California
California Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 15 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

California Labor Code Section 1102.5 protects employees who report suspected violations of state or federal law from employer retaliation, including termination, demotion, and suspension. The law covers both public and private sector workers and requires only a good-faith, reasonable belief that a violation occurred.
Overview of California Whistleblower Laws
California provides some of the strongest whistleblower protections in the United States. While the state follows the employment-at-will doctrine, multiple statutes prohibit employers from retaliating against workers who report illegal activity, safety violations, fraud, or other misconduct.

The primary whistleblower statute is California Labor Code Section 1102.5. It applies to both public and private sector employees. Additional protections exist under the California Whistleblower Protection Act (Government Code Section 8547), the California False Claims Act (Government Code Sections 12650 through 12656), and several industry-specific statutes.
This guide covers who is protected, what activities qualify, how to file a complaint, available remedies, and recent changes to the law. Make sure to also review the Federal Whistleblower Laws that may apply alongside California's protections.
Who Is Protected Under California Law
California whistleblower protections cover a broad range of workers. Under Labor Code Section 1102.5, the following individuals are protected:
- Current employees who report suspected violations of law
- Former employees who engaged in protected whistleblowing during their employment
- Job applicants who reported violations at a prior employer
- Independent contractors in certain circumstances
State government employees receive additional protection under the California Whistleblower Protection Act (Government Code Section 8547). This statute specifically protects state workers who report improper governmental activity, including waste, fraud, abuse of authority, or threats to public health and safety. Cal. Gov. Code Section 8547
Protected Whistleblowing Activities
Reporting Violations of Law
Under Labor Code Section 1102.5, employers cannot retaliate against an employee for disclosing information to a government agency, law enforcement, or a supervisor when the employee has reasonable cause to believe the information reveals a violation of state or federal law. The employee does not need to prove an actual violation occurred. A good-faith, reasonable belief is enough. Cal. Lab. Code Section 1102.5
Refusing to Participate in Illegal Activity
Employees are also protected when they refuse to participate in an activity that would violate a state or federal statute, rule, or regulation. An employer cannot punish a worker for declining to break the law.
Testifying or Cooperating in Investigations
Workers who testify before or provide information to a government body conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry related to legal violations are protected from retaliation.
Filing Complaints
Employees who file formal complaints with regulatory agencies about workplace violations are shielded from adverse employment actions. This includes complaints about discrimination, safety hazards, wage theft, and environmental violations.
Key California Whistleblower Statutes
The table below summarizes the major California statutes that include whistleblower protections.
| Statute | Coverage Area | Who Is Protected |
|---|---|---|
| Labor Code Section 1102.5 | General whistleblower retaliation | All employees, former employees, applicants |
| Government Code Section 8547 | State employee whistleblower protection | State government employees |
| Government Code Sections 12650 to 12656 | False claims against the government | Any person filing a qui tam action |
| Government Code Section 12940 | Employment discrimination and harassment | Employees reporting FEHA violations |
| Labor Code Section 6310 | Occupational safety and health | Employees reporting workplace safety issues |
| Labor Code Section 132a | Workers' compensation retaliation | Employees filing workers' comp claims |
| Health and Safety Code Section 1278.5 | Health care facility patient safety | Health facility employees |
| Labor Code Section 1101 | Political activity and off-duty conduct | All employees |
| Labor Code Section 6399.7 | Hazardous substances | Employees reporting hazardous material issues |
The California Whistleblower Protection Act (Government Code Section 8547)
This statute specifically covers California state employees. The Legislature declared that state employees should be free to report waste, fraud, abuse of authority, violations of law, and threats to public health without fear of retribution.
Under this act, an "improper governmental activity" includes any action by a state agency or employee that violates state or federal law (including corruption, bribery, theft of government property, fraudulent claims, or misuse of government property), constitutes economic waste, or involves gross misconduct or inefficiency. Cal. Gov. Code Section 8547
The California State Auditor investigates complaints filed under this act. The State Personnel Board handles retaliation complaints and must begin an investigation within 10 working days of receiving a written complaint.
