Wisconsin
Wisconsin Debt Collection Laws: Expired Debt Dies and Repossession Needs Permission
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A debt collector in Wisconsin cannot garnish your wages, freeze your bank account, or send anyone for your car just because you missed payments. For wages and bank accounts, the collector must sue you, win a judgment, and then use Wisconsin's garnishment procedures, and most garnishments trace back to default judgments entered because the person sued never answered. For cars, Wisconsin goes further than almost any other state: the Wisconsin Consumer Act takes the ordinary repossession playbook away from lenders entirely. Wisconsin also writes its own rules for how collectors may behave, in Wis. Stat. ch. 427, on top of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Add the state's unusual rule that an expired debt is not merely unenforceable but legally dead, and Wisconsin is one of the most debtor-protective collection regimes in the country. None of it helps if you ignore the summons.
Wage Garnishment in Wisconsin: 20% at Most, Nothing Below the Poverty Line
Wisconsin starts from a stricter baseline than federal law. Under Wis. Stat. 812.34(2)(a), 80% of your disposable earnings are exempt from garnishment, so a judgment creditor can reach at most 20%, compared with the 25% federal ceiling. The statute then adds a shield most states lack: your earnings are totally exempt if your household income is below the federal poverty line, or if you receive (or recently qualified for) need-based public assistance such as W-2 payments, medical assistance, or SSI. And if taking the standard 20% would push your household below the poverty line, the garnishment is limited to the amount by which your income exceeds it.
The protection is real but not automatic. When a creditor starts an earnings garnishment, it must serve you with an exemption notice, an answer form, and a poverty-line schedule along with the garnishment papers (812.35(4)). You assert the poverty-line exemption by completing and returning that answer form. Thrown-away garnishment paperwork is how a fully exempt paycheck ends up garnished anyway.
Wisconsin's anti-retaliation rule is also broader than the federal one, with one written exception. Wis. Stat. 812.43 provides that «unless permitted under any applicable collective bargaining agreement», a garnishee shall not impose any fee or take any adverse action against a debtor by reason of the garnishment of the debtor's earnings, and it gives the debtor an action for reinstatement, back wages and benefits, restored seniority, and reasonable attorney fees. Unlike the federal rule, which protects only a first debt, 812.43 contains no one-debt limit on its face. The collective bargaining qualifier is the piece to check if you are a union member: where your contract permits the employer's action, the statute's prohibition does not reach it.
One creditor plays by different rules: the Wisconsin Department of Revenue. A DOR levy for delinquent state taxes is continuous under Wis. Stat. 71.91(6), and the per-paycheck cap is 25% of the compensation due (71.91(7)(b)), not 20%. The same statute has a sharp edge worth knowing: if you quit, give notice of intent to quit, or are fired, your employer must withhold the entire remaining delinquent amount from whatever it still owes you, with no percentage cap at all.
Bank Accounts and Property
Wisconsin's exemption statute, Wis. Stat. 815.18(3), protects up to $5,000 in depository accounts held for personal use, alongside $12,000 in aggregate consumer goods, a $4,000 vehicle exemption (plus unused consumer-goods amounts), business and farm property up to $15,000, and IRC-qualified retirement accounts without a dollar cap. Directly deposited Social Security, VA, and other federal benefits carry their own automatic federal shield covering roughly the last two months of deposits, which the bank must apply before freezing anything. If an account garnishment lands, identify the exempt dollars quickly and assert the exemptions through the garnishment answer process rather than assuming the bank will sort it out.

What a Collector May Not Do: Wisconsin's Own Conduct Rules
The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is not the only rulebook that applies here. The Wisconsin Consumer Act carries its own debt collection chapter, Wis. Stat. ch. 427, which reaches conduct and practices in connection with the collection of obligations arising from consumer transactions (427.102) and defines a debt collector broadly, as any person engaging, directly or indirectly, in debt collection of claims owed or alleged to be owed to a merchant by a customer (427.103).
