Washington
Washington Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 19 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Washington regulates background checks primarily through the Fair Chance Act (RCW 49.94), which bars employers from asking about criminal history until late in the hiring process, and for employers with 15 or more employees, not until after a conditional job offer. The federal FCRA and RCW 19.182.040 impose a seven-year lookback limit on consumer reports, subject to broad exceptions. A 2025 expansion through HB 1747 has applied to employers with 15 or more employees since July 1, 2026, and reaches employers with fewer than 15 employees on January 1, 2027.
Overview of Washington Background Check Laws
Washington state has some of the most comprehensive background check protections in the country. The cornerstone of these protections is the Washington Fair Chance Act (RCW 49.94), originally enacted in 2018 and significantly expanded in 2025 through House Bill 1747. These laws regulate when and how employers, landlords, and licensing agencies can access and use criminal history information.
Washington's approach reflects a growing national trend toward "fair chance" hiring practices. The state recognizes that blanket exclusions based on criminal records create barriers to employment, housing, and economic stability, particularly for communities that are disproportionately affected by the criminal legal system.
This guide covers all major aspects of Washington background check law, including the Fair Chance Act and its HB 1747 expansion, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) as it applies in Washington, lookback periods, housing and licensing checks, and recent legislative changes that every employer, job seeker, landlord, and tenant should understand.
The Washington Fair Chance Act (Ban the Box)
The Washington Fair Chance Act is the state's primary "ban the box" law. Enacted in 2018, it bars covered employers from asking about an applicant's criminal history on job applications and from inquiring before the point in the hiring process the statute allows. The 2018 version let an employer inquire once it had initially determined the applicant was otherwise qualified. HB 1747 moved that line later, to a conditional offer of employment, for employers with 15 or more employees as of July 1, 2026.

The law was designed to ensure that people with criminal records receive fair consideration for jobs based on their qualifications first, rather than being automatically screened out before an employer evaluates their skills and experience.
What Employers Cannot Do
RCW 49.94.010 prohibits a covered employer from:
- Including any question about criminal history on job applications
- Inquiring about criminal records orally or in writing before the timing point described below
- Running a criminal background check before that same point
- Advertising jobs with language like "no felons" or "no criminal background"
- Implementing blanket policies that automatically exclude anyone with a criminal record
When Employers Can Ask
The timing rule changed with HB 1747, and which version applies depends on employer size.
For employers with 15 or more employees, the amended rule has been in force since July 1, 2026. Those employers may not inquire into or obtain criminal record information until they have initially determined the applicant is otherwise qualified for the position and have made an offer of employment conditioned on obtaining the applicant's criminal record. At that point the employer may run a background check and consider the results, subject to the assessment and notice rules below.
Employers with fewer than 15 employees come under that same rule on January 1, 2027. Until then they remain under the 2018 version of the Act, which allowed inquiry once the employer had initially determined the applicant was otherwise qualified. The 2018 law did not require a conditional offer first. That requirement is new 2025 language.
Exemptions to the Fair Chance Act
The Fair Chance Act does not apply to every employer or every position. The following are exempt from the law's requirements:
- Employers hiring for positions involving unsupervised access to children, vulnerable adults, or vulnerable persons
- Law enforcement and criminal justice agencies in Washington
- Financial institutions and registered securities entities required by law to consider criminal history
- Employers seeking non-employee volunteers
- Positions where federal or state law requires a criminal background check
The HB 1747 Fair Chance Act Expansion
In 2025, the Washington Legislature passed HB 1747, which dramatically expanded the Fair Chance Act. The bill was enacted as chapter 71, Laws of 2025. These changes represent one of the most significant updates to employment background check law in Washington's history.
Effective Dates
The expansion rolls out in two phases:
| Employer Size | Effective Date |
|---|---|
| 15 or more employees | July 1, 2026 (in force) |
| Fewer than 15 employees | January 1, 2027 |
New Protections for Applicants and Employees
HB 1747 added several important new protections that go well beyond the original Fair Chance Act:
Arrest and Juvenile Records Are Off Limits. Employers are entirely prohibited from taking adverse employment action based on an applicant's or employee's arrest record or juvenile conviction record. The only exception is for an adult arrest where the individual is currently out on bail or released on their own personal recognizance pending trial.
Conditional Offer Required Before Any Inquiry. Under the expansion, employers must wait until after making a conditional offer of employment before inquiring about or considering criminal history. This is a stricter standard than the original law, which allowed inquiry after determining the applicant was "otherwise qualified."
