Oregon
Oregon Identity Theft Laws: ORS 165.800 and 165.803 Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). How we verify our legal content

Oregon treats identity theft as a flat Class C felony under ORS 165.800 regardless of dollar amount, but a separate aggravated version of the crime, ORS 165.803, escalates it to a Class B felony when any of four specific conditions apply. This page covers both statutes, Oregon's own protected-consumer credit freeze law for minors, the Oregon Department of Justice's reporting process, and the federal rights every Oregon resident also has.
This article addresses Oregon state law on identity theft alongside the federal framework under 18 U.S.C. Section 1028 and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. For the parent overview of identity theft law generally, see our identity theft laws hub.
Oregon's Two-Tier Identity Theft Statute
Oregon's base identity theft offense is defined at ORS 165.800: «A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person's own use the personal identification of another person.» «Personal identification» is defined broadly under the statute to include names, addresses, phone numbers, driving privileges, Social Security numbers, employment information, signatures, email accounts, photographs, dates of birth, and PINs. The statute also carries an affirmative defense for a person under 21 who uses another person's identification solely to purchase an age-restricted item such as alcohol.
Unlike many states, Oregon does not tier the base offense by dollar amount. Identity theft under ORS 165.800 is a Class C felony regardless of how much money or property is involved.
Aggravated Identity Theft: ORS 165.803
Oregon escalates identity theft to a Class B felony, aggravated identity theft under ORS 165.803, when a person's violation of ORS 165.800 meets any one of four specific conditions. First, the person's conduct involves 10 or more separate incidents within a 180-day period. Second, the person has a previous conviction for aggravated identity theft, in any state or federal court, at any prior time. Third, the losses from a single transaction or from transactions aggregated together total $10,000 or more within a 180-day period. Fourth, the person possesses 10 or more pieces of personal identification belonging to 10 or more different people. Any one of these four triggers is enough to raise the charge from a Class C to a Class B felony.

Oregon's Protected Consumer Credit Freeze
Oregon has its own security freeze statute specifically for minors and other protected consumers, part of the Oregon Consumer Identity Theft Protection Act, ORS 646A.600 through 646A.628. ORS 646A.602(14) defines a «protected consumer» as an individual not older than 16 at the time a representative requests a freeze on their behalf, or an individual who is incapacitated or under a court-appointed guardianship or conservatorship. Under ORS 646A.606, a representative, meaning a parent, guardian, or conservator, can freeze a protected consumer's credit report by submitting proof of their authority to act, such as a court order, a valid power of attorney, or a notarized affidavit describing the relationship. This state-law right sits alongside the separate federal minor-freeze right described below; whether Oregon's own law predates or postdates the 2018 federal statute was not independently confirmed this session.
Reporting Identity Theft to the Oregon DOJ
The Oregon Department of Justice's Consumer Protection Section directs identity theft victims to file with local law enforcement and with the FTC, either through its online complaint assistant or by calling 1-877-ID-THEFT. The DOJ's own site also provides guidance on free annual credit reports, security-freeze contact information for all three credit bureaus, and fraud-alert guidance covering the initial 90-day alert, the extended 7-year alert, and the active-duty military alert, along with an Identity Theft Affidavit for credit restoration. Oregon consumers can also reach the DOJ's general Consumer Hotline at 1-877-877-9392, listed on the Consumer Protection Section's main landing page, or file online through the department's consumer complaints portal.

Victim Rights and Remedies
Restitution in Oregon comes through the state's general criminal restitution statute, ORS 137.106. Under ORS 137.106(1)(a), when a person is convicted of a crime that has resulted in economic damages, the district attorney investigates and presents to the court evidence of the nature and amount of those damages. If the court then finds from that evidence that a victim suffered economic damages, ORS 137.106(2)(a) says the court «shall enter a judgment or supplemental judgment requiring that the defendant pay the victim restitution in a specific amount that equals the full amount of the victim's economic damages.» ORS 137.106(2)(b) carries the one exception: a court may order less than the full amount only if the victim, or an authorized representative of the victim, consents to the lesser amount, and that consent must be in writing when the conviction is for a person felony. This session's research did not find a restitution provision specific to ORS 165.800 or 165.803 themselves; the restitution right comes from Oregon's general criminal-restitution law, which applies to identity theft convictions the same as any other crime.
Oregon's data breach notification law, ORS 646A.604, works alongside the criminal statute as a companion victim protection: a company that suffers a breach must notify affected Oregon consumers within 45 days of discovering it, and must notify the Attorney General if the number of consumers it has to notify exceeds 250. The required notice itself must include advice on reporting suspected identity theft, giving breach victims an early, actionable warning rather than a bare notification.
This session's research did not find an Oregon-specific private civil cause of action for identity theft written directly into ORS Chapter 165. Oregon's general Unlawful Trade Practices Act may theoretically reach identity theft in some circumstances, but that was not independently confirmed against a specific case or provision this session. Whether Oregon has a mandatory police-report-acceptance statute or an identity-theft-passport victim-certification program, both features some other states have, was also not confirmed either way this session.