Wis. Stat. 427.104(1) is the list of what is off limits. A collector may not use or threaten force or violence to cause physical harm, threaten criminal prosecution, or use obscene or threatening language. It may not «disclose or threaten to disclose information adversely affecting the customer's reputation for credit worthiness with knowledge or reason to know that the information is false», and it may not disclose reputation-affecting information to someone it knows has no legitimate business need for it. Disclosing a debt it knows is disputed, without saying that the debt is disputed, is also prohibited.
Two of the prohibitions have no clean federal twin. Under 427.104(1)(d), a collector may not initiate or threaten to initiate communication with your employer before obtaining final judgment against you, subject to narrow exceptions such as verifying employment status or earnings. Under 427.104(1)(k), it may not «use a communication which simulates legal or judicial process or which gives the appearance of being authorized, issued or approved by a government, governmental agency or attorney-at-law when it is not». The chapter closes the list with the familiar catch-alls: no communicating «with such frequency or at such unusual hours or in such a manner as can reasonably be expected to threaten or harass the customer», no other harassing conduct, and no claiming or threatening to enforce a right «with knowledge or reason to know that the right does not exist».
These are privately enforceable, not just regulator-enforced. Wis. Stat. 427.105 gives a person injured by a violation actual damages plus the penalty in 425.304, and it states that actual damages «shall include damages caused by emotional distress or mental anguish with or without accompanying physical injury». A customer who was induced to surrender collateral through a violation of the chapter may also recover the collateral along with damages for loss of its use. Chapter 427 runs alongside the FDCPA rather than replacing it, so a single collection call can violate both.
How Long Can You Be Sued: Six Years, Then the Debt Actually Dies
Wisconsin keeps its debt limitations rules unusually simple. Wis. Stat. 893.43 gives actions on any contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, six years from accrual. There is no separate shorter track for oral contracts or open accounts, so credit cards, medical bills, personal loans, and handshake deals all run the same six years. Promissory notes payable at a definite time also carry six years under Wis. Stat. 403.118, and a demand note with no demand ever made is barred after ten years with no payment of principal or interest.
What makes Wisconsin genuinely different is what happens when the clock runs out. In most states, an expired statute of limitations only bars the lawsuit; the debt itself survives, and in many states a payment or signed acknowledgment can restart the clock even years later. Wisconsin rejects that model. Wis. Stat. 893.05 says that when the limitation period expires, «the right is extinguished as well as the remedy». The debt is legally dead, and there is nothing left for a later payment or signed writing to revive. Wisconsin courts have treated a partial payment made before expiry as restarting the six-year period, so payments during the life of the debt still extend a collector's window; but once the period has fully run, it is over for good.
Two national caveats still apply. An extinguished debt does not scrub your credit report, which runs on its own clock of roughly seven years. And collectors may still ask you to pay old debt; what federal Regulation F flatly prohibits is suing or threatening to sue on a time-barred debt.
Repossession: Wisconsin Is Not a Self-Help State for Consumer Loans
In most states, a car lender can send a repossession agent the day after default with no warning, subject only to the rule against breaching the peace. Wisconsin abolished that playbook for consumer credit. Under the Wisconsin Consumer Act, Wis. Stat. 425.206(1) flatly provides that no merchant may take possession of collateral in this state except through one of four doors: you voluntarily surrender it; the merchant wins a court judgment for possession under 425.205; the property is abandoned; or, for motor vehicles only, the merchant sends a written notice stating it may take the vehicle without court proceedings, and you do not demand court proceedings in writing within 15 days. Even when repossession is allowed, 425.206(2) bars any breach of the peace and any entry into your dwelling without your consent at the time.

Before any of that, Wisconsin layers on a cure right. Under Wis. Stat. 425.104 and 425.105, a lender who believes you are in default generally must send a notice identifying the default and the exact amount needed to cure it, and then wait 15 days; if you pay the missed amounts (plus any delinquency charges) within that window, the contract continues as if the default never happened. The lender cannot accelerate the loan, sue, or move on the collateral during the cure period.
