Ohio
Ohio Expungement Laws: Sealing and Expungement Under ORC 2953.32
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Ohio law gives eligible individuals two forms of criminal record relief, sealing and expungement, governed by Ohio Revised Code (ORC) § 2953.32. Senate Bill 288, which took effect April 4, 2023, significantly expanded who qualifies and introduced true expungement for conviction records for the first time in the state's history. House Bill 96, the state's FY2026-27 budget bill, further amended ORC § 2953.32 effective September 30, 2025, adding a sealing and expungement pathway for certain ORC § 2921.43 convictions.
Information last verified on May 29, 2026. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed attorney.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Ohio state law only. For a comparison across all states, see Expungement Laws by State.
What Senate Bill 288 Changed
Ohio's General Assembly passed Senate Bill 288 (134th General Assembly), and it became effective on April 4, 2023. Before that date, only "eligible offenders," a narrowly defined category tied to the total number of prior convictions, could petition for record sealing. SB 288 eliminated that categorical definition entirely.
Under the reformed statute, courts now evaluate each conviction individually. A person may seek sealing or expungement of an unlimited number of qualifying convictions, as long as no individual offense falls into a prohibited category and the applicable waiting period has elapsed. One count-based limit does survive inside those prohibited categories: under ORC § 2953.32(A)(1)(h), a third-degree felony conviction stays ineligible once the person's other convictions pass a threshold, set out in the eligibility section below. SB 288 also formally introduced expungement as a distinct remedy for adult conviction records, separate from sealing, under ORC § 2953.32. Prior to the bill, true destruction of conviction records was not available in Ohio. The bill preserved sealing (record hidden but retained) while layering on expungement (record destroyed) as a higher-tier remedy with longer waiting periods. Any person whose convictions became eligible under the expanded standards retroactively gained the right to petition under the new framework. (Ohio Legislature, Senate Bill 288, 134th General Assembly, eff. April 4, 2023.)
Sealing vs. Expungement: Key Distinction
Ohio law draws a meaningful line between sealing and expungement, and the difference matters for background checks and government access.

When a record is sealed under ORC § 2953.32, it is removed from all public records and becomes inaccessible to employers, landlords, and the general public. However, the government retains the record. Law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI), probation officers, and certain licensing boards may still access sealed records. Under ORC § 2953.34, a person with a sealed record may legally answer "no" on most private employment applications when asked about prior convictions, with an exception for positions where the conviction bears a direct and substantial relationship to the job.
When a record is expunged under ORC § 2953.32, the court orders the record destroyed and the index references to the case deleted. ORC § 2953.32(D)(5) sets out who must destroy what, and it draws one explicit exception. Any entity other than the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation that receives an expungement notice from the court "shall destroy, delete, and erase the record as appropriate for the record's physical or electronic form or characteristic so that the record is permanently irretrievable."
BCI is treated differently. The same division provides that when BCI receives notice of an expungement, it "shall maintain a record of the expunged conviction record for the limited purpose of determining an individual's qualification or disqualification for employment in law enforcement," and that BCI "shall not be compelled by the court to destroy, delete, or erase those records so that the records are permanently irretrievable." That retained record may be disclosed only to law enforcement, and only for that law enforcement employment purpose. So an expungement is not a guarantee that no government copy survives anywhere; it means every holder except BCI must destroy its copy, and BCI's surviving copy is walled off to a single screening use.
Expungement is available only for convictions whose offense level and waiting period qualify under the statute. It is not available for misdemeanor domestic violence convictions under ORC § 2919.25 or for violations of ORC § 2919.27 (violating a protection order), both of which may be sealed but never expunged. (ORC § 2953.32(A)(2), (D)(5); ORC § 2953.34.)
Waiting Periods and Eligibility by Offense Level
The waiting period for both sealing and expungement runs from the date of final discharge, generally understood as the completion of all incarceration, supervision (probation or parole), and payment of all fines and restitution; Ohio's sealing and expungement statutes use the term without defining it in ORC § 2953.31. Court costs are not included in the final discharge calculation.

