Massachusetts
Massachusetts Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Massachusetts imposes strict liability on dog owners and keepers under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, Section 155. A victim does not need to prove negligence or prior dangerous behavior. Liability is barred only if the victim was trespassing, committing a tort, or teasing or abusing the dog; children under seven are presumed innocent of provocation.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Massachusetts Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Massachusetts's liability rule.
Overview of Massachusetts Dog Bite Laws
Massachusetts is one of the strongest strict liability states in the country when it comes to dog bite injuries. Under M.G.L. c. 140, § 155, a dog's owner or keeper is automatically liable for any damage the dog causes to a person's body or property. The victim does not need to prove the owner was negligent or that the dog had any history of aggression.
This statute covers all types of dog-related injuries, not just bites. If a dog knocks someone down, scratches them, or destroys their property, the same strict liability standard applies.
The law places the burden squarely on dog owners. If you own or keep a dog in Massachusetts, you are financially responsible for any harm that dog causes, with only narrow exceptions.
The Strict Liability Standard: M.G.L. c. 140, § 155
The core of Massachusetts dog bite law is M.G.L. c. 140, § 155. The statute states that if any dog does damage to the body or property of any person, the owner or keeper shall be liable for such damage.

If the owner or keeper is a minor, the minor's parent or guardian becomes liable instead.
What Victims Must Prove
To win a dog bite case in Massachusetts, the victim needs to establish only three things:
- The defendant owned or kept the dog
- The dog caused damage to the victim's body or property
- The victim was not trespassing, committing another tort, or teasing, tormenting, or abusing the dog at the time
Notice what is absent from that list. The victim does not need to show:
- The owner knew the dog was dangerous
- The dog had bitten anyone before
- The owner failed to use reasonable care
- The dog had shown aggressive tendencies
This makes Massachusetts far more favorable to dog bite victims than states that follow the "one-bite rule," where owners escape liability if they had no prior knowledge of their dog's dangerous behavior.
Who Qualifies as a "Keeper"
The statute imposes liability on both owners and "keepers." M.G.L. c. 140, § 136A supplies the controlling definition, and it applies to "sections 137 to 174G, inclusive," a range that contains § 155. Under it, a keeper is "a person, business, corporation, entity or society, other than the owner, having possession of a dog."
Possession is the test. Someone who has the dog in their care can be a keeper even though they have never owned it.
This distinction matters in cases involving dog walkers, pet sitters, and other temporary caretakers.
Special Protections for Children Under 7
M.G.L. c. 140, § 155 includes a powerful provision protecting young children. If the victim is under seven years of age, the law presumes the child was not trespassing, committing a tort, or provoking the dog.
This shifts the burden of proof to the dog owner. The owner must affirmatively prove that the child was trespassing or provoking the dog in order to escape liability. In practice, this presumption makes it very difficult for dog owners to avoid responsibility when a young child is injured.
Legal Defenses for Dog Owners
The statute provides three specific defenses that can eliminate or reduce the owner's liability.

Trespassing or Committing a Tort
If the victim was trespassing on the owner's property or committing another tort at the time of the bite, the owner is not liable under § 155. However, the trespassing defense is harder to invoke against children under seven because of the presumption described above.
Teasing, Tormenting, or Abusing the Dog
If the victim provoked the dog by teasing, tormenting, or abusing it, the owner may escape liability. The provocation must be the direct cause of the bite. Minor interactions that would not cause a reasonable dog to bite typically do not qualify.
Comparative Negligence Is Not a Fourth Defense
Massachusetts does have a modified comparative negligence statute, M.G.L. c. 231, § 85, but it is written for negligence claims. By its own terms it governs actions "to recover damages for negligence," and it operates by comparing "the negligence of each plaintiff" to "the total negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought."
A § 155 claim gives that comparison nothing to work with, because the owner's negligence is not an element of the claim in the first place. Section 155 supplies its own closed list of defenses: trespass, another tort, and teasing, tormenting, or abusing the dog. If a victim also pleads a separate ordinary negligence count against the owner, comparative negligence applies to that count in the usual way.
Damages Available to Dog Bite Victims
Dog bite victims in Massachusetts can pursue both economic and non-economic damages.
Economic Damages
- Medical bills, including emergency treatment, surgery, and rehabilitation
- Future medical costs for ongoing treatment or reconstructive procedures
- Lost wages from missed work during recovery
- Loss of earning capacity if injuries cause long-term disability
- Property damage
Non-Economic Damages
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma, including PTSD
- Scarring and disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
Massachusetts does not impose a statutory cap on damages in dog bite cases. The full extent of the victim's losses can be recovered.
