New York
New York Identity Theft Laws: The Four Degrees Under Penal Law 190.78-190.80-a
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New York breaks identity theft into four separate crimes, each carrying its own penalty class tied to how much money or property is involved: identity theft in the third degree, second degree, first degree, and a separate aggravated identity theft offense that specifically protects deployed military service members. New York's degree structure is one of the most detailed in the country, and this article confirms the exact classification for each degree directly from the current statutory text.
This article addresses New York's identity theft statute, together with the federal layer of protections that applies nationwide. It does not cover every state's law; see the identity theft laws hub for other states.
New York's Four Degrees of Identity Theft
New York Penal Law defines identity theft across four separate sections, each sharing the same basic definition: a person knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person, by presenting themselves as that person, acting as that person, or using that person's identifying information, and thereby does one of a list of specific triggering things. What separates the degrees is the dollar amount involved and the severity of any related offense.
Third degree identity theft, Penal Law § 190.78, is a class A misdemeanor. It applies when a person assumes another's identity and, as a result, obtains goods, money, property, or services or uses credit in the other person's name, causes financial loss to that person or to another person, or commits a class A misdemeanor or higher level crime. The financial-loss route is its own separate prong, so a victim who lost money does not have to show that the thief obtained anything. Unlike the second and first degree sections, § 190.78 contains no attempt prong.
Second degree identity theft, Penal Law § 190.79, is a class E felony. It applies when the person obtains goods, money, property, services, or credit exceeding $500 in aggregate value, causes financial loss exceeding $500 in aggregate, commits or attempts a felony or acts as an accessory to one, or commits third degree identity theft with a prior conviction for a specified identity-theft or related crime within the preceding 5 years.
First degree identity theft, Penal Law § 190.80, is a class D felony. It applies when the amount obtained or the financial loss caused exceeds $2,000, when the person commits or attempts to commit a class D felony or higher level crime or acts as an accessory in the commission of a class D or higher level felony, or on a repeat offense with qualifying prior convictions. Because first degree identity theft is itself a class D felony, the related crime does not have to be more serious than that: a class D felony is enough to trigger this route.
Aggravated identity theft, Penal Law § 190.80-a, is a distinct offense that applies when the actor knows that the victim is a member of the armed forces and knows that the member is presently deployed outside the continental United States, and obtains goods, money, property, services, or credit, or causes financial loss to that member, exceeding $500. Both knowledge elements are part of the offense, so the victim's status alone does not trigger it. This offense is also classified as a class D felony, the same classification as first degree identity theft. That is not a typographical inconsistency; it is what the current text of both sections provides, confirmed independently from each section's live statutory language. In practical terms, New York treats identity theft against a deployed service member as serious enough to carry a first-degree-level felony class even though the dollar threshold that triggers it, $500, is far lower than the $2,000 threshold that applies to first degree identity theft generally.
Credit Freezes and Other Protections in New York
New York layers its own security freeze law on top of the federal rules. Under General Business Law § 380-t, a consumer credit reporting agency must place a security freeze on a New York consumer's file at that consumer's request, and the section prohibits charging a fee for placing, removing, or temporarily lifting a freeze. General Business Law § 380-u adds a separate security record freeze for protected minors, which a protected consumer's representative, typically a parent or guardian, may request on the minor's behalf; an agency may charge up to $15 for a placement or removal there, but that fee is waived where the representative supplies documentation of identity theft or fraud against the minor or where the agency already maintains a file on the minor. This article did not independently confirm a specific New York Attorney General identity-theft resource page or a New York-specific victim-rights or restitution framework for identity theft at the time of publication.

Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, every consumer, including New York residents, is entitled to a free security freeze and free fraud alerts from each of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies. A freeze physically blocks a lender from accessing your credit file, which stops new-account fraud even if a thief already has your Social Security number, date of birth, or address. The same statute provides a 1-year initial fraud alert and, with a copy of an FTC Identity Theft Report, a 7-year extended fraud alert requiring a potential creditor to actually contact you before extending credit, and it includes a federal Protected Consumer Freeze provision that lets a parent, guardian, or person with valid power of attorney freeze a minor's credit file. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2, a victim with an FTC Identity Theft Report can get fraudulent information blocked from their credit report within 4 business days of the credit reporting agency receiving the required documentation. New York's own general criminal restitution framework, Penal Law § 60.27, is presumed to apply to identity theft convictions as a matter of general criminal procedure, but this article did not independently confirm that provision's specific application to identity theft at publication.
What To Do If You're a Victim of Identity Theft in New York
Start at IdentityTheft.gov to create an FTC Identity Theft Report and a personalized recovery plan, which pre-fills the letters and forms you need to send to credit bureaus, businesses, and debt collectors. Place a security freeze and, if needed, a fraud alert with each of the three credit bureaus, which is free under both federal law and New York's General Business Law § 380-t. File a report with your local New York police department, particularly if you have information about a specific suspect or a business requires a police report before it will investigate, and contact the New York Attorney General's consumer protection resources for further state-level guidance, since this article was not able to independently verify the office's current identity-theft page at publication.

Information last verified on 2026-09-02, drawn from the live text of New York Penal Law §§ 190.78, 190.79, 190.80, and 190.80-a and General Business Law §§ 380-t and 380-u on the New York State Senate's official statute site, and federal law under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681c-1 and 1681c-2. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer. New York's specific victim-rights and restitution framework for identity theft, and its current Attorney General identity-theft resource page, were not independently confirmed at publication.
Related Resources
- Identity Theft Laws: Federal Rules and State Penalties
- How to Report Identity Theft
- Credit Freeze vs. Fraud Alert
- Child Identity Theft
- Tax Identity Theft: When to File IRS Form 14039
Last updated: 2026-09-02.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the different degrees of identity theft in New York?
New York has four: third degree (Penal Law § 190.78, a class A misdemeanor), second degree (§ 190.79, a class E felony), first degree (§ 190.80, a class D felony), and aggravated identity theft (§ 190.80-a, also a class D felony, which applies where the actor knows the victim is a member of the armed forces deployed outside the continental United States).
What dollar amount makes identity theft a felony in New York?
Identity theft becomes second degree, a class E felony, once the amount obtained or financial loss caused exceeds $500 in aggregate. It becomes first degree, a class D felony, once that figure exceeds $2,000.
Is identity theft against a military service member treated differently in New York?
Yes. Aggravated identity theft under Penal Law § 190.80-a applies when the actor knows that the victim is a member of the armed forces and knows that the member is presently deployed outside the continental United States, and more than $500 is obtained or lost. Both knowledge elements are part of the offense. It carries the same class D felony classification as first degree identity theft, even though its dollar threshold is lower.
Does New York have a free credit freeze for identity theft victims?
Yes, under both federal and state law. Federal law, 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, entitles every New York resident to a free security freeze and free fraud alerts from each of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies. New York's own General Business Law § 380-t separately requires a credit reporting agency to place a freeze on request and bars any fee for placing, removing, or temporarily lifting it, and § 380-u lets a parent or guardian place a security record freeze on a protected minor's record.
How do I report identity theft in New York?
Start at IdentityTheft.gov to file a federal report and get a personalized recovery plan. You should also file a police report with your local New York law enforcement agency and contact New York's consumer protection resources for state-level guidance.
Updates
Corrected the elements of New York's identity theft degrees against the current statutory text (third degree also covers causing financial loss and has no attempt prong; aggravated identity theft requires the actor to know the victim is a deployed service member; first degree's related-crime route starts at a class D felony), and replaced an inaccurate statement that New York's security freeze law could not be confirmed with the actual provisions, General Business Law §§ 380-t and 380-u.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New York Penal Law
§ 190.78Identity theft in the third degreeIn force
Identity theft in the third degree. A person is guilty of identity theft in the third degree when such person knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person by presenting themself as that other person, or by acting as that other person or by using personal identifying information of that other person, and thereby: 1. obtains goods, money, property or services or uses credit in the name of such other person or causes financial loss to such person or to another person or persons; or 2. commits a class A misdemeanor or higher level crime. Identity theft in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):People v. Vandermuelen (2007) found evidence legally sufficient under Penal Law 190.78(1) where the defendant used a credit card opened in her grandmother's name. People v. Roberts (2018), construing the parallel higher-degree provisions, held that using another's personal identifying information is itself a way of assuming that identity.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Roberts (New York Court of Appeals 2018, 31 N.Y.3d 406)✓One defendant used a real cardholder's card number under an invented name and another banked checks in a victim's name; the court read the 'assumes the identity of another' text shared by sections 190.78 through 190.80 as satisfied by using another's identifying information.
- People v. Debranche (Civil Court of the City of New York 2012, 38 Misc. 3d 872)“…ncial loss to such person or to another person or persons” (Penal Law § 190.78 [1]), or “commits a class A misdemeanor…”
- People v. Vandermuelen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2007, 42 A.D.3d 667)✓A woman applied for and used a credit card in her elderly grandmother's name, and the grandmother testified she never applied for it; the court held the evidence legally sufficient for identity theft in the third degree under section 190.78(1).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 190.79Identity theft in the second degreeIn force
Identity theft in the second degree. A person is guilty of identity theft in the second degree when such person knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person by presenting themself as that other person, or by acting as that other person or by using personal identifying information of that other person, and thereby: 1. obtains goods, money, property or services or uses credit in the name of such other person in an aggregate amount that exceeds five hundred dollars; or 2. causes financial loss to such person or to another person or persons in an aggregate amount that exceeds five hundred dollars; or 3. commits or attempts to commit a felony or acts as an accessory to the commission of a felony; or 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Roberts (New York Court of Appeals 2018, 31 N.Y.3d 406)“…trial on one count of identity theft in the second degree (Penal Law § 190.79) and two counts of criminal possession…”
- In re Schoenecker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2013, 107 A.D.3d 113)“…nse of identity theft in the second degree, in violation of Penal Law § 190.79. Respondent was served with the petitio…”
- People v. Golb (New York Court of Appeals 2014, 23 N.Y.3d 455)“…son, and thereby” “commits or attempts to commit a felony” (Penal Law § 190.79 [3]). The attempted felony at issue her…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 190.80Identity theft in the first degreeIn force
Identity theft in the first degree. A person is guilty of identity theft in the first degree when such person knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person by presenting themself as that other person, or by acting as that other person or by using personal identifying information of that other person, and thereby: 1. obtains goods, money, property or services or uses credit in the name of such other person in an aggregate amount that exceeds two thousand dollars; or 2. causes financial loss to such person or to another person or persons in an aggregate amount that exceeds two thousand dollars; or 3. commits or attempts to commit a class D felony or higher level crime or acts as an accessory in the commission of a class D or higher level felony; or 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Destin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2017, 150 A.D.3d 76)“…personal identifying information” (see Penal Law § 190.80), the defendant implicitly assumed the…”
- People v. Rosario (New York Supreme Court 2013, 41 Misc. 3d 392)“…he crimes of identity theft in the first degree pursuant to Penal Law § 190.80 (2) (two counts); grand larceny in the…”
- YUSON, MORRIS B., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2015)“…t of two counts each of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]) and criminal possession of a forge…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.Y. Penal Law § 190.78, Identity theft in the third degree(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law § 190.79, Identity theft in the second degree(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law § 190.80, Identity theft in the first degree(nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law § 190.80-a, Aggravated identity theft(nysenate.gov).gov
- IdentityTheft.gov (Federal Trade Commission)(identitytheft.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-1, Identity theft prevention; fraud alerts and active duty alerts (security freeze)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2, Block of information resulting from identity theft (FCRA § 605B)(law.cornell.edu)
- N.Y. General Business Law § 380-t, Security freeze(nysenate.gov)
- N.Y. General Business Law § 380-u, Security record freeze for protected minors(nysenate.gov)