Mississippi
Mississippi Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

If a collector is pursuing you in Mississippi, understand the process before anything else. A private creditor has to sue you, win a judgment, and obtain a writ of garnishment before any of your paycheck or bank account can legally be reached. The two beliefs that cause the most trouble, that garnishment can start the moment you fall behind, and that an unanswered lawsuit simply disappears, are both wrong. Most Mississippi garnishments trace back to a default judgment entered because the person being sued never answered the complaint, which makes responding to a summons the single most valuable thing you can do.
Mississippi also has a genuinely distinctive rule worth understanding closely: once its statute of limitations runs out, the debt itself is legally extinguished, not merely unenforceable, and only a new signed promise can bring it back to life.
Wage Garnishment in Mississippi
Mississippi gives every resident employee a genuine grace period before wage garnishment can begin at all. Under Miss. Code Section 85-3-4, wages, salaries, and other compensation of Mississippi-resident employees are entirely exempt from seizure by attachment, execution, or garnishment for 30 days from the date a writ is served. Only after that window passes does the ordinary formula apply: the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings for the week, or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, the same $217.50-a-week floor used in the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act. Support-order garnishments follow separate, higher percentages, 50 to 65 percent of disposable earnings depending on your circumstances and how far in arrears the support is, and are not subject to the 30-day wage exemption.
The mechanics of the garnishment itself come from a different statute, Miss. Code Section 11-35-23, and that is the provision that actually binds your employer. Under Section 11-35-23(3)(b), the employer-garnishee must pay over to the employee all wages that come due during the first thirty days after a proper writ is served. Only after that does it retain the nonexempt percentage of disposable earnings, as provided by Section 85-3-4, and the writ operates as a continuing lien: the employer keeps withholding until it has accumulated a sum equal to the amount shown on the writ, even if that runs past the writ's return day. Unless the court authorizes earlier payments, the garnishee makes just one payment into court once the total is accumulated, subject to a floor of at least one payment per year of what has been withheld. If your employment ends, the employer has 15 days to report the termination to the court and pay in everything withheld. An employer that files a timely and complete answer is not liable for a good-faith error in working out how much was subject to the writ, which is a practical reason to check the arithmetic yourself rather than assume payroll got it right.
Section 11-35-23(3)(a) adds a protection with no real counterpart in the wage-exemption statute. Where the writ of garnishment is issued on a judgment based on a claim or debt of less than $100, excluding court costs, wages in the employer's hands are not bound by, or subject to the lien of, that judgment at all. The exception to that carve-out is money owed to the state or its political subdivisions, meaning judgments, liens, attachments, fees, or charges owed to a government body remain collectible from wages. For the smallest consumer judgments, in other words, a Mississippi paycheck is off the table entirely rather than merely limited.
No head-of-household wage exemption was found in the mirrored Mississippi Code text this article relies on (the official, paywalled Mississippi Code was not opened live, so this is not a confirmed absence). Its broader property exemptions instead let a resident select $10,000 of tangible personal property of their choosing under Miss. Code Section 85-3-1, with an additional $50,000 exemption available to residents age 70 or older. A separate provision opts Mississippi residents out of the federal bankruptcy exemption schedule, meaning the state's own exemptions, not the federal ones, control in a Mississippi bankruptcy case.
No Mississippi statute extending job protection beyond the federal one-debt rule was located. Under 15 U.S.C. Section 1674, an employer cannot discharge an employee over a garnishment for the first debt, punishable federally by up to $1,000 or a year in prison, but that protection stops there unless a state law extends it, and no such Mississippi statute was confirmed this session.
State and local tax debt sits outside these limits altogether. Under Section 85-3-4(3)(a)(ii), the restrictions in subsections (1) and (2), which is to say both the 30-day exemption and the 25-percent-or-30-times-minimum-wage ceiling, do not apply to any debt due for a state or local tax. So a Mississippi Department of Revenue wage levy is bounded neither by the 30-day grace period nor by the 25 percent figure; how much the Department can take is a question of its own collection authority, not of Section 85-3-4. Ask the Department of Revenue or an attorney about a specific levy rather than assuming a percentage cap applies. No post-2023 medical-debt-specific garnishment statute was found for Mississippi either, though that should be treated as an open question rather than a confirmed absence.