Triple Damages If the Dog Was Already Deemed Dangerous
If a hearing authority or a district court has already deemed the dog dangerous and that dog then wounds a person, M.G.L. c. 140, § 159 makes the owner or keeper "liable in tort to the person injured by the dog for 3 times the amount of damages sustained by such person." The same trebling applies when such a dog worries, wounds, or kills livestock or fowl.
That is why the dangerous dog process described below matters to an injured person and not only to the dog's owner. A prior dangerous dog finding is worth checking for with the local hearing authority before valuing a claim.
Statute of Limitations
Dog bite victims in Massachusetts must file their lawsuit within 3 years from the date of the injury. This deadline comes from M.G.L. c. 260, § 2A, which governs personal injury claims.
Key points about the filing deadline:
- The clock starts on the date of the bite or attack
- If the victim was a minor at the time of the injury, the 3-year period does not begin until the minor turns 18
- A claim against a city, town, or other public employer runs on a different track: M.G.L. c. 258, § 4 requires written presentment to that entity's executive officer within 2 years of the date the cause of action arose, and no civil action may be brought more than 3 years after it accrued
- Missing the deadline almost always results in permanent dismissal of the case
Dangerous Dog Designations: M.G.L. c. 140, § 157
Massachusetts has a detailed process for classifying dogs as "nuisance" or "dangerous" under M.G.L. c. 140, § 157. This process is separate from the civil liability statute but can result in serious consequences for dog owners.

How the Process Works
Any person may file a written complaint with the local hearing authority (typically an animal control officer or municipal official) alleging that a dog is a nuisance or dangerous. The hearing authority then investigates and holds a public hearing.
Based on credible evidence and testimony, the hearing authority can:
- Dismiss the complaint
- Deem the dog a nuisance dog
- Deem the dog a dangerous dog
What Makes a Dog "Dangerous"
A dog may be deemed dangerous if it attacks a person or domestic animal causing physical injury or death without justification. However, the law includes important limitations. A dog cannot be deemed dangerous:
- Solely based on growling or barking
- Based on the dog's breed
- If the dog was protecting itself, its offspring, another animal, or a person from attack
- If the person threatened or attacked was committing a crime against the owner or keeper
- If the person was teasing, tormenting, or provoking the dog
Requirements for Owners of Dangerous Dogs
If a dog is deemed dangerous, the hearing authority may order the owner to:
- Confine the dog in a securely enclosed and locked pen with a secure roof, with sides embedded at least 2 feet into the ground if there is no secured floor
- Muzzle the dog securely and humanely when off the owner's premises, using a chain or tether with a minimum tensile strength of 300 pounds and no longer than 3 feet
- Maintain liability insurance
- Comply with any other conditions the hearing authority considers necessary
Statewide Ban on Breed-Specific Legislation
Massachusetts law explicitly prohibits cities and towns from regulating dogs in a manner that is specific to breed. No dog can be found to be a nuisance or dangerous based solely on its breed. This means breed-specific bans targeting pit bulls, Rottweilers, or any other breed are illegal throughout the state.
Criminal Penalties: M.G.L. c. 140, § 157A
Dog owners who fail to comply with a dangerous dog order face criminal penalties under M.G.L. c. 140, § 157A.
| Offense | Maximum Fine | Maximum Jail Time |
|---|---|---|
| First offense | $500 | 60 days |
| Second or subsequent offense | $1,000 | 90 days |
In the most serious cases, a court may order a dangerous dog to be euthanized under M.G.L. c. 140, § 157. If euthanasia is ordered and affirmed on appeal, the owner must reimburse the city or town for all reasonable costs incurred for housing and caring for the dog during impoundment and throughout the appeals process.
Landlord Liability for Dog Bites
Landlords in Massachusetts are generally not considered "owners" or "keepers" of a tenant's dog under § 155. Instead, landlord liability for tenant dog bites is governed by common-law negligence principles.
A landlord may be held liable if:
- The landlord knew or reasonably should have known the tenant's dog had dangerous propensities
- The landlord had the authority to require removal of the dog (through a lease provision, for example)
- The landlord failed to take reasonable steps to protect others
Simply owning the property where a tenant keeps a dog does not create strict liability for the landlord. The injured person must prove the landlord was negligent.
