Maryland
Maryland Court Records: How to Search, What's Public, and How to Seal Them
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 10, 2026). · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Maryland runs one of the more genuinely useful statewide court-record tools covered in this series. Maryland Judiciary Case Search is free, covers the whole state from a single login, and has been public for years, but the state's own courts are explicit that it is not an authoritative record and was never built for background-check purposes.
This page covers how to use Case Search, what it excludes, what stays confidential under Maryland's court rules, and the difference between Maryland's two distinct record-clearing remedies: shielding and expungement.
Information last verified on 2026-08-10. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
How to Search Maryland Court Records: Case Search
Maryland Judiciary Case Search is the state's official, free, statewide public access tool, covering District Court and Circuit Court cases from one login with no fee. The portal's landing page states plainly: "This website provides public access to the case records of the Maryland Judiciary. Access to these records is governed by the Maryland Rules on Access to Court Records." Getting in requires clicking through an I-AGREE disclaimer page first; the search tool itself cannot be reached by a direct link that skips that step.
Case Search is not comprehensive by design. The portal's own examples of what's excluded from search results are "juvenile case records, cases involving trade secrets and records in any case ordered shielded by a judge." It also links an index of public cases created by MDEC (Maryland Electronic Courts) courts in the previous five days, a useful feature for anyone tracking newly filed cases.
Maryland's court system is direct about the tool's limits: "PLEASE NOTE that this information is NOT intended to be used as an authoritative public record or as a legal document and shall have no legal force or effect." If you spot an error in a Case Search entry, the remedy is written notice to the court where the record was created or filed, not a correction request through the website itself.
What's Public and What's Restricted in Maryland
Maryland codified its access framework in the Maryland Rules on Access to Judicial Records (Title 16, Chapter 900 of the Maryland Rules), which formalized the state's existing common-law access right in 2004. That framework rests on a broader constitutional foundation too: the First Amendment, Article 40 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, and common law dating back to the pre-colonial period, according to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Presumptively open categories include court papers, documents, exhibits, orders, and docket entries filed in a case, trial records, pretrial motions, settlement agreements, and arrest records once they've been introduced as evidence. Presumptively closed categories include search warrants before they've been executed, grand jury investigation records, presentence investigation reports (unless later entered into evidence), and juvenile and family proceeding records such as adoption, guardianship, and abuse or neglect cases. A party seeking to seal an otherwise-open record has to show a special and compelling reason, and any sealing order is supposed to be narrowly tailored and temporary where possible.
Maryland's Case Search portal echoes this framework in practice: its own listed exclusions (juvenile records, trade secrets, judicially shielded cases) map directly onto the categories the access rules identify as closed. If a case type is confidential under Maryland's rules, it will not surface in Case Search at all, rather than appearing with sensitive information redacted.
Shielding vs. Expungement in Maryland
Maryland runs two separate record-clearing mechanisms, and mixing them up leads to wrong assumptions about what actually happens to a record. Shielding temporarily limits or denies inspection of a court record while the record remains in the court system; a shielded case will not turn up in Case Search, but law enforcement and other public agencies can still see it. Expungement, by contrast, permanently destroys or removes conviction records from public access, effectively erasing the record's existence in most contexts.
Maryland's shielding statute, Criminal Procedure Section 10-303, requires waiting until no earlier than three years after a person satisfies the sentence, including any parole, probation, or mandatory supervision, before filing a petition. If someone is convicted of a new crime during that waiting period, the original conviction becomes ineligible for shielding unless the new conviction also becomes eligible. A person cannot petition while they're a defendant in a pending criminal proceeding, and critically, the statute allows only one shielding petition over a person's entire lifetime.
Maryland's expungement statute, Criminal Procedure Section 10-105, sets different waiting periods depending on how a case ended. A petition based on an acquittal, a nolle prosequi, or a dismissal generally cannot be filed within three years after the disposition, unless the petitioner files with the petition a written general waiver and release of all tort claims arising from the charge, which allows an earlier filing. A petition based on probation before judgment cannot be filed earlier than the later of the date probation ended or three years after probation was granted. One category waits far longer: a petition based on a probation before judgment for driving under the influence of alcohol or driving while impaired by alcohol, under Transportation Article Section 21-902(a) or (b), may not be filed within 15 years after the date the petitioner was discharged from probation. Read that category carefully, because it turns on a probation before judgment rather than a conviction, and Section 10-105(a) bars expungement of a probation before judgment for a violation of Section 21-902(c), (d), (h), or (i) altogether. A court can grant a petition sooner than these default windows on a showing of good cause.