After a lawful repossession, the usual commercial rules apply: the sale must be commercially reasonable, sale proceeds are applied to costs and the loan balance, and any deficiency claim against you shrinks or disappears if the disposition was not handled properly. If you receive a 425.205 summons or a 15-day vehicle notice, the deadlines are short and real; responding in writing preserves rights that silence forfeits.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Wisconsin
Read everything you are served, and answer it. A lawsuit ignored becomes a default judgment, and a default judgment forfeits defenses a court will never raise on its own, including an extinguished statute of limitations under 893.05. If a garnishment has started, complete the exemption answer form that came with it, especially if your household income is near the poverty line, because the strongest exemption in Wisconsin law only works if you claim it. Check whether the debt is time-barred before paying anything on an old account, since a payment made while the clock is still running restarts it. If garnishments, levies, and repossession notices are arriving faster than they can be handled one at a time, a bankruptcy filing stops collection through the automatic stay while the underlying debts are resolved; whether that is the right trade depends on your full situation and is worth professional advice.

Overwhelmed by debt in Wisconsin? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on Wisconsin's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a Wisconsin bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
For the national picture, see debt collection laws by state, statute of limitations on debt, how to stop wage garnishment, and car repossession laws. Federal benefits have their own rules, covered in can Social Security be garnished. For deadlines on other Wisconsin claim types, see the Wisconsin statute of limitations, and if the debts themselves have become unmanageable, Wisconsin bankruptcy covers the state and federal exemption choices.
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Wisconsin Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Wisconsin?
At most 20% of disposable earnings, and nothing at all if your household income is below the federal poverty line or you receive need-based public assistance. If taking 20% would push your household below the poverty line, the garnishment is limited to the amount above it. You claim these protections on the answer form served with the garnishment papers.
What is the statute of limitations on debt in Wisconsin?
Six years for essentially all contract debt, written or oral, under Wis. Stat. 893.43. Promissory notes payable at a definite time also run six years.
Can an old debt be revived in Wisconsin if I make a payment?
Not after it expires. Wis. Stat. 893.05 extinguishes the right itself when the limitation period runs, so no payment or signed writing brings an expired Wisconsin debt back. A payment made before expiry, though, restarts the six-year clock, so be careful with payments on aging debts.
Can a repo company take my car without warning in Wisconsin?
No. Under the Wisconsin Consumer Act, a lender may take a vehicle only after a voluntary surrender, a court judgment, abandonment, or a written notice giving you 15 days to demand court proceedings, and a separate 15-day cure notice generally must come first. Breach of the peace and entry into your home without consent are prohibited.
Can a debt collector call my employer in Wisconsin?
Generally not before it has a final judgment against you. Wis. Stat. 427.104(1)(d) bars a collector from initiating or threatening to initiate communication with your employer prior to obtaining final judgment, with narrow exceptions such as verifying your employment status or earnings. That is one of several conduct rules in Wis. Stat. ch. 427, which also bans threats, harassment, false statements about your credit reputation, and communications that imitate legal process. Wis. Stat. 427.105 lets you sue for actual damages, expressly including emotional distress.
Is money in my bank account protected from garnishment in Wisconsin?
Up to $5,000 in personal-use depository accounts is exempt under Wis. Stat. 815.18(3), and directly deposited federal benefits like Social Security carry an automatic federal protection covering roughly the last two months of deposits.
Can I be fired over a wage garnishment in Wisconsin?
Wis. Stat. 812.43 bars an employer from taking any adverse action against you, or charging you any fee, because of a garnishment, with no one-debt limit in its text. The section opens with one exception: it applies unless the action is permitted under an applicable collective bargaining agreement, so union members should check the contract. Remedies include reinstatement, back wages, restored seniority, and attorney fees.
