Texas
Texas Debt Collection Laws: Protected Wages, Exposed Bank Accounts
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No debt collector in Texas can touch your paycheck, your bank account, or your car over an ordinary consumer debt without following a legal process, and for the first two of those the process starts with a lawsuit. A collection agency calling about a credit card cannot garnish anything. It must sue you, win a judgment, and then use the specific collection remedies Texas law allows. Most judgments in consumer debt cases are default judgments, entered because the person sued never filed an answer, so responding to the summons is the single most valuable thing you can do. Texas then adds a twist found almost nowhere else: your wages are constitutionally protected from garnishment for ordinary debts, but the moment your paycheck lands in your bank account, that protection is gone.
Wage Garnishment in Texas: A Real Bar With Real Exceptions
Texas is one of a handful of states where an ordinary judgment creditor cannot garnish wages at all. The rule sits in three places at once. Article XVI, Section 28 of the Texas Constitution says no current wages for personal service shall ever be subject to garnishment except for court-ordered child support or spousal maintenance. Civil Practice and Remedies Code 63.004 repeats the exemption and discharges the employer from any garnishment aimed at current wages. Property Code 42.001(b)(1) lists current wages among the personal property exempt from seizure. (The Property Code's text names only child support as its exception, while the Constitution also names spousal maintenance, a drafting inconsistency between the two; the constitutional rule controls.)
That protection is genuine, but the popular version, that «garnishment is illegal in Texas», is wrong twice over. First, the state-law exceptions are built into the text: court-ordered child support and spousal maintenance orders reach Texas wages. Second, federal law does not ask Texas for permission. The U.S. Department of Education and other federal agencies can garnish up to 15% of disposable pay administratively for defaulted student loans and other federal debts, with no court judgment, and the Department of Labor confirms that this federal administrative garnishment operates without regard to state garnishment laws. IRS wage levies work the same way. If your paycheck is being taken in Texas, one of those regimes is almost certainly the reason.
Texas has no state income tax, so there is no state revenue-department wage levy to worry about. Federal law protects you from being fired over a garnishment for any one debt, and Family Code 8.208 separately bars firing over a spousal maintenance withholding order, but Texas has no broader statute protecting an employee whose pay is garnished for multiple debts.
The Bank Account Exception: Wages Lose Protection the Moment They Are Deposited
This is the most important and least understood rule in Texas collection law. The constitutional exemption covers «current wages», and Texas courts read that phrase literally: wages are current only until they are paid. In Fitzpatrick v. Leasecomm Corp. (Texas Court of Appeals, Tyler, 2008), the debtor argued that her electronically direct-deposited paycheck kept its exempt character in her credit union account. The court rejected the argument, holding that wages cease to be current and lose their exempt status immediately upon being paid to and received by the wage earner, and that a direct deposit is no different in legal effect from walking a paper check to the bank. The deposited wages became subject to garnishment the moment they hit the account.

The practical upshot: a judgment creditor who could never send a garnishment writ to your employer can send one to your bank under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 63. The writ freezes the account while the case is sorted out, and money that started as wages generally has no special claim to come back. Texas law does not appear to provide a self-executing dollar-amount shield for bank deposits the way some states do. What does stay protected in a bank account: directly deposited federal benefits such as Social Security, which federal banking rules require the bank to protect automatically up to the last two months of deposits, and funds you can trace to categories the Property Code exempts. Timing matters enormously with a frozen account, so if a bank writ lands, treat it as urgent rather than waiting to see what happens.
How Long Can You Be Sued: The Four-Year Rule
Most Texas debt claims expire quickly by national standards. Civil Practice and Remedies Code 16.004(a)(3) gives an action for debt 4 years from accrual, and 16.004(c) gives actions on open or stated accounts 4 years from when the dealings cease. Credit card debt falls inside the 4-year window under either theory. Promissory notes run longer: Business and Commerce Code 3.118(a) allows 6 years from the due date (or accelerated due date), and a demand note with no demand ever made is barred after 10 years with no payment of principal or interest.
Two cautions apply everywhere, including Texas. A time-barred debt is not an erased debt: the collector may still ask you to pay, and federal Regulation F only forbids suing or threatening suit on it. And credit reporting runs on its own separate clock, generally seven years, so a debt can vanish from your credit report while still being inside the statute of limitations, or the reverse.