Sealing waiting periods (ORC § 2953.32):
- Minor misdemeanor: 6 months after final discharge
- Misdemeanor (M1 through M4): 1 year after final discharge
- Fourth-degree felony (F4) or fifth-degree felony (F5): 1 year after final discharge
- Third-degree felony (F3): 3 years after final discharge
- Tier 1 or Tier 2 sex offenses (where eligible): 5 years after sex offender registration requirements end
Expungement waiting periods (ORC § 2953.32):
- Minor misdemeanor: 6 months after final discharge
- Misdemeanor (M1 through M4): 1 year after final discharge
- Fourth- or fifth-degree felony: 11 years after final discharge
- Third-degree felony: 13 years after final discharge
There is no expungement pathway for first- or second-degree felonies under any circumstances.
Third-degree felonies carry a conviction-count limit that the waiting period alone does not capture. Under ORC § 2953.32(A)(1)(h), an F3 conviction cannot be sealed or expunged at all if the offender "has more than one other conviction of any felony," and where the person has exactly two F3 convictions, relief is barred if the person "has more convictions in total than those two third degree felony convictions and two misdemeanor convictions." The sealing timetable in ORC § 2953.32(B)(1)(a)(i) likewise reaches only a person convicted of one or two third-degree felonies. A person with two F3 convictions plus three misdemeanors, or with one F3 plus two other felonies, does not qualify even after the three-year wait has run.
ORC § 2953.32(A)(3) governs how those convictions are counted, and it can work in an applicant's favor. Convictions that result from or are connected with the same act, or that result from offenses committed at the same time, count as one conviction. Two or three convictions arising from the same indictment, information, complaint, guilty plea, or official proceeding, and from related criminal acts committed within a three-month period, also count as one conviction unless the court decides it is not in the public interest to treat them that way. Felony offenses of violence are separately and permanently barred under ORC § 2953.32(A)(1)(b), whatever the count. A separate pathway added by House Bill 96 (eff. September 30, 2025) allows sealing of an ORC § 2921.43 (soliciting improper compensation) conviction seven years after final discharge. Because § 2921.43 is a first-degree misdemeanor, its expungement follows ORC § 2953.32(B)(1)(b)'s misdemeanor timing; the ten-years-after-sealing expungement rule applies only to felonies. The court weighs each petition individually, considering the interests of the applicant, prosecutorial objections, victim impact, and public safety before granting any order. (ORC § 2953.32(B)-(C).)
Offenses That Cannot Be Sealed or Expunged
Ohio law, primarily through ORC § 2953.32(A)(1), lists categories that are permanently ineligible for both sealing and expungement:
- First- or second-degree felonies
- Felony offenses of violence that are not sexually oriented offenses
- Sexually oriented offenses that require registration under ORC Chapter 2950
- Any offense, whether misdemeanor or felony, where the victim was under 13 years of age at the time of the offense, except for convictions under ORC § 2919.21 (nonsupport of dependents)
- Convictions for a violation of ORC § 2921.41 (theft in office), under division (A)(1)(e)
- Convictions for a violation of ORC § 2919.25 (domestic violence) that is a misdemeanor of the first or second degree, under division (A)(1)(g)
- Third-degree felonies that fail the conviction-count limits in division (A)(1)(h), described in the previous section
- Most traffic convictions under ORC Chapters 4506, 4507, 4510, 4511, and 4549 (commercial and standard motor vehicle offenses)
A second and narrower list, in ORC § 2953.32(A)(2), covers convictions that may be sealed but never expunged:
- Violations of ORC § 2919.25 (domestic violence) that are misdemeanors of the third or fourth degree
- Violations of ORC § 2919.27 (violating a protection order)
A conviction for a municipal ordinance violation that is substantially similar to any section named in either list is treated the same way as the state offense.