California False Claims Act (Government Code Sections 12650 to 12656)
The California False Claims Act allows private individuals (called "relators") to file qui tam lawsuits on behalf of the state against persons or entities that defraud the government. This is one of the most powerful whistleblower tools available because it provides direct financial rewards. Cal. Gov. Code Section 12650
Qui Tam Rewards
The financial incentives for whistleblowers under this act are significant:
- If the government intervenes and takes over the case, the whistleblower receives 15% to 33% of the recovery
- If the whistleblower prosecutes the case independently without government assistance, the reward increases to 25% to 50% of the recovery
The California Attorney General's False Claims Unit oversees these cases.
Retaliation Protections Under the False Claims Act
Employees who suffer retaliation for filing or assisting with a qui tam action are entitled to:
- Reinstatement with the same seniority status
- Two times the amount of back pay plus interest
- Compensation for special damages
- Reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs
The statute of limitations for retaliation claims under the False Claims Act is three years from the date of the retaliatory action.
Discrimination and Fair Employment Protections
Under California Government Code Section 12940, it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate against or discharge an employee based on race, religion, sex, medical condition, disability, or other protected characteristics. Employees who oppose unlawful practices under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) or file complaints, testify, or participate in proceedings under FEHA are protected from retaliation.
Complaints under this statute should be filed with the California Civil Rights Department (formerly known as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing). The filing deadline is three years from the date of the retaliatory action.
Occupational Safety and Health Protections
California Labor Code Sections 6310 and 6311 protect employees who report workplace safety concerns. Employers cannot retaliate against employees for:
- Filing oral or written safety complaints with Cal/OSHA or other agencies
- Participating in an occupational health and safety committee
- Refusing to work under conditions that violate state safety and health standards
- Testifying or planning to testify in a safety-related proceeding
Complaints must be filed with the Labor Commissioner within six months of the retaliatory action. This deadline can be extended in special circumstances.
Workers' Compensation Retaliation
California Labor Code Section 132a makes it illegal for employers to discharge or retaliate against an employee for filing or intending to file a workers' compensation claim. Employees who testify or plan to testify in another worker's case before the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board are also protected.
Workers must file a retaliation complaint with the California Division of Workers' Compensation within one year of the retaliatory action.
Health Care Facility Protections
California Health and Safety Code Section 1278.5 prohibits health facilities from discharging or discriminating against employees who report concerns about patient care standards to accrediting or evaluating entities. Employees who start proceedings, testify, or intend to testify about patient care conditions are also protected.
Hazardous Substances
California Labor Code Section 6399.7 prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who file complaints, start proceedings, testify, or intend to testify in matters related to the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act.
Recent Changes to California Whistleblower Law
SB 497: Rebuttable Presumption of Retaliation (Effective January 1, 2024)
Senate Bill 497 is one of the most significant recent changes to California whistleblower law. Signed by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2023, this law amended Labor Code Sections 98.6, 1102.5, and 1197.5 to create a rebuttable presumption of retaliation.
If an employer takes adverse action against an employee within 90 days of that employee's protected whistleblowing activity, the law presumes the action was retaliatory. The employer must then prove by clear and convincing evidence that the action was taken for legitimate, independent reasons.
Before SB 497, employees had to prove all elements of a retaliation claim themselves. Now, the 90-day presumption shifts a significant portion of the burden to the employer. The law also imposes a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation.
AB 2299: Whistleblower Notice Posting Requirement (Effective January 1, 2025)
Assembly Bill 2299 required the California Labor Commissioner to create and publish a model notice listing employee rights and responsibilities under the state's whistleblower laws. As of January 1, 2025, all employers must display this notice in the workplace.
The notice must be printed in a font size larger than 14 points and include the state's whistleblower hotline number (1-800-952-5225). Employers who post the Labor Commissioner's model notice are automatically deemed compliant.