Time-Barred Debt: Texas Draws a Hard Line for Debt Buyers
What happens if you make a payment on an old debt is where Texas law splits sharply by who owns the debt.

If the debt has been sold to a debt buyer, Finance Code 392.307 (enacted in 2019) makes expiration permanent. A debt buyer may not sue or start arbitration on a consumer debt once the limitations period under Section 16.004 or Business and Commerce Code 3.118 has run, and the statute says the cause of action is not revived by a payment, an oral or written reaffirmation, or any other activity on the debt. Even a signed writing changes nothing. The debt buyer must also tell you, in its first written communication, that because of the age of the debt it will not sue you for it.
If the original creditor still owns the debt, the older rule in Civil Practice and Remedies Code 16.065 applies: an acknowledgment of a time-barred claim revives it only if it is in writing and signed by the person to be charged. A payment alone, without a signed writing, is not a signed acknowledgment under that section's text.
The practical takeaway is unusually clean for Texas: paying a debt buyer on an out-of-statute debt cannot restart the clock, and no one should tell you otherwise. With an original creditor, be careful what you sign.
What a Collector May Not Do: The Texas Debt Collection Act
Section 392.307 is one provision of a much larger statute. Finance Code Chapter 392, the Texas Debt Collection Act, is the state law that sets the rules of collector conduct alongside the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and four of its sections define what is off limits.
Section 392.301 forbids threats and coercion, including threatening violence, falsely accusing you of a crime, and threatening arrest or property seizure without the court proceedings that would actually be required. Section 392.302 forbids harassment and abuse: profane or obscene language, repeated calls made to annoy, calls placed without disclosing who is calling, and causing you to incur communication charges. Section 392.303 forbids unfair or unconscionable means, including collecting charges that no agreement and no law authorizes. Section 392.304 forbids fraudulent, deceptive, or misleading representations across nineteen listed categories, among them using a false name, misrepresenting the character, amount, or status of the debt, sending documents made to resemble court papers, and falsely implying that a lawyer is involved.
There is also a threshold question most people never think to ask. Under Section 392.101, a third-party debt collector or credit bureau may not engage in debt collection at all unless it has obtained a $10,000 surety bond from a surety company authorized to do business in Texas, with a copy of the bond filed with the secretary of state. A collector working your account without that bond on file is collecting unlawfully, and the secretary of state's records are where that gets confirmed.
The enforcement side sits in Sections 392.403 and 392.404, and it is the part worth knowing. Section 392.403 lets you sue for injunctive relief to stop or prevent a violation and for the actual damages the violation caused, and a plaintiff who prevails recovers attorney's fees reasonably related to the work performed, plus costs; for violations of the bond requirement in 392.101, of Section 392.202, or of Section 392.301(a)(3), the statute sets a floor of not less than $100 for each violation. Section 392.404 then goes further: a violation of Chapter 392 is a deceptive trade practice under Subchapter E, Chapter 17 of the Business and Commerce Code, and is actionable under the DTPA, which carries its own remedies. In practice that combination is why a Texas collector's conduct is worth documenting as it happens, with dates, times, and what was said.
Car Repossession in Texas
Texas gives car lenders the standard self-help remedy with no cure period in front of it. Under Business and Commerce Code 9.609, a secured lender may repossess after default without going to court, so long as it proceeds without breach of the peace. There is no Texas statute requiring advance notice of repossession or giving you a set number of days to catch up after a missed payment; Finance Code Chapter 348, which governs motor vehicle installment sales, contains no right-to-cure provision. Whatever grace period exists comes from your contract, not from the state.
What Texas law does regulate: Finance Code 348.411 forbids a vehicle installment contract from authorizing the creditor to enter your premises in violation of the commercial code or to commit a breach of the peace during repossession, and it bars the contract from appointing the lender as your agent for repossession. Section 348.412 voids any contract clause waiving your right to sue over illegal collection or repossession conduct.
The notice you do get comes after the car is gone, and it is the step readers most often miss. Once the lender intends to sell the vehicle, Business and Commerce Code 9.611(b) and (c) require it to send the debtor and any secondary obligor a reasonable authenticated notification of the disposition. Because a car bought for personal use is consumer goods, Section 9.614 controls what that notice has to contain: the general contents listed in 9.613(1), a description of any deficiency liability, a telephone number where you can get the exact amount needed to redeem the car, and a contact point for further information about the sale and the debt. Section 9.614 also supplies a safe-harbor form headed «NOTICE OF OUR PLAN TO SELL PROPERTY». Until that sale actually happens, Section 9.623 gives you the right to redeem the collateral by tendering the full amount owed, not merely the past-due payments, together with the lender's reasonable expenses and attorney's fees.
After the repossession, the sale of the car must be commercially reasonable in every aspect under Section 9.610, and Section 9.615 makes you liable for any deficiency, the gap between what the sale brings and what you owed, while requiring any surplus to be paid back to you. If the lender or a related party buys the car at a lowball price, the deficiency is measured against what an arm's-length sale would have brought. Where the lender skipped a step, Section 9.625 makes it liable for the loss its noncompliance caused, and for consumer goods it sets a minimum recovery of the credit service charge plus 10 percent of the principal amount of the obligation. How a missing notice affects the deficiency itself in a consumer transaction is left to the courts rather than fixed by statute: Section 9.626 applies its rules to non-consumer transactions and says expressly that the limitation is meant to leave the consumer question to judicial development. Servicemembers who signed the contract before entering military service cannot have the vehicle repossessed without a court order under the federal SCRA.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Texas
Start with the paperwork. If you have been served with a lawsuit, file an answer by the deadline even if you think the debt is legitimate, because a default judgment gives the creditor every collection tool at once and forfeits defenses like an expired statute of limitations, which a court will not raise for you. If the suit is on old debt, check the 4-year clock and, if a debt buyer is suing, whether Finance Code 392.307 bars the case outright.

If your bank account has been frozen by a garnishment writ, act immediately: identify every exempt dollar in the account (federal benefits, insurance proceeds, other exempt categories) and assert the exemptions with the court handling the writ. If your paycheck itself is being garnished, identify which regime is doing it, because the response differs completely between child support, federal student loan garnishment (which has its own hearing rights and a 30-day notice requirement), and an IRS levy. If the problem is the collector's behavior rather than the judgment, Chapter 392 gives you a cause of action with attorney's fees attached, so keep a dated record of the calls and letters. And if judgments and frozen accounts are stacking up faster than they can be dealt with one at a time, a bankruptcy filing stops garnishment and collection through the automatic stay while the underlying debts are resolved; whether that trade is worth it depends on your whole financial picture, and it is worth a professional's eyes.
Overwhelmed by debt in Texas? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on Texas's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a Texas bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
For the national picture, see debt collection laws by state, statute of limitations on debt, how to stop wage garnishment, and car repossession laws. Social Security and other federal benefits have their own protection rules, covered in can Social Security be garnished. For deadlines on other Texas claim types, see the Texas statute of limitations, and if the debts themselves have become unmanageable, Texas bankruptcy explains the state's famously generous exemptions.
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Texas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my wages be garnished in Texas?
Not by ordinary creditors like credit card companies or debt buyers. The Texas Constitution exempts current wages for personal service from garnishment. But court-ordered child support and spousal maintenance, federal administrative garnishment for student loans and other federal debts (up to 15% of disposable pay), and IRS levies all reach Texas wages.
Can a creditor take money from my bank account in Texas?
Yes, with a judgment. Texas courts held in Fitzpatrick v. Leasecomm Corp. that wages lose their exempt status the moment they are deposited, including by direct deposit, so a bank garnishment writ can reach a deposited paycheck. Directly deposited federal benefits keep an automatic federal protection covering roughly the last two months of deposits.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Texas?
Four years, under Civil Practice and Remedies Code 16.004, whether the claim is framed as a debt or an open account. Promissory notes carry six years under Business and Commerce Code 3.118.
What is a debt collector not allowed to do in Texas?
Finance Code Chapter 392, the Texas Debt Collection Act, forbids threats and coercion (Section 392.301), harassment and abuse such as profane language, repeated annoying calls, or calls that do not disclose who is calling (392.302), unfair or unconscionable means like collecting charges no agreement or law authorizes (392.303), and fraudulent, deceptive, or misleading representations such as using a false name or sending documents made to resemble court papers (392.304). A third-party debt collector must also hold a $10,000 surety bond filed with the secretary of state under Section 392.101.
What can I do about a debt collector who breaks Texas law?
Section 392.403 lets you sue for an injunction to stop the violation and for actual damages, with attorney's fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff, and a floor of at least $100 per violation for certain sections including the bond requirement. Section 392.404 also makes a Chapter 392 violation a deceptive trade practice actionable under the DTPA.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in Texas?
If a debt buyer owns the debt, no. Finance Code 392.307 says a time-barred consumer debt is never revived by a payment, a reaffirmation, or any other activity. If the original creditor still owns it, only a signed written acknowledgment revives a time-barred claim under Section 16.065.
Does Texas require notice before repossessing a car?
No. Texas has no statutory right to cure or advance-notice requirement before repossession. After default, the lender may use self-help repossession as long as it does not breach the peace, and the later sale must be commercially reasonable.
Do I get notice before my repossessed car is sold in Texas?
Yes. Business and Commerce Code 9.611 requires the lender to send the debtor and any secondary obligor a reasonable authenticated notification before it disposes of the car, and because a personal-use vehicle is consumer goods, Section 9.614 sets the required contents and a safe-harbor form. Until the sale happens, Section 9.623 lets you redeem the car by tendering the full amount owed plus the lender's reasonable expenses and attorney's fees.
Can I be fired over a wage garnishment in Texas?
Federal law bars firing an employee because of garnishment for any one debt, and Texas Family Code 8.208 separately protects employees under spousal maintenance withholding orders. Texas has no broader statute covering garnishments for multiple ordinary debts.
Updates
Added coverage of the Texas Debt Collection Act (Finance Code Chapter 392), including the conduct rules in Sections 392.301 to 392.304, the $10,000 surety bond requirement in Section 392.101, and the civil and DTPA remedies in Sections 392.403 and 392.404, and added the pre-sale notice, notice-contents and redemption rights that apply after a car repossession under Business and Commerce Code Sections 9.611, 9.614 and 9.623.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
§ 63.004CURRENT WAGES EXEMPTIn force
Except as otherwise provided by state or federal law, current wages for personal service are not subject to garnishment. The garnishee shall be discharged from the garnishment as to any debt to the defendant for current wages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2008
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Simulis, L.L.C. v. G.E. Capital Corp. (2008) held that section 63.004 protects the debtor's own current wages, so the exemption did not cover a debtor employer's bank account holding payroll for its employees. The court found no authority extending the exemption to wages of employees other than the debtor.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Caulley v. Caulley (Texas Supreme Court 1991, 806 S.W.2d 795)“…of court-ordered child support payments. [1] See also Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 63.004 (current wages for personal services ar…”
- Davis v. Raborn (Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) 1988, 754 S.W.2d 481)✓A judgment debtor was ordered to turn over every future salary check to a receiver; citing the constitutional wage exemption and Section 63.004, the court held wages stay exempt until actually paid to the earner, so the order could not reach them in advance.
- Simulis, L.L.C. v. G.E. Capital Corp. (Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) 2008, 276 S.W.3d 109)✓A creditor garnished a company's bank account that the company said held only employee payroll; the court held the Section 63.004 current-wage exemption protects a debtor's own wages, not funds a debtor holds to pay other people's wages, and affirmed the garnishment.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16.004FOUR-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIODIn force
(a) A person must bring suit on the following actions not later than four years after the day the cause of action accrues: (1) specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real property; (2) penalty or damages on the penal clause of a bond to convey real property; (3) debt; (4) fraud; or (5) breach of fiduciary duty. (b) A person must bring suit on the bond of an executor, administrator, or guardian not later than four years after the day of the death, resignation, removal, or discharge of the executor, administrator, or guardian. (c) A person must bring suit against his partner for a settlement of partnership accounts, and must bring an action on an open or stated account, or on a mutual and current account concerning the trade of merchandise between merchants or their agents or factors, not later than four years after the day that the cause of action accrues. For purposes of this subsection, the cause of action accrues on the day that the dealings in which the parties were interested together cease.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 402 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Thweatt v. Jackson (Court of Appeals of Texas 1992, 838 S.W.2d 725)“…t was barred under the Texas statute of limitation found in Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.004 (1986). December 28, 1988 FDIC in its…”
- Mid-South Telecommunications Co. v. Best (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2006, 184 S.W.3d 386)“…sing the four-year statute of limitations. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 16.004(a)(3) (West 2002). The district court d…”
- Richard Nugent and CAO, Inc. v. the Estate of Janie Baker Ellickson (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2018, 543 S.W.3d 243)“…9 fiduciary duty. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.004(a)(5) (Vernon 2002). The statute of lim…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16.065ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CLAIMIn force
An acknowledgment of the justness of a claim that appears to be barred by limitations is not admissible in evidence to defeat the law of limitations if made after the time that the claim is due unless the acknowledgment is in writing and is signed by the party to be charged.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gerald Brooks v. Holland Price, IV (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2001)“…he two debts and agreed to pay them off to Brooks. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.065 (West 1997). The portion of the Dece…”
- Samuel and Leela Murphy v. Fairfield Financial Group, Inc. and J. Richard ("Rick") Renshaw (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2000)“…riting and is signed by the party to be charged. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.065 (West 1997). 7. We believe t…”
- Stine v. Stewart (Texas Supreme Court 2002, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 966)“…in writing and is signed by the party to be charged. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 16.065. Texas courts have consistently interpr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Texas Finance Code
§ 392.307COLLECTION OF CERTAIN CONSUMER DEBT BY DEBT BUYERSIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) In this section: (1) "Charged-off debt" means a consumer debt that a creditor has determined to be a loss or expense to the creditor instead of an asset. (2) "Debt buyer" means a person who purchases or otherwise acquires a consumer debt from a creditor or other subsequent owner of the consumer debt, regardless of whether the person collects the consumer debt, hires a third party to collect the consumer debt, or hires an attorney to pursue collection litigation in connection with the consumer debt. The term does not include: (A) a person who acquires in-default or charged-off debt that is incidental to the purchase of a portfolio that predominantly consists of consumer debt that has not been charged off; or (B) a check services company that acquires the right to collect on a paper or electronic negotiable instrument, including an Automated Clearing House (ACH) authorization to debit an account that has not been processed. (b) Unless otherwise expressly provided, this section prevails to the extent of any conflict between this section and any other law of this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Also relied on in: Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules, Statute of Limitations on Debt: The 50-State Payment-Revival Table
§ 348.411PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ACTS OF REPOSSESSIONIn force
A retail installment contract may not: (1) authorize the holder or a person acting on the holder's behalf to: (A) enter the retail buyer's premises in violation of Chapter 9, Business & Commerce Code; or (B) commit a breach of the peace in the repossession of the motor vehicle; or (2) contain, or provide for the execution of, a power of attorney by the retail buyer appointing, as the buyer's agent in the repossession of the vehicle, the holder or a person acting on the holder's behalf.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
§ 348.412BUYER'S WAIVERIn force
(a) A retail installment contract may not: (1) provide for a waiver of the retail buyer's rights of action against the holder or a person acting on the holder's behalf for an illegal act committed in: (A) the collection of payments under the contract; or (B) the repossession of the motor vehicle; or (2) provide that the retail buyer agrees not to assert against the holder a claim or defense arising out of the sale. (b) An act or agreement of the retail buyer before or at the time of the making of a retail installment contract or a purchase under the contract does not waive any provision of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Texas Business & Commerce Code
§ 3.118STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSIn force
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (e), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six years after the accelerated due date. (b) Except as provided in Subsection (d) or (e), if demand for payment is made to the maker of a note payable on demand, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the note must be commenced within six years after the demand. If no demand for payment is made to the maker, an action to enforce the note is barred if neither principal nor interest on the note has been paid for a continuous period of 10 years. (c) Except as provided in Subsection (d), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft must be commenced within three years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Aguero v. Ramirez (Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District 2002, 70 S.W.3d 372)“…years after the due date or dates stated in the note.... ” Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 3.118 (a) (Vernon Supp.2002). The tria…”
- Rodger Mulley v. Texas Capital Holdings, LLC (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2023)“…imitations period to actions on a debt). 2 Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 3.118(a) (“[A]n action to enforce the obligat…”
- Manuel v. Aguero v. Juan M. and Susana Ramirez (Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District 2002)“…rs after the due date or dates stated in the note. . . ." Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 3.118 (a) (Vernon Supp. 2002). The tria…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.609SECURED PARTY'S RIGHT TO TAKE POSSESSION AFTER DEFAULTIn force
(a) After default, a secured party: (1) may take possession of the collateral; and (2) without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on the debtor's premises under Section 9.610. (b) A secured party may proceed under Subsection (a): (1) pursuant to judicial process; or (2) without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace. (c) If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party may require the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party at a place to be designated by the secured party that is reasonably convenient to both parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brazoria County Imaging Center, LLC, Robert D. Neidert, and Robert S. Neidert v. Celeste Investment Group Angleton, LLC (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2023)“…hich it holds a security interest than does the debtor. See Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 9.609 (West, Westlaw through 2023 R.S.); Sanc…”
- First Valley Bank of Los Fresnos v. Martin (Texas Supreme Court 2004, 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1052)“…the property may be identified by it alone). [26] See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 9.609(c) (formerly § 9.503) (providing secure…”
- Ellen Foley v. Capital One Bank, N.A. (Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) 2012, 383 S.W.3d 644)“…it, and apply the proceeds to help satisfy the obligation. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. §§ 9.609, 9.610, 9.615 (West 2011). If th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.610DISPOSITION OF COLLATERAL AFTER DEFAULTIn force
(a) After default, a secured party may sell, lease, license, or otherwise dispose of any or all of the collateral in its present condition or following any commercially reasonable preparation or processing. (b) Every aspect of a disposition of collateral, including the method, manner, time, place, and other terms, must be commercially reasonable. If commercially reasonable, a secured party may dispose of collateral by public or private proceedings, by one or more contracts, as a unit or in parcels, and at any time and place and on any terms. (c) A secured party may purchase collateral: (1) at a public disposition; or (2) at a private disposition only if the collateral is of a kind that is customarily sold on a recognized market or the subject of widely distributed standard price quotations. (d) A contract for sale, lease, license, or other disposition includes the warranties relating to title, possession, quiet enjoyment, and the like that by operation of law accompany a voluntary disposition of property of the kind subject to the contract.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- SunTrust Bank v. Mark A. Monroe (Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) 2018)“…and other terms—must be commercially reasonable. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 9.610(b) (providing that if commercially reas…”
- Tami Donald, Jerry Moore, and Summit Spring Water Company, Inc. v. Brian Rhone, BMR Distributing, Inc., Chris Rhone, and Rhone Water Company, Inc. D/B/A Frosty's Water (Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) 2015)“…625(b), (d) for “failure to comply with the provisions of Texas Business & Commerce Code Sections 9.610, 9.611, 9.613, 9.616, 9.625, 9.626 et.…”
- Regal Finance Co. v. Tex Star Motors, Inc. (Texas Supreme Court 2010, 53 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1034)“…ncluding the method, manner, time, place, and other terms.” Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 9.610(b). Article 9 provides several examples…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.615APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF DISPOSITION; LIABILITY FOR DEFICIENCY AND RIGHT TO SURPLUSIn force
(a) A secured party shall apply or pay over for application the cash proceeds of disposition under Section 9.610 in the following order to: (1) the reasonable expenses of retaking, holding, preparing for disposition, processing, and disposing and, to the extent provided for by agreement and not prohibited by law, reasonable attorney's fees and legal expenses incurred by the secured party; (2) the satisfaction of obligations secured by the security interest or agricultural lien under which the disposition is made; (3) the satisfaction of obligations secured by any subordinate security interest in or other subordinate lien on the collateral if: (A) the secured party receives from the holder of the subordinate security interest or other lien an authenticated demand for proceeds before distribution of the proceeds is completed; and (B) in a case in which a consignor has an interest in the collateral, the subordinate security interest or other lien is senior to the interest of the consignor; and (4) a secured party that is a consignor of the collateral if the secured party receives from the consignor an authenticated demand for proceeds before distribution of the proceeds is…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harold McGee v. Deere & Company (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2005)“…ttorney’s fees, as allowed in the original contract and by Texas Business & Commerce Code section 9.615 (West 2002). It subsequently filed a m…”
- Berrocal (District Court, W.D. Texas 2025)“…9.609 Regarding Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 9.615 and 9.616, Berrocal’s Amended Complaint…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Texas Constitution, Article XVI, Section 28 (Garnishment of Wages)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Chapter 63 (Garnishment), including Section 63.004 (Current Wages Exempt)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Chapter 16 (Limitations), Sections 16.004 and 16.065(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Fin. Code Section 392.307 (Collection of Time-Barred Debt by Debt Buyers)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Chapter 9 (Secured Transactions), Sections 9.609, 9.610, 9.615; Section 3.118 (Statute of Limitations on Notes)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Fin. Code Chapter 348 (Motor Vehicle Installment Sales), Sections 348.411 and 348.412(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, Fact Sheet #30: The Federal Wage Garnishment Law (CCPA)(dol.gov).gov