This page covers the mechanism and the timing framework at a general level. For a full eligibility walkthrough, see our Maryland expungement guide.
Getting Certified Copies and Searching Effectively
Certified copies of Maryland court records come from the clerk's office of the court where the case was filed or the hearing was conducted, not from Case Search itself, which the portal repeatedly disclaims as non-authoritative.
When searching Case Search by name, keep in mind that common names can produce multiple matches or none at all if you enter a name slightly differently than it appears in the court's system. A case number, where you have one, avoids that ambiguity entirely. And because juvenile, trade-secret, and judicially shielded cases are excluded from search results by design, a blank result on Case Search does not necessarily mean no case exists; it may mean the case falls into one of those excluded categories. Our how to look up court records guide covers name-versus-case-number search strategy in more depth.
Using Court Records Responsibly: The FCRA Rule
Checking your own case, or a case you have a genuine personal reason to look into, is exactly what Case Search is built for. Using it, or a commercial people-search product pulling from the same underlying data, to screen a tenant or job applicant is a different legal question, governed by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), not Maryland's access rules.

Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c, most negative consumer-report information ages off after seven years, but § 1681c(a)(5) exempts criminal convictions from that window, so a conviction can be reported indefinitely unless a shielding or expungement order actually restricts it. In 2023, the FTC fined TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate $5.8 million for marketing public-records-based background reports for tenant and employment screening without complying with the FCRA, making clear that a company marketing reports for that purpose is a consumer reporting agency under the law. Treat Case Search as personal-use research, and run any real tenant or employment screening through a properly FCRA-compliant background check instead.
Related Maryland Records Searches
This page is part of our broader Court Records by State guide, and our are court records public page covers the general presumption-of-openness concept in more depth. If you're checking your own history before a job or a lease, see Maryland background check laws. If you think you might have an active warrant rather than an ordinary case, see Maryland warrant search. For records held by state agencies rather than the courts, see Maryland public records laws.
Disclaimer
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Court portals, fees, and coverage change without notice, and the Maryland Judiciary is the only authoritative source for its own records. If you need a certified copy or have a legal question about a specific case, contact the clerk of court where the case was filed, or consult a licensed Maryland attorney.

Last updated: 2026-08-10. Portal facts and fees reflect their published status as of August 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Maryland Judiciary Case Search really free?
Yes. Case Search is free and statewide, covering District Court and Circuit Court cases with no account or fee required. You do have to click through an I-AGREE disclaimer page before you can search.
Can I use Case Search for a background check?
The portal itself is explicit that its information 'is NOT intended to be used as an authoritative public record or as a legal document.' It excludes juvenile, trade-secret, and judicially shielded cases from results, so it is not a complete or certified background-check source.
What is the difference between shielding and expungement in Maryland?
Shielding temporarily restricts access to a record that still exists in the court system; law enforcement and other public agencies retain access even though the case will not appear in Case Search. Expungement permanently removes conviction records from public access.
How long do I have to wait to petition for shielding in Maryland?
Under Criminal Procedure Section 10-303, a shielding petition generally cannot be filed earlier than three years after satisfying the sentence, and a person can only be granted one shielding petition over their entire lifetime.
How long do I have to wait to petition for expungement in Maryland?
It depends on how the case ended. Under Criminal Procedure Section 10-105, acquittals, nolle prosequi, and dismissals generally require a three-year wait, unless the petitioner files a written general waiver and release of all tort claims arising from the charge, which permits an earlier filing. Probation before judgment requires three years or the end of probation, whichever is later. A probation before judgment for a DUI or DWI violation under Transportation Article Section 21-902(a) or (b) requires 15 years after discharge from probation.
Why does a case I know exists not show up on Case Search?
Case Search excludes juvenile case records, cases involving trade secrets, and any case a judge has ordered shielded. If a case falls into one of those categories, it will not appear in search results even though the record exists.
How do I get a certified copy of a Maryland court record?
Contact the clerk's office of the court where the case was filed or the hearing was conducted. Case Search itself is not a certified or authoritative source, according to its own disclaimer.
