New Mexico
New Mexico Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Mexico has no dedicated teen-sexting law, so minors who send or possess explicit images face charges under the state's Sexual Exploitation of Children statute, NMSA § 30-6A-3. Possession is a fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children and distribution is a third degree felony for sexual exploitation of children. Those are specially sentenced classifications, not ordinary fourth and third degree felonies, and they carry ten-year and eleven-year basic sentences. The statute does include a narrow possession exemption for consensual, close-in-age minors.
The "Child Exploitation" Trap (NMSA § 30-6A-3)
Because New Mexico lacks a specific statute for "sexting" (consensual sharing of images between minors), these acts fall under the state's Sexual Exploitation of Children laws. This statute, NMSA § 30-6A-3, was originally designed to combat commercial child pornography but is written broadly enough to capture teen behavior.
Under this law, it is illegal to intentionally:
- Produce: Direct, edit, or create any visual medium depicting a minor engaged in sexual conduct.
- Distribute: Sell, share, or transfer such material.
- Possess: Knowingly have such material on a phone, computer, or cloud account.
Definition of "Prohibited Sexual Act"
New Mexico's statute does not use the term "sexual conduct." The operative definition is "prohibited sexual act" in NMSA § 30-6A-2(A), which covers sexual intercourse, bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation, and, in the subparagraph most likely to reach a sexted image, "lewd and sexually explicit exhibition with a focus on the genitals or pubic area of any person for the purpose of sexual stimulation."
Two elements in that last clause do real work. The image must focus on the genitals or pubic area, and it must be for the purpose of sexual stimulation. The material must also be "obscene" as § 30-6A-2(E) defines that term. New Mexico courts have read the clause narrowly: a photograph must display visible signs of sexual eroticism and be identifiable as hard-core child pornography rather than merely depict a naked child (State v. Rendleman, 2003-NMCA-150).
That is a meaningful limit, but it is not a safe harbor. Whether any particular image clears it is a fact question a prosecutor decides first and a court decides later, so a teenager should not assume a given photo falls outside the statute.
Felony Penalties & Consequences
Since these offenses are charged as felonies, the potential penalties are severe compared to states with specific misdemeanor sexting laws.

A point that is easy to miss, and that changes the numbers by years: § 30-6A-3 does not create ordinary felonies. Each subsection creates a felony "for sexual exploitation of children," and NMSA § 31-18-15(A) gives those qualified classifications their own, far longer basic sentences. An ordinary fourth degree felony in New Mexico carries eighteen months; a fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children carries ten years.
New Mexico also sentences by "basic sentence" rather than by a statutory maximum. Under NMSA § 31-18-15.1, a judge may alter the basic sentence on a finding of mitigating circumstances, or on a finding beyond a reasonable doubt of aggravating circumstances. The figures below are therefore starting points, not ceilings.
Possession of Material
Mere possession of an explicit image of a minor (even if you are a minor yourself) is a fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children.
Basic sentence: ten years in prison, plus a fine of up to $5,000.
Section 30-6A-3(A) adds a mandatory enhancement: where a court or jury separately finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the depicted child is under thirteen, the basic sentence increases by one year, and that first year must be served and cannot be suspended or deferred.
Production or Distribution
Sending an explicit image to someone else is considered "distribution." This is a third degree felony for sexual exploitation of children.
Basic sentence: eleven years in prison, plus a fine of up to $5,000.
Creating an image (taking a selfie) is considered "manufacture" under § 30-6A-3(E). That is a second degree felony for sexual exploitation of children, with a basic sentence of twelve years and a fine of up to $5,000.
Revenge Porn & Unauthorized Distribution (§ 30-37A-1)
New Mexico has a specific statute addressing "revenge porn," known legally as the Unauthorized Distribution of Sensitive Images (NMSA § 30-37A-1). This law applies to both adults and minors.
You commit this offense if you:
- Distribute or publish a "sensitive image" (nude or sexual image) of another person.
- Do so without that person's consent.
- Have the intent to harass, humiliate, or intimidate the person.
- Engage in conduct that would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.
Unlike the child exploitation statute, a first offense under this statute is a misdemeanor; a second or subsequent conviction is a fourth-degree felony.
Penalties for Revenge Porn
- Jail (first offense): Up to 1 year (actually 364 days)
- Fine (first offense): Up to $1,000
- Repeat Offense: A second or subsequent conviction is a fourth-degree felony. This one is an ordinary fourth degree felony, not a "for sexual exploitation of children" classification, so it carries the standard 18-month basic sentence and a fine of up to $5,000.