SB 53: AI Sector Whistleblower Protections (Effective January 1, 2026)
Senate Bill 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act, extends whistleblower protections to employees in the AI sector. Governor Newsom signed this bill on September 29, 2025.
The law protects "covered employees," defined as personnel responsible for assessing, managing, or addressing risks of critical safety incidents at frontier AI companies. Employers cannot adopt rules or policies that prevent these employees from disclosing information about activities that pose catastrophic risks or violate the law.
Protected employees can report safety concerns to the California Attorney General. If retaliation occurs, employees may seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. Beginning in 2027, the Attorney General will publish anonymized annual reports on whistleblower activity in the AI sector.
How to File a Whistleblower Complaint in California
The filing process depends on the type of violation being reported.
General Whistleblower Complaints (Labor Code 1102.5)
- Report the suspected violation to your employer's designated supervisor or internal compliance system.
- If the issue is not resolved, file a complaint with the California Labor Commissioner's Office or the relevant government agency.
- You may also file a civil lawsuit. The statute of limitations is three years from the date of the retaliatory action.
State Employee Complaints (Government Code 8547)
- File a complaint with the California State Auditor's Whistleblower Hotline.
- If you experience retaliation, file a written complaint with the State Personnel Board within one year.
Qui Tam Actions (False Claims Act)
- Consult with an attorney experienced in qui tam litigation.
- File the complaint under seal with the court.
- Notify the California Attorney General, who has 60 days (with possible extensions) to decide whether to intervene.
Key Phone Numbers
| Agency | Phone Number |
|---|---|
| California Attorney General Whistleblower Hotline | 1-800-952-5225 |
| California Civil Rights Department (CRD) | 1-800-884-1684 |
| Labor Commissioner's Office | 916-263-1811 |
| Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) | 1-800-736-7401 |
| California State Auditor Whistleblower Hotline | 916-445-0255 |
Statute of Limitations Summary
Filing deadlines vary by statute. Missing a deadline can result in your claim being dismissed regardless of its merits.
| Claim Type | Filing Deadline |
|---|---|
| Labor Code 1102.5 (civil lawsuit) | 3 years from retaliation |
| Labor Code 1102.5 (Labor Commissioner complaint) | 6 months from retaliation |
| FEHA / Civil Rights Department complaint | 3 years from retaliation |
| Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) | 6 months from retaliation |
| Workers' Compensation retaliation | 1 year from retaliation |
| State Employee Whistleblower Protection Act | 1 year from retaliation |
| False Claims Act retaliation | 3 years from retaliation |
Remedies and Penalties
General Remedies for Whistleblower Retaliation
California courts can order the following relief for employees who prove retaliation:
- Reinstatement to the former position
- Back pay for the period of lost employment
- Restoration of lost benefits
- Compensation for attorney's fees and litigation costs
- Other relief the court deems appropriate
Penalties Under Specific Statutes
| Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Labor Code 1102.5 (per SB 497) | Civil penalty up to $10,000 per violation |
| Health and Safety Code 1278.5 | Civil penalty up to $25,000; up to $75,000 for willful violations |
| Labor Code 132a (Workers' Comp) | Misdemeanor charge; compensation increase of 50% (capped at $10,000); costs up to $250 |
| False Claims Act | Double back pay, interest, special damages, attorney's fees |
Burden of Proof
Under Labor Code Section 1102.6, once an employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse action, the burden shifts to the employer. The employer must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the action would have occurred for legitimate, independent reasons even without the whistleblowing. Cal. Lab. Code Section 1102.6
Federal Whistleblower Protections
California employees may also be covered by federal whistleblower statutes, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (for publicly traded companies), the Dodd-Frank Act (for securities violations), and the federal False Claims Act. These federal laws can provide additional remedies and longer filing windows in some cases. See our Federal Whistleblower Laws guide for full details.
More California Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies as whistleblowing under California law?