Federal Rights That Apply Regardless of State Law
Every Oregon identity theft victim also has rights under federal law that apply on top of anything ORS Chapter 165 or 646A provides. A credit freeze and a fraud alert are both free under 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1, added by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018. A free report at IdentityTheft.gov unlocks the right under FCRA Section 605B, 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, to have fraudulent information blocked from a credit report. For the full mechanics, see our guides on how to report identity theft and credit freeze vs. fraud alert.

Information last verified on 2026-08-13, drawing directly on the live text of ORS 165.800, ORS 165.803, ORS 646A.602, ORS 646A.606, ORS 646A.604, and ORS 137.106, plus the Oregon Department of Justice's Consumer Protection Section page. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
Last updated: 2026-08-13.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for identity theft in Oregon?
Identity theft under ORS 165.800 is a flat Class C felony regardless of dollar amount. Aggravated identity theft under ORS 165.803, a Class B felony, applies when there are 10 or more incidents within 180 days, a prior aggravated identity theft conviction, losses of $10,000 or more within 180 days, or possession of 10 or more pieces of identification from 10 or more people.
What counts as personal identification under Oregon's identity theft law?
Oregon defines personal identification broadly to include names, addresses, phone numbers, driving privileges, Social Security numbers, employment information, signatures, email accounts, photographs, dates of birth, and PINs.
Can I freeze my child's credit report under Oregon law?
Yes. Oregon's own protected-consumer freeze statute, ORS 646A.606, lets a parent, guardian, or conservator freeze the credit report of a protected consumer, defined as anyone not older than 16, or an incapacitated person under guardianship or conservatorship, by submitting proof of authority.
Is restitution mandatory for identity theft convictions in Oregon?
In most cases, yes, but it is not automatic. Under ORS 137.106(1)(a) the district attorney investigates and presents evidence of the victim's economic damages, and if the court finds from that evidence that the victim suffered damages, ORS 137.106(2)(a) requires an order for the full amount. ORS 137.106(2)(b) lets a court order less than the full amount only if the victim or an authorized representative consents to the lesser amount, in writing if the conviction is for a person felony.
How do I report identity theft in Oregon?
File with your local law enforcement agency and with the FTC, either online or by calling 1-877-ID-THEFT. The Oregon Department of Justice's Consumer Protection Section also takes complaints at 1-877-877-9392 or through its online consumer complaints portal.
Does Oregon's data breach law require companies to help victims of identity theft?
Oregon's breach notification law, ORS 646A.604, requires companies to notify affected consumers within 45 days of discovering a breach, and the notice itself must include advice on reporting suspected identity theft.
Updates
Corrected Oregon's data breach reporting threshold (the Attorney General must be notified when the number of consumers notified exceeds 250, not when 250 are affected) and rewrote the restitution section to reflect that ORS 137.106 requires full economic damages only after the district attorney presents evidence and the court finds the loss, and allows a lesser amount with the victim's consent.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 165: Offenses Involving Fraud or Deception
§ 165.800Identity theftIn force
(1) A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person’s own use the personal identification of another person. (2) Identity theft is a Class C felony. (3) It is an affirmative defense to violating subsection (1) of this section that the person charged with the offense: (a) Was under 21 years of age at the time of committing the offense and the person used the personal identification of another person solely for the purpose of purchasing alcohol, tobacco products as defined in ORS 431A.175 or inhalant delivery systems as defined in ORS 431A.175; or (b) Used the personal identification of another person solely for the purpose of misrepresenting the person’s age to gain access to a: (A) Place the access to which is restricted based on age; or (B) Benefit based on age.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 126 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Medina (2015) held that falsely signing police-created forms was neither uttering nor converting personal identification under ORS 165.800, though intent to deceive reaches misrepresenting identity to an officer for an unwarranted advantage. State v. Gensitskiy (2019) merged 27 identity thefts into the aggravated count.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Poston (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2016, 277 Or. App. 137)✓A jail inmate used other inmates' PINs to place calls and was convicted of 26 identity theft counts under ORS 165.800; the court reversed those convictions because the indictment failed to allege a basis for joinder, without reaching the statute's elements.
- State v. Medina (Oregon Supreme Court 2015)✓Medina signed a fingerprint card and a property receipt with a fictitious name after a speeding stop; the Oregon Supreme Court held he neither uttered nor converted that personal identification to his own use, so acquittal on the ORS 165.800 charge was required.
- State v. Stutte (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2025, 339 Or. App. 87)“…olves the theft of information, rather than “property.” See ORS 165.800(1) (“A person commits the crime of iden…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 165.803Aggravated identity theftIn force
(1) A person commits the crime of aggravated identity theft if: (a) The person violates ORS 165.800 in 10 or more separate incidents within a 180-day period; (b) The person violates ORS 165.800 and the person has a previous conviction for aggravated identity theft; (c) The person violates ORS 165.800 and the losses incurred in a single or aggregate transaction are $10,000 or more within a 180-day period; or (d) The person violates ORS 165.800 and has in the person’s custody, possession or control 10 or more pieces of personal identification from 10 or more different persons. (2) Aggravated identity theft is a Class B felony. (3) As used in this section, “previous conviction” includes: (a) Convictions occurring before, on or after January 1, 2008; and (b) Convictions entered in any other state or federal court for comparable offenses. (4) The state shall plead in the accusatory instrument and prove beyond a reasonable doubt, as an element of the offense, the previous conviction for aggravated identity theft.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gensitskiy (Oregon Supreme Court 2019, 365 Or. 263)“…begins instead with the aggravated identity theft statute, ORS 165.803, suggesting that the legislative histor…”
- State v. Hampton (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2023, 327 Or. App. 28)“…ee under ORS 164.225 or aggravated identity theft under ORS 165.803, the pre- sumptive sentence is 24 m…”
- State v. McCright (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2016, 282 Or. App. 692)“…seven counts of aggravated identity theft (Counts 11-17), ORS 165.803; 4 three counts of identity theft (Cou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 646A: Trade Regulation
§ 646A.606Security freeze; requirements; proof of authority; effectIn force
(1) A consumer may elect to place a security freeze on the consumer’s consumer report or, if the consumer is a representative, on a protected consumer’s consumer report or protective record by sending a written request to a consumer reporting agency at an address the agency designates to receive such requests, or a secure electronic request at a website the agency designates to receive such requests if the consumer reporting agency, at the agency’s discretion, makes a secure electronic method available. (2) If the consumer or protected consumer is the victim of identity theft or has reported a theft of personal information to a law enforcement agency, the consumer or representative may include a copy of the police report, incident report or identity theft declaration. (3)(a) The consumer or representative must provide proper identification. (b)(A) In addition to the information described in paragraph (a) of this subsection, a representative who seeks to place a security freeze on a protected consumer’s consumer report or protective record shall provide sufficient proof of the representative’s authority to act on the protected consumer’s behalf.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
§ 646A.604Notice of breach of security; delay; methods of notification; contents of notice; application of notice requirementIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) If a covered entity is subject to a breach of security or receives notice of a breach of security from a vendor, the covered entity shall give notice of the breach of security to: (a) The consumer to whom the personal information pertains. (b) The Attorney General, either in writing or electronically, if the number of consumers to whom the covered entity must send the notice described in paragraph (a) of this subsection exceeds 250. (2)(a) A vendor that discovers a breach of security or has reason to believe that a breach of security has occurred shall notify a covered entity with which the vendor has a contract as soon as is practicable but not later than 10 days after discovering the breach of security or having a reason to believe that the breach of security occurred. (b) If a vendor has a contract with another vendor that, in turn, has a contract with a covered entity, the vendor shall notify the other vendor of a breach of security as provided in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Eldred v. Oregon Anesthesiology Group (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2026, 347 Or. App. 169)“…that expose consumers’ personal information. ORS 646A.602; ORS 646A.604; ORS 646A.620; ORS 646A.622. Section 5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026)
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 137: Judgment and Execution; Parole and Probation by the Court
§ 137.106Restitution to victims; objections by defendant; disclosure to defendantIn force
(1)(a) Except as provided in subsection (8) of this section, when a person is convicted of a crime, or a violation as described in ORS 153.008, that has resulted in economic damages, the district attorney shall investigate and present to the court, at the time of sentencing or as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, evidence of the nature and amount of the damages. (b)(A) If the district attorney is unable to present restitution evidence at sentencing, within 90 days after sentencing the district attorney may file a motion requesting that either the judgment be amended to require restitution or that a supplemental judgment be entered requiring restitution. The court may extend the time by which the district attorney must file the motion for good cause. The motion must contain a statement that documentation supporting the requested amount of restitution has been provided to the defendant as described in subsection (7) of this section. (B) Upon receipt of a motion described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the court shall set a hearing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 392 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Riverman (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2022, 320 Or. App. 388)“…e trial court complied with the restitution requirements in ORS 137.106 is a question of law, it is not reasona…”
- State v. Dillon (Oregon Supreme Court 1981, 292 Or. 172)“…participant in the defendant’s criminal activities.” ORS 137.106: “(1) When a person is convicted…”
- State v. Ramos (Oregon Supreme Court 2016)“…urer’s expenses did not qualify as “economic damages” under ORS 137.106. The trial court and Court of Appeals r…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORS 165.800, Identity Theft (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 165.803, Aggravated Identity Theft (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 646A.602, Definitions for ORS 646A.600 to 646A.628 (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 646A.606, Security Freeze for Protected Consumer (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 646A.604, Notification of Breach of Security (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 137.106, Restitution (Oregon Public Law)(oregon.public.law)
- Identity Theft (Oregon Department of Justice, Consumer Protection Section)(doj.state.or.us)
- Oregon Department of Justice, Consumer Protection Section (main landing page, lists the Consumer Hotline number)(doj.state.or.us)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-1, Identity Theft Prevention; Fraud Alerts and Active Duty Alerts (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c-2, Block of Information Resulting From Identity Theft (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- ORS Chapter 646A, including 646A.604 (Notice of breach of security) and 646A.606 (Oregon Legislative Assembly, official chapter text)(oregonlegislature.gov)
- ORS Chapter 137, including 137.106 (Restitution to victims) (Oregon Legislative Assembly, official chapter text)(oregonlegislature.gov)