How to File a DMCA Takedown on AWS (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

To file a DMCA takedown for content hosted on AWS, email your notice to trustandsafety@support.aws.com with all required elements from 17 U.S.C. 512(c)(3) written in plain text in the email body. AWS will then contact its customer and direct them to remove the infringing content from their servers.
Generate a Free DMCA Takedown Notice
Our AI-powered tool creates a legally-structured notice compliant with 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3). Fill in your details, edit the letter, sign it, and download a PDF.
Generate Your NoticeWhat Is a DMCA Takedown on AWS?
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the world's largest cloud infrastructure provider. When someone hosts a website, application, or file storage system on AWS and uses it to distribute your copyrighted content without permission, you can file a DMCA takedown notice directly with AWS.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), passed in 1998, created a notice-and-takedown system that allows copyright owners to request the removal of infringing content from online service providers. AWS participates in this system under Section 512 of Title 17 of the U.S. Code.
Unlike filing a DMCA notice with a social media platform, filing with AWS requires understanding that AWS is an infrastructure layer, not the content owner or publisher. This distinction matters for how you write and send your notice.
How AWS Differs From Social Media Platforms for DMCA Purposes
When you file a DMCA notice with YouTube, Facebook, or TikTok, you are targeting the platform that directly hosts and serves your content to end users. Those platforms use the Section 512(c) safe harbor, which covers user-generated content stored on the service provider's systems.

AWS operates differently. It provides raw infrastructure (compute, storage, and networking) that website owners use to build and run their own services. Depending on how AWS is used, it may qualify under different safe harbor provisions:
- Section 512(a) covers transitory digital network communications. This applies when AWS acts as a passive conduit, simply routing data from one point to another without storing or selecting it.
- Section 512(c) covers storage of information at the direction of users. This applies when AWS (through services like S3 or EC2) stores the infringing content at a user's direction.
In practice, most DMCA takedown requests against AWS-hosted content fall under Section 512(c), because the infringing content is stored on AWS infrastructure (such as an EC2 instance or S3 bucket) even though AWS did not create or select it.
This matters because it affects what action AWS actually takes. AWS does not administer a customer's server for them, so its published process is to contact the customer and have them remove or disable the material. AWS reserves the right to remove or disable access to violating content itself, and in serious cases it can suspend or terminate the account.
How to Identify If Content Is Hosted on AWS
Before filing a DMCA notice with AWS, confirm that the infringing content is actually hosted on AWS infrastructure. Filing with the wrong provider wastes time.
Step 1: Run a DNS lookup. Use a tool like nslookup or an online WHOIS tool to find the IP address associated with the domain hosting the infringing content.
Step 2: Check the IP against AWS's published ranges. AWS publishes a list of the IP address ranges for the services customers most commonly filter on at ip-ranges.amazonaws.com/ip-ranges.json, as documented in AWS VPC documentation. If the server's IP falls within an AWS range, the site is AWS-hosted. AWS states in that same documentation that it does not publish the ranges for all of its services, so a non-match is not proof the site is off AWS. Use the checks below before ruling AWS out.
Step 3: Look for AWS-specific domain patterns. Domains ending in .amazonaws.com, .cloudfront.net, or .awsapps.com are operated directly on AWS infrastructure.
Step 4: Check WHOIS registration. A WHOIS lookup on the IP address will often return Amazon Technologies Inc. or Amazon Data Services as the registrant, confirming AWS hosting.
If the website uses Cloudflare as a proxy in front of AWS, the IP you find may belong to Cloudflare, not AWS. In that case, you may need to file a DMCA takedown with Cloudflare as well.
AWS's DMCA Safe Harbor and Obligations
AWS qualifies for DMCA safe harbor protection under Section 512 of the Copyright Act, which limits its liability for copyright infringement committed by its customers. To maintain this protection, AWS must:
- Respond expeditiously to valid DMCA notices by removing or disabling access to infringing content
- Have a policy for terminating accounts of repeat infringers
- Accommodate standard technological measures used to protect copyrighted works
- Not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity when it has the ability to control it
AWS addresses these requirements through its published DMCA notice procedures, its stated repeat-infringer policy, and the designated copyright agent named in the AWS Site Terms. As noted in the U.S. Copyright Office's Section 512 resources, service providers that comply with these conditions are shielded from monetary damages, though courts can still issue injunctions.