No Automatic or Categorical Exclusions. Employers cannot implement any policy or practice that automatically or categorically excludes individuals with a criminal record from any employment position.
Written Disclosure Required. Before conducting a background check, or if an applicant voluntarily discloses criminal history, the employer must immediately provide a written disclosure explaining the Fair Chance Act provisions. The disclosure must include a copy of the Attorney General's Fair Chance Act guidance document.
The "Legitimate Business Reason" Standard
Under the expanded law, an employer may only take adverse action based on an adult conviction record if the employer has a "legitimate business reason." To meet this standard, the employer must believe in good faith that the criminal conduct underlying the conviction will either:
- Have a negative impact on the employee's or applicant's fitness or ability to perform the position, or
- Harm or cause injury to people, property, business reputation, or business assets
Required Individualized Assessment Factors
Before making an adverse decision based on a conviction, the employer must consider and document all six of the following factors:
- The seriousness of the conduct underlying the conviction
- The number and types of convictions
- The time that has elapsed since the conviction, excluding periods of incarceration
- Any verifiable information related to the individual's rehabilitation, good conduct, work experience, education, and training
- The specific duties and responsibilities of the position sought or held
- The place and manner in which the position will be performed
Notice and Response Requirements
If an employer intends to take adverse action based on a conviction, the employer must:
- Notify the applicant or employee of the specific record being considered
- Hold the position open for at least two business days
- Allow a reasonable opportunity to correct or explain the record or submit evidence of rehabilitation
- If proceeding with adverse action, issue a written decision explaining the reasons, including how the record relates to the position and the employer's assessment of any mitigating information provided
Penalties for Violating the Fair Chance Act
The 2025 amendments substantially increased penalties for employers who violate the Fair Chance Act. Penalties are imposed per affected job applicant or employee, meaning they can accumulate quickly for employers with systemic compliance failures.

| Violation Number | Maximum Penalty Per Affected Person |
|---|---|
| First violation | Up to $1,500 |
| Second violation | Up to $3,000 |
| Third and subsequent violations | Up to $15,000 each |
The Attorney General's Civil Rights Division has sole enforcement authority. For first-time or minor violations, the AG's office may waive penalties and instead provide education and a warning. Complaints can be filed at fairchancejobs@atg.wa.gov or by calling the toll-free line at (833) 660-4877.
Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
Washington law places limits on how far back criminal history information can be reported, though these limits vary based on the type of check and the position's salary.
The Seven-Year Rule (RCW 19.182.040)
Under Washington's Fair Credit Reporting Act (RCW 19.182.040), consumer reporting agencies generally cannot include records of arrest, indictment, or conviction that are older than seven years in a consumer report. The seven-year clock begins running from the date of disposition, release from incarceration, or the start of parole.
However, RCW 19.182.040(2) carves out three broad exceptions. The seven-year limit does not apply to a credit transaction involving, or reasonably expected to involve, a principal amount of $50,000 or more; to the underwriting of life insurance with a face amount of $50,000 or more; or to the employment of an individual at an annual salary that equals, or may reasonably be expected to equal, $20,000 or more. Because that last exception covers essentially every full-time job in Washington, the seven-year cap places little practical limit on employment background checks in this state.
Washington State Patrol Records
The Washington State Patrol (WSP) maintains the state's criminal history records through the WATCH (Washington Access to Criminal History) system. WSP records follow different rules:
- Arrest information older than one year is not reported unless a disposition is available
- There is no time limit on reporting conviction information through WSP
- Fingerprint-based background checks provide the most accurate results
WATCH System Details
The WATCH system is the official online source for Washington conviction records. Key details include:
- Name-based searches cost $11 per search
- Fingerprint-based conviction checks cost $58
- The system includes convictions and arrests less than one year old with dispositions pending
- Information on registered sex and kidnap offenders is also available
FCRA Interaction With Washington Law
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies alongside Washington's state laws whenever a third-party consumer reporting agency conducts a background check. Employers must comply with both federal and state requirements, and the stricter standard applies when there is a conflict.