Bail forfeiture entries are treated similarly to convictions for sealing purposes under ORC § 2953.32 and may be sealed when the underlying charge would have qualified. Non-conviction records, including dismissed charges, not-guilty verdicts, and no-bill grand jury returns, are handled under the separate provision at ORC § 2953.33 and are generally eligible immediately or after a 2-year wait for no-bills.
How to File: The Application Process
Petitions for sealing or expungement under ORC § 2953.32 are filed with the court that originally sentenced the applicant. A single application may cover multiple cases, regardless of the number of records requested. The step-by-step process is:

- Confirm eligibility by verifying the offense level, absence of prohibited categories, and elapsed waiting period since final discharge.
- Obtain and complete the court's petition form. Many Ohio courts, including the Franklin County Municipal Court Self-Help Resource Center, provide free assistance and forms.
- Pay the $50 application fee to the court. An additional local fee of up to $50 may apply depending on the county. Applicants who qualify as indigent may submit a poverty affidavit in place of the fee.
- The court sets a hearing date not less than 45 days and not more than 90 days from the date of filing, and notifies the prosecuting attorney for each case listed in the application at least 60 days before the hearing.
- The prosecutor may file a written objection stating reasons for denial, but must do so no later than 30 days before the hearing date, under ORC § 2953.32(B).
- The court holds a hearing. If the applicant is an eligible offender and the interests of justice support granting relief, the court issues a sealing or expungement order.
- Upon a granted order, the court forwards a copy of the sealing or expungement order to BCI and notifies the other agencies holding records of the case, including the arresting agency and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Every entity other than BCI must seal the record, or destroy it if the order was for expungement. BCI instead retains a record of an expunged conviction for the limited purpose of law enforcement employment screening under ORC § 2953.32(D)(5).
The timeline from filing to a court decision typically ranges from 60 to 90 days, depending on court scheduling and whether the prosecutor files an objection. (ORC § 2953.32(B)-(D).)
Juvenile Records: Separate Track Under ORC Chapter 2151
Juvenile adjudications follow a different statutory path from adult convictions. A juvenile adjudication in Ohio is not a criminal conviction, but the record can still affect employment, housing, and education.
Under ORC § 2151.356, a person may apply to the juvenile court for sealing of their record. If the person is under 18 at the time of application, they may file 6 months after discharge from parole or probation. If the person is 18 or older, they may file immediately after final discharge. The juvenile court holds a hearing and considers whether sealing serves the interests of the person and the public.
Once a juvenile record is sealed, expungement under ORC § 2151.358 occurs automatically, either 5 years after the sealing order is issued or upon the person's 23rd birthday, whichever comes first. There is no need to file a separate expungement petition for juvenile records; the court carries out the destruction on its own schedule. Juvenile records do not automatically seal at age 18; a court order is still required.
Certain serious juvenile adjudications are ineligible for sealing under ORC § 2151.356(A): adjudications for acts that would constitute aggravated murder (§ 2903.01), murder (§ 2903.02), or rape (§ 2907.02) if committed by an adult.
Disclaimer: This article covers Ohio record sealing and expungement law as of May 29, 2026, based on ORC § 2953.32, § 2953.33, § 2953.34, § 2151.356, and § 2151.358, as amended by Senate Bill 288 (eff. April 4, 2023) and House Bill 96 (eff. September 30, 2025). Laws change and court interpretations vary by county. This article is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Ohio attorney before filing any petition for sealing or expungement.
Related Articles
- Expungement Laws by State - Full hub covering all 50 states
- DUI Expungement by State - Whether DUI records can be cleared in each state
- How to Check If Your Record Has Been Expunged - Steps to verify your record status
RecordingLaw.com provides legal information, not legal advice. Always consult a licensed Ohio attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
More Ohio Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I expunge my record in Ohio?
