and 1046 of the Evidence Code. This section does not apply to investigations or proceedings concerning the conduct of peace officers or custodial officers, or an agency or department that employs those officers, conducted by a grand jury, a district attorney’s office, the Attorney General’s office, or the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, or a civilian oversight board or commission for a law enforcement agency established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 25303.7 of the Government Code or other duly enacted municipal or county ordinance.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 453 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court (California Supreme Court 1989, 49 Cal. 3d 74)“…l. Rptr. 897 , 522 P.2d 305 ]) through the enactment of Penal Code sections 832.7 and 832.8 [3] and Evidence Code sectio…”
- Alford v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court 2003, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 672)“…hess scheme applies “in any criminal or civil proceeding” (Pen. Code, § 832.7, subd. (a)), the list of interested par…”
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court 2002, 124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 202)“…tchess scheme added Evidence Code sections 1043-1045 and Penal Code sections 832.7 and 832.8. It also amended Penal Code s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Police Body Camera Laws: Footage & Access, California Public Records Act: The 10-Day Rule, Fees, and Police Records, How to Request Body Cam Footage: State Laws and the Request Process
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Cal. Vehicle Code § 20012 (confidentiality and disclosure of accident reports)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Penal Code § 832.7 (peace officer personnel records; SB 1421 disclosure categories)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California AB 748 (2018), critical-incident video and audio release timing(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Highway Patrol, Collision Report (CHP 190)(chp.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Gov't Code § 7923.600 (California Public Records Act, law enforcement investigatory-records exemption)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Gov't Code § 7923.610 (arrest information a law enforcement agency shall make public)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Gov't Code § 7923.605 (mandatory incident-report disclosure to victims, representatives, insurers, and injured parties)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Gov't Code § 7923.625 (critical-incident recording release timing; codification of AB 748)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)