Updates
Corrected the Maryland expungement timing section: the 15-year wait applies to a probation before judgment for a DUI or DWI violation under Transportation Article Section 21-902(a) or (b), not to convictions or to reckless driving, and the three-year acquittal, nolle prosequi, and dismissal window can be shortened by filing a general waiver and release of tort claims.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article
§ 2-203In force
§2–203. Unless otherwise provided by law or order of court, any person may, without charge, inspect, examine, and make memoranda or notes from an index or paper filed with the clerk of a court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Maryland Code, Criminal Procedure Article
§ 10-105In forcecited in 2 of our articles
§10–105. (a) A person who has been charged with the commission of a crime, including a violation of the Transportation Article for which a term of imprisonment may be imposed, or who has been charged with a civil offense or infraction, except a juvenile offense, may file a petition listing relevant facts for expungement of a police record, court record, or other record maintained by the State or a political subdivision of the State if: (1) the person is acquitted; (2) the charge is otherwise dismissed; (3) a probation before judgment is entered, unless the person is charged with a violation of § 21–902(c), (d), (h), or (i) of the Transportation Article or Title 2, Subtitle 5 or § 3–211 of the Criminal Law Article; (4) a nolle prosequi or nolle prosequi with the requirement of drug or alcohol treatment is entered; (5) the court indefinitely postpones trial of a criminal charge by marking the criminal charge “stet” or stet with the requirement of drug or alcohol abuse treatment on the docket; (6) the case is compromised under § 3–207 of the Criminal Law Article; (7) the charge was transferred to the juvenile court under § 4–202 of this article; (8) the person: (i) is…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Nelson (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2004, 156 Md. App. 558)“…s entitlement to the remedy of expungement is determined by Md.Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 10-105(a)(200.1 & Supp.2002), which provides…”
- Expungement Petition of Vincent S. (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2022)“…RITY TO ORDER EXPUNGEMENT AT ANY TIME FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 10-105(c)(9) authorizes courts to order the ex…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maryland Expungement Laws: Eligibility, Waiting Periods, and How to File (2026)
§ 10-303In forcecited in 2 of our articles
§10–303. (a) A person may petition the court to shield the person’s court and police records relating to one or more shieldable convictions entered in the circuit court or the District Court in one county no earlier than 3 years after the person satisfies the sentence or sentences imposed for all convictions for which shielding is requested, including parole, probation, or mandatory supervision. (b) (1) If the person is convicted of a new crime during the applicable time period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, the original conviction or convictions are not eligible for shielding unless the new conviction becomes eligible for shielding. (2) A person is not eligible for shielding if the person is a defendant in a pending criminal proceeding. (c) If a person is not eligible for shielding of one conviction in a unit, the person is not eligible for shielding of any other conviction in the unit. (d) (1) The court shall have a copy of a petition for shielding served on the State’s Attorney.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681cRequirements relating to information contained in consumer reportsIn forcecited in 54 of our articles
Except as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 383 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (2017) addressed the FACTA truncation rule in 1681c(g) and affirmed dismissal for lack of Article III standing, treating material risk of harm as a fact question. Edward Seamans v. Temple University (2014) held the seven-year window in 1681c(a)(4) is extended for an education loan only until that loan is repaid.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2017, 872 F.3d 114)✓A shopper sued two stores whose receipts printed the first six digits of his credit card number; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of standing, seeing no clear error in the finding that those digits show only the card issuer, not a material risk of identity theft.
- Edward Seamans v. Temple University (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2014, 744 F.3d 853)✓A defaulted university loan kept appearing on a borrower's credit reports after he repaid it because the school never reported the delinquency date; the Third Circuit held the Higher Education Act suspends section 1681c(a)(4)'s aging-off rule only until repayment.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 660 F.3d 1055)✓A debt buyer offered to settle health club debts over seven years old, saying that if it was reporting the account the bureaus would be told it was settled; the Ninth Circuit, treating those debts as unreportable under section 1681c(a)(4), called that implication misleading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Louisiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Maryland Judiciary Case Search(courts.state.md.us).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Open Courts Compendium: Maryland(rcfp.org)
- Maryland General Assembly, Criminal Procedure Section 10-105, Expungement(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Maryland General Assembly, Criminal Procedure Section 10-303, Shielding(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c(law.cornell.edu)
- FTC, FTC Says TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate Deceived Users About Background Report Accuracy, Violated FCRA(ftc.gov).gov
- Maryland General Assembly, Transportation Article Section 21-902, Driving While Under the Influence(mgaleg.maryland.gov)