Dog Owner Responsibilities
Beyond the liability statute, Massachusetts imposes several obligations on dog owners:
- Licensing: A dog over the age of 6 months must be licensed with the licensing authority in the city or town where the dog is kept (M.G.L. c. 140, § 137). The length of the license period is set by that municipal licensing authority, not fixed at one year by statute (M.G.L. c. 140, § 136A)
- Rabies Vaccination: Dogs must be vaccinated against rabies before licensing
- Leash Laws: Many Massachusetts municipalities have local leash ordinances; check your city or town's bylaws
- Confinement: Dogs must be kept under the owner's control at all times
- Reporting Bites: Dog bites must be reported to the local board of health
How to File a Dog Bite Claim in Massachusetts
If a dog has injured you or your property in Massachusetts, take these steps to protect your legal rights:
- Get medical treatment immediately. Your health comes first, and medical records create essential documentation for your claim.
- Report the bite to local animal control and police. This creates an official record and may trigger a dangerous dog investigation.
- Document the scene. Photograph your injuries, the location, and the dog if you can do so safely.
- Collect the owner's information. Get their name, address, phone number, and homeowner's or renter's insurance details.
- Identify witnesses. Get contact information from anyone who saw the incident.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloody clothing and any other items damaged in the attack.
- Contact a personal injury attorney. Because Massachusetts is a strict liability state, an experienced attorney can evaluate your case quickly.
Remember that you have 3 years from the date of the bite to file a lawsuit, but starting the process early preserves evidence and strengthens your claim.
More Massachusetts Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Massachusetts a strict liability state for dog bites?
Yes. Under M.G.L. c. 140, § 155, dog owners and keepers are strictly liable for any damage their dog causes to a person's body or property. The victim does not need to prove the owner was negligent or knew the dog was dangerous.
What defenses can a dog owner raise in Massachusetts?
A dog owner can argue that the victim was trespassing, committing another tort, or teasing, tormenting, or abusing the dog at the time of the incident. Those are the only defenses § 155 names. Massachusetts's comparative negligence statute, M.G.L. c. 231, § 85, is written for actions to recover damages for negligence, so it does not supply a further defense to a strict liability claim under § 155.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Massachusetts?
You have 3 years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit under M.G.L. c. 260, § 2A. If the victim was a minor, the 3-year period does not start until they turn 18.
Can a landlord be held liable for a tenant's dog bite in Massachusetts?
A landlord is not strictly liable under § 155, but may be liable under common-law negligence if they knew or should have known the tenant's dog was dangerous and failed to take action, such as enforcing a lease provision requiring removal of the dog.
Are pit bull bans legal in Massachusetts?
No. Massachusetts law prohibits cities and towns from regulating dogs in a manner specific to breed. No dog can be deemed dangerous or nuisance based solely on its breed. Breed-specific legislation is illegal statewide.
Injured in Massachusetts? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Massachusetts personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the deadline for claims against Massachusetts cities and towns to the Tort Claims Act's 2-year presentment and 3-year suit periods, removed the incorrect statement that comparative negligence can eliminate recovery in a strict liability dog bite claim, added the triple damages remedy under M.G.L. c. 140, § 159, and replaced the descriptions of a dog keeper and the licensing rule with the controlling statutory text.
Fixed a dead citation link for the Massachusetts statute of limitations (M.G.L. c. 260, section 2A was filed under the wrong Title in the URL) and clarified that the dangerous-dog euthanasia and cost-reimbursement rule comes from M.G.L. c. 140, section 157, not section 157A.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 140
§ 155Liability for damage caused by dog; minors; presumption and burden of proofIn force
Section 155. If any dog shall do any damage to either the body or property of any person, the owner or keeper, or if the owner or keeper be a minor, the parent or guardian of such minor, shall be liable for such damage, unless such damage shall have been occasioned to the body or property of a person who, at the time such damage was sustained, was committing a trespass or other tort, or was teasing, tormenting or abusing such dog. If a minor, on whose behalf an action under this section is brought, is under seven years of age at the time the damage was done, it shall be presumed that such minor was not committing a trespass or other tort, or teasing, tormenting or abusing such dog, and the burden of proof thereof shall be upon the defendant in such action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 155 - Dog Liability Statute(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 157 - Nuisance or Dangerous Dogs(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 157A - Criminal Penalties for Non-Compliance(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 231, § 85 - Comparative Negligence(malegislature.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 260, § 2A - Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury(malegislature.gov).gov
- Massachusetts Model Jury Instructions - Dog Liability (May 2024)(mass.gov).gov
- Massachusetts Law About Animals - Mass.gov(mass.gov).gov
- Animal Laws and Regulations in Massachusetts (2025 Edition)(mass.gov).gov
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 159 - Treble Damages for Injury by a Dog Deemed Dangerous(malegislature.gov)
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 136A - Definitions, Including Keeper and License Period(malegislature.gov)
- M.G.L. c. 140, § 137 - Dog Licensing Requirement(malegislature.gov)
- M.G.L. c. 258, § 4 - Massachusetts Tort Claims Act Presentment Requirement(malegislature.gov)