File a petition for sealing or expungement with the court that originally sentenced you, using the court's form. Pay the $50 filing fee (waived for indigent applicants), wait for the court to schedule a hearing within 45 to 90 days of filing, and attend if required. The prosecutor has until 30 days before the hearing to file a written objection. If the court grants the order, the court forwards it to BCI and to the other agencies holding the record. Every entity except BCI must destroy an expunged record; BCI keeps a copy solely for law enforcement employment screening under ORC § 2953.32(D)(5). The full process typically takes 60 to 90 days after filing under ORC § 2953.32.
What did Ohio Senate Bill 288 change about expungement?
SB 288, effective April 4, 2023, eliminated the 'eligible offender' category that capped the number of convictions qualifying for relief, introduced true expungement (record destruction) for adult conviction records for the first time in Ohio, and allowed applicants to seek relief for an unlimited number of qualifying convictions. Courts now evaluate each conviction individually rather than automatically disqualifying applicants based on their total conviction count.
What is the difference between sealing and expungement in Ohio?
Sealing removes a record from public access but the government retains it. Law enforcement, prosecutors, and certain licensing boards can still access sealed records. Expungement destroys the record and deletes index references to the case, with one statutory exception: under ORC § 2953.32(D)(5) BCI keeps a record of the expunged conviction for the limited purpose of law enforcement employment screening and cannot be ordered to make it permanently irretrievable. Every other entity must destroy its copy. Expungement has longer waiting periods than sealing. Both are available under ORC § 2953.32 as of April 4, 2023.
What does ORC 2953.32 cover?
ORC § 2953.32 is Ohio's primary statute for sealing and expungement of adult criminal conviction records. It sets waiting periods by offense level, defines the application process, governs prosecutorial objections, and specifies what agencies must do after a court order is granted. It was significantly amended by Senate Bill 288 (eff. April 4, 2023) to expand eligibility and add expungement as a remedy, and further amended by House Bill 96 (eff. September 30, 2025) to add a sealing and expungement pathway for ORC § 2921.43 convictions.
How long does it take to get a record sealed or expunged in Ohio?
After you file a petition, Ohio courts must schedule a hearing within 45 to 90 days. The prosecutor receives notice at least 60 days before the hearing and must file any objection no later than 30 days before the hearing. After a court order is granted, BCI and law enforcement agencies must update or destroy their records, which can take additional weeks. Total time from filing to final clearance is usually 3 to 6 months.
Can a felony be expunged in Ohio?
Yes, but only for qualifying offense levels. Third-, fourth-, and fifth-degree felonies may be eligible for expungement after meeting the applicable waiting period (13 years for F3, 11 years for F4/F5 from final discharge). First- and second-degree felonies, violent felonies, and sexually oriented offenses subject to registration cannot be expunged. Sealing is available sooner, at 1 year for F4/F5 and 3 years for F3. An F3 is barred outright, for both sealing and expungement, if the person has more than one other felony conviction, or if the person has exactly two F3 convictions plus more convictions in total than those two F3s and two misdemeanors. (ORC § 2953.32(A)(1)(h).)
Do juvenile records automatically seal at 18 in Ohio?
No. Ohio juvenile records do not automatically seal when a person turns 18. You must apply to the juvenile court for a sealing order under ORC § 2151.356. If you are under 18, you may file 6 months after discharge from supervision. If you are 18 or older, you may file immediately after final discharge. Once sealed, the record is automatically expunged under ORC § 2151.358 either 5 years after the sealing order or on your 23rd birthday, whichever comes first.
What convictions are ineligible for sealing or expungement in Ohio?
