Delaware
Delaware Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A collector cannot start taking money from your paycheck in Delaware just because you fell behind. The creditor first has to sue you, win a judgment, and get a court attachment against your wages before your employer withholds anything. That sequence is where most garnishments are actually decided, because the large majority happen through a default judgment entered when the person being sued never responded. If you take one action from this page, answer any lawsuit you are served with, even if you believe the debt is too old or is not yours.
Wage Garnishment in Delaware
Delaware runs one of the simplest wage-exemption formulas of any state. Under 10 Del. C. 4913(a), 85% of a wage earner's wages is exempt from attachment and execution, meaning only 15% can be taken toward an ordinary judgment debt. There is no separate minimum-wage-multiple test layered into the state statute itself, though the federal $217.50-per-week floor under the Consumer Credit Protection Act still applies of its own force wherever it would protect more than Delaware's flat percentage does.
The 85% exemption is not absolute. It does not apply to process issued to collect a fine, court costs, or taxes owed to the State of Delaware, so a state tax or court-debt attachment can reach further than an ordinary consumer-judgment attachment can.
Only one attachment can run against a given amount of wages due at a time. If a second creditor also has a judgment, it has to wait its turn behind the first attachment until that debt is satisfied in full. Delaware has no head-of-household wage exemption on top of the 85% rule, and we did not locate a Delaware statute extending firing protection beyond the federal rule that bars discharge over a garnishment for any one debt.
Medical debt runs the other way entirely. A hospital or a collector working a medical bill cannot garnish any share of your wages, not even the 15%. That rule is covered in its own section below.
Bank Account Protections
This is the point where Delaware residents most often get misled. A frequently cited figure, the $25,000 exemption in 10 Del. C. 4914, applies only «in any federal bankruptcy or state insolvency proceeding.» It is a bankruptcy exemption, not a shield against an ordinary bank garnishment outside of bankruptcy, and it should never be relied on as protection against a creditor's collection attachment on a bank account.

We did not find a Delaware statute creating an automatic exemption for money sitting in a bank account outside of bankruptcy. If a Delaware bank account is garnished for an ordinary judgment debt, plan to raise any exemption claim directly with the court rather than assuming a specific dollar figure is automatically protected.
Delaware does have two general exemption statutes that operate outside bankruptcy, but neither one shields a deposit account. 10 Del. C. 4902 exempts named articles from execution, attachment, and distress for rent: the family Bible, school books and family library, family pictures, a church seat or pew, a burial lot, wearing apparel, and the tools and fixtures needed to carry on a trade or business, capped at $75 in New Castle and Sussex Counties and $50 in Kent County. 10 Del. C. 4903 lets a person who is the head of a family exempt an additional $500 of personal property, with «the articles to be selected by the debtor.» Both are claim-it-yourself exemptions over articles, not an automatic dollar shield on money in an account, which is why the practical advice above is to raise the claim with the court.
Medical debt is the significant exception to this whole section. Bank accounts, pensions, annuities, and retirement accounts are off limits to a medical creditor or medical debt collector outright, not merely exempt up to some amount.
Federal benefits carry a separate, well-established shield regardless of state law. Social Security, VA, and similar federal benefits that arrive by direct deposit are automatically protected for the trailing two months of deposits under 31 CFR Part 212, and the bank applies that protection without you filing anything. Benefits paid by paper check and later deposited do not get this automatic treatment and must be claimed as exempt through the court.
Medical Debt Is Treated Differently
Delaware's Medical Debt Protection Act, 6 Del. C. ch. 25J, takes both of the collection tools described above off the table for medical bills. Under 6 Del. C. 2505J(a), a medical creditor or medical debt collector may not garnish the wages, disability insurance payments or other disability benefits, workers' compensation payments, or unemployment benefits of a patient, and may not garnish or attach a patient's bank account, pension, annuity, or retirement account. The same subsection bars causing the patient's arrest, subjecting the patient to a writ of body attachment or capias, and foreclosing on the patient's real property.