Updates
Added Wisconsin's own debt collector conduct rules under Wis. Stat. ch. 427, and corrected the employer anti-retaliation rule to note the collective bargaining agreement exception written into Wis. Stat. 812.43.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 427: Consumer Transactions
§ 427.104Prohibited practices.In force
(1) In attempting to collect an alleged debt arising from a consumer credit transaction or other consumer transaction, including a transaction primarily for an agricultural purpose, where there is an agreement to defer payment, a debt collector may not: (a) Use or threaten force or violence to cause physical harm to the customer or the customer’s dependents or property; (b) Threaten criminal prosecution; (c) Disclose or threaten to disclose information adversely affecting the customer’s reputation for credit worthiness with knowledge or reason to know that the information is false; (d) Initiate or threaten to initiate communication with the customer’s employer prior to obtaining final judgment against the customer, except as permitted by statute including specifically s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 893: Limitations Of Commencement Of Actions And Proceedings; Procedure For Claims Against Governmental Units
§ 893.43Action on contract.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in sub. (2), an action upon any contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, including an action to recover fees for professional services, except those mentioned in s. 893.40, shall be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrues or be barred. (2) An action upon a motor vehicle insurance policy described in s. 632.32 (1) shall be commenced within 3 years after the cause of action accrues or be barred. A cause of action involving underinsured motorist coverage, as defined in s. 632.32 (2) (d), or uninsured motorist coverage, as defined in s. 632.32 (2) (f), accrues on the date there is final resolution of the underlying cause of action by the injured party against the tortfeasor. Judicial Council Committee’s Note, 1979: This section is previous s. 893.19 (3) renumbered for more logical placement in restructured ch. 893. [Bill 326-A]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Zastrow v. Journal Communications, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2006, 291 Wis. 2d 426)“…is. Stat. § 893.57 , or the six-year limit found in either Wis. Stat. §§ 893.43 or 893.52. This question is answered b…”
- Van Lare v. Vogt, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2004, 274 Wis. 2d 631)“…orney notified Vogt of the claimed contractual breach. See Wis. Stat. § 893.43 . [2] The letter stated in part: It…”
- Abraham v. General Casualty Co. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1998, 217 Wis. 2d 294)“…r statute of limitations for actions sounding in contract, Wis. Stat. § 893.43 , 3 applies to Abraham's claim to rend…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 893.05Relation of statute of limitations to right and remedy.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
When the period within which an action may be commenced on a Wisconsin cause of action has expired, the right is extinguished as well as the remedy. Judicial Council Committee’s Note, 1979: This new section is a codification of Wisconsin case law. See Maryland Casualty Company v. Beleznay, 245 Wis. 390, 14 N.W.2d 177 (1944), in which it is stated at page 393: “In Wisconsin the running of the statute of limitations absolutely extinguishes the cause of action for in Wisconsin limitations are not treated as statutes of repose. The limitation of actions is a right as well as a remedy, extinguishing the right on one side and creating a right on the other, which is as of high dignity as regards judicial remedies as any other right and it is a right which enjoys constitutional protection”. [Bill 326-A]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2004, 274 Wis. 2d 220)“…ion and statutes of repose alluded to in *260 the Note to Wis. Stat. § 893.05 has nothing to do with how the two con…”
- Town of Burnside v. City of Independence (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2016, 372 Wis. 2d 802)“…347, 373 , 531 N.W.2d 386 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Wis. Stat. § 893.05 ("When the period within which an acti…”
- Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson (Supreme Court of the United States 2017, 581 U.S. 224)“…limitations period extinguishes the remedy and the right); Wis. Stat. §893.05 (2011–2012) (same). Johnson argues t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Statute of Limitations on Debt: The 50-State Payment-Revival Table
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 425: Consumer Transactions
§ 425.206Nonjudicial enforcement limited.In force
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no merchant may take possession of collateral or goods subject to a consumer lease in this state except when any of the following apply: (a) The customer has surrendered the collateral or leased goods. (b) Judgment for the merchant has been entered in a proceeding for recovery of collateral or leased goods under s. 425.205, or for possession of the collateral or leased goods under s. 425.203 (2). (c) The merchant has taken possession of collateral or leased goods pursuant to s. 425.207 (2). (d) For motor vehicle collateral or goods subject to a motor vehicle consumer lease, the customer has not made a demand as specified in s. 425.205 (1g) (a) 3. and, no sooner than 15 days after the merchant gives the notice specified in s. 425.205 (1g) (a), the merchant has taken possession of the collateral or goods in accordance with sub. (2). (2) In taking possession of collateral or leased goods, no merchant may do any of the following: (a) Commit a breach of the peace. (b) Enter a dwelling used by the customer as a residence except at the voluntary request of a customer. (3) A violation of this section is subject to s. 425.305.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1999, 228 Wis. 2d 1)“…the venue provision of the Wisconsin Consumer Act violate Wis. Stat. § 425.206 ? If so, the customers are entitled to…”