Under ORC § 2953.32(A)(1), ineligible offenses include first- and second-degree felonies, felony offenses of violence that are not sexually oriented offenses, sexually oriented offenses requiring sex offender registration, offenses where the victim was under 13 (except convictions under ORC § 2919.21), theft in office under ORC § 2921.41, domestic violence under ORC § 2919.25 that is a first- or second-degree misdemeanor, third-degree felonies that fail the conviction-count limits in ORC § 2953.32(A)(1)(h), and most traffic convictions under ORC Chapters 4506, 4507, 4510, 4511, and 4549. A separate list in ORC § 2953.32(A)(2) may be sealed but never expunged: domestic violence under ORC § 2919.25 at the M3 or M4 level, and violations of ORC § 2919.27 (violating a protection order).
Updates
Corrected what happens to records after an expungement (all agencies except BCI must destroy their copy, while BCI keeps one solely for law enforcement employment screening under ORC 2953.32(D)(5)), replaced the incomplete description of the third-degree felony limit with the statute's actual conviction-count test, and completed the list of offenses that cannot be sealed or expunged.
Updated Ohio's sealing and expungement page to reflect House Bill 96 (effective September 30, 2025), which further amended ORC 2953.32 and 2151.356 after the 2023 Senate Bill 288 reform and added a sealing/expungement pathway for ORC 2921.43 convictions that the page had omitted, and removed an inaccurate citation of ORC 2953.31 as the source of the 'final discharge' definition, since that term is not defined in the statute.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the exclusions-list citation from ORC 2953.36 (which is now the human-trafficking-victim expungement statute) to the actual exclusions statute, ORC 2953.32(A)(1), in the article body, a KeyTakeaways bullet, and two FAQ answers; removed a fabricated list of felony-violence exceptions; added the missing ORC 2919.21 nonsupport carve-out to the under-13-victim exclusion in two places; and fixed the juvenile-sealing exclusion to the three specifically named offenses (aggravated murder, murder, rape) under the correct subsection, ORC 2151.356(A).
Updated the disclaimer's statute list to match the sections the article actually relies on.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Ohio Revised Code
§ 2953.32Sealing or expungement of record of conviction record or bail forfeiture; exceptionsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(A)(1) Sections 2953.32 and 2953.34 of the Revised Code do not apply to any of the following: (a) Convictions under Chapter 4506., 4507., 4510., 4511., or 4549.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 607 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Hamilton (1996) held that a prosecutor's participation in a sealing hearing is not limited to the issues stated in a written objection under R.C. 2953.32(B), and State v. LaSalle (2002) held that the statutory law in effect when a 2953.32 application is filed controls.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Hamilton (Ohio Supreme Court 1996, 75 Ohio St. 3d 636)✓A man convicted of theft applied to seal the record; the prosecutor filed no written objection but appeared at the hearing and cross-examined him. The court held R.C. 2953.32(B) does not limit a prosecutor's participation to issues raised in a written objection.
- State v. Pariag (Ohio Supreme Court 2013, 137 Ohio St. 3d 81)“…ied definition. Although the word “expungement” was used in R.C. 2953.32, Ohio’s first-time-offender statute, “e…”
- State v. LaSalle (Ohio Supreme Court 2002, 96 Ohio St. 3d 178)✓LaSalle applied to seal a domestic violence conviction; while it was pending, an amendment barred sealing such records and the trial court vacated its sealing order. The court held the statutory law in effect when an R.C. 2953.32 application is filed governs.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules, Penalties, and Compliance, Expungement Laws by State: How to Clear Your Record (2026), Ohio OVI Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026)
§ 2953.34Effect of sealing or expungement order under R.C. 2953.32 or 2953.33In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) Inspection of the sealed records included in a sealing order may be made only by the following persons or for the following purposes: (1) By a law enforcement officer or prosecutor, or the assistants of either, to determine whether the nature and character of the offense with which a person…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Marksch (Ohio Court of Appeals 2026, 2026 Ohio 2347)“…ific purposes and those specific officials as set forth in R.C. 2953.34.” 1 1 Marksch and the trial court…”