Who counts as covered matters here. «Medical creditor» is defined at 6 Del. C. 2502J(10) as a large health-care facility, which the chapter limits to a licensed hospital, an outpatient clinic operating under a hospital's license or majority hospital ownership, or a licensed freestanding emergency department. «Medical debt collector» is broader: any person who regularly collects medical debts originally owed to someone else, and a medical debt buyer counts as one. So a hospital collecting its own bill, and any collection agency or debt buyer working a medical account, are both covered. A small independent practice pursuing its own bill directly fits neither definition.
Two timing rules sit on top of the outright bans. No permissible extraordinary collection action may begin until 120 days after the first bill for the medical debt was sent, 6 Del. C. 2505J(c). And at least 30 days before taking any extraordinary collection action, the medical creditor or medical debt collector must give the patient written notice that identifies the actions it intends to initiate, states whether financial assistance is available along with a plain-language summary of that policy, and sets a deadline no earlier than 30 days after the date of the notice, 6 Del. C. 2505J(d).
«Extraordinary collection action» is itself defined, at 6 Del. C. 2502J(4), and it reaches further than garnishment. It covers reporting adverse information to a consumer reporting agency, selling the debt to another party outside a tightly conditioned written agreement, placing a lien on property, attaching or seizing a bank account or other personal property, and filing a civil action.
If a hospital or a collector chasing a medical bill has garnished your wages or attached your account, that is the statute to raise with the court.
Statute of Limitations on Debt in Delaware
Delaware keeps its debt statute of limitations unusually uniform. Under 10 Del. C. 8106(a), an action on a debt not evidenced by a record or instrument under seal, including promises and mutual debit-and-credit accounts, must be brought within 3 years. That single period covers written contracts, oral contracts, open accounts, and credit-card debt alike; Delaware does not single out cards for different treatment.
| Debt type | Limitations period | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Written contract, oral contract, or open account | 3 years | 10 Del. C. 8106(a) |
| Promissory note | 6 years from the due date | 6 Del. C. 3-118 |
| Large written contracts ($100,000+) | up to 20 years, if the contract specifies | 10 Del. C. 8106(c) |
Delaware allows parties to a written contract of $100,000 or more to agree, in the contract itself, to a limitations period as long as 20 years, a carve-out that mainly affects commercial lending rather than ordinary consumer debt.
We did not locate a Delaware statute addressing whether a partial payment or written acknowledgment revives an already-expired debt. Delaware's revival practice, if any, appears to rest on common law rather than a codified rule, so treat any specific claim about payment restarting Delaware's clock as unconfirmed rather than settled.
Time-barred does not mean the debt disappears. A collector may still contact you about an old debt, but federal Regulation F, 12 CFR 1006.26, bars a debt collector from suing or threatening to sue on a debt once the statute of limitations has expired. Credit reporting runs on its own separate clock, roughly seven years, regardless of the limitations period.
What Debt Collectors Can and Cannot Do
The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act governs third-party collectors operating in Delaware. They cannot use false, deceptive, or misleading statements, including misrepresenting the amount or legal status of a debt, and cannot threaten action they cannot legally take or do not intend to take, 15 U.S.C. 1692e. Regulation F adds specific limits on call frequency and requires collectors to provide validation information. Complaints can be filed with the CFPB and the Delaware Attorney General's Fraud and Consumer Protection Division.
Car Repossession Rules
Delaware enacted the Uniform Commercial Code's self-help repossession rule at 6 Del. C. 9-609: after default, a secured party may take possession of collateral without judicial process, as long as it can do so without a breach of the peace, a standard the statute leaves undefined and that courts interpret case by case.

We found no Delaware statute giving consumers a right-to-cure notice or a fixed waiting period before a vehicle can be repossessed, comparable to the cure regimes some other states impose. That means a Delaware lender generally does not have to warn a borrower before taking a vehicle for a payment default, beyond whatever notice its own contract requires. After repossession, the sale of the vehicle must still be commercially reasonable, the proceeds are applied to the debt, and a borrower can be sued for any remaining deficiency.
