Minnesota Eviction Law Changes Take Effect August 1, 2026 Under HF 3809

Minnesota Eviction Law Changes Take Effect August 1, 2026 Under HF 3809

Two changes to Minnesota's eviction statute took effect August 1, 2026, under HF 3809. Landlords can now seek an expedited hearing when a tenant assaults the landlord or the landlord's employees or contractors, and landlords are barred from naming a minor as a defendant in an eviction action except in narrow circumstances.

Information last verified on August 5, 2026. This is a developing story; we update it as the record changes.

Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Minnesota law only. See our Minnesota landlord-tenant law guide for the state's broader eviction and rental framework.

What Happened

HF 3809, introduced by Rep. Dotseth with co-authors Norris, Mekeland, Rehrauer, Igo, and Zeleznikar, amended Minnesota's eviction-action statute, Minn. Stat. § 504B.321, subdivision 2. The Minnesota House's official "New Laws Aug. 1, 2026" summary confirms both changes took effect that date. Two distinct provisions moved through the same bill.

The first lets a landlord file for an expedited eviction hearing when the tenant has assaulted the landlord, or the landlord's employees or contractors. "Assault" carries the definition in Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subdivision 10, Minnesota's general criminal-code assault definition. The filing must be supported by an affidavit stating specific facts supporting the assault allegation. At the expedited hearing, the court may consider only those assault allegations. It may not consolidate the claim with other eviction grounds, such as breach of lease, holding over under Minn. Stat. § 504B.285, or nonpayment of rent under Minn. Stat. § 504B.291. This provision is effective August 1, 2026, and applies to eviction actions filed on or after that date.

The second bars a landlord from listing a minor as a defendant in an eviction action, unless the minor is the only tenant on the unit. The protection cannot be waived by agreement, and a tenant may recover damages if a landlord violates it. According to the House's bill summary, the rationale is to prevent a young adult from discovering years later that an eviction case was filed against them as a child. This provision applies to leases entered into or renewed on or after August 1, 2026, a different applicability trigger than the filing-date trigger governing the expedited-hearing provision.

What the Law Actually Says

Minnesota eviction actions run through Minn. Stat. ch. 504B. Section 504B.321 governs the complaint and summons that start an eviction case, including the standard and expedited timelines. Under the existing expedited-hearing framework, eviction hearings must be scheduled within a compressed window, generally not less than five days nor more than seven days from when the summons is issued, which is faster than the standard eviction timeline. HF 3809 added assault on the landlord or the landlord's employees or contractors as a new basis for using that expedited path, alongside grounds that already existed in the statute.

The affidavit-and-no-consolidation structure is a guardrail on the new ground. Because an expedited hearing moves quickly and narrows the tenant's preparation time, the statute confines it to the assault allegation alone. A landlord cannot use an assault filing as a vehicle to also litigate unrelated nonpayment, holding-over, or lease-breach issues in the same fast-tracked hearing; those still proceed under separate provisions, including Minn. Stat. §§ 504B.285 (holding over) and 504B.291 (nonpayment of rent).

The minor-defendant provision operates independently of the eviction-filing mechanics. It restricts who a landlord can name as a defendant at all, regardless of which eviction ground is alleged. Because the trigger is the lease's execution or renewal date, not the filing date, a lease signed or renewed on or after August 1, 2026, falls under the new naming restriction even if the eviction itself is filed later. For readers researching whether Minnesota permits landlords to install security cameras or record interactions with tenants, a separate area of state law, see our Minnesota landlord-tenant recording rules, which is governed by a different statute than the eviction provisions discussed here.

Analysis: Why This Matters

The following is analysis from the Recording Law Editorial Team.

The two provisions address different sides of the landlord-tenant relationship. The expedited assault hearing responds to landlord and contractor safety concerns by giving landlords a faster court path when they allege a tenant assaulted them or someone working for them. The affidavit requirement and the bar on consolidating other claims appear designed to keep that faster path narrow, limited to the safety allegation itself rather than becoming a shortcut for unrelated eviction grounds.

The minor-defendant prohibition addresses a different problem: the downstream effect of an eviction filing on a person who was a child when it happened. Eviction records are commonly used in tenant-screening reports, and a record naming a minor as a co-defendant on a household eviction can attach to that person's rental history long after they reach adulthood, independent of anything they did. Removing minors from the caption, except when the minor is the sole tenant, is a records-hygiene change with tenant-screening implications rather than a change to who can be removed from a unit.

Neither provision changes who ultimately can be ordered to vacate a unit. The assault provision changes how fast a hearing on that specific allegation can be scheduled. The minor provision changes who can be named as a party, not who can be evicted.

How This Affects You

The date that matters depends on which provision is at issue. For the expedited assault hearing, the relevant date is when the eviction action is filed. Actions filed on or after August 1, 2026, can use the new expedited path if a landlord alleges assault under the § 609.02, subd. 10 definition and supports it with an affidavit stating specific facts.

For the minor-defendant restriction, the relevant date is when the lease was entered into or renewed, not when any eviction is later filed. A lease signed or renewed on or after August 1, 2026, falls under the new naming restriction; a lease predating that window and not yet renewed may not, though this article does not offer an opinion on how the provision applies to any specific lease.

This is general information about a recently enacted law, not legal advice about a specific eviction case. Landlords and tenants dealing with an active or upcoming eviction should consult the statute directly or an attorney licensed in Minnesota.

This is general legal information, not legal advice. Laws change, and how a statute applies can depend on specific facts. This article reflects Minnesota law as verified on August 5, 2026; consult a Minnesota-licensed attorney for advice about a specific situation.

Related articles

• Minnesota Landlord-Tenant Laws
• Landlord-Tenant Laws by State
• Minnesota Recording Laws for Landlords and Tenants

---

Last updated: 2026-08-05. This is a developing story; details verified as of 2026-08-05.