Note that § 30-37A-1 is a criminal statute only. It runs from subsection (A) through (D) and creates no private right of action, so it is not itself a basis for a victim to sue. A victim may still have civil options through ordinary tort claims or through the federal remedy in 15 U.S.C. 6851 discussed below, but those come from other law, not from this section.
AI & Deepfake Laws (2026 Updates)
New Mexico remains one of the few states without a deepfake-specific criminal statute, and that is not changing as quickly as once expected.
2026 Legislative Session
A bill introduced for the 2026 legislative session would have amended the Unauthorized Distribution of Sensitive Images act, NMSA § 30-37A-1, to explicitly cover "digitally modified" or "AI-generated" sensitive images. That session concluded in February 2026 without the bill passing, so as of mid-2026 New Mexico still has no deepfake-specific statute.
Current Prosecution Strategies
Absent a deepfake-specific law, prosecutors may attempt to charge deepfake distribution under existing harassment or defamation laws, though these are often ill-suited for the specific harm of synthetic porn.
Federal Law: The TAKE IT DOWN Act
Federal law also reaches this conduct, alongside New Mexico's unauthorized-distribution statute. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) added 47 U.S.C. 223(h), making it a federal crime to publish an intimate image of an identifiable person without consent, whether the image is authentic or an AI-generated digital forgery. Publishing an authentic image carries up to 2 years in prison, or 3 years if the victim is a minor. Threatening to publish a digital forgery carries a lower penalty, up to 18 months, or 30 months if the victim is a minor, but threatening to publish an authentic image is punished the same as actually publishing it. Covered platforms must also remove a reported image within 48 hours of a valid request, a duty that became enforceable in 2026. Separately, 15 U.S.C. 6851 (enacted 2022) allows victims to sue for civil damages of at least $150,000 in liquidated damages or actual damages plus attorney fees; whether it reaches AI-generated forgeries remains legally unsettled.
Adults Sexting with Minors
For adults (18+) who exchange images with minors (under 18), the exploitation statute above applies with full force. There is no "Romeo and Juliet" exception for an 18-year-old dating a 17-year-old as to image possession, because § 30-6A-3(B)'s exemption is available only to a person under eighteen.
The two solicitation-style statutes below are narrower, and it matters which one is actually in play.
Child Solicitation by Electronic Communication Device
Adults are sometimes charged under NMSA § 30-37-3.2, "Child solicitation by electronic communication device," which can apply even if no physical meeting occurs.
This statute is narrower than it sounds, and the limits are easy to miss. Subsection (A) reaches soliciting a child under sixteen years of age, not any minor under eighteen. Its final "any other sexual conduct" branch also requires that the perpetrator be at least four years older than the child. So § 30-37-3.2 does not reach the 18-year-old and 17-year-old pairing described above; that situation is governed by the exploitation statute, not by this one.
The penalties depend on the victim's age:
Solicitation, victim age 13 to 15: A fourth-degree felony, rising to a third-degree felony if the offender (or an agent) actually appears at an arranged meeting.
Solicitation, victim under 13: A third-degree felony, rising to a second-degree felony if the offender (or an agent) actually appears at an arranged meeting.
Criminal Sexual Communication with a Child
The statute that most directly addresses an adult sending a nude image to a minor is NMSA § 30-37-3.3, "Criminal sexual communication with a child." It applies where a person knowingly and intentionally communicates directly with a specific child under sixteen by sending the child obscene images of the sender's own intimate parts through an electronic communication device, and the sender is at least four years older than the child. The statute defines "intimate parts" as the primary genital area, groin, buttocks, anus or breast.
The offense is an ordinary fourth degree felony, so it carries the standard 18-month basic sentence, not the ten-year sexual-exploitation sentence.
Sexual Exploitation: Separately, if the minor sends the photo, the adult is in possession of child sexual exploitation material under § 30-6A-3(A), a fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children carrying a ten-year basic sentence, in addition to any solicitation or communication charge.
Defenses & "Romeo and Juliet"
Important Nuance: New Mexico's Sexual Exploitation of Children statute contains a narrow possession exemption, but it is limited to minors and does not cover production, distribution, or adult offenders. Under NMSA § 30-6A-3(B), a person under 18 who possesses a depiction of another minor aged 14 to 17 is exempt from the possession charge if the depicted minor knowingly and voluntarily consented to the possession, and either knowingly and voluntarily consented to the creation of the depiction or knowingly and voluntarily produced it without coercion.