Under California Labor Code Section 1102.5, whistleblowing includes reporting a suspected violation of any state or federal law, rule, or regulation to a government agency, law enforcement, or a supervisor with authority to investigate. You are also protected for refusing to participate in illegal activity and for testifying in investigations.
Can I be fired for being a whistleblower in California?
No. California law prohibits employers from retaliating against whistleblowers through termination, demotion, suspension, or any other adverse employment action. Under SB 497, if your employer takes adverse action within 90 days of your protected activity, the law presumes it was retaliation, and your employer must prove otherwise.
How long do I have to file a whistleblower retaliation claim in California?
For claims under Labor Code Section 1102.5, you have three years from the date of the retaliatory action to file a civil lawsuit. If you file with the Labor Commissioner instead, the deadline is six months. Other statutes have different deadlines, so check the specific law that applies to your situation.
Can I receive a financial reward for reporting fraud against the government?
Yes. Under the California False Claims Act (Government Code Sections 12650 to 12656), whistleblowers who file qui tam lawsuits can receive 15% to 33% of the government's recovery if the state intervenes, or 25% to 50% if the whistleblower prosecutes the case independently.
Do California whistleblower protections apply to independent contractors?
Labor Code Section 1102.5 primarily protects employees, former employees, and applicants. Independent contractors may have protections under the False Claims Act for qui tam actions, and courts have extended some protections depending on the nature of the working relationship. Consult an attorney if you are uncertain about your classification.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Labor Code
§ 1102.5In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) An employer, or any person acting on behalf of the employer, shall not make, adopt, or enforce any rule, regulation, or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, to a person with authority over the employee, or to another employee who has authority to investigate, discover, or correct the violation or noncompliance, or from providing information to, or testifying before, any public body conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry, if the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation of or noncompliance with a local, state, or federal rule or regulation, regardless of whether disclosing the information is part of the employee’s job duties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-09 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 905 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (California Supreme Court 1988, 47 Cal. 3d 654)“…e, and therefore covered by the public policy rule. Under Labor Code section 1102.5, subdivision (b), an employer is prohib…”
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif (California Supreme Court 2006, 46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638)“…action violated state and federal labor laws, specifically Labor Code section 1102.5 and 29 United States Code section 1140…”
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co. (California Supreme Court 1998, 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16)“…b. Code, §§ 132a, 923; see also Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.; Lab. Code, § 1102.5.) The court’s observations further refl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ameris Bank Hit With $79.5M Whistleblower-Retaliation Judgment, California Workplace Recording Laws: Employee Rights and Employer Rules (2026), California At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
§ 1102.6In force
In a civil action or administrative proceeding brought pursuant to Section 1102.5, once it has been demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that an activity proscribed by Section 1102.5 was a contributing factor in the alleged prohibited action against the employee, the employer shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged action would have occurred for legitimate, independent reasons even if the employee had not engaged in activities protected by Section 1102.5.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 64 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. (California Supreme Court 2022, 12 Cal. 5th 703)“…ken the same action “for legitimate, independent reasons.” (Lab. Code, § 1102.6, added by Stats. 2003, ch. 484, § 3, pp…”
- Scheer v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (California Court of Appeal 2022)“…Inc., supra, 12 Cal.5th 703, which would determine whether Labor Code section 1102.6 (discussed in more detail below), rathe…”
