North Dakota
North Dakota Debt Collection Laws: The Uniform 6-Year Deadline and Strong Firing Protection
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Before a North Dakota creditor can take any part of a paycheck, it has to sue, win a judgment, and get a garnishment order from the court. Most North Dakota garnishments start with a default judgment entered because the person sued never answered, which is why answering the summons, even with a brief written response, remains the single most valuable step available. North Dakota then applies a garnishment formula that tracks the federal baseline closely, but its statute of limitations and its protection against being fired over a garnishment both stand out from the norm.
North Dakota's Wage Garnishment Formula
North Dakota's garnishment statute tracks the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act formula closely, but not exactly. The maximum part of disposable earnings subject to garnishment in any workweek cannot exceed the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings for that week, or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum hourly wage. That 40x reference is worth flagging specifically: North Dakota keys the floor to the FEDERAL minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act, not a state minimum wage multiple the way some states do, so the dollar floor moves only when Congress changes the federal rate.
North Dakota then adds a protection few states offer in the base wage-garnishment formula itself: the maximum amount that can be garnished is reduced by $20 per week for each dependent family member living with the debtor. To get the reduction, the debtor generally must self-certify the list of dependents within 10 days of the garnishment summons; without that certification, dependents are presumed to be zero.
The 25%/40x cap, and the dependent reduction on top of it, do not apply at all to three categories: court-ordered support, which instead runs under a separate 50% to 65% sliding scale depending on other dependents and arrears; bankruptcy court orders; and any debt due for state or federal tax. State and federal tax debt is expressly carved out of the ordinary formula entirely under N.D.C.C. 32-09.1-03(3).
Head-of-Family Status and General Exemptions
North Dakota's wage-garnishment statute does not include a separate head-of-household percentage beyond the $20-per-dependent reduction above. But the state's broader property-execution scheme, a separate body of law from wage garnishment, is built around exactly that status. A «head of a family,» defined broadly to include a married person or anyone housing and supporting a listed dependent relative, receives an additional $7,500 personal-property exemption on top of the state's baseline absolute exemptions, compared to only $3,750 for an unmarried person with no dependents.

North Dakota also lets any resident elect a $25,000 exemption in place of the homestead exemption, which can be applied to bank funds or other property rather than a home. Additional exemptions cover a vehicle up to $10,000 (or $50,000 if modified for a disability at a cost of at least $1,500), tools of the trade up to $10,000, retirement funds up to $200,000 per account and $400,000 in aggregate, and state or public pensions, crime-victim awards, and public-assistance payments, which are exempt from all process entirely. Most of these exemptions must be affirmatively claimed within 10 days of a levy notice; only the state's short list of «absolute» exemptions applies automatically without a claim.
Firing Protection Stronger Than Federal Law
Federal law bars firing an employee over garnishment for a single debt and stops there. North Dakota goes further under N.D.C.C. 32-09.1-18: an employer may not discharge an employee because earnings have been subjected to garnishment or execution, full stop, without the federal one-debt limitation. A violating employer faces a civil action, which the discharged employee must bring within 90 days, for double the wages lost because of the violation, plus an order requiring reinstatement. That combination, uncapped by debt count and doubled in damages, is a materially stronger deterrent than the federal rule most states simply mirror.
The Statute of Limitations: One Uniform 6-Year Rule
North Dakota takes a simpler approach to debt deadlines than most states. Under N.D.C.C. 28-01-16(1), an action on a contract, obligation, or liability, «express or implied,» must be commenced within 6 years, and the statute does not split written contracts from oral ones or open accounts the way New Jersey and New Mexico do. All three fall under the same single 6-year period. Contracts secured by real property carry a longer 10-year period, and UCC sales-of-goods claims carry a shorter 4-year period, but ordinary contract, credit-card, and open-account debt all land on the same 6-year clock.

Revival works the same way it does in several other payment-friendly states: N.D.C.C. 28-01-36 requires a signed writing for an acknowledgment or new promise to restart the clock, but the statute explicitly does not alter the effect of a payment of principal or interest. In plain terms, a bare payment, with no writing at all, restarts North Dakota's 6-year period on its own. Anyone considering paying anything toward an old North Dakota debt should confirm how old it actually is first, since even a small payment can hand the collector a fresh 6-year window to sue.
An expired limitation period does not erase the underlying debt. A collector may still ask for payment, and the account can remain on a credit report for up to 7 years on a separate federal clock. What a collector may not do is sue or threaten to sue once the North Dakota deadline has genuinely passed, which federal Regulation F prohibits outright.
Repossession in North Dakota
North Dakota enacted the standard UCC self-help rule for secured debt: after default, a lender may repossess a financed vehicle without a court order, as long as it proceeds without a breach of the peace, a standard left to case law to define. North Dakota's Retail Installment Sales Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-13, contains no pre-repossession notice requirement and no right-to-cure provision. The «NOTICE TO THE BUYER» the Act requires in a retail installment contract refers only to the right «to redeem the property if repossessed for a default within the time provided by law», which points back to the UCC redemption right rather than creating a cure period before repossession. After repossession, the sale must be commercially reasonable, and a servicemember whose loan predates military service cannot be repossessed without a court order under federal law.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in North Dakota
Answer the summons before the deadline; a default judgment forfeits every defense, including the statute of limitations. If a garnishment is running, confirm the 25%/40x math and make sure the $20-per-dependent reduction has been applied if you have dependents living with you and certified them in time. If you are fired because of a garnishment, North Dakota's double-damages remedy is worth pursuing within the 90-day window. Claim any general execution exemptions, including the $25,000 wildcard or head-of-family personal-property amount, promptly after a levy notice, since most are not automatic. Do not pay anything on an old debt before dating the 6-year clock, because a bare payment restarts it. And when judgments have stacked past what a budget can absorb, bankruptcy's automatic stay halts garnishment while the case is pending; the guide to stopping wage garnishment walks through the options in order.

Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- North Dakota Statute of Limitations
- North Dakota Bankruptcy
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More North Dakota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in North Dakota?
The lesser of 25% of disposable earnings, or the amount by which earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum wage. That protected amount increases by $20 per week for each dependent family member living with you, if certified in time. State and federal tax debt is not subject to this cap at all.
What is the statute of limitations on debt in North Dakota?
A single, uniform 6 years applies to written contracts, oral contracts, and open accounts alike under N.D.C.C. 28-01-16(1). North Dakota does not split those categories into different deadlines the way some neighboring states do.
Does a payment restart the clock on old debt in North Dakota?
Yes. Under N.D.C.C. 28-01-36, a bare payment of principal or interest, with no writing required, restarts the 6-year statute of limitations. Only a new promise or acknowledgment made without a payment needs a signed writing.
Can I be fired for having my wages garnished in North Dakota?
No, and North Dakota's protection exceeds federal law. An employer who discharges a worker over a garnishment faces a civil suit for double the lost wages plus reinstatement, without the one-debt limit federal law carries, if the employee sues within 90 days.
Are North Dakota bank accounts protected from creditors?
Not automatically in most cases. North Dakota residents can claim a $25,000 wildcard exemption in place of the homestead exemption, applicable to bank funds, plus other property exemptions, but these generally must be claimed within 10 days of a levy notice rather than applying on their own.
Can a North Dakota lender repossess my car without notice?
Likely yes for an ordinary auto loan. North Dakota follows the standard UCC rule allowing repossession without a court order if it proceeds without a breach of the peace, and its Retail Installment Sales Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-13, contains no pre-repossession notice requirement and no right-to-cure provision.
Updates
Confirmed against the official North Dakota Century Code chapters that the Retail Installment Sales Act imposes no pre-repossession notice or right-to-cure requirement, and that state and federal tax debt is excluded from the wage-garnishment cap, replacing two hedged passages with sourced statements.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Dakota Century Code
§ 32-09.1-03Restriction on garnishment of earningsIn force
The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subject to garnishment may not exceed the lesser of: Twenty-five percent of disposable earnings for that week. The amount by which disposable earnings for that week exceed forty times the federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [Pub. L. 95-151; 91 Stat. 1245; 29 U.S.C. 206] or any equivalent multiple thereof prescribed by regulation by the secretary of labor in case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, in effect at the time the earnings are payable. The maximum amount subject to garnishment under subsection 1 for any workweek must be reduced by twenty dollars for each dependent family member residing with the garnishment debtor. Within ten days after receipt of the garnishment summons, the garnishment debtor shall provide to the employer a list, signed under penalty of perjury by the garnishment debtor, of the names and social security numbers, if any, of the dependents who reside with the garnishment debtor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
§ 28-01-16Actions having six-year limitationsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
The following actions must be commenced within six years after the claim for relief has accrued: An action upon a contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, subject to the provisions of sections 28-01-15 and 41-02-104. An action upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture, when not otherwise expressly provided. An action for trespass upon real property. An action for taking, detaining, or injuring any goods or chattels, including actions for the specific recovery of personal property. An action for criminal conversation or for any other injury to the person or rights of another not arising upon contract, when not otherwise expressly provided. An action for relief on the ground of fraud in all cases both at law and in equity, the claim for relief in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 116 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Diocese of Bismarck Trust v. Ramada, Inc. (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 553 N.W.2d 760)“…e considered whether the six-year statute of limitations in N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16, or the two-year statute of limitations…”
- Wells v. First American Bank West (North Dakota Supreme Court 1999, 598 N.W.2d 834)“…of the claim as barred by the statute of limitations. Under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16: The following actions must be commen…”
- Kimball v. Landeis (North Dakota Supreme Court 2002, 652 N.W.2d 330)“…mitations for his claim against Landeis is six years. See N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16; Lang v. Barrios, 472 N.W.2d 464, 4…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Dakota Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, North Dakota Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim, North Dakota Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
§ 28-01-36New promise must be in writing in order to extend limitation - Effect of any paymentIn force
No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this chapter, unless the same is contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby, but this section does not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ndlegis.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pear v. Grand Forks Motel Associates (North Dakota Supreme Court 1996, 553 N.W.2d 774)“…and unconditional recognition of the debt” required under NDCC 28-01-36 by Huus v. Huus, 75 N.D.…”
- Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, P.C. v. Bolken (North Dakota Supreme Court 1993, 508 N.W.2d 341)“…acknowledg *343 ment or promise to pay under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-36, or by an oral agreement. The court con…”
- In Re Estate of Sorenson (North Dakota Supreme Court 2006, 717 N.W.2d 535)“…Limitations of Actions, § 211 (2000). However, under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-36, no acknowledgment or promise is suffic…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.D. Cent. Code Chapter 32-09.1, Wage Garnishment (Formula, Dependent Reduction, Anti-Retaliation)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D. Cent. Code Chapter 28-01, Limitation of Actions (Section 28-01-16 Deadlines and 28-01-36 Revival)(ndlegis.gov).gov
- N.D. Cent. Code Chapter 28-22, Exemptions(ndlegis.gov).gov
- Uniform Commercial Code Section 9-609, Secured Party's Right to Take Possession After Default (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of Time-Barred Debts (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- N.D. Cent. Code Chapter 51-13, Retail Installment Sales Act (No Pre-Repossession Notice or Right-to-Cure Provision)(ndlegis.gov)