Prosecutorial Discretion
In practice, many District Attorneys in New Mexico realize that charging a 16-year-old with a felony for sending a selfie to a boyfriend is excessive. They often use discretion to:
- Decline to prosecute (drop the case).
- Divert the case to juvenile probation programs.
- Charge a lesser offense (like harassment) instead of a felony.
However, this is not guaranteed. It depends entirely on the specific prosecutor, the county, and the circumstances of the case.
Standard Criminal Defenses
Your attorney may argue:
- Lack of Intent: You did not knowingly possess the image (e.g., it was sent to you unsolicited and you didn't open/save it).
- Identity Issues: Proof that you were not the person who sent the image.
- Search & Seizure: The police obtained the phone or evidence illegally without a warrant.
Sex Offender Registration
Sexual exploitation of children under § 30-6A-3 is a listed "sex offense" under New Mexico's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), at NMSA § 29-11A-3(I)(4). Registration is the most serious long-term consequence a sexting case can produce, and it can restrict:
- Where you can live.
- Future employment opportunities.
- Access to college education.
How registration actually attaches to a minor
The mechanism matters more than the headline, and it is not simply judicial discretion. SORNA applies to a "sex offender," defined at § 29-11A-3(H)(1) as a person convicted of a sex offense, with "conviction" defined at § 29-11A-3(B) to include a deferred sentence but not a conditional discharge.
That definition is the gate. Under NMSA § 32A-2-18(A), a judgment in a Delinquency Act proceeding resulting in a juvenile disposition "shall not be deemed a conviction of crime nor shall it impose any civil disabilities ordinarily resulting from conviction of a crime." An ordinary children's court adjudication therefore does not produce a conviction, and so does not by itself trigger registration.
Registration generally attaches where the teenager is instead prosecuted and convicted as a youthful offender or serious youthful offender, which under § 32A-2-18(B) and (C) can result in an adult sentence and an actual conviction. Even then, § 29-11A-5.1(E) bars the state from publishing on the public registry website the information of an offender who was under eighteen at the time of the offense and was convicted as a youthful offender, unless the sentencing court found the offender is not amenable to treatment and is a danger to the community.
This is a real and serious exposure, but it runs through how the case is charged and resolved, not through a general judicial discretion to waive registration. It is one of the strongest reasons to involve a defense attorney early.
More New Mexico Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is sexting a felony in New Mexico?
Yes. Because there is no specific misdemeanor law for sexting, it falls under felony child exploitation statutes. Possession is a 'fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children' and distribution is a 'third degree felony for sexual exploitation of children.' Those are distinct sentencing classifications under NMSA Section 31-18-15, carrying ten-year and eleven-year basic sentences rather than the eighteen months and three years that ordinary fourth and third degree felonies carry.
What if I am 17 and my partner is 16?
Possessing the image may actually be exempt under Section 30-6A-3(B): a person under 18 who possesses a depiction of a 14-to-17-year-old partner is exempt from the possession charge if the partner knowingly and voluntarily consented to the possession, and either consented to the image's creation or produced it without coercion. This exemption covers possession only, so creating or sending the photo can still lead to charges.
Does New Mexico have a "Romeo and Juliet" law for sexting?
Not exactly, but the statute does include a narrow possession exemption. Under Section 30-6A-3(B), a person under 18 who possesses an image of another minor aged 14 to 17 is exempt from the possession charge if the depicted minor consented to the possession and either consented to the image's creation or produced it without coercion. This exemption applies only to possession by a minor; it does not cover production, distribution, or adult offenders.
Can my school punish me for sexting?
Yes. If the sexting happens on school property, during school hours, or disrupts the school environment, schools can suspend or expel students. They are also mandatory reporters and must contact the police if they find explicit images of minors.
What if I didn't ask for the photo?
If you receive an unsolicited photo, you are technically in "possession" once it downloads. To protect yourself, do not save it, do not share it, and delete it immediately. Do not ask for more.
Are parents liable for their kids' sexting?
Generally, parents are not criminally liable unless they facilitated the crime. However, they could face civil lawsuits if their child's actions caused harm (e.g., revenge porn/bullying) and they were negligent.
Mandatory Reporting Obligations
Teachers, counselors, and school administrators in New Mexico are **mandatory reporters**. If they become aware of a student possessing or distributing sexually explicit images of a minor, they are legally required to report it to law enforcement (typically the local police and New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department). They cannot simply "handle it internally" or delete the images. Deleting the images could be considered destruction of evidence.