Servicemembers get an additional federal layer. For an installment contract entered into before military service, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. 3952, requires a court order before the property can be repossessed for a pre-service breach.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Delaware
Work the problem in this order:
- Answer the lawsuit. A default judgment is how most Delaware garnishments start. Filing an answer, even a simple one disputing the amount, forces the creditor to prove its case and often opens the door to a payment arrangement.
- Check the garnishment math. Delaware's rule is simple: no more than 15% of wages can be taken for an ordinary judgment. If more is being withheld, or the debt is a state fine, cost, or tax, ask what exception applies. If the underlying debt is a medical bill, no wage garnishment is allowed at all.
- Do not rely on the $25,000 bankruptcy figure outside of bankruptcy. That exemption in 10 Del. C. 4914 only helps inside a federal bankruptcy or state insolvency case, not against an everyday bank garnishment.
- Ask whether the debt is time-barred. Delaware's 3-year period applies broadly to written, oral, and open-account debt alike. Raise the statute of limitations as a defense in your answer; the court will not raise it for you.
- Consider bankruptcy if the debt is unmanageable. Filing triggers an automatic stay that stops garnishment immediately, and Delaware's exemptions, including the $25,000 figure, apply fully inside bankruptcy.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- Can Social Security Be Garnished?
- Delaware Statute of Limitations
- Delaware Bankruptcy Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Delaware Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Delaware?
15%. Delaware exempts 85% of wages from attachment under 10 Del. C. 4913(a), so only the remaining 15% is garnishable for an ordinary judgment debt. That exemption does not apply to unpaid state fines, costs, or taxes. Medical debt runs the other way: under 6 Del. C. 2505J(a), a medical creditor or medical debt collector cannot garnish wages for a medical bill at all.
Can a hospital garnish my wages in Delaware for an unpaid medical bill?
No. Delaware's Medical Debt Protection Act, 6 Del. C. 2505J(a), bars a medical creditor or medical debt collector from garnishing wages, disability benefits, workers' compensation, or unemployment benefits, and from garnishing or attaching a bank account, pension, annuity, or retirement account. A medical creditor is a large health-care facility, meaning a licensed hospital, a hospital-licensed or hospital-owned outpatient clinic, or a licensed freestanding emergency department. A medical debt collector is anyone who regularly collects medical debts originally owed to another, which covers collection agencies and debt buyers.
Does the $25,000 Delaware exemption protect my bank account from garnishment?
No. The $25,000 figure in 10 Del. C. 4914 applies only inside a federal bankruptcy or state insolvency proceeding. It does not protect a bank account from an ordinary, non-bankruptcy garnishment. Medical debt is a separate matter: 6 Del. C. 2505J(a) bars a medical creditor or medical debt collector from garnishing or attaching a bank account, pension, annuity, or retirement account outright.
What is the statute of limitations on debt in Delaware?
3 years for most debt, including written contracts, oral contracts, and open accounts, under 10 Del. C. 8106(a). Only large written contracts of $100,000 or more can specify a longer period, up to 20 years.
Does making a payment restart the statute of limitations in Delaware?
We could not locate a Delaware statute addressing this. Delaware's revival practice, if any, appears to rest on common law rather than a codified rule, so treat this as an open question rather than a settled fact.
Do I get a notice before my car is repossessed in Delaware?
Generally not by state law. We found no Delaware statute requiring a right-to-cure notice or waiting period before repossession, so a lender can typically retake a vehicle after default without advance warning, as long as it avoids a breach of the peace.
Can more than one creditor garnish my wages at the same time in Delaware?
No. Only one attachment can be enforced against wages at a time; the first creditor to attach keeps priority until its judgment is paid in full, and later creditors must wait their turn.