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Hamm (Ohio Court of Appeals 2026, 2026 Ohio 2304)“…ns were expunged and therefore “never happened.” She cites R.C. 2953.34(I), (K), and (L) for the proposition th…”
- State v. N.S. (Ohio Court of Appeals 2025, 2025 Ohio 5166)“…eople and purposes. See R.S. at ¶ 9; R.C. 2953.32(D)(2)(a); R.C. 2953.34(A)(1)-(13). {¶30} Thus, each ha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 2953.33[Former R.C. 2953.52, amended and renumbered by S.B. 288, 134th General Assembly, effective 4/4/2023] Sealing of official records after not guilty finding, dismissal of proceedings, grand jury no bill, or pardonIn force
(A)(1) Any person, who is found not guilty of an offense by a jury or a court or who is the defendant named in a dismissed complaint, indictment, or information, may apply to the court for an order to seal or, except as provided in division (C) of this section, expunge the person's official records…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State ex rel. Gains v. Rossi (Ohio Supreme Court 1999, 86 Ohio St. 3d 620)“…robation or by final release on parole.” (Emphasis added.) R.C. 2953.33(A). Under the applicable rule of stat…”
- State v. Bissantz (Ohio Supreme Court 1988, 40 Ohio St. 3d 112)“…ic office, employment, or position of trust in this state.” R.C. 2953.33(A) provides the general effect of seali…”
- Szep v. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy (Ohio Court of Appeals 1995, 106 Ohio App. 3d 621)“…34, 336-337 , 421 N.E.2d 1303, 1306-1307 . For example, R.C. 2953.33(B) provides that an individual can be q…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2953.31Sealing or expungement of record of conviction or bail forfeiture - definitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) As used in sections 2953.31 to 2953.521 of the Revised Code: (1) "Prosecutor" means the county prosecuting attorney, city director of law, village solicitor, or similar chief legal officer, who has the authority to prosecute a criminal case in the court in which the case is filed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 358 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Futrall (Ohio Supreme Court 2009, 123 Ohio St. 3d 498)“…rt for our holding in the definition of “first offender” in R.C. 2953.31: “When two or more convictions result f…”
- The State Ex Rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons, Judge (Ohio Supreme Court 2014, 140 Ohio St. 3d 7)“…d.) {¶ 18} The term “eligible offender” is defined in R.C. 2953.31(A) as anyone who has been convi…”
- State v. Hilbert (Ohio Court of Appeals 2001, 145 Ohio App. 3d 824)“…nberger, supra, at 533 , 685 N.E.2d 841 : “R.C. 2953.31, which defines the term ‘first offender…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2151.356Sealing of juvenile court recordsIn force
(A) The records of a case in which a person was adjudicated a delinquent child for committing a violation of section 2903.01, 2903.02, or 2907.02 of the Revised Code shall not be sealed under this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bloomer (Ohio Supreme Court 2009, 122 Ohio St. 3d 200)“…rable to that in the adult criminal justice system. Compare R.C. 2151.356 and 2953.32. One of the overriding purp…”
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2017, 150 Ohio St. 3d 489)“…and are not under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. R.C. 2151.356(B). Other records may be sealed six mon…”
- State ex rel. Doe v. Smith (Ohio Supreme Court 2009, 123 Ohio St. 3d 44)“…involving the above name[d] juvenile have been sealed per R.C. 2151.356. As directed by that statute, all recor…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2151.358Expungement of sealed recordsIn force
(A) The juvenile court shall expunge all records sealed under section 2151.356 of the Revised Code five years after the court issues a sealing order or upon the twenty-third birthday of the person who is the subject of the sealing order, whichever date is earlier.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 74 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Pariag (Ohio Supreme Court 2013, 137 Ohio St. 3d 81)“…N.E.2d 1. The term “expungement” continues to appear in R.C. 2151.358 relating to juveniles and, in contrast…”
- State v. Robinson (Ohio Court of Appeals 1994, 98 Ohio App. 3d 560)“…the General Assembly.” The General Assembly enacted R.C. 2151.358, which reads in pertinent part at subse…”
- State v. Shedrick (Ohio Supreme Court 1991, 61 Ohio St. 3d 331)“…lusion for the reasons which follow. The basic purpose of R.C. 2151.358 is to protect the actual proceedings th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2919.25Domestic violenceIn force
(A) No person shall knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to a family or household member. (B) No person shall recklessly cause serious physical harm to a family or household member.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 2,611 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Fry (Ohio Supreme Court 2010, 125 Ohio St. 3d 163)“…viction for domestic violence. {¶ 89} A violation of R.C. 2919.25(A), the domestic-violence statute, is a…”
- State v. Woullard (Ohio Court of Appeals 2004, 158 Ohio App. 3d 31)“…9, 2002, on one count of domestic violence, in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A). The offense, which is ordinarily a…”
- State v. Jones (Ohio Supreme Court 2007, 116 Ohio St. 3d 211)“…before trial, Jones filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that R.C. 2919.25 was unconstitutional after the passage…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2919.21Nonsupport or contributing to nonsupport of dependentsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(A) No person shall abandon, or fail to provide adequate support to: (1) The person's spouse, as required by law; (2) The person's child who is under age eighteen, or the persons's child with a mental or physical disability who is under age twenty-one; (3) The person's aged or infirm parent or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 352 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Collins (Ohio Supreme Court 2000, 89 Ohio St. 3d 524)“…s presenting the legal issue whether the crime set forth in R.C. 2919.21(B), i.e., failure to pay in accordanc…”
- City of Cleveland Heights v. Lewis (Ohio Supreme Court 2011, 129 Ohio St. 3d 389)“…that can result in penalty enhancement include nonsupport (R.C. 2919.21(G)(1)), gambling (R.C. 2915.02(F) and 2…”
- City of Columbus v. Bickel (Ohio Court of Appeals 1991, 77 Ohio App. 3d 26)“…the municipal court to wait for a criminal conviction under R.C. 2919.21 in order to revoke appellant’s probatio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Child Support Laws (2026): Guidelines & Calculator
§ 2921.43Soliciting or accepting improper compensationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) No public servant shall knowingly solicit or accept, and no person shall knowingly promise or give to a public servant, either of the following: (1) Any compensation, other than as allowed by divisions (G), (H), and (I) of section 102.03 of the Revised Code or other provisions of law, to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Dann (Ohio Supreme Court 2012, 134 Ohio St. 3d 68)“…counts of soliciting improper compensation in violation of R.C. 2921.43(A)(1)2 and filing false financial discl…”
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Conese (Ohio Supreme Court 2004, 102 Ohio St. 3d 439)“…we affirmed respondent’s conviction for having violated R.C. 2921.43(C) (coercive solicitation for a politic…”
- State v. Conese (Ohio Supreme Court 2004, 102 Ohio St. 3d 435)“…citing improper compensation. The statute in question here, R.C. 2921.43(C), provides: {¶ 16} “No person for t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORC § 2953.32 - Sealing or Expungement of Record of Conviction(codes.ohio.gov)
- ORC § 2953.31 - Definitions(codes.ohio.gov)
- ORC § 2953.33 - Sealing After Acquittal, Dismissal, or Pardon(codes.ohio.gov)
- ORC § 2953.34 - Effect of Sealing or Expungement Order(codes.ohio.gov)
- ORC § 2151.356 - Sealing of Juvenile Court Records(codes.ohio.gov)
- ORC § 2151.358 - Expungement of Sealed Juvenile Records(codes.ohio.gov)
- Senate Bill 288, 134th Ohio General Assembly(legislature.ohio.gov)
- Ohio Supreme Court Sentencing Commission - RC 2953.32 Expungement Memo (May 2023)(supremecourt.ohio.gov)
- House Bill 96, 136th Ohio General Assembly (FY2026-27 budget bill, amending ORC 2953.32 and 2151.356 eff. September 30, 2025)(legislature.ohio.gov).gov