Title IX Investigations
Under federal Title IX regulations, schools must investigate allegations of sexual harassment, which includes non-consensual sharing of intimate images (sexual harassment/misconduct). This process is separate from the police investigation. - **Standard of Proof:** Schools use a "preponderance of evidence" standard (more likely than not), which is a lower bar than the criminal court's "beyond a reasonable doubt." - **Interim Measures:** While an investigation is pending, schools may issue "no-contact" orders, change class schedules, or suspend the accused student. - **Hearings:** Students may face a disciplinary hearing where they can present evidence, but they do not have the same rights as in a criminal trial.
Updates
Corrected the New Mexico sentencing figures for sexual exploitation of children, which are set by their own classifications in NMSA 31-18-15 rather than by ordinary felony ranges, replaced a misquoted statutory definition with the actual text of NMSA 30-6A-2(A), clarified the age and age-gap limits on NMSA 30-37-3.2, added NMSA 30-37-3.3, and corrected how sex offender registration attaches in juvenile cases.
Corrected New Mexico's adult-solicitation section, which named a nonexistent statute ("Computer Abuse of a Child") and understated its penalty; added the felony enhancement for a second or subsequent revenge-porn conviction; and corrected the AI-deepfake section, which described a 2026 bill as an active ongoing proposal after that legislative session had already concluded without the bill passing.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the repeated claim that New Mexico has no Romeo and Juliet exception for sexting images; NMSA 30-6A-3(B) contains a narrow possession exemption for consensual, close-in-age minors. Also fixed the manufacture penalty (second-degree, not third-degree felony), the revenge-porn statute's actual second element, and removed a fabricated second-conviction felony escalation.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978, Chapter 30
§ 30-6A-3Sexual exploitation of childrenIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. It is unlawful for a person to intentionally possess any obscene visual or print medium depicting any prohibited sexual act or simulation of such an act if that person knows or has reason to know that the obscene medium depicts any prohibited sexual act or simulation of such act and if that person knows or has reason to know that one or more of the participants in that act is a child under eighteen years of age. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a fourth degree felony for sexual exploitation of children and shall be sentenced pursuant to the provisions of Section 31- 18-15 NMSA 1978. When a separate finding of fact made by a court or jury shows beyond a reasonable doubt that a child depicted in the visual or print medium is a child under the age of thirteen, the basic sentence shall be increased by one year, and the sentence imposed by this subsection shall be the first year served and shall not be suspended or deferred; provided that when the offender is a youthful offender, the sentence imposed by this subsection may be increased by one year. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nmonesource.com
Cited in 57 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Olsson (2014) held that Section 30-6A-3(A) does not clearly set the unit of prosecution, so under the rule of lenity defendants who possessed many images faced only one possession count. State v. Myers (2009) held covert bathroom video of minors depicted a prohibited sexual act and was obscene under the Act.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Santillanes (New Mexico Supreme Court 2001, 130 N.M. 464)“…ther, New Mexico's sexual-exploitation-of-children statute, NMSA 1978, § 30-6A-3 (1993), and sexual-exploitation-of-chil…”
- State v. Riley (New Mexico Supreme Court 2010, 147 N.M. 557)“…tent to punish unitary conduct under more than one statute. NMSA 1978, § 30-6A-3(G) (1984, amended 2007) (“The penalties…”
- State v. Druktenis (New Mexico Court of Appeals 2004, 135 N.M. 223)“…nder Section 30-9-13; sexual exploitation of children under NMSA 1978, § 30-6A-3(A), (B), (C) (2001); sexual exploitatio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Mexico Pornography Laws (2026): Legality and Penalties
§ 30-37A-1Unauthorized distribution of sensitive images; penaltiesIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
A. Unauthorized distribution of sensitive images consists of distributing, publishing or otherwise making available, by an electronic communications device or other means, sensitive images of a person, with or without information identifying that person, without that person's consent: (1) with the intent to: (a) harass, humiliate or intimidate that person; (b) incite another to harass, humiliate or intimidate that person; (c) cause that person to reasonably fear for that person's own or family members' safety; (d) cause that person to suffer unwanted physical contact or injury; or (e) cause that person to suffer substantial emotional distress; and (2) where the conduct is such that it would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nmonesource.com
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Valerio (New Mexico Court of Appeals 2025)“…n for the purpose of transfer to or use by a prisoner”); NMSA 1978, § 30-37A-1(B)(1) (2015) (prohibiting the unauthori…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Mexico Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), New Mexico Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Filming, and Consent Rules (2026), New Mexico Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: § 30-9-20 Penalties (2026)