Federal FCRA Requirements for Employers
Before running a background check through a third party, employers must:
- Provide a clear, standalone written disclosure to the applicant or employee
- Obtain written authorization before pulling the report
- Follow the pre-adverse action process if considering negative action based on the report
- Send a final adverse action notice with required information about the applicant's rights
Washington-Specific Additions
Washington adds several requirements on top of the federal FCRA:
- The Fair Chance Act's timing restrictions (post-conditional-offer only for employers with 15 or more employees)
- The individualized assessment requirement with six documented factors
- The two-business-day hold period before finalizing adverse action
- The written decision requirement explaining the reasoning
- Mandatory inclusion of the AG's Fair Chance Act guidance document
Employers who use third-party background check companies must ensure those vendors comply with both federal and state reporting limitations, including the seven-year lookback rule in RCW 19.182.040 and the exceptions to it, one of which covers employment at an annual salary of $20,000 or more.
Employment Background Checks
Washington employers must navigate multiple layers of regulation when conducting employment background checks. Here is a summary of the complete process under current law.

Step-by-Step Employer Compliance
- Post job openings without exclusionary language. Do not include phrases like "no felonies" or "clean background required."
- Evaluate applicants on qualifications only. Do not ask about criminal history on applications or during initial interviews.
- Make a conditional offer of employment. Only after the offer may an employer with 15 or more employees begin the background check process. Employers with fewer than 15 employees come under this step on January 1, 2027.
- Provide required disclosures. Give the applicant written notice about the Fair Chance Act and include the AG's guidance document.
- Obtain written consent before pulling any background report through a third-party agency (required by FCRA).
- Conduct the individualized assessment. Evaluate all six required factors and document your analysis.
- If considering adverse action, notify the applicant. Provide the specific record being considered and hold the position open for at least two business days.
- Allow response time. Give the applicant a reasonable opportunity to explain or provide evidence of rehabilitation.
- Issue a written decision if proceeding with adverse action, explaining the reasoning in detail.
Housing Background Checks
Washington landlords may conduct background checks on prospective tenants, but there are significant restrictions on how criminal history can be used in rental decisions.
Tenant Screening Requirements (RCW 59.18.257)
Under RCW 59.18.257, landlords must follow specific procedures before and during tenant screening:
- Notify prospective tenants in writing about what types of information will be accessed
- Disclose what criteria may result in denial
- If using a consumer report, provide the name and address of the reporting agency
- Inform tenants of their right to obtain a free copy of the consumer report
No Blanket Criminal History Bans
The Washington Attorney General's Office has actively enforced fair housing laws against landlords who use blanket bans on tenants with criminal histories. Under both the federal Fair Housing Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination, landlords cannot:
- Automatically deny anyone with a felony conviction
- Apply blanket policies that exclude all applicants with any criminal history
- Use criminal history screening in a way that has a disparate impact on protected classes
Instead, landlords must conduct individualized assessments that consider the type and severity of the offense and how much time has passed since the conviction.
Crime-Free Housing Programs
Under RCW 35.106, crime-free rental housing programs in Washington may not prohibit a landlord from renting to a person solely because of criminal history. The legislature recognized that blanket exclusions prevent stable reentry and undermine housing access, regardless of other factors like employment history, rental references, or time in the community without further criminal activity.
Adverse Action Notice for Tenants
If a landlord denies a rental application based in whole or part on a background check, the landlord must provide a written notice of adverse action explaining the reasons for denial, including which information in the consumer report contributed to the decision.
Professional Licensing Background Checks
Washington regulates how criminal history is used in professional licensing decisions, providing pathways for people with convictions to determine their eligibility before investing time and money in training or education.
Department of Licensing Screening
The Washington Department of Licensing (DOL) allows individuals with criminal convictions to request a pre-application review. This review examines whether a specific conviction relates to the professional license being sought. The DOL considers convictions within the last five years for most licensing determinations.
Fingerprint-Based Background Checks
Many professional licenses require fingerprint-based background checks through the Department of Licensing. These checks are processed through the Washington State Patrol and the FBI, providing both state and national criminal history information.
Health Care and Vulnerable Population Positions
Under RCW 43.43.832, background checks are required for individuals who will have unsupervised access to children, vulnerable adults, or people with developmental disabilities. These checks are conducted through WSP and may include both state and federal records. Certain disqualifying convictions can permanently bar employment in these positions.
Local Licensing Authority
Under RCW 36.01.300, counties and cities may require both state and federal background checks for license applicants and licensees under local licensing authority. These checks are also processed through the Washington State Patrol.
Vacating and Sealing Criminal Records
Washington law provides pathways for people to clear certain criminal records, which directly affects what shows up on background checks.