- Harris v. City of Santa Monica (California Supreme Court 2013, 56 Cal. 4th 203)“…ce to an employer‘s same-decision showing. Harris points to Labor Code section 1102.6, which requires the employer to prove a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 6311In force
No employee shall be laid off or discharged for refusing to perform work in the performance of which this code, including Section 6400, any occupational safety or health standard, or any safety order of the division or standards board will be violated, where the violation would create a real and apparent hazard to the employee or their fellow employees. Any employee who is laid off or discharged in violation of this section or is otherwise not paid because the employee refused to perform work in the performance of which this code, any occupational safety or health standard, or any safety order of the division or standards board will be violated and where the violation would create a real and apparent hazard to the employee or their fellow employees shall have a right of action for wages for the time the employee is without work as a result of the layoff or discharge.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc. (California Court of Appeal 1980, 111 Cal. App. 3d 443)“…ployee refuses to perform work under unsafe conditions (see Lab. Code, § 6311, and Mason v. Lyl P…”
- Hentzel v. Singer Co. (California Court of Appeal 1982, 138 Cal. App. 3d 290)“…rt action to enforce such decision.” 6 Labor Code section 6311 provides: “No employee shall be laid of…”
- Dabbs v. Cardiopulmonary Management Services (California Court of Appeal 1987, 188 Cal. App. 3d 1437)“…nt; she walked off the job. OSHA specifically addresses, in Labor Code section 6311, the separate and distinct activity of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 132aIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
It is the declared policy of this state that there should not be discrimination against workers who are injured in the course and scope of their employment. (1) Any employer who discharges, or threatens to discharge, or in any manner discriminates against any employee because he or she has filed or made known his or her intention to file a claim for compensation with his or her employer or an application for adjudication, or because the employee has received a rating, award, or settlement, is guilty of a misdemeanor and the employee’s compensation shall be increased by one-half, but in no event more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), together with costs and expenses not in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250). Any such employee shall also be entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits caused by the acts of the employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 119 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (California Court of Appeal 2008, 166 Cal. App. 4th 952)“…the appeal is dismissed as to summary adjudication of the Labor Code section 132a and related wrongful termination claims…”
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (California Supreme Court 1978, 22 Cal. 3d 658)“…as engaged in unlawful discrimination within the meaning of Labor Code section 132a. In 1972 the Legislature amended sectio…”
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc. (California Court of Appeal 2008, 163 Cal. App. 4th 327)“…n retaliation for filing workers’ compensation claims. (See Lab. Code, § 132a.) The trial court granted summary judgm…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 6399.7In force
No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against, any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or has instituted, or caused to be instituted, any proceeding under or related to the provisions of this chapter, or has testified, or is about to testify, in any such proceeding, or because of the exercise of any right afforded pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on such employee’s behalf or on behalf of others, nor shall any pay, seniority, or other benefits be lost for exercise of any such right. A violation of the provisions of this section shall be a violation of the provisions of Section 6310. Notwithstanding Section 6303 or other law, as used in this section, “employee” includes a domestic work employee, except for a person who performs household domestic service that is publicly funded, including publicly funded household domestic service provided to a recipient, client, or beneficiary with a share of cost in that service.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1993
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smedley v. Capps, Staples, Ward, Hastings & Dodson (District Court, N.D. California 1993, 820 F. Supp. 1227)“…1, 2 and 3 of the California Constitution as. well as Cal. Labor Code § 6399.7 ; (c) the state’s substantial interest…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
California Government Code
§ 8547In force
This article shall be known and may be cited as the “California Whistleblower Protection Act.”