§ 30-37-3.2Child solicitation by electronic communication deviceIn force
A. Child solicitation by electronic communication device consists of a person knowingly and intentionally soliciting a child under sixteen years of age, by means of an electronic communication device, to engage in sexual intercourse, sexual contact or in a sexual or obscene performance, or to engage in any other sexual conduct when the perpetrator is at least four years older than the child. B. Whoever commits child solicitation by electronic communication device is guilty of a: (1) fourth degree felony if the child is at least thirteen but under sixteen years of age; or (2) third degree felony if the child is under thirteen years of age. C. Whoever commits child solicitation by electronic communication device and also appears for, attends or is present at a meeting that the person arranged pursuant to the solicitation is guilty of a: (1) third degree felony if the child is at least thirteen but under sixteen years of age; or (2) second degree felony if the child is under thirteen years of age. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nmonesource.com
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Morgan (New Mexico Court of Appeals 2016, 2016 NMCA 89)“…or child solicitation by electronic device, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-37-3.2 (2007). Defendant makes two arguments:…”
- State v. Ebert (New Mexico Court of Appeals 2011, 150 N.M. 576)“…to one count of child solicitation by computer, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-37-3.2 (2005) (amended 2007). Defendant argued…”
- State v. Sena (New Mexico Supreme Court 2023, 528 P.3d 631)“…tion by electronic 10 communication device,” contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-37-3.2(C) (2007) 11 (CES), having been accu…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 47
§ 223Obscene or harassing telephone calls in the District of Columbia or in interstate or foreign communicationsIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Whoever— in interstate or foreign communications— by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass another person; by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication; makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass any specific person; makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 208 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Sable Communications v. FCC (1989) upheld the 47 U.S.C. 223(b) ban on obscene commercial phone messages but struck its indecency ban as not narrowly tailored. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) held the CDA's 223(a) indecency and 223(d) display provisions violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent".
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)✓Online speakers challenged the Communications Decency Act's bans on indecent transmissions to minors and patently offensive displays. The Court held 47 U.S.C. 223(a) and 223(d) facially violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent" from section 223(a).
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 803)“…suant to § 561 of the Act, 110 Stat. 142 , note following 47 U. S. C. § 223 (1994 ed., Supp. III). Playboy sought…”
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (Supreme Court of the United States 1978, 438 U.S. 726)“…ous, filthy, or indecent" telephone calls, 82 Stat. 112 , 47 U. S. C. § 223 , the FCC itself indicated that it thou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Is the Take It Down Act? The 2025 Federal NCII Law Explained, How to File a Take It Down Request (Step by Step), Louisiana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 24 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), Revenge Porn Laws by State: All 50 States and DC (2026), Mississippi Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026)
Explore the law
The laws cited above reference these related sections in their own text:
- New Mexico Statutes Annotated 1978, Chapter 31 § 31-18-15 — Sentencing authority; noncapital felonies; basic sentences and fines; parole authority; meritorious deductions. view in our statute record · read at the official source
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- New Mexico Statute § 30-6A-3 (Sexual Exploitation)(nmonesource.com)
- State Bar of New Mexico - Lawyer Referral(sbnm.org)
- New Mexico Law Offices of the Public Defender(lopdnm.us)
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC)(missingkids.org)
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (Revenge Porn Help)(cybercivilrights.org)
- ConnectSafely - Safety Tips for Teens(connectsafely.org)
- Public Law 119-12 - TAKE IT DOWN Act (Congress.gov)(congress.gov).gov
- 47 U.S.C. 223 - includes TAKE IT DOWN Act provisions (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- NMSA Chapter 30, Criminal Offenses (30-6A-2, 30-6A-3, 30-37-3.2, 30-37-3.3, 30-37A-1) - NMOneSource(nmonesource.com)
- NMSA Chapter 31, Criminal Procedure (31-18-15 basic sentences; 31-18-15.1 alteration) - NMOneSource(nmonesource.com)
- NMSA Chapter 29, Law Enforcement (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 29-11A-3) - NMOneSource(nmonesource.com)
- NMSA Chapter 32A, Children's Code (32A-2-18, juvenile disposition is not a conviction) - NMOneSource(nmonesource.com)