Vacating Felony Convictions (RCW 9.94A.640)
Under RCW 9.94A.640, individuals who have completed their sentence may petition the court to vacate a felony conviction. If granted, the conviction is removed from the individual's criminal history, and the person may legally state they have never been convicted of that crime on employment applications and other inquiries.
Eligibility requirements include:
- All conditions of the sentence must be completed
- No criminal charges may be pending
- The offense cannot be a violent offense or crime against persons (with limited exceptions)
- Specific waiting periods must have elapsed since discharge
Vacating Misdemeanors (RCW 9.96.060)
Under RCW 9.96.060, misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor convictions may also be vacated. The eligibility requirements and waiting periods vary based on the type of offense.
Effect of Vacated Records
Once a conviction is vacated:
- The Washington State Patrol and local law enforcement agencies may not disclose the conviction to the public
- The individual may legally state they have not been convicted of that crime
- The conviction is not included in criminal history for sentencing purposes in future cases
- Other criminal justice agencies may still access vacated records for limited purposes
Recent Changes and What to Watch
Washington's background check landscape has changed rapidly in recent years, and additional changes may be on the horizon.
2025: HB 1747 Enacted
The most significant recent change is HB 1747, which expanded the Fair Chance Act with the new protections described throughout this guide. The bill was enacted as chapter 71, Laws of 2025. It took effect for employers with 15 or more employees on July 1, 2026, and applies to employers with fewer than 15 employees beginning January 1, 2027.
Key Changes Under HB 1747
- Conditional offer required before any criminal history inquiry (stricter than previous standard)
- Complete ban on using arrest records and juvenile conviction records
- Mandatory individualized assessment with six documented factors
- Written disclosure and AG guidance document requirement
- Increased penalties of up to $15,000 per violation per affected person
- Two-business-day hold period before adverse action
- Written decision requirement when taking adverse action
Local Ordinances
Several Washington cities have their own fair chance or ban-the-box ordinances that may impose additional requirements. Seattle's Fair Chance Employment Ordinance, for example, has been in effect since 2013 and includes provisions specific to the city. Employers operating in multiple jurisdictions within Washington should review all applicable local laws to ensure full compliance.
How to Run a Background Check in Washington
Whether you are an employer, landlord, or licensing authority, here is how to access criminal history records in Washington.
WATCH (Washington Access to Criminal History)
The primary tool for background checks in Washington is the WATCH system operated by the Washington State Patrol. You can access it online for name-based searches at $11 per search.
Fingerprint-Based Checks
For more comprehensive and accurate results, fingerprint-based checks are available through WSP at a cost of $58. These are required for many professional licensing and sensitive employment positions.
Third-Party Consumer Reporting Agencies
Many employers and landlords use third-party background check companies. When doing so, both the FCRA and Washington state law apply. Ensure your vendor complies with Washington's reporting limits under RCW 19.182.040, including the seven-year rule and the exceptions to it, and does not report records that should be excluded under state law.
FBI Checks
For positions requiring national criminal history checks, fingerprint-based FBI background checks can be arranged through WSP under RCW 43.43.8325, which implements the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact for interstate criminal history exchange.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Washington employer ask about criminal history on a job application?
No. Under the Washington Fair Chance Act (RCW 49.94), employers cannot include questions about criminal history on job applications, and they cannot inquire about criminal records verbally or in writing, or run a background check, before the point in hiring where the statute allows it. Since July 1, 2026, employers with 15 or more employees may not inquire until they have initially determined the applicant is otherwise qualified and have made an offer of employment conditioned on obtaining the applicant's criminal record. Employers with fewer than 15 employees come under that conditional-offer rule on January 1, 2027; until then, they may inquire once they have initially determined the applicant is otherwise qualified.
How far back can a background check go in Washington state?
Washington's Fair Credit Reporting Act (RCW 19.182.040) generally bars consumer reporting agencies from including records of arrest, indictment, or conviction older than seven years in a consumer report. The exceptions in RCW 19.182.040(2) are broad: the limit does not apply to a credit transaction of $50,000 or more, to life insurance underwriting with a face amount of $50,000 or more, or to the employment of an individual at an annual salary that equals, or may reasonably be expected to equal, $20,000 or more. Because that salary exception covers essentially every full-time job, the seven-year cap rarely limits an employment background check in Washington. Separately, the Washington State Patrol has no time limit on reporting conviction records through its WATCH system, and arrest records older than one year without a disposition are not reported by WSP.