Bank Account Protections
Mississippi has no general self-executing dollar-amount exemption for bank deposits, and wages do not carry their exemption into the account. Section 85-3-4 exempts wages, salaries, and other compensation from seizure; it says nothing about money that has already been deposited, so do not treat a deposited paycheck as still protected by the 30-day rule. Section 85-3-1 is also narrower here than it first appears: the $10,000 selection in paragraph (a) covers tangible personal property and cash on hand, and that paragraph's closing sentence expressly excludes wages described in Section 85-3-4, so it is not a deposit-account exemption. The one exemption in that section reaching a bank balance is paragraph (h), an additional $50,000 of property of any type, including deposits of money, available to a Mississippi resident who is 70 or older.
What Mississippi does supply is a timing rule limiting how much of an account a single writ can catch. Under Miss. Code Section 11-35-23(1)(b), a bank or other financial-institution garnishee accounts only for funds on deposit between service of the writ of garnishment and service of its answer, and has no obligation to account for deposits accruing after it answers. The institution may submit its answer at any time within the 30 days allowed for a response. A deposit landing after that answer requires a fresh writ rather than being swept up by the old one.

Federal law fills much of the remaining gap for benefit income specifically. Under 31 CFR Part 212, a bank that receives a garnishment order must review the account and protect an amount equal to the last two months of directly deposited Social Security, VA, and certain other federal benefit payments, automatically, without the account holder needing to claim an exemption first. That protection covers direct deposit only, not benefits later deposited by paper check.
Statute of Limitations on Debt in Mississippi
Mississippi runs a shorter clock than most states. It has no separate written-contract statute of limitations; ordinary written obligations fall under the residual 3-year period at Miss. Code Section 15-1-49. Unwritten contracts, express or implied, and open accounts, get the same 3 years under Section 15-1-29, with one narrow exception: an unwritten employment contract has only 1 year. Because both the written and unwritten tracks land at 3 years, the classification fight that matters elsewhere is largely moot, and credit card debt should generally be treated as a 3-year claim either way.
Promissory notes get longer treatment: 6 years under Mississippi's UCC Article 3 enactment, Section 75-3-118. Mississippi also extended its UCC sale-of-goods statute of limitations to 6 years under Section 75-2-725, longer than the 4-year period used in most other states.
Mississippi's revival rule has two distinct layers, and the order matters. Before the 3-year period expires, a bare part payment, acknowledgment, or promise restarts the clock under Section 15-1-3(2), with no writing required for the payment itself. But once the period expires, the debt is not merely unenforceable; Section 15-1-3(1) states that the running of the statute of limitations extinguishes the right itself, not just the remedy, though the extinguished obligation can still serve as consideration for a genuinely new promise. After expiration, only a new promise, and Section 15-1-73 requires that new promise to be in a writing signed by the party being charged, can create fresh liability; a joint contractor is not bound by another contractor's acknowledgment. The practical effect: paying on a live Mississippi debt, before the 3-year clock runs out, can restart that clock without any writing at all, but once the clock has run, nothing short of a signed writing brings the debt back, because the original obligation is gone.
Two points hold true regardless. Time-barred debt is not simply forgotten by the credit-reporting system: a debt can remain on your credit report for up to 7 years under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a separate clock from the statute of limitations. And suing or threatening to sue on a debt after the statute of limitations has run is a flat violation of federal Regulation F (12 CFR 1006.26), regardless of what the collector believed about the deadline.
A note on the source of Mississippi's statutory text: the official Mississippi Code is published behind a commercial legal-research paywall. The sections quoted on this page, including Sections 85-3-4, 85-3-1, 11-35-23 and 75-9-609, were verified against Mississippi Legislature documents and an official-derived open mirror of the code rather than the paywalled publisher's own page. Statutes are amended between sessions, so confirm any specific figure or deadline against the current official Mississippi Code, or with an attorney, before relying on it in an actual dispute.
What Debt Collectors Can and Cannot Do
Third-party collectors working Mississippi accounts answer to the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F. They cannot call before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. your local time, harass you, misrepresent the amount or legal status of a debt, or threaten to sue on a debt that is already time-barred. Within five days of first contacting you, a collector must send validation information, and once you dispute a debt in writing, the collector must stop reporting it as valid until it verifies the debt. You can also demand in writing that a collector stop contacting you.
Car Repossession in Mississippi
Mississippi enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at Miss. Code Section 75-9-609: a secured party may take possession through judicial process, or without judicial process if it proceeds without a breach of the peace. Mississippi's statute does not define breach of the peace, leaving that content to case law that was not confirmed for this page.

Mississippi provides no statutory notice-before-repossession or right-to-cure requirement for ordinary consumer vehicles. The state's Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Law was reviewed in full and regulates finance charges, disclosures, and lender licensing, but contains no repossession, cure, or resale provisions. In practice, Mississippi vehicle repossession runs on plain UCC self-help, with no statutory grace period built in beyond a secured party's obligation to avoid a breach of the peace.
Deficiency judgments follow Mississippi's standard UCC Article 9 disposition rules, requiring a commercially reasonable sale. A separate regulatory overlay applies to licensed lenders: state administrative rules require a licensee reselling a repossessed vehicle to keep a repossession log, a condition report, two photographs, and two bids or auction receipts for vehicles under 10 years old, a documentation requirement that can matter if you are disputing whether a sale was handled properly.
Servicemembers get one further protection: for a vehicle financed before military service, the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3952) requires a court order before repossession.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Mississippi
Move in this order. First, if you are served with a lawsuit, file an answer before the deadline, even a bare general denial, because a default judgment forfeits every defense you had, including the statute of limitations. Second, remember that your wages cannot be touched at all for the first 30 days after a garnishment writ is served; after that, check the math against the 25 percent and $217.50-a-week formula in Section 85-3-4, which is the same nonexempt percentage Section 11-35-23(3)(b) requires your employer to apply. Third, look at the size of the underlying judgment: if it rests on a claim or debt under $100 excluding court costs, and is not owed to a government body, Section 11-35-23(3)(a) means your wages should not be bound by the writ at all. Fourth, if the debt is old, raise the statute of limitations yourself, and understand that a payment made before the deadline runs can restart the clock without any writing. Finally, if the overall debt picture is unmanageable, bankruptcy's automatic stay stops most garnishments and collection lawsuits while the case is pending.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-09-02. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Can Social Security Be Garnished?
- Mississippi Bankruptcy
Last updated: 2026-09-02.
More Mississippi Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How soon can my wages be garnished after a lawsuit in Mississippi?
Not immediately. Under Miss. Code Section 85-3-4, Mississippi-resident wages are fully exempt from garnishment for 30 days after a writ is served. Only after that window does the ordinary 25-percent-or-30x-minimum-wage formula begin to apply, and Section 11-35-23(3)(b) requires your employer to pay you everything that comes due during those first 30 days.
Is my paycheck still protected once it is deposited in my bank account in Mississippi?
No. Mississippi's 30-day wage exemption in Section 85-3-4 protects wages in the hands of your employer, not money already deposited, and Section 85-3-1(a) expressly excludes wages described in Section 85-3-4 from its $10,000 personal-property selection. Directly deposited federal benefits are separately protected by 31 CFR Part 212, and residents age 70 or older have a $50,000 exemption under Section 85-3-1(h) that does reach deposits of money.
Can a small debt lead to wage garnishment in Mississippi?
Not if the judgment is small enough. Under Miss. Code Section 11-35-23(3)(a), wages in your employer's hands are not bound by a writ of garnishment where the judgment rests on a claim or debt of less than $100, excluding court costs. That carve-out does not apply to amounts owed to the state or its political subdivisions.
Is old debt really dead in Mississippi once the statute of limitations runs?
Legally, yes, in a stronger sense than most states. Mississippi law provides that the running of the statute of limitations extinguishes the right itself, not just the remedy, under Miss. Code Section 15-1-3. After that point, only a new promise in a signed writing can create fresh liability.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in Mississippi?