Updates
Added Delaware's Medical Debt Protection Act, 6 Del. C. 2505J, which bars hospitals and medical debt collectors from garnishing wages or attaching bank accounts for medical bills, and noted the general personal-property exemptions in 10 Del. C. 4902 and 4903.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Delaware Code, Title 10 (Courts and Judicial Procedure), Chapter 049 (EXECUTIONS)
§ 4913Exemption and attachment of wages.In force
(a) Eighty-five percent of the amount of the wages for labor or service of any person residing within the State shall be exempt from mesne attachment process and execution attachment process under the laws of this State; but such limitation shall be inapplicable to process issued for the collection of a fine or costs or taxes due and owing the State. (b) On any amount of wages due, only 1 attachment may be made. Any creditor causing such attachment to be made shall have the benefit of priority until the judgment with costs for which the attachment was made has been paid in full. (c) Wages shall include salaries, commissions and every other form of remuneration paid to an employee by an employer for labor or services, but shall not include payment made for services rendered by a person who is self-employed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 15
§ 1692eFalse or misleading representationsIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof. The false representation of— the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt. The false representation or implication that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney. The representation or implication that nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or wages of any person unless such action is lawful and the debt collector or creditor intends to take such action. The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,533 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts read Section 1692e through the least sophisticated consumer test. Christ Clomon v. Philip D. Jackson (1993) held that mass-mailed letters bearing an attorney signature, sent without file review, violated subsections (3) and (10); Gonzalez v. Kay (2009) held a back-page disclaimer did not defeat the claim on a motion to dismiss.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 321 F.3d 292)✓Debt letters went out on law firm letterhead after an attorney reviewed only a file showing the debt was outstanding; the Second Circuit held that merely being told by a client that a debt is overdue is not enough attorney involvement, and vacated summary judgment.
- William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498) (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 135 F.3d 389)✓A collection letter told the debtor to contact 'M. Hall,' a name no employee at the agency actually used; the Sixth Circuit held the alias was not a false or deceptive means under 1692e(10) because the account had been assigned to a real representative and no harm was shown.
- Gonzalez v. Kay (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2009, 577 F.3d 600)✓A law firm collecting a $448.97 phone debt sent an unsigned letter on its letterhead with the disclaimer of attorney review only on the back; the Fifth Circuit held the least sophisticated consumer might think a lawyer was involved and reversed dismissal of the 1692e claim.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Statute of Limitations on Debt: The 50-State Payment-Revival Table, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 50
§ 3952Protection under installment contracts for purchase or leaseIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
After a servicemember enters military service, a contract by the servicemember for— the purchase of real or personal property (including a motor vehicle); or the lease or bailment of such property, may not be rescinded or terminated for a breach of terms of the contract occurring before or during that person’s military service, nor may the property be repossessed for such breach without a court order. This section applies only to a contract for which a deposit or installment has been paid by the servicemember before the servicemember enters military service. A person who knowingly resumes possession of property in violation of subsection (a), or in violation of section 3918 of this title, or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ditech Holding Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2025)“…d on, or sold during or within a year after active service. 50 U.S.C. §§ 3952, 3953. Claimant states that he re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Debt Collection Laws: Prescription, Garnishment, and Repossession, Maryland Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Massachusetts Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 10 Del. C. Title 10, Chapter 49, Subchapter I, Wage attachment exemption (85%)(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 10 Del. C. Title 10, Chapter 81, Statute of limitations for debt actions(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 6 Del. C. Title 6, Article 3, Promissory notes (six-year limitations period)(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 6 Del. C. 9-609, Secured party's right to take possession after default(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. 1673, Federal restriction on garnishment (25%/30-times test)(govinfo.gov).gov
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Regulation F prohibition on suits and threats of suit on time-barred debt(ecfr.gov).gov
- 6 Del. C. ch. 25J, Delaware Medical Debt Protection Act (2502J definitions; 2505J limits on medical creditors and medical debt collectors)(delcode.delaware.gov)