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Taswell v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (California Court of Appeal, 5th District 2018, 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 628)“…violation of the California Whistleblower Protection Act, Government Code, section 8547 et seq. ; (2) whistleblower retaliation…”
- Brown v. Department of Corrections (California Court of Appeal 2005, 33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 754)“…ployee California Whistleblower Protection Act contained in Government Code section 8547 et seq. (Whistleblower Act), and the an…”
- Taswell v. The Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (California Court of Appeal 2018)“…violation of the California Whistleblower Protection Act, Government Code, section 8547 et seq.; (2) whistleblower retaliation…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12650In force
(a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) “Claim” means any request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money, property, or services, and whether or not the state or a political subdivision has title to the money, property, or services that meets either of the following conditions: (A) Is presented to an officer, employee, or agent of the state or of a political subdivision. (B) Is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient, if the money, property, or service is to be spent or used on a state or any political subdivision’s behalf or to advance a state or political subdivision’s program or interest, and if the state or political subdivision meets either of the following conditions: (i) Provides or has provided any portion of the money, property, or service requested or demanded. (ii) Reimburses the contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money, property, or service that is requested or demanded.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 136 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wells v. One2One Learning Foundation (California Supreme Court 2006, 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108)“…of the state, under the California False Claims Act (CFCA; Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.). 1 We reach the following c…”
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing Authority (California Court of Appeal 2007, 152 Cal. App. 4th 720)“…er false claim pursuant to the California False Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.). The jury also found Fassberg…”
- Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of Sunnyvale (California Court of Appeal 2007, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 175)“…ed “person,” “knowingly,” and “claim” using the language of Government Code section 12650, 7 but did not define the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12940In forcecited in 3 of our articles
It is an unlawful employment practice, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification, or, except where based upon applicable security regulations established by the United States or the State of California: (a) For an employer, because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, reproductive health decisionmaking, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or veteran or military status of any person, to refuse to hire or employ the person or to refuse to select the person for a training program leading to employment, or to bar or to discharge the person from employment or from a training program leading to employment, or to discriminate against the person in compensation or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1,507 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC. (California Supreme Court 2005, 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 436)“…uted unlawful retaliation in violation of the provisions of Government Code section 12940, subdivision (h) (section 12940(h)), wh…”
- Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (California Supreme Court 2003, 6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 457)“…Gov.Code, § 12920) and is an unlawful employment practice. (Gov.Code, § 12940.) The legislative scheme created two ad…”
- Hughes v. Pair (California Supreme Court 2009, 46 Cal. 4th 1035)“…al harassment in the workplace. Originally enacted in 1980, Government Code section 12940 is part of the FEHA. (See Gov. Code, §…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
California Health and Safety Code
§ 1278.5In force
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that it is the public policy of the State of California to encourage patients, nurses, members of the medical staff, and other health care workers to notify government entities of suspected unsafe patient care and conditions. The Legislature encourages this reporting in order to protect patients and in order to assist those accreditation and government entities charged with ensuring that health care is safe. The Legislature finds and declares that whistleblower protections apply primarily to issues relating to the care, services, and conditions of a facility and are not intended to conflict with existing provisions in state and federal law relating to employee and employer relations. (b) (1) A health facility shall not discriminate or retaliate, in any manner, against a patient, employee, member of the medical staff, or other health care worker of the health facility because that person has done either of the following: (A) Presented a grievance, complaint, or report to the facility, to an entity or agency responsible for accrediting or evaluating the facility, or the medical staff of the facility, or to any other governmental entity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 91 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Shaw v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty. (California Supreme Court 2017, 216 Cal. Rptr. 3d 643)“…ower action for retaliatory termination brought pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 1278.5, subdivision (g), as amended in 2007?…”
- Taswell v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (California Court of Appeal, 5th District 2018, 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 628)“…547 et seq. ; (2) whistleblower retaliation in violation of Health and Safety Code section 1278.5 ; (3) whistleblower retaliation in viol…”
- Brenner v. Universal Health Servs. of Rancho Springs, Inc. (California Court of Appeal, 5th District 2017, 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 135)“…h based on medical negligence; retaliation, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 1278.5 ; and elder abuse, in violation of Welf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- California Labor Code Section 1102.5(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Government Code Section 8547 - Whistleblower Protection Act(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Government Code Section 12650 - False Claims Act(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Government Code Section 12940 - FEHA(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Labor Code Sections 6310-6311 - Occupational Safety(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Labor Code Section 132a - Workers Compensation Retaliation(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Health and Safety Code Section 1278.5(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Labor Code Section 6399.7 - Hazardous Substances(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Labor Code Section 1102.6 - Burden of Proof(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Labor Commissioner Whistleblower Notice(dir.ca.gov).gov
- California Attorney General False Claims Unit(oag.ca.gov).gov
- California State Auditor Whistleblower Program(auditor.ca.gov).gov
- California Civil Rights Department(calcivilrights.ca.gov).gov
- Governor Newsom Signs SB 53(gov.ca.gov).gov
- AB 2299 - Whistleblower Protections Model Notice(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov