Maryland
Maryland Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Maryland passed a dedicated teen-sexting law in 2021 under Cts. and Jud. Proc. § 3-8A-35. It does not move qualifying peer-to-peer cases off the child-pornography statutes: the child is still adjudicated for violating Crim. Law § 11-203, § 11-207, or § 11-208, and sexting operates as a mitigating factor at the disposition stage. Adults face felony prosecution for distribution under Crim. Law § 11-207, and a first possession offense under § 11-208 is a misdemeanor, with no mitigating factor available in either case.
Maryland Teen Sexting Law (§ 3-8A-35)
Maryland passed specific legislation in 2021 to address the issue of teenagers sending explicit images to one another. Before this law, such actions were technically classified as child pornography distribution. The statute is found in Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 3-8A-35.
This law creates a "mitigating factor" in juvenile court proceedings. It does not make teen sexting legal, and it does not change what the child is charged with. Subsection (b) states that it is a mitigating factor in a proceeding against a child for a violation of Criminal Law § 11-203, § 11-207, or § 11-208 that the violation involved or arose out of sexting. The charge stays the same; the mitigation applies when the judge decides the disposition.
Qualifying for Mitigation
Subsection (a)(2) defines which conduct counts as "sexting" by listing what is excluded. Conduct does not qualify if:
- The sender is more than 4 years older than the recipient.
- The recipient is more than 4 years older than the sender.
- The child did not consent to committing the conduct constituting the violation.
- The child was coerced, threatened, or intimidated into committing the conduct.
The provision applies in juvenile proceedings, so the respondent is a child under 18. Note that a detention finding is not one of these conditions: the limit on detention dispositions described below is a consequence of qualifying, not a prerequisite for it.
Effect at Disposition
If the mitigating factor applies, subsection (c) does three things. The court shall take the mitigating factor into consideration. The court may not make a disposition of community detention under § 3-8A-19(d)(1)(i) or a commitment disposition under § 3-8A-19(d)(1)(ii) unless it finds and explains on the record, verbally and in writing, that extraordinary circumstances exist to warrant the disposition. And the court may order the child to participate in an age-appropriate educational program on the risks and consequences of possessing, sending, displaying, and publishing such images. The educational program is discretionary, not required, and the limit on detention reaches those two enumerated dispositions rather than every form of confinement.
Child Pornography Statutes
Despite the juvenile mitigation law, the underlying statutes regarding explicit images of minors remain active. These are the laws that adults are charged under. Teens can also be charged under these laws if they do not qualify for the § 3-8A-35 mitigation.

Possession of Explicit Material (§ 11-208)
Under Criminal Law § 11-208, it is illegal to knowingly possess a film, videotape, photograph, or other visual representation depicting a minor engaged in sexual conduct. This statute applies if the person knows or reasonably should know that the individual depicted is a minor.
The law defines "minor" in this context as an individual under the age of 16 for simple possession charges. However, other statutes cover minors up to age 18.
Distribution and Production (§ 11-207)
A more serious offense is found in Criminal Law § 11-207. This statute prohibits creating, distributing, or possessing with intent to distribute child pornography. This includes:
- Soliciting a minor to pose for explicit photos.
- Sending explicit photos of a minor to others.
- Printing or publishing such images.
Maryland courts have held that a minor can be both the "pornographer" and the victim. In the case In re S.K. (2019), the court ruled that a teen taking a nude selfie could technically violate these statutes, although the 2021 juvenile law now mitigates how these cases are handled.
Penalties for Sexting Offenses
The penalties for sexting in Maryland depend heavily on whether the offender is charged as a juvenile or an adult, and which specific statute is cited.

Juvenile Dispositions
For teens qualifying under the juvenile sexting law (§ 3-8A-35):
- Limited Detention: The court may not order community detention or a commitment disposition unless it finds and explains extraordinary circumstances on the record, verbally and in writing.
- Education: The court may order participation in an age-appropriate educational program about the risks and consequences of sharing such images. This is discretionary.
- Community Service: The court may order community service hours.
- Probation: Supervised probation is a possible outcome.
Adult Penalties (Child Pornography)
For adults, or juveniles transferred to adult court, the penalties are severe:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Fine | Maximum Prison Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession (§ 11-208) | Misdemeanor | $2,500 | 5 years |
| Possession (Subsequent) | Felony | $10,000 | 10 years |
| Distribution (§ 11-207) | Felony | $25,000 | 10 years |
| Distribution (Subsequent) | Felony | $50,000 | 20 years |
Sharing Obscene Material to Minors (§ 11-203)
Another relevant charge is Criminal Law § 11-203. This prohibits showing or giving obscene material to a minor. It is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine for a first offense.
Revenge Porn Laws (§ 3-809)
Maryland has a specific statute addressing "revenge porn," officially known as the non-consensual distribution of intimate images. This is found in Criminal Law § 3-809.
A person violates this law if they knowingly distribute a visual representation of another identifiable person that displays intimate parts or sexual activity:
- With the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce.
- Knowing that the person did not consent to the distribution.
- Under circumstances where the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Penalty: This offense is a misdemeanor. A conviction carries a potential sentence of imprisonment not exceeding 2 years and/or a fine not exceeding $5,000.
Federal Law: The TAKE IT DOWN Act
Federal law also covers this conduct. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) added 47 U.S.C. § 223(h), making it a federal crime to publish an intimate image of an identifiable person without consent, whether the image is authentic or an AI-generated digital forgery. Publishing an authentic image carries up to 2 years in prison, or 3 years if the victim is a minor. Threatening to publish a digital forgery carries a lower penalty, up to 18 months, or 30 months if the victim is a minor, but threatening to publish an authentic image is punished the same as actually publishing it. Covered platforms must also remove a reported image within 48 hours of a valid request, a duty that became enforceable in 2026. Separately, 15 U.S.C. § 6851 (enacted 2022) allows victims to sue for civil damages of at least $150,000 in liquidated damages or actual damages plus attorney fees; whether it reaches AI-generated forgeries remains legally unsettled.
Defenses and Mitigation
There are several legal defenses available in Maryland sexting cases. These depend on the specific facts of the situation.

Prompt Destruction
Under Criminal Law § 11-208(e), it is a specific defense to a possession charge if the defendant:
- Promptly destroyed the visual representation.
- Promptly reported the matter to a law enforcement officer.
This defense is crucial for individuals who receive unsolicited images and immediately delete them.
Reasonable Effort to Verify Age
For charges involving showing obscene material to a minor (§ 11-203), it is a defense if the defendant made a reasonable effort to verify that the recipient was of legal age, such as checking a driver's license.
Juvenile Mitigation Factors
As discussed, the primary defense for teens is establishing that they qualify for the mitigation under § 3-8A-35. This requires showing the age proximity (within 4 years) and that the exchange was consensual and not the product of coercion, threats, or intimidation.
Adults Sexting With Minors
Adults who engage in sexting with minors face the full weight of Maryland's child pornography laws. There is no "Romeo and Juliet" exception for adults in the child pornography statutes regarding possession or distribution.
An adult (18+) who requests, receives, or possesses explicit images of a minor (under 18) commits a crime. Even if the minor consented to send the images, the adult can be charged. Consent is not a defense for statutory crimes involving minors.
Additionally, adults who use a computer, the internet, or other electronic means to solicit a minor for sexual acts can be charged under Criminal Law § 3-324 (Sexual Solicitation of a Minor). A first offense carries up to 10 years in prison and a $25,000 fine; a subsequent offense carries up to 20 years and a $50,000 fine. Federal solicitation laws may also apply depending on the conduct.
Juvenile Justice Process
Maryland's juvenile system operates differently from the adult criminal system. The focus is on the "best interests of the child" and public safety.
Intake and Informal Resolution
Many sexting cases begin with a referral to the Department of Juvenile Services (DJS). An intake officer reviews the case. For first-time offenders involved in consensual sexting, the officer may propose an informal resolution. This avoids court entirely. It might involve a warning letter, a parent conference, or a short educational program.
Adjudication
If the case goes to court, it is called an "adjudicatory hearing" rather than a trial. The judge determines if the allegations are proven. If proven, the next step is a "disposition hearing" (sentencing). This is where § 3-8A-35 applies, requiring the judge to weigh the mitigating factor, restricting community detention and commitment absent an on-the-record finding of extraordinary circumstances, and authorizing an educational program in place of a harsher disposition.
Sex Offender Registration
The requirement to register as a sex offender is a major concern in sexting cases.
Juveniles
Generally, juveniles adjudicated delinquent in Maryland do not automatically have to register as sex offenders. Registration is typically reserved for adults or juveniles charged as adults for serious offenses. The legislative intent behind the 2021 sexting law was specifically to prevent labeling teens as sex offenders for peer-to-peer sexting.
Adults
Adults convicted of child pornography offenses (possession or distribution) are required to register on the Maryland Sex Offender Registry. This is a Tier II or Tier III offense depending on the specific charge. It requires registration for 25 years or for life. This includes quarterly in-person verification and public listing on the registry website.
Long-Term Consequences
Even without jail time, a sexting incident can have lasting impacts.
Digital Footprint
Once an image is shared, control is lost. It can be copied, saved, and re-shared indefinitely. This can lead to cyberbullying, school disciplinary actions, and future embarrassment.
School Disciplinary Action
Schools often have their own policies regarding sexting. Even if the police do not file charges, a student can face suspension or expulsion if the conduct causes a disruption to the school environment. This is true even if the sexting occurred off-campus.
Employment and College
While juvenile records are generally sealed, an adult conviction (or a juvenile charged as an adult) will appear on background checks. This can bar individuals from careers in education, healthcare, law enforcement, and government.
More Maryland Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal for two 17-year-olds to sext in Maryland?
Technically, the images they create are considered child pornography because they depict minors. However, under the juvenile sexting law (§ 3-8A-35), if they are within four years in age and the act was consensual and free of coercion, the court must weigh sexting as a mitigating factor at disposition. It may not order community detention or commitment without finding extraordinary circumstances on the record, and it may order an educational program instead. The charge itself is still brought under the child-pornography statutes.
Can parents be held responsible for their child's sexting?
Parents are generally not criminally liable for their child's actions unless they facilitated the crime. However, parents could potentially face civil liability if their child's actions caused harm to another (like in a revenge porn or harassment scenario) and they failed to supervise adequately.
What counts as "intimate parts" under Maryland law?
For the revenge porn statute, "intimate parts" is defined in § 3-809 to include the naked genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female nipple.
Does Maryland have a specific "Romeo and Juliet" law?
Maryland does not have a statute explicitly named "Romeo and Juliet" that applies to all sex crimes. However, the juvenile sexting law (§ 3-8A-35) functions similarly by providing leniency for peers who are close in age (within 4 years).
If I find sexts on my child's phone, what should I do?
Do not forward the images to anyone, even to send them to yourself for safekeeping or to show other parents. That constitutes distribution of child pornography. You should confiscate the phone and consult with a lawyer or contact law enforcement to report the possession appropriately.
Can I be charged with revenge porn if I just show the picture to one person?
Yes. The definition of "distribute" in § 3-809 includes giving, transferring, or allowing access to another person. It does not require posting it publicly on the internet. If you show it with the intent to harm or harass, you can be charged.
What should you do if you or your child is accused of sexting?
Step 1: Remain Silent: Do not answer questions from police officers without an attorney present. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you. Step 2: Do Not Delete Evidence: While it is illegal to possess the images, deleting them after an investigation has started can lead to charges of tampering with evidence. Turn the device off and give it to your attorney.
Updates
Corrected the description of Maryland juvenile sexting law: the statute makes sexting a mitigating factor at disposition rather than moving a case off the child-pornography charges, the educational program is discretionary rather than required, the limit on detention applies only to two enumerated dispositions and only absent an on-record finding of extraordinary circumstances, the qualifying conditions now match the statutory exclusions including coercion, and a first possession offense under Criminal Law 11-208 is identified as a misdemeanor rather than a felony.
Corrected the statute cited for adult online solicitation of a minor (the page wrongly cited the prostitution-earnings statute, § 11-304; the correct law is § 3-324, Sexual Solicitation of a Minor), added the primary Maryland statute citations the article already relies on, and added a new section on the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act and 15 U.S.C. 6851 civil remedy.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article
§ 3-8A-35In force
§3–8A–35. (a) (1) In this section, “sexting” means: (i) The sending of a photograph, image, or video that depicts sexual conduct, as defined in § 11–101 of the Criminal Law Article, or sexual excitement, as defined in § 11–101 of the Criminal Law Article, of oneself to another or of oneself and the recipient by mobile telephone, computer, or other electronic or digital device; or (ii) The receipt and retention of a photograph, image, or video described in subparagraph (i) of this paragraph. (2) “Sexting” does not include conduct described in paragraph (1) of this subsection if: (i) The sender is more than 4 years older than the recipient; (ii) The recipient is more than 4 years older than the sender; (iii) The child did not consent to committing the conduct constituting the violation; or (iv) The child was coerced, threatened, or intimidated into committing the conduct constituting the violation. (b) It is a mitigating factor in a proceeding against a child under this subtitle for a violation of § 11–203, § 11–207, or § 11–208 of the Criminal Law Article that the violation involved or arose out of sexting.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article
§ 11-207In force
§11–207. (a) A person may not: (1) cause, induce, solicit, or knowingly allow a minor to engage as a subject in the production of obscene matter or a visual representation or performance that depicts a minor engaged as a subject in sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct; (2) photograph or film a minor engaging in an obscene act, sadomasochistic abuse, or sexual conduct; (3) use a computer to depict or describe a minor engaging in an obscene act, sadomasochistic abuse, or sexual conduct; (4) knowingly promote, advertise, solicit, distribute, or possess with the intent to distribute any matter, visual representation, or performance: (i) that depicts a minor engaged as a subject in sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct; or (ii) in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the matter, visual representation, or performance depicts a minor engaged as a subject of sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct; or (5) use a computer to knowingly compile, enter, transmit, make, print, publish, reproduce, cause, allow, buy, sell, receive, exchange, or disseminate any notice, statement, advertisement, or minor’s name, telephone number,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jun v. State (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2025)“…isual representation of a minor engaged in sexual conduct, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 11-207(a)(4), 1 and ten counts of possessing…”
- Md. Shall Issue v. Hogan (District Court, D. Maryland 2018, 353 F. Supp. 3d 400)“…paraphernalia), and 5-620(a) (controlled paraphernalia); Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law §§ 11-207 (a)(4)-(5) (child pornography); Md.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11-208In forcecited in 3 of our articles
§11–208. (a) (1) In this section, “indistinguishable from an actual and identifiable child” means an ordinary person would conclude that the image is of an actual and identifiable minor. (2) “Indistinguishable from an actual and identifiable child” includes a computer–generated image that has been created, adapted, or modified to appear as an actual and identifiable child. (3) “Indistinguishable from an actual and identifiable child” does not include images or items depicting minors that are: (i) drawings; (ii) cartoons; (iii) sculptures; or (iv) paintings. (b) (1) A person may not knowingly possess and intentionally retain a film, videotape, photograph, or other visual representation showing an actual child or a computer–generated image that is indistinguishable from an actual and identifiable child under the age of 16 years: (i) engaged as a subject of sadomasochistic abuse; (ii) engaged in sexual conduct; or (iii) in a state of sexual excitement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jun v. State (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2025)“…isual representation of a minor engaged in sexual conduct, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 11-208, he filed a motion in limine. During a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maryland Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Maryland Pornography Laws (2026): Legal Status & Penalties
§ 3-809In forcecited in 5 of our articles
§3–809. (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. (2) “Distribute” means to give, sell, transfer, disseminate, publish, upload, circulate, broadcast, make available, allow access to, or engage in any other form of transmission, electronic or otherwise. (3) “Harm” means: (i) physical injury; (ii) serious emotional distress; or (iii) economic damages. (4) “Intimate parts” means the naked genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female nipple. (5) “Sexual activity” means: (i) sexual intercourse, including genital–genital, oral–genital, anal–genital, or oral–anal; (ii) masturbation; or (iii) sadomasochistic abuse. (6) (i) “Visual representation” of an identifiable person means: 1. an unaltered image of the person; or 2. an image created with or without using other existing depictions of the person that is indistinguishable from the person, from the perspective of an ordinary person. (ii) “Visual representation” includes a computer–generated image. (iii) “Visual representation” does not include an image or depiction that is: 1. a drawing; 2. a cartoon; 3. a sculpture; or 4. a painting.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Also relied on in: Maryland Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits (2026), Maryland Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026)
§ 11-203In forcecited in 2 of our articles
§11–203. (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. (2) “Distribute” includes to rent. (3) “Illicit sex” means: (i) human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal; (ii) acts of human masturbation, sexual intercourse, or sodomy; or (iii) fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals. (4) “Item” means a: (i) still picture or photograph; (ii) book, pocket book, pamphlet, or magazine; (iii) videodisc, videotape, video game, film, or computer disc; or (iv) recorded telephone message. (5) “Obscene” means: (i) that the average adult applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (ii) that the work depicts sexual conduct specified in subsection (b) of this section in a way that is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material; and (iii) that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious artistic, educational, literary, political, or scientific value.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
§ 3-324In force
§3–324. (a) In this section, “solicit” means to command, authorize, urge, entice, request, or advise a person by any means, including: (1) in person; (2) through an agent or agency; (3) over the telephone; (4) through any print medium; (5) by mail; (6) by computer or Internet; or (7) by any other electronic means. (b) (1) A person may not, with the intent to commit a violation of § 3–304 or § 3–307 of this subtitle or § 11–207, § 11–303, § 11–304, § 11–305, § 11–306, or § 11–307 of this article, knowingly solicit a minor, or a law enforcement officer posing as a minor, to engage in activities that would be unlawful for the person to engage in under § 3–304 or § 3–307 of this subtitle or § 11–207, § 11–303, § 11–304, § 11–305, § 11–306, or § 11–307 of this article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Charles Morgan, Jr. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2022, 45 F.4th 192)“…lation of section 3-307(a)(4) in certain circumstances, see Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-324(b), but Morgan does not purport to conf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 47
§ 223Obscene or harassing telephone calls in the District of Columbia or in interstate or foreign communicationsIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Whoever— in interstate or foreign communications— by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass another person; by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication; makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass any specific person; makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 208 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Sable Communications v. FCC (1989) upheld the 47 U.S.C. 223(b) ban on obscene commercial phone messages but struck its indecency ban as not narrowly tailored. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) held the CDA's 223(a) indecency and 223(d) display provisions violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent".
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)✓Online speakers challenged the Communications Decency Act's bans on indecent transmissions to minors and patently offensive displays. The Court held 47 U.S.C. 223(a) and 223(d) facially violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent" from section 223(a).
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 803)“…suant to § 561 of the Act, 110 Stat. 142 , note following 47 U. S. C. § 223 (1994 ed., Supp. III). Playboy sought…”
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (Supreme Court of the United States 1978, 438 U.S. 726)“…ous, filthy, or indecent" telephone calls, 82 Stat. 112 , 47 U. S. C. § 223 , the FCC itself indicated that it thou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Is the Take It Down Act? The 2025 Federal NCII Law Explained, How to File a Take It Down Request (Step by Step), Louisiana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 24 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), Revenge Porn Laws by State: All 50 States and DC (2026), Mississippi Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Maryland Office of the Public Defender(opd.state.md.us)
- Maryland State Bar Association Lawyer Referral(msba.org)
- The People's Law Library of Maryland(peoples-law.org)
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC)(missingkids.org)
- Cyberbullying Research Center(cyberbullying.org)
- Maryland Crisis Connect(mdcrisisconnect.org)
- Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-8A-35 - Juvenile sexting mitigation (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Crim. Law § 11-207 - Distribution/production of child pornography (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Crim. Law § 11-208 - Possession of child pornography (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Crim. Law § 11-203 - Distribution of obscene material to a minor (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Crim. Law § 3-809 - Revenge porn (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Crim. Law § 3-324 - Sexual solicitation of a minor (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Public Law 119-12 - TAKE IT DOWN Act (Congress.gov)(congress.gov).gov
- 47 U.S.C. § 223 - Obscene or harassing telephone calls (includes TAKE IT DOWN Act provisions) (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 2021 Md. Laws ch. 393 (HB 180, Juveniles - Sexting) - enacted May 30, 2021, effective October 1, 2021 (Maryland General Assembly)(mgaleg.maryland.gov)