- Security Finance v. Brian Kirsch (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2019, 386 Wis. 2d 388)“…inst the creditor, asserting (1) that the creditor violated Wis. Stat. § 425.206 by bringing suit in the wrong venue; an…”
- Danelle Duncan v. Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2022, 400 Wis. 2d 1)“…equest of a customer" during the repossession. See Wis. Stat. § 425.206(2)(b) (2017-18).1…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 425.104Notice of customer’s right to cure default.In force
(1) A merchant who believes that a customer is in default may give the customer written notice of the alleged default and, if applicable, of the customer’s right to cure any such default (s. 425.105). (2) Any notice given under this section shall contain the name, address and telephone number of the creditor, a brief identification of the consumer credit transaction, a statement of the nature of the alleged default and a clear statement of the total payment, including an itemization of any delinquency charges, or other performance necessary to cure the alleged default, the exact date by which the amount must be paid or performance tendered and the name, address and telephone number of the person to whom any payment must be made, if other than the creditor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Security Finance v. Brian Kirsch (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2019, 386 Wis. 2d 388)“…a notice of default and right to cure letter as required by Wis. Stat. §§ 425.104 and 425.105. Id.…”
- Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2013, 346 Wis. 2d 635)“…o notify him of his right to cure his default, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 425.104 , before repossessing the car and filin…”
- Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Chao Kong (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2012, 344 Wis. 2d 259)“…pursuant to s. 425.104." Wis. Stat. § 425.105 . In turn, Wis. Stat. § 425.104 (1) states that a merchant "may give th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 425.105Cure of default.In force
(1) A merchant may not accelerate the maturity of a consumer credit transaction, commence any action except as provided in s. 425.205 (6), or demand or take possession of collateral or goods subject to a consumer lease other than by accepting a voluntary surrender thereof (s. 425.204), unless the merchant believes the customer to be in default (s. 425.103), and then only upon the expiration of 15 days after a notice is given pursuant to s. 425.104 if the customer has the right to cure under this section. (2) Except as provided in subs. (3) and (3m), for 15 days after such notice is given, a customer may cure a default under a consumer credit transaction by tendering the amount of all unpaid installments due at the time of the tender, without acceleration, plus any unpaid delinquency or deferral charges, and by tendering performance necessary to cure any default other than nonpayment of amounts due. The act of curing a default restores to the customer the customer’s rights under the agreement as though no default had occurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Security Finance v. Brian Kirsch (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2019, 386 Wis. 2d 388)“…ays after a notice is given pursuant to s. 425.104 . . . ." Wis. Stat. § 425.105(1) As in Kett, Mr. Ki…”
- Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2013, 346 Wis. 2d 635)“…e deficiency action. Therefore, Credit Acceptance violated Wis. Stat. § 425.105 (1) when it filed the deficiency action…”
- Danelle Duncan v. Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2022, 400 Wis. 2d 1)“…Indeed, aside from curing the default under Wis. Stat. § 425.105, a customer's only way of contesting…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 812: Garnishment
§ 812.34Exemption.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) The exemptions provided in this section do not apply if the judgment debt meets one of the following conditions: (a) Was ordered by a court under s. 128.21 or by any court of the United States under 11 USC 1301 to 1330. (b) Is for the support of any person. (c) Is for unpaid taxes. (2) (a) Unless the court grants relief under s. 812.38 (2) or par. (b) or (c) applies, 80 percent of the debtor’s disposable earnings are exempt from garnishment under this subchapter. (b) The debtor’s earnings are totally exempt from garnishment under this subchapter if: 1. The debtor’s household income is below the poverty line. 2. The debtor receives need-based public assistance, has received such assistance within 6 months prior to service of the earnings garnishment forms upon the garnishee or has been determined eligible to receive need-based assistance although actual receipt of benefits has not commenced.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Unifund CCR Partners v. Olofson (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2018, 384 Wis. 2d 272)“…shment, and that as such the exemptions to garnishment of Wis. Stat. § 812.34 do not apply in this case. By not fil…”
- Chase Lumber & Fuel Co. v. Koch (In Re Koch) (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin 1996, 197 B.R. 654)“…rtcy.W.D.Wis.1981). The debtor may claim an exemption under Wis.Stat. § 812.34(2)(b) or assert any defense to the garn…”
- Whitehead v. Discover Bank (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2015, 118 F. Supp. 3d 1111)“…be partially or completely exempt from garnishment. See Wis. Stat. § 812.34 . In his answer, WTiitehead did not cla…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Wisconsin (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 812.43Retaliation by garnishee for earnings garnishment forbidden.In force
Unless permitted under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, a garnishee shall not impose any fee or take any adverse action against a debtor by reason of the garnishment of the debtor’s earnings. If a garnishee violates this section, the debtor may bring an action for reinstatement, back wages and benefits, restoration of seniority, other relief allowed by law and reasonable attorney fees incurred in bringing this action. 812.43 Note
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 815: Executions
§ 815.18Property exempt from execution.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Statutory construction. This section shall be construed to secure its full benefit to debtors and to advance the humane purpose of preserving to debtors and their dependents the means of obtaining a livelihood, the enjoyment of property necessary to sustain life and the opportunity to avoid becoming public charges. (2) Definitions. In this section: (a) “Aggregate value” means the sum total of the debtor’s equity in the property claimed exempt. (am) “Annuity” means a series of payments payable during the life of the annuitant or during a specific period. (b) “Business” means any lawful activity, including a farm operation, conducted primarily for the purchase, sale, lease or rental of property, for the manufacturing, processing or marketing of property, or for the sale of services. (bc) “Closely held business” means a corporation whose stocks are held by not more than 25 individuals, a partnership of not more than 25 partners who are individuals, or a limited liability company of not more than 25 members who are individuals. (c) “Debtor” means an individual.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 67 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rumage v. Gullberg (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2000, 235 Wis. 2d 279)“…is surplus equity and the homestead is "partially exempt." Wis. Stat. § 815.18 (9). 9 We agree with the c…”
- Paulman v. Pemberton (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2001, 246 Wis. 2d 909)“…gave Carole a "consensual lien" over his home pursuant to Wis. Stat. §815.18 (12) 4 when he stipulated…”
- Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLC (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2010, 331 Wis. 2d 74)“…action under Wis. Stat. ch. 242 to set aside the transfer. Wis. Stat. § 815.18 (10); see also Wis. Stat. §§ 242.04-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 403: Uniform Commercial Code
§ 403.118Statute of limitations.In force
(1) Except as provided in sub. (5), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time shall be commenced within 6 years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within 6 years after the accelerated due date. (2) Except as provided in sub. (4) or (5), if demand for payment is made to the maker of a note payable on demand, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the note shall be commenced within 6 years after the demand. If no demand for payment is made to the maker, an action to enforce the note is barred if neither principal nor interest on the note has been paid for a continuous period of 10 years. (3) Except as provided in sub. (4), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft shall be commenced within 3 years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2008
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2008, 307 Wis. 2d 776)“…was time barred by the statute of limitations specified in Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (7). 2 *780…”
- Gerczak v. Estate of Gerczak (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2005, 285 Wis. 2d 397)“…but the six-to-ten-year limitation for actions on notes, Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (2), or the six-year limitation for act…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. 812.34 (Exemption from Earnings Garnishment)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 815.18 (Property Exempt from Execution), including 815.18(3) Depository Accounts(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 893.05 (Relation of Statute of Limitations to Right and Remedy)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 893.43 (Action on Contract; 6-Year Limitation)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 425.206 (Nonjudicial Enforcement Limited; Wisconsin Consumer Act)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 425.105 (Cure of Default; Wisconsin Consumer Act)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 403.118 (Statute of Limitations on Negotiable Instruments)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 427.104 (Prohibited Practices; Wisconsin Consumer Act Debt Collection)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. 427.105 (Remedies; actual damages include emotional distress)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. 812.43 (Garnishee May Not Penalize Debtor; collective bargaining exception)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)