What are the penalties for employers who violate the Fair Chance Act?
Under the 2025 amendments (HB 1747), penalties are assessed per affected applicant or employee. A first violation can result in a penalty of up to $1,500. A second violation can result in up to $3,000. Third and subsequent violations can result in penalties of up to $15,000 each. The Attorney General's office may waive penalties for first-time or minor violations and provide education instead.
Can a landlord in Washington deny a rental application based on criminal history?
A landlord cannot use a blanket policy to automatically deny anyone with a criminal record. Under both the federal Fair Housing Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination, landlords must conduct individualized assessments considering the type and severity of the offense and how much time has passed. The Washington Attorney General has actively pursued enforcement actions against landlords who use blanket criminal history bans.
Can a vacated conviction still appear on a Washington background check?
No. Once a conviction is vacated under RCW 9.94A.640 (felonies) or RCW 9.96.060 (misdemeanors), the Washington State Patrol and local law enforcement may not disclose the conviction to the public. The individual may legally state they have never been convicted of that crime. However, other criminal justice agencies may still access vacated records for limited law enforcement purposes.
Updates
Updated for the HB 1747 Fair Chance Act amendments now in force for employers with 15 or more employees, corrected which timing rule the 2018 law actually imposed, and added the RCW 19.182.040 exception that lifts the seven-year reporting limit for jobs paying $20,000 or more a year.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Code of Washington
§ 49.94.010Inquiries into employee or applicant criminal records—Adverse employment actions—Timing—Advertisements—Exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) An employer may not include any question on any application for employment, inquire either orally or in writing, receive information through a criminal history background check, or otherwise obtain information about an applicant's criminal record until after the employer initially determines that the applicant is otherwise qualified for the position and makes an offer of employment conditioned on obtaining the applicant's criminal record. (2) An employer may not advertise employment openings in a way that excludes people with criminal records from applying. Ads that state "no felons," "no criminal background," or otherwise convey similar messages are prohibited. (3) An employer may not implement any policy or practice that automatically or categorically excludes individuals with a criminal record from any employment position. An employer may not reject an applicant for failure to disclose a criminal record prior to receiving a conditional offer of employment. (4)(a) An employer may not carry out a tangible adverse employment action based on an applicant's or employee's arrest record or juvenile conviction record.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Branson v. Wash. Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC (Washington Supreme Court 2025)“…e term “job applicant,” it could have done so as it did in RCW 49.94.010(1), which restricts employers from requ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington's Fair Chance Act Amendments Take Effect July 1, 2026: What HB 1747 Changes for Employers
§ 59.18.257Screening of prospective tenants—Notice to prospective tenant—Costs—Adverse action notice—Violation.In force
(1)(a) Prior to obtaining any information about a prospective tenant, the prospective landlord shall first notify the prospective tenant in writing, or by posting, of the following: (i) What types of information will be accessed to conduct the tenant screening; (ii) What criteria may result in denial of the application; (iii) If a consumer report is used, the name and address of the consumer reporting agency and the prospective tenant's rights to obtain a free copy of the consumer report in the event of a denial or other adverse action, and to dispute the accuracy of information appearing in the consumer report; and (iv) Whether or not the landlord will accept a comprehensive reusable tenant screening report made available to the landlord by a consumer reporting agency. If the landlord indicates its willingness to accept a comprehensive reusable tenant screening report, the landlord may access the landlord's own tenant screening report regarding a prospective tenant as long as the prospective tenant is not charged for the landlord's own tenant screening report.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Victoria Lockett v. Douglas Saturno (Court of Appeals of Washington 2022, 21 Wash. App. 2d 216)“…r as a whole. The term “prospective tenant” is also used in RCW 59.18.257(1)(a). This statute provides that “[p]r…”
- Chong Yim v. City of Seattle (Washington Supreme Court 2019, 451 P.3d 675)“…32 Yim et al. v. City ofSeattle, No. 95813-1 RCW 59.18.257(1)(a)(i)-(ii). The validity of that sta…”
