Texas
Texas Pornography Laws (2026): Age Verification, FSC v. Paxton, and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Private adult possession of pornography is legal in Texas, but Texas is also the state where the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case that reshaped this entire area of law. In Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (2025), the Court upheld Texas's age-verification requirement for adult websites, and that ruling now controls how every state age-verification law in the country is reviewed. This page covers Texas's obscenity, CSAM, age-verification, and adult-business law, and how the Paxton ruling changed the constitutional landscape.
Is Pornography Legal in Texas?
Texas's obscenity statute, Tex. Penal Code § 43.23, does not ban private adult possession of pornography. It criminalizes wholesale promotion or possession with intent to wholesale promote obscene material or obscene devices, a state jail felony, and the lesser offenses of promotion, possession with intent to promote, or producing an obscene performance, a Class A misdemeanor. Simply owning or viewing material that meets Texas's legal definition of obscenity, without any intent to sell, distribute, or otherwise promote it, is not a crime under this statute.
That distinction reflects Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court case holding that states cannot criminalize the mere private possession of obscene material inside a person's own home, while leaving states free to regulate commercial distribution. Notably, Texas law creates a presumption of intent to promote once a person possesses six or more obscene devices or similar articles, which can turn what looks like personal possession into a promotion charge depending on the facts.
Ordinary, non-obscene, adult-only pornography is legal to produce and sell in Texas. Federal law, not Texas law, separately requires producers of sexually explicit material to keep age and identity records for every performer under 18 U.S.C. § 2257.
Texas's Age-Verification Law: Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
Texas enacted House Bill 1181 in 2023, codified at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ch. 129B, requiring commercial websites where more than one-third of the content is sexual material harmful to minors to use reasonable age-verification methods, government-issued ID, digital ID, or a third-party verification service, before granting access.
The law's constitutionality reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton on June 27, 2025, in a 6-3 ruling authored by Justice Thomas. The Court held that an age-verification requirement for material that is obscene to minors but constitutionally protected for adults triggers only intermediate scrutiny, not the strict scrutiny the Court had applied to similar laws in earlier cases like Reno v. ACLU and Ashcroft v. ACLU, because a modest age-gate imposes only an incidental burden on adults rather than functioning as a ban. The majority wrote that "no person, adult or child, has a First Amendment right to access speech that is obscene to minors without first submitting proof of age." Justice Kagan's dissent argued the law was a direct, content-based burden that should have faced strict scrutiny. This ruling is now the controlling precedent nationally for age-verification laws of this kind, including the one at issue in Tennessee's ongoing litigation.
One part of HB 1181 did not survive: § 129B.004's separate requirement that covered websites display a health-warning label about pornography was preliminarily enjoined by a federal district court as unconstitutional compelled speech. That injunction is unrelated to the Supreme Court's 2025 ruling, which addressed only the age-verification mandate, and remains in effect while Texas appeals it to the Fifth Circuit. In practical terms, a site subject to Chapter 129B must verify a visitor's age, but is not currently required to display the warning label.
Enforcement of Chapter 129B is civil and runs exclusively through the Texas Attorney General under § 129B.006. Penalties reach up to $10,000 per day of a continuing violation, up to $10,000 for each instance of improper retention of a user's verification data, and an additional civil penalty of up to $250,000 if a minor is shown to have actually accessed the material. Chapter 129B does not create a private right of action, unlike the age-verification laws in some other states.
Some adult platforms, most visibly Pornhub's parent company Aylo, geo-block Texas entirely rather than build age-verification into their sites, citing user-privacy concerns in their own public statements. That is a business decision by those platforms, not a Texas ban on viewing legally verified adult content.
Texas's App Store Accountability Act Is a Different Law
Texas also passed Senate Bill 2420, the App Store Accountability Act, in 2025. It is a separate statute from HB 1181 and should not be confused with it: SB 2420 regulates app-store operators like Apple and Google, requiring them to verify a user's age at account creation and to obtain parental consent before a minor downloads an app or makes an in-app purchase. It does not directly regulate pornography websites.

SB 2420 has its own, still-unresolved litigation history. A federal district court enjoined it in December 2025, but the Fifth Circuit stayed that injunction, letting the law take effect June 4, 2026, while the appeal (CCIA v. Paxton, No. 25-51073) continues. On July 6, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to block the law in two consolidated emergency applications. That was a denial of emergency relief, not a ruling on the law's constitutional merits, and the Fifth Circuit's underlying appeal remains open. A page or source describing SB 2420 as fully "upheld by the Supreme Court" is overstating what happened.
Texas's CSAM and Harmful-to-Minors Laws
Texas Penal Code § 43.26 criminalizes possessing or promoting child sexual abuse material, and the Texas Legislature comprehensively rewrote its definitions and penalty structure in 2025, including extending coverage to AI and computer-generated depictions that are indistinguishable from a real child. Base possession is a third-degree felony. It rises to a second-degree felony with a prior conviction or 10 to 49 depictions, and to a first-degree felony for 50 or more depictions, aggravated conduct, depictions of children under 10, or an offender employed at a child-care, residential-treatment, or youth-shelter facility, with some of those first-degree circumstances carrying a mandatory minimum in the 15 to 25 year range. Promotion of CSAM is a second-degree felony at minimum, rising to first-degree under similar aggravating circumstances. Because this statute was substantially amended in 2025, anyone relying on a specific penalty tier should confirm it against the current codified text.
Separately, Tex. Penal Code § 43.24 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to knowingly sell, distribute, or exhibit material harmful to minors to a known minor, or to display such material while reckless about whether a minor present will be offended. That offense becomes a third-degree felony if a minor is hired or used to help carry it out.
Sexting between minors, and the distinct legal exposure that creates for both minors and adults, is covered on RecordingLaw's Texas sexting laws page. This page addresses Texas's general obscenity, CSAM, and age-verification law; the sexting page addresses the sexting-specific charging framework.
Revenge Porn and Non-Consensual Intimate Images in Texas
Texas criminalizes the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images under Tex. Penal Code § 21.16, the unlawful disclosure or promotion of intimate visual material statute. It applies when someone discloses, or promotes, visual material depicting an identifiable person's intimate parts or sexual conduct, without that person's consent, knowing the material was created or obtained under circumstances where it was expected to remain private, with intent to harm the depicted person, and the disclosure actually causes harm and reveals their identity. A violation is a state jail felony.
That state law now works alongside the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act, effective May 19, 2025, which created a separate federal crime for publishing or threatening to publish non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated forgeries, and imposed a 48-hour takedown duty on covered platforms once a report is verified, enforced by the FTC. RecordingLaw's revenge porn laws by state guide covers both layers in more detail.
Indecent Exposure in Texas
Tex. Penal Code § 21.08 makes it an offense to expose the anus or genitals with intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire, while reckless about whether someone present will be offended or alarmed. A first offense is a Class B misdemeanor. It escalates to a Class A misdemeanor with one prior conviction, a state jail felony with two or more prior convictions, and a third-degree felony if the person is civilly committed as a sexually violent predator.

Adult Business Licensing and Zoning in Texas
Texas Local Government Code ch. 243 authorizes, but does not itself mandate, cities and counties to regulate sexually oriented businesses, adult bookstores, theaters, video arcades, and similar establishments. Under this chapter, a municipality or county may adopt whatever regulations it considers necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare, including licensing, permitting, location restrictions, and density limits. The chapter does not itself set a statewide distance requirement from schools or residential areas; specific distances and licensing procedures are set by local ordinance, so requirements vary by city and county.
Separately, Texas imposes a statewide tax on certain sexually oriented businesses. Under Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 102, a business that offers live nude entertainment and permits on-premises alcohol consumption owes $10 for each customer admitted, remitted quarterly to the state Comptroller, with the revenue credited to the state's sexual assault program fund.
Penalties for Pornography-Related Offenses in Texas
| Offense | Texas Code | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Obscenity, wholesale promotion | Penal Code § 43.23 | State jail felony (2nd-degree felony if material depicts a child) |
| Obscenity, simple promotion | Penal Code § 43.23 | Class A misdemeanor |
| Harmful material to a minor | Penal Code § 43.24 | Class A misdemeanor (3rd-degree felony if a minor assisted) |
| CSAM possession | Penal Code § 43.26 | 3rd-degree felony (up to 1st-degree, 15-25 year minimums in aggravated cases) |
| Unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material | Penal Code § 21.16 | State jail felony |
| Indecent exposure | Penal Code § 21.08 | Class B misdemeanor (up to 3rd-degree felony with priors/SVP status) |
| Adult-website age-verification noncompliance (civil, AG-enforced) | Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 129B.006 | Up to $10,000/day, $10,000 per data-retention violation, up to $250,000 if a minor accessed the material |
Practical Considerations
Texas's age-verification requirement for adult websites is now settled federal constitutional law after Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, but the separate health-warning-label requirement in the same bill remains blocked by an injunction under appeal. The App Store Accountability Act (SB 2420) is a different statute, regulating app stores rather than adult websites, and is still working through the Fifth Circuit; describing it as fully upheld goes beyond what the courts have actually decided. Some adult platforms geo-block Texas entirely rather than comply with age verification, so a reader may encounter a blocked site even though viewing verified adult content itself is not illegal. Federal recordkeeping requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 2257 apply to producers regardless of Texas law, and an employer's device policy or a platform's own terms of service can restrict access to lawful content even where state law does not.

This article provides general legal information about Texas law and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult an attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Related Texas Resources
More Texas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to watch porn in Texas?
Yes. Private adult possession and viewing of pornography without intent to promote or sell it is legal in Texas. Tex. Penal Code § 43.23 targets promotion and wholesale promotion of obscene material, not bare private possession.
Does Texas require age verification to access porn websites?
Yes. Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ch. 129B (HB 1181), commercial websites where more than a third of the content is sexual material harmful to minors must verify a visitor is 18 or older. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld this requirement in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (2025).
Did the Supreme Court strike down or uphold Texas's porn age-verification law?
The Supreme Court upheld it. In Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, decided June 27, 2025, the Court ruled 6-3 that Texas's age-verification requirement triggers only intermediate scrutiny and does not violate the First Amendment.
Why is Pornhub blocked in Texas?
Pornhub's parent company, Aylo, chose to geo-block Texas entirely rather than build age verification into its site, citing its own privacy concerns. That is the platform's business decision, not a Texas law banning the site or banning legal adult content.
Is the Texas App Store Accountability Act the same law as the porn age-verification law?
No. SB 2420, the App Store Accountability Act, is a separate statute that regulates app stores like Apple's and Google's, not pornography websites. It took effect June 4, 2026 and remains under active appeal in the Fifth Circuit.
What is the penalty for possessing child sexual abuse material in Texas?
Under Tex. Penal Code § 43.26, as comprehensively amended in 2025, base possession is a third-degree felony, rising to a first-degree felony with mandatory minimums up to 25 years for large volumes, prior convictions, or aggravated circumstances.
What is Texas's revenge porn law?
Tex. Penal Code § 21.16 makes it a state jail felony to disclose intimate visual material of an identifiable person without consent, when the material was expected to stay private and the disclosure causes harm and reveals the person's identity.
Do strip clubs and adult bookstores need a license in Texas?
It depends on the city or county. Texas Local Government Code ch. 243 authorizes, but does not require, local governments to license and zone sexually oriented businesses, so requirements vary by location.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Texas Penal Code
§ 43.23OBSCENITYIn force
(a) A person commits an offense if, knowing its content and character, he wholesale promotes or possesses with intent to wholesale promote any obscene material or obscene device. (b) Except as provided by Subsection (h), an offense under Subsection (a) is a state jail felony. (c) A person commits an offense if, knowing its content and character, he: (1) promotes or possesses with intent to promote any obscene material or obscene device; or (2) produces, presents, or directs an obscene performance or participates in a portion thereof that is obscene or that contributes to its obscenity. (d) Except as provided by Subsection (h), an offense under Subsection (c) is a Class A misdemeanor. (e) A person who promotes or wholesale promotes obscene material or an obscene device or possesses the same with intent to promote or wholesale promote it in the course of his business is presumed to do so with knowledge of its content and character. (f) A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 57 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burden v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas 2001, 55 S.W.3d 608)“…intent to promote any obscene material or obscene device.” Tex. Penal Code § 43.23(c)(1). We will give effect to the plain…”
- Southwick v. State (Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) 1985, 701 S.W.2d 927)“…guilty of the promotion of obscene devices in violation of Tex.Penal Code Ann. sec. 43.23 (Vernon Supp.1985) and assessed his pun…”
- Villarreal v. State (Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District 2008, 267 S.W.3d 204)“…1 . See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.23 (c)(1) (Vernon 2003). This offense cons…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2257Record keeping requirementsIn forcecited in 33 of our articles
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (1998) affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against section 2257. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012) reviewed it as content neutral under intermediate scrutiny, a standard the Third Circuit later replaced with strict scrutiny.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…rformers with independent penalties for failure to comply. 18 U. S. C. §§ 2257 (a) and (i) (1988 ed. and Supp. V); Am…”
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 154 F.3d 281)✓A swingers magazine that ran readers' sexually explicit ads challenged section 2257's age record and labeling duties; the court treated the statute as content neutral, found no substantial likelihood of First Amendment success, and affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction.
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2012, 677 F.3d 519)✓Adult film producers, photographers and sex educators challenged section 2257's recordkeeping duties; the court held the statutes content neutral and found they advance protecting children, but vacated dismissal of the First and Fourth Amendment claims for record development.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), West Virginia Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras and Privacy Violations, Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Tex. Penal Code § 43.23 (obscenity)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Penal Code § 43.24 (harmful material to a minor) / § 43.26 (child pornography)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Penal Code § 21.16 (unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material) / § 21.08 (indecent exposure)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Local Government Code ch. 243 (municipal/county authority to regulate sexually oriented business)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Tex. Business & Commerce Code ch. 102 (sexually oriented business fee)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), No. 23-1122(law.cornell.edu)
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)(law.cornell.edu)
- Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce App Store Accountability Act (SB 2420) pending Fifth Circuit appeal(scotusblog.com)