Tennessee
Tennessee Debt Collection Laws: The 25% Cap and the Child Credit Most Debtors Miss
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A Tennessee debt collector cannot touch your paycheck on its own signature. It has to sue you, win a judgment, and then send a writ of garnishment to your employer. Most Tennessee garnishments trace back to a default judgment, entered because the person being sued never filed an answer, so responding to the lawsuit is the single highest-value move available once you are served. Once a garnishment does start, Tennessee follows the federal 25% cap almost exactly, with one twist most federal-copy states skip: an extra weekly credit for each dependent child under 16 living with you, stacked directly on top of the cap.
Wage Garnishment in Tennessee: The 25% Cap and the Child Credit
Tennessee's garnishment formula mirrors the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act almost word for word. Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 26-2-106, quoted directly in Tennessee Attorney General Opinion 19-10, caps garnishment at the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings for the week or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, roughly $217.50 a week at today's $7.25 federal minimum. Below that floor, nothing can be garnished at all.
Tennessee adds something most states copying the federal formula do not: Sec. 26-2-107 layers an additional $2.50-per-week exemption on top of the cap for each dependent child under 16 who lives in Tennessee. An official Montgomery County circuit court garnishment-answer form spells out the per-pay-period equivalents: $5.00 biweekly, $5.42 semimonthly, $10.83 monthly. The claiming procedure is a condition written into the statute, not a formality. Sec. 26-2-107(b) puts the responsibility on the judgment debtor to inform the employer of each dependent child claimed, and subsection (c) states flatly that the section does not apply if the debtor fails to so inform the employer. Miss that step and the credit is forfeited entirely. The same condition is reproduced in the statutory notice to the garnishee at Sec. 26-2-216(b)(2), which instructs the employer to subtract $2.50 for each qualifying child under 16 residing in the state. If you are being garnished and have children who qualify, tell your employer's payroll office, in writing, and keep a copy.
A garnishment lien in Tennessee does not run forever. It lasts until the judgment is paid in full or until six months after the writ is served, whichever happens first, at which point the creditor has to serve a fresh writ to keep collecting.
When More Than One Creditor Comes After Your Paycheck
Tennessee has a defined answer for what happens when two creditors both want a piece of the same paycheck. Under Sec. 26-2-214(b), the first writ filed gets priority. If a second creditor files a writ seeking less than the statutory maximum, that second writ can only collect the gap between what the first writ is already taking and the overall cap, and it adjusts upward automatically, no new filing required, once the first writ is satisfied or expires. But if the second writ itself demands the full maximum allowed, Sec. 26-2-224(a) says it does not run at the same time as the first writ at all; it simply waits until the earlier judgment is paid, expires, or is paused by an installment order.

Child support sits above all of this. Sec. 36-5-501(j)(1) gives a child support income assignment priority over any other Title 26, Chapter 2 garnishment. And no matter how many writs are stacked, the combined amount taken can never exceed the federal ceiling under 15 U.S.C. 1673.
The Installment Stay: A Way to Pause Garnishment
Tennessee lets a garnished debtor propose a payment plan instead. Under Sec. 26-2-216, you can move the court for an order suspending further garnishment by the same creditor in exchange for paying a set sum weekly, biweekly, or monthly toward the judgment. Filing the motion stops the garnishment for as long as you keep making the ordered payments. This is a real, court-supervised alternative to having 25% of a paycheck disappear every pay period, and it is worth raising with the court or an attorney before assuming garnishment is the only option once a judgment is entered.
How Long Can You Be Sued Over a Tennessee Debt
Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 28-3-109(a) provides that «the following actions shall be commenced within six (6) years after the cause of action accrued», and subdivision (a)(3) is the catch-all that captures ordinary consumer debt, including credit card debt: «actions on contracts not otherwise expressly provided for». The wording matters, because it is often loosely described as a rule for written contracts. It is not limited to written contracts, which is why Tennessee's six-year period reaches oral agreements as well. The main carve-out is a contract for the sale of goods, which runs four years under Sec. 47-2-725(1).

Tennessee's revival rule cuts hard against debtors, and it is settled by the state's highest court rather than by statute. In Graves v. Sawyer, 588 S.W.2d 542 (Tenn. 1979), the Tennessee Supreme Court overruled its earlier contrary decisions and held that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, a voluntary and unconditional payment on a debt or of interest on a debt «is an acknowledgment of the debt and implies a promise of payment which operates to keep the debt alive for the statutory period from that time». In practical terms, paying even a small amount on an old Tennessee debt can restart the six-year clock from the date of that payment. That is the most expensive mistake available to someone being contacted about a debt that may already be too old to sue on, so pin down how long ago the account actually went into default before you send a collector any money.
Whatever the exact number turns out to be, a time-barred debt is not an erased debt. A collector can still ask you to pay it. What federal Regulation F forbids is suing or threatening to sue on debt that is genuinely past the deadline.
Car Repossession in Tennessee
Tennessee enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 47-9-609: after default, a secured lender may repossess a vehicle without going to court, including rendering equipment unusable and disposing of it on your property, as long as it does not breach the peace. Neither the statute nor this research turned up a Tennessee right-to-cure requirement giving you advance notice or a set window to catch up before repossession.
No notice is owed before the tow, but notice is owed before the resale, and that is where a Tennessee consumer gets the most usable leverage in the whole chapter. Sec. 47-9-611(b) requires the secured party to send the debtor a reasonable authenticated notification of disposition before it sells the collateral, and Sec. 47-9-612(b) makes a notice sent after default and ten days or more before the earliest sale date reasonable as a matter of law. In a consumer-goods transaction such as a car loan, Sec. 47-9-614 prescribes what that notice must contain, including a description of any deficiency liability and a telephone number you can call to get the exact amount required to redeem the vehicle. Sec. 47-9-623 is the right that phone number exists to serve: you, or anyone else obligated on the loan, may redeem the car at any time before the lender disposes of it, contracts to dispose of it, or accepts it in satisfaction of the debt, by tendering the full obligation plus the lender's reasonable expenses and attorney's fees. Redemption means the entire balance, not merely the missed payments.
What Tennessee case law does develop is what comes after the tow truck leaves. In WM Capital Partners v. Thornton (Tennessee Court of Appeals, 2016), the court held that a lender's duty under Sec. 47-9-610(b) to run a commercially reasonable disposition, meaning every aspect of the sale, from method to timing to price, only attaches once the lender has actual or constructive possession of the vehicle; simply refusing to repossess when a debtor asks does not, by itself, create that possession. Sec. 47-9-615(d) makes clear you remain liable for any deficiency after a proper sale, but Sec. 47-9-626(4) gives you a real lever: if the lender's compliance with the commercially-reasonable-sale rules is challenged and the lender cannot prove it, the law presumes the sale would have covered the full debt, which can wipe out a deficiency claim entirely.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Tennessee
If you have been served with a debt lawsuit in Tennessee, answer it. A default judgment opens every collection tool at once and forfeits defenses, including an expired statute of limitations, that a court will not raise for you. If a garnishment has already started, check whether you have dependent children under 16 who qualify for the additional weekly credit and make sure your employer has been told about each of them, since Sec. 26-2-107(c) forfeits the credit if the employer is not informed, and whether an installment-payment motion under Sec. 26-2-216 could stop the garnishment while you pay on your own terms. If a child support order is competing with an ordinary garnishment, remember it takes priority under Tennessee law and is handled as a separate legal track, not an ordinary consumer collection matter. And if garnishments and judgments are piling up faster than any single fix can address, bankruptcy's automatic stay halts collection activity while the bigger picture gets sorted out; whether that is the right move depends on your full financial situation.

Overwhelmed by debt in Tennessee? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on Tennessee's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a Tennessee bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
For the national picture, see debt collection laws by state, statute of limitations on debt, how to stop wage garnishment, and car repossession laws. Social Security and other federal benefits have their own protection rules, covered in can Social Security be garnished. For deadlines on other Tennessee claim types, see the Tennessee statute of limitations. Child support garnishment runs through a different, higher-priority process, covered in Tennessee child support laws. If the debts themselves have become unmanageable, Tennessee bankruptcy explains the state's exemptions.
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Tennessee Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What percentage of my wages can be garnished in Tennessee?
The lesser of 25% of your disposable earnings or the amount by which your disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, about $217.50 a week currently. An additional $2.50-per-week exemption applies for each dependent child under 16 who resides in Tennessee, but only if you inform your employer of each child claimed.
Does Tennessee reduce garnishment if I have kids?
Yes, but you have to claim it. Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 26-2-107(a) provides an extra $2.50-per-week exemption for each dependent child under 16 who resides in Tennessee, on top of the standard 25% cap. Subsection (b) makes it your responsibility to inform your employer of each child claimed, and subsection (c) says the exemption does not apply if you fail to do so, so the credit is forfeited unless payroll is told.
Can more than one creditor garnish my wages at the same time in Tennessee?
Yes, but with a priority order. The first writ filed collects first; a second writ for less than the maximum can collect only the remaining room, and a second writ demanding the full maximum has to wait its turn. Child support garnishment outranks all of them, and the combined total can never exceed the federal cap.
Can I stop a Tennessee wage garnishment with a payment plan?
You can ask. Sec. 26-2-216 lets you move the court for an order suspending further garnishment by the same creditor in exchange for a set weekly, biweekly, or monthly payment, which stops the garnishment for as long as you keep paying.
What is the statute of limitations on debt in Tennessee?
Six years. Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 28-3-109(a)(3) covers actions on contracts not otherwise expressly provided for, which includes credit card and other ordinary consumer debt, and it is not limited to written contracts, so oral agreements fall under the same six-year period. Contracts for the sale of goods run four years under Sec. 47-2-725(1). Be careful about paying an old debt: under Graves v. Sawyer, 588 S.W.2d 542 (Tenn. 1979), a voluntary payment is treated as an acknowledgment that restarts the clock from the date of payment.
Does Tennessee require notice before repossessing my car?
Not before the tow, but yes before the sale. Tennessee follows the standard UCC self-help rule, so a lender can repossess without advance notice or a cure period as long as it does not breach the peace. Before it resells the car, though, Sec. 47-9-611(b) requires a reasonable authenticated notice of disposition, Sec. 47-9-612(b) treats ten days or more as reasonable, and Sec. 47-9-614 requires that notice to give you a phone number for the payoff amount. Sec. 47-9-623 lets you redeem the vehicle by paying the full balance plus the lender's expenses any time before the sale, and the resale itself must be commercially reasonable or the deficiency you owe afterward can shrink.
Updates
Corrected the statute of limitations section to state Tennessee's six-year deadline and the rule that a voluntary payment can restart the clock, added the statutory requirement that a debtor tell the employer about each dependent child or lose the weekly garnishment credit, and added the notice and redemption rights a lender owes before reselling a repossessed vehicle.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Tennessee Code Annotated
§ 26-2-106Maximum amount of disposable earnings subject to garnishment — Garnishment costs.In force
(a) The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed: (1) Twenty-five percent (25%) of the disposable earnings for that week;…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts applying Tenn. Code Ann. 26-2-106 have addressed both its reach and its base. Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence) (1998) held the section caps garnishment only while a third party holds the earnings and creates no bankruptcy exemption. Erlanger Medical Center v. Strong (2012) held customer tips are not part of disposable earnings.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Erlanger Medical Center v. Angela Strong a/k/a Granger, Shoney's North Georgia, LLC, Garnishee (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2012, 382 S.W.3d 349)✓A hospital garnishing a waitress's pay argued her customer tips counted toward disposable earnings; the court held tips paid directly by customers are not earnings for garnishment purposes, leaving them outside the 25% ceiling section 26-2-106 sets, and reversed.
- Julie Ann Kendle v. Matthew Davis Kendle (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2018, 578 S.W.3d 431)“…xceeds the aggregate disposable earnings limits provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-106. An employer of the obligor, Blue Shiel…”
- Hal Gerber v. Robert R. Holcomb, Salans, Holcomb Management, Inc., Holcomb Investments, L.P. and Vanderbilt University (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2006)“…y period become due and payable, whichever is less. T.C.A. § 26-2-106 (a)(1)-(2) (Supp. 2005) (emphasis added…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 26-2-107Exemptions for dependent children.In force
(a) To the above allowances, there shall be added as exempt to the judgment debtor the sum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per week for each dependent child under sixteen (16) years of age and a resident of this state. (b) It is the responsibility of the judgment debtor to inform the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 26-2-216Installment payments to obtain stay of garnishment — Service of garnishment summons.In force
(a)(1) After any judgment has been rendered in any court and the time to appeal therefrom has elapsed without such an appeal having been made, the judge of the court which rendered the judgment may, either before or after the issuance and service of garnishment, upon written consent of the parties…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dexter Ridge Shopping Center, LLC v. Little (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2010, 358 S.W.3d 597)“…ng as the debtor complies with the orders of the court. See T.C.A. § 26-2-216.…”
- Harrington v. Harrington (Tennessee Supreme Court 1988, 759 S.W.2d 664)“…installment payments on judgments, authorized pursuant to T.C.A. §§ 26-2-216, et seq. must be fixed in an amount a…”
- Henry Kerr v. Earl Lemoine (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2002)“…Kathleen Kerr are entitled to the benefit of Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-216 to stay execution/levy o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1673Restriction on garnishmentIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 1675 of this title, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or the amount by which his disposable earnings for that week exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 206(a)(1) of title 29 in effect at the time the earnings are payable, whichever is less. In the case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, the Secretary of Labor shall by regulation prescribe a multiple of the Federal minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect to that set forth in paragraph (2). The restrictions of subsection (a) do not apply in the case of any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure, which is established by State law, which affords substantial due process, and which is subject to judicial review. any order of any court of the United States having jurisdiction over cases under chapter 13 of title 11. any debt due for any State or Federal tax.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 450 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have read the section 1673 garnishment cap narrowly. Kokoszka v. Belford (1974) held that "disposable earnings" reaches periodic compensation and not an income tax refund, so the cap did not keep a refund out of the bankruptcy estate. Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2015) held section 1673 creates no private right of action.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 439 U.S. 572)“…and amended § 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1673 (b), to pre-empt state law by limiting…”
- Kokoszka v. Belford (Supreme Court of the United States 1974, 417 U.S. 642)✓A bankrupt argued the 25 percent garnishment cap exempted 75 percent of his $250.90 income tax refund from the trustee; the Supreme Court held Section 1673's limit covers periodic compensation, not a tax refund, so the whole refund passed to the estate.
- Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (District Court, S.D. New York 2015, 91 F. Supp. 3d 491)✓After a Florida garnishment froze a disabled borrower's bank account holding disability benefits, she sued under Section 1673; the court held the section creates no private right of action and is enforced by the Secretary of Labor, and dismissed the claim.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in South Dakota (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Tennessee Attorney General Opinion No. 19-10 (July 3, 2019), quoting Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 26-2-106, 26-2-214, and 26-2-224(tn.gov).gov
- Montgomery County, Tennessee Circuit Court official garnishment and answer instructions form (Sec. 26-2-106, 26-2-107, and 26-2-216)(montgomerytn.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, Fact Sheet #30: The Federal Wage Garnishment Law (CCPA)(dol.gov).gov
- Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 28-3-109 (six-year limitation; actions on contracts not otherwise expressly provided for), official Tennessee Code text(archive.org)
- Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 26-2-107 (dependent-child garnishment exemption; debtor must inform the employer or the section does not apply), official Tennessee Code text(archive.org)
- Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 47-9-611, 47-9-612, 47-9-614, 47-9-623 and 47-2-725 (notification before disposition of collateral, ten-day safe harbor, consumer-goods notice contents, right to redeem, and the four-year limit on sale-of-goods contracts), official Tennessee Code text(archive.org)
- Graves v. Sawyer, 588 S.W.2d 542 (Tenn. 1979) (voluntary payment on a debt is an acknowledgment implying a promise of payment that keeps the debt alive for the statutory period from that time)(courtlistener.com)