Yes, but only before the original deadline expires. A partial payment, acknowledgment, or promise made while the debt is still within its limitations period restarts the clock with no writing required. Once the deadline has already passed, only a signed writing can create new liability.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Mississippi?
Three years, whether the debt is treated as written or unwritten, under Miss. Code Sections 15-1-49 and 15-1-29, since both tracks land at the same 3-year period.
Does a lender have to warn me before repossessing my car in Mississippi?
No statutory notice or cure period was found for Mississippi vehicle repossessions. The state relies on plain UCC self-help, meaning a lender can repossess without advance notice as long as it avoids a breach of the peace.
Can I be fired for a wage garnishment in Mississippi?
No specific Mississippi statute extending firing protection beyond the federal rule was found. Under federal law, an employer cannot discharge you over a garnishment for a first debt, but that protection does not clearly extend to a second, unrelated garnishment in Mississippi.
Updates
Removed an incorrect statement that Mississippi wages stay exempt for a period after being deposited in a bank, which was never enacted law, and added the garnishment procedure, bank-garnishee rule and under-$100 wage protection in Miss. Code Section 11-35-23.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated
§ 85-3-4Execution or attachment of wages, salaries or other compensation; limitations.In force
(1) The wages, salaries or other compensation of laborers or employees, residents of this state, shall be exempt from seizure under attachment, execution or garnishment for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of service of any writ of attachment, execution or garnishment. (2) After the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Mississippi has read Section 85-3-4's support-order exception narrowly. Sorrell v. Borner determined the exception did not fit a past-due child-support judgment held by a parent who no longer had custody, so the 25 percent limit of 85-3-4(2)(a) applied. Reasor v. Jordan followed it and vacated a 55 percent withholding order.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sorrell v. Borner (Mississippi Supreme Court 1991, 593 So. 2d 986)✓A father who gained custody of his two children had 65 percent of his wages garnished for back child support owed to their mother. The court held the legislature did not intend the support exception in Section 85-3-4 for that situation and that the 25 percent restriction applied.
- Frankie L. Reasor v. Rose M. Johnson Jordan (Mississippi Supreme Court 2011)“…arnishments to twenty-five percent of disposable income.10 Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-4(2)(a)(i) (Rev. 2011). But the statute m…”
- Reasor v. Jordan (Mississippi Supreme Court 2013, 110 So. 3d 307)✓A father who had won custody was ordered to pay $24,428 in back child support, with 55 percent of his income withheld. The court held the support exception in Section 85-3-4 did not fit because the mother no longer had custody, so the 25 percent limit governed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-1-3Completion of limitation extinguishes right; partial payment.In force
(1) The completion of the period of limitation prescribed to bar any action, shall defeat and extinguish the right as well as the remedy. However, the former legal obligation shall be a sufficient consideration to uphold a new promise based thereon. (2) In any case founded on a debt, when any part…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-07-08 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Windham v. Latco of Mississippi, Inc. (Mississippi Supreme Court 2008, 972 So. 2d 608)“…ll defeat and extinguish the right as well as the remedy. " Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-3 (Rev.2003) (emphasis added). [4] ¶ 6…”
- Townes v. Rusty Ellis Builder, Inc. (Mississippi Supreme Court 2012, 98 So. 3d 1046)“…ent consideration to uphold a new promise based thereon. Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-3 (Rev.2003) (emphasis added). In the cas…”
- Tolliver Ex Rel. Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Green v. Mladineo (Court of Appeals of Mississippi 2007, 987 So. 2d 989)“…ct of the passing of a statute of limitations on an action. Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-3 (Rev. 2003) ("The completion of the per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 85-3-1Property exempt from seizure under execution or attachment.In force
There shall be exempt from seizure under execution or attachment: (a) Tangible personal property of the following kinds selected by the debtor, not exceeding Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) in cumulative value: (i) Household goods, wearing apparel, books, animals or crops; (ii) Motor vehicles;
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cartwright v. Deposit Guar. Nat. Bank (Mississippi Supreme Court 1996, 675 So. 2d 847)“…nd the funds it represented as exempt property pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 85-3-1 (1972). The county court found that th…”
- Lawrence v. Greenline Equipment, Inc. (Mississippi Supreme Court 1996, 676 So. 2d 291)“…om claiming the vehicles as exempt from seizure pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1(a), and granted summary judgment in fav…”
- Glenn Folse v. Paula N Stennett-Yancey (Mississippi Supreme Court 1997)“…County, claiming the $7,303.33 as cash on hand pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 85-3-1. ¶10. By order entered May 20, 1996, t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-1-49Limitations applicable to actions not otherwise specifically provided for.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) All actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed shall be commenced within three (3) years next after the cause of such action accrued, and not after. (2) In actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed and which involve latent injury or disease, the cause of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 539 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stephens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of US (Mississippi Supreme Court 2003, 850 So. 2d 78)“…1. Statute of limitations, Miss.Code Ann. § 722 (1972) and Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-49 ¶11. In 1972, Miss.Code Ann. § 722,…”
- Stevens v. Lake (Mississippi Supreme Court 1993, 615 So. 2d 1177)“…on is time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-49 (1972). However, finding nothing to su…”
- PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. Lowery (Mississippi Supreme Court 2005, 909 So. 2d 47)“…UES. A. Historical Review of the Discovery Rule ¶ 9. Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-49(2) (Rev.2002) provides for a special ex…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Mississippi Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Mississippi Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
§ 15-1-29Limitations applicable to actions on accounts and unwritten contracts.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, actions on an open account or account stated not acknowledged in writing, signed by the debtor, and on any unwritten contract, express or implied, shall be commenced within three (3) years next after the cause of such action accrued, and…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-07-08 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Levens v. Campbell (Mississippi Supreme Court 1999, 733 So. 2d 753)“…barred pursuant to a one-year statute of limitations under Miss.Code Ann. § 15-1-29 and § 15-1-35. In his opinion, the chan…”
- Hill v. Southeastern Floor Covering (Mississippi Supreme Court 1992, 596 So. 2d 874)“…as meritless and that the statute of limitations set out in Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-29 (Supp. 1991), was inapplicable as the…”
- Trammell v. State (Mississippi Supreme Court 1993, 622 So. 2d 1257)“…Plaintiff's cause is barred by the statute of limitation. Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-29 (1972); (2) The Plaintiff's claims a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 50
§ 3952Protection under installment contracts for purchase or leaseIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
After a servicemember enters military service, a contract by the servicemember for— the purchase of real or personal property (including a motor vehicle); or the lease or bailment of such property, may not be rescinded or terminated for a breach of terms of the contract occurring before or during that person’s military service, nor may the property be repossessed for such breach without a court order. This section applies only to a contract for which a deposit or installment has been paid by the servicemember before the servicemember enters military service. A person who knowingly resumes possession of property in violation of subsection (a), or in violation of section 3918 of this title, or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ditech Holding Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2025)“…d on, or sold during or within a year after active service. 50 U.S.C. §§ 3952, 3953. Claimant states that he re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Louisiana Debt Collection Laws: Prescription, Garnishment, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Miss. Code Section 85-3-4, Thirty-Day Wage Exemption from Garnishment(unicourt.github.io)
- Miss. Code Section 85-3-1, General Exemptions from Execution(unicourt.github.io)
- Miss. Code Section 15-1-49, Residual Three-Year Limitation(unicourt.github.io)
- Miss. Code Section 15-1-29, Limitation on Unwritten Contracts and Open Accounts(unicourt.github.io)
- Miss. Code Section 15-1-3, Extinguishment of Right upon Expiration(unicourt.github.io)
- Mississippi Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Law(dbcf.ms.gov).gov
- 5 Miss. Code R. Section 3-4.3, Repossessed Vehicle Documentation(law.cornell.edu)
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of Time-Barred Debt (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. 1673, Restriction on Garnishment (CCPA)(govinfo.gov).gov
- Miss. Code Section 11-35-23, Nature and Effects of Garnishment; Employer and Bank Garnishee Duties(unicourt.github.io)
- Mississippi Legislature, SB 2179 (2006) reproducing the enacted text of Miss. Code Section 85-3-4(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us)
- Mississippi Legislature, HB 1071 (2020) reproducing Miss. Code Section 85-3-1 exemptions(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us)