- Hoban & Associates LLC v. RealPage Inc (District Court, E.D. Washington 2024)“…See 15 U.S.C. § 1681a; Wash. Rev. Code § 19.182.030; 15 Wash. Rev. Code § 59.18.257. Relevant to this dispute, landlords a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 19.182.040Consumer report—Prohibited information—Exceptions.In force
(1) Except as authorized under subsection (2) of this section, no consumer reporting agency may make a consumer report containing any of the following items of information: (a) Bankruptcies that, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcy, antedate the report by more than ten years; (b) Suits and judgments that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period; (c) Paid tax liens that, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years; (d) Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss that antedate the report by more than seven years; (e) Records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of an adult for a crime that, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than seven years; (f) Juvenile records, as defined in RCW 13.50.010(1)(f), when the subject of the records is twenty-one years of age or older at the time of the report; (g) Medical debt, as defined in RCW 19.16.100; and (h) Any other adverse item of information that antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hundtofte v. Encarnación (Washington Supreme Court 2014, 181 Wash. 2d 1)“…detainer actions that are more than seven years old. See RCW 19.182.040(l)(b). ¶6 The clerk appealed, and the…”
- Hundtofte v. Encarnacion (Court of Appeals of Washington 2012, 169 Wash. App. 498)“…that “antedate the report by more than seven years.” *518 RCW 19.182.040(l)(b). Thus, it is not unlawful for a c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.94A.640Vacation of offender's record of conviction.In force
(1) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, every offender who has been discharged under RCW 9.94A.637 may apply to the sentencing court for a vacation of the offender's record of conviction. If the court finds the offender meets the tests prescribed in subsection (2) of this section, the court may clear the record of conviction by: (a) Permitting the offender to withdraw the offender's plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty; or (b) if the offender has been convicted after a plea of not guilty, by the court setting aside the verdict of guilty; and (c) by the court dismissing the information or indictment against the offender.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 47 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re the Personal Restraint of Carrier (Washington Supreme Court 2012, 173 Wash. 2d 791)“…conviction in former RCW 9.94A.230 (1987), recodified as RCW 9.94A.640 (Laws of 2001, ch. 10, § 6). [7] Under…”
- State v. Haggard (Washington Supreme Court 2020, 195 Wash. 2d 544)“…ure intended RCW 9.95.240 and RCW 9.94A.230 (recodified as RCW 9.94A.640) to have the same practical effect. Id.…”
- State v. Cervantes (Court of Appeals of Washington 2012, 169 Wash. App. 428)“…previously vacated the offense at his request in 2005 under RCW 9.94A.640 after he had served his sentence. We re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.96.060Vacating records of conviction for misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) When vacating a conviction under this section, the court effectuates the vacation by: (a)(i) Permitting the applicant to withdraw the applicant's plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty; or (ii) if the applicant has been convicted after a plea of not guilty, the court setting aside the verdict of guilty; and (b) the court dismissing the information, indictment, complaint, or citation against the applicant and vacating the judgment and sentence. (2) Every person convicted of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense may apply to the sentencing court for a vacation of the applicant's record of conviction for the offense. If the court finds the applicant meets the requirements of this subsection, the court may in its discretion vacate the record of conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 31 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Haggard (2020) held a dismissal under RCW 3.66.067 is not legally equivalent to vacation, so only a conviction vacated under RCW 9.96.060 leaves the criminal history used to set a later sentence. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Perez-Pena (2007) found no vacation where the court refused to set aside the guilty verdict.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re the Personal Restraint of Carrier (Washington Supreme Court 2012, 173 Wash. 2d 791)“…endant's criminal history only if it is vacated pursuant to RCW 9.96.060, 9.94A.640, 9.95.240, or a similar out-…”
- State v. Haggard (Washington Supreme Court 2020, 195 Wash. 2d 544)✓Haggard's 2011 disorderly conduct conviction was dismissed under RCW 3.66.067 but never vacated; the court held that only a conviction vacated under RCW 9.96.060 is omitted from criminal history, so the dismissed misdemeanor interrupted his felony washout period.
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Perez-Pena (Washington Supreme Court 2007, 168 P.3d 408)✓A lawyer convicted of misdemeanor assault got his judgment and sentence vacated and the complaint dismissed, but the judge would not set aside the guilty verdict; the court held that was no vacation under RCW 9.96.060(1), so the conviction stayed conclusive proof of guilt.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Expungement Laws: How to Vacate a Conviction (2026), Washington DUI Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026)
§ 43.43.832Background checks—Disclosure of information—Sharing of state criminal background information by health care facilities.In force
(1) The Washington state patrol identification and criminal history section shall disclose conviction records as follows: (a) An applicant's conviction record, upon the request of a business or organization as defined in RCW 43.43.830, a developmentally disabled person, or a vulnerable adult as defined in RCW 43.43.830 or his or her guardian; (b) The conviction record of an applicant for certification, upon the request of the Washington professional educator standards board; (c) Any conviction record to aid in the investigation and prosecution of child, developmentally disabled person, and vulnerable adult abuse cases and to protect children and adults from further incidents of abuse, upon the request of a law enforcement agency, the office of the attorney general, prosecuting authority, or the department of social and health services; and (d) A prospective client's or resident's conviction record, upon the request of a business or organization that qualifies for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. Sec.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ana Liza Garcia v. Wa State Dshs (Court of Appeals of Washington 2019)“…ackciround Checks In 1987, the legislature enacted RCW 43.43.832, requiring the Washington State Patrol…”
- In re the Dependency of H.S. (Court of Appeals of Washington 2015, 188 Wash. App. 654)“…carries collateral consequences under RCW 43.43.830(4) with RCW 43.43.832, RCW 26.44.125(2)(e), WAC 388-101--3090…”
- Brooke Howell v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. (Court of Appeals of Washington 2019, 436 P.3d 368)“…She makes the following allegations: Under RCW 43.43.832 et seq., many Washington employers are…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 36.01.300State and federal background checks of license applicants and licensees of occupations under local licensing authority.In force
(1) For the purpose of receiving criminal history record information by county officials, counties may: (a) By ordinance, require a state and federal background investigation of license applicants or licensees in occupations specified by ordinance; (b) By ordinance, require a federal background investigation of county employees, applicants for employment, volunteers, vendors, and independent contractors, who, in the course of their work or volunteer activity with the county, may have unsupervised access to children, persons with developmental disabilities, or vulnerable adults; (c) Require a state background investigation of county employees, applicants for employment, volunteers, vendors, and independent contractors, who, in the course of their work or volunteer activity with the county, may have unsupervised access to children, persons with developmental disabilities, or vulnerable adults; and (d) Require a criminal background investigation conducted through a private organization of county employees, applicants for employment, volunteers, vendors, and independent contractors, who, in the course of their work or volunteer activity with the county, may have unsupervised…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 43.43.8325Background checks—National crime prevention and privacy compact.In force
(1) In order to facilitate the authorized interstate exchange of criminal history information for noncriminal justice purposes of background checks for the licensing and screening of employees and volunteers under the national child protection act of 1993, as amended, 34 U.S.C. Sec. 40102, and to implement the national crime prevention and privacy compact, 34 U.S.C. Sec. 40316, the Washington state patrol shall execute the compact on behalf of the state. (2) The Washington state patrol is the repository of criminal history records for purposes of the compact and shall do all things necessary or incidental to carrying out the compact. (3) The chief, or the chief's designee, is the state's compact officer and shall administer the compact within the state. The Washington state patrol may establish procedures for the cooperative exchange of criminal history records between the state and federal government for use in noncriminal justice cases. (4) The state's ratification of the compact remains in effect until legislation is enacted which specifically renounces the compact.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Chapter 49.94 RCW: Employees and Job Applicants - Criminal Records(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Washington Attorney General: Fair Chance Act(atg.wa.gov).gov
- HB 1747 - Washington State Legislature Bill Summary(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- HB 1747 Full Bill Text - As Passed Legislature(lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 19.182.040: Consumer Report - Prohibited Information(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Washington State Patrol: Criminal History(wsp.wa.gov).gov
- WATCH - Washington Access to Criminal History(watch.wsp.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 59.18.257: Screening of Prospective Tenants(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- AG Takes on Discriminatory Blanket Housing Bans(atg.wa.gov).gov
- Chapter 35.106 RCW: Crime-Free Rental Housing(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- WA Department of Licensing: Criminal Conviction Screening(dol.wa.gov).gov
- WA Department of Licensing: Fingerprinting and Background Checks(dol.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 43.43.832: Background Checks - Disclosure of Information(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.94A.640: Vacation of Offender Record of Conviction(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.96.060: Vacating Records of Conviction for Misdemeanor Offenses(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Seattle Fair Chance Employment Ordinance(seattle.gov).gov
- Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)(ftc.gov).gov
- RCW 36.01.300: Background Checks for License Applicants(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 43.43.8325: National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 49.94.010: Inquiries into employee or applicant criminal records, adverse employment actions, timing, advertisements, exceptions(app.leg.wa.gov)