Where AWS's Copyright Rules Actually Live
AWS splits its rules across two separate documents, and people routinely cite the wrong one. Knowing which is which keeps your notice accurate and stops you from quoting language that does not exist.
The AWS Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), last updated July 1, 2021, prohibits six categories of use: illegal or fraudulent activity, violating the rights of others, threatening or promoting violence or terrorism, child sexual exploitation or abuse, security violations, and spam. It does not mention copyright, intellectual property, the DMCA, or repeat infringers anywhere in its text. Copyright infringement falls under the general "violate the rights of others" prohibition, not under any copyright-specific clause.
The copyright-specific commitments sit in the AWS Site Terms instead. Under the heading "Copyright Complaints," AWS states that it respects the intellectual property of others and points complainants to its Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement. That same page names AWS's designated copyright agent (Copyright Agent/Amazon Web Services, Amazon.com Legal Department, P.O. Box 81226, Seattle, WA 98108; telephone (206) 266-4064; email trustandsafety@support.aws.com), which satisfies one of the key requirements for DMCA safe harbor eligibility.
AWS's repeat-infringer policy is a third, separate item. AWS publishes it in its DMCA guidance on AWS re:Post, where AWS states that it terminates the accounts of repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances. If you want to reference that policy in correspondence, cite the DMCA guidance, not the AUP.
Tip: AWS accepts a copyright complaint through either of two intake channels, and its own documentation says so. AWS's DMCA guidance tells you to send the notice to trustandsafety@support.aws.com. Its separate abuse guidance names the Report Abusive Activity form as a primary reporting method and lists "Copyright that's subject to content removal requests regarding the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)" among the abuse types its Trust and Safety team handles, with the instruction to "provide a valid DMCA complaint that follows public documentation guidelines." Email is the more predictable route for a copyright notice, because the DMCA guidance is where AWS spells out the plain-text and no-attachment rules the abuse team applies. Either way, what you send has to be a complete Section 512(c)(3) notice.
Violations of the AUP can still result in account suspension or termination, which gives AWS an enforcement mechanism separate from the DMCA notice-and-takedown process. That is a supplement to a complete DMCA notice, never a substitute for one.
Step-by-Step: How to File a DMCA Takedown Notice with AWS
Follow these steps carefully. Missing required elements will cause AWS to reject or delay your notice.
Step 1: Gather Evidence of Infringement
Before writing your notice, collect:
- The exact URL(s) where the infringing content appears
- Screenshots or screen recordings of the content
- A description of your original copyrighted work and proof of ownership (registration certificate, publication records, or other documentation)
- The date you first discovered the infringement
Keep copies of all evidence. If the content is later taken down or moved, you will need this documentation for any follow-up action.
Step 2: Draft Your DMCA Notice
Your notice must comply with the statutory requirements under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3). It must include:
- Identification of the copyrighted work. Describe what you own. If multiple works are affected, you may provide a representative list.
- Identification of the infringing material. Provide the specific URLs where the infringing content is located. Be precise.
- Your contact information. Full name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address.
- A good-faith belief statement. "I have a good-faith belief that the use of the material described above is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law."
- An accuracy statement under penalty of perjury. "I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner."
- Your signature. A physical or electronic signature. Your full typed name is generally accepted as an electronic signature.
You can use the free DMCA takedown notice generator to produce a properly formatted notice.
Step 3: Send the Notice to AWS
Send your completed notice by email to:
trustandsafety@support.aws.com
Critical submission rules per AWS re:Post guidance:
- Write everything in the body of the email, in plain text only
- Do not attach documents, PDFs, or screenshots. AWS's team will not open attachments under any circumstances
- Include all required DMCA elements directly in the email body
- You do not need to provide a physical (wet ink) signature. A typed full name is sufficient
Step 4: Receive Acknowledgment
After submitting your notice, AWS will send an automated acknowledgment email confirming receipt. If AWS needs more information to process your notice, their team will follow up by email.
What Happens After AWS Receives Your DMCA Notice?
If your notice is complete and valid and the reported content is confirmed to be on AWS infrastructure, AWS will act expeditiously. According to AWS's DMCA submission guidance, this process involves:
- AWS contacts its customer. AWS forwards notice of the complaint to the account holder running the infringing content. AWS provides the customer with a copy of the original complaint and your contact information.
- The customer is directed to remove or disable the content. The AWS customer is responsible for taking down the infringing material from their own servers.
- AWS routes removal through the customer. Because the content lives on the customer's allocated infrastructure, AWS typically requires the customer to act rather than deleting files on the customer's behalf. In serious cases or repeat infringement, AWS may suspend or terminate the account.
AWS does not publicly specify an exact number of days for resolution, but is legally required to act "expeditiously" under Section 512. For complex cases, expect the process to take several business days to a few weeks.
Counter-Notification Process for AWS-Hosted Content
If you are the AWS customer whose content was removed following a DMCA notice, you have the right to file a counter-notice under 17 U.S.C. § 512(g).
Send your counter-notice to AWS at the same address: trustandsafety@support.aws.com
Your counter-notice must include, per AWS's counter-notice guidance:
- Your full name, address, and telephone number
- A description of the removed content and its location before removal
- A statement under penalty of perjury that you have a good-faith belief the content was removed due to mistake or misidentification
- If you are located within the United States: a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of the United States federal district court for the judicial district in which your address is located, and agreeing to accept service of process from the person who filed the notice or their agent
- If you are located outside the United States: a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of any United States federal district court where AWS is located, and agreeing to accept service of process from the person who filed the notice or their agent
- Your physical or electronic signature
AWS asks for exactly one of those two jurisdiction statements, not both. Non-US customers who copy the domestic version are submitting an incomplete counter-notice, and AWS can decline to restore the content until the right statement is supplied. Write the counter-notice in plain text in the email body as well, because the same no-attachments rule applies here.
After AWS receives a valid counter-notice, it will forward the counter-notice to the original complainant. The complainant then has 10 to 14 business days to notify AWS that they have filed a lawsuit. If no lawsuit notification is received within that window, AWS may take steps to restore the content.
Important: Filing a false counter-notice exposes you to civil liability under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f). Only file a counter-notice if you genuinely believe the original takedown was mistaken.
When to Contact AWS vs. the Website Owner Directly
Filing a DMCA notice with AWS is not always the most efficient first step. Consider these factors:
Contact the website owner first if:
- The website owner's contact information is readily available (e.g., a WHOIS-listed email or a contact page)
- The infringement appears to be an honest mistake
- A direct takedown request is faster than waiting for AWS's process
File with AWS directly if:
- The website owner is unresponsive or cannot be identified
- The website owner has refused to take down the content
- The infringement is commercial or systematic in nature
- The content is hosted on an S3 bucket or other AWS-controlled service where there is no identifiable website owner
In many cases, filing simultaneously with both the website owner and AWS is the most effective strategy.
Tips for a Successful DMCA Takedown on AWS
These practical steps increase the likelihood of a fast, successful outcome:
- Be precise with URLs. Vague descriptions ("my content is on their website") will delay processing. Provide exact URLs to the specific infringing files or pages.
- Write in plain text. Rich formatting, HTML, or attachments will not be read by AWS's trust and safety team.
- One notice per infringement campaign. If the same infringer has multiple URLs, you can list all URLs in a single notice rather than sending multiple emails.
- Keep records. Save copies of your sent notice and all correspondence with AWS. You will need these if the matter escalates to litigation.
- Include your real contact information. False or incomplete contact details invalidate your notice and may expose you to legal liability.
- Cite the right AWS document. If the site is running an outright piracy operation, you can note that the conduct also breaches the AUP's prohibition on violating the rights of others. Do not claim the AUP contains copyright-specific language, because it does not, and do not let an AUP reference replace any required element of your DMCA notice.
Can You Go to Jail for Copyright Infringement on AWS?
Yes, in the narrow circumstances Congress defined, though civil liability is the far more common exposure.
17 U.S.C. § 506 defines criminal copyright infringement but sets no penalty of its own. It provides that an offender "shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18." Under 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b)(1), willful infringement for commercial advantage or private financial gain carries up to five years for a first offense, but only where the conduct involved at least 10 copies or phonorecords of one or more works with a total retail value of more than $2,500 during any 180-day period. Below that threshold, section 2319(b)(3) caps the term at one year.
The fine is not a copyright-specific figure. Section 2319 says the offender is "fined in the amount set forth in this title," which routes to the general federal fine provision at 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b): up to $250,000 for an individual convicted of a felony, or a higher amount under section 3571(d) where the offense produced a gain or loss.
Tampering with Copyright Management Information (CMI) is prohibited by 17 U.S.C. § 1202, which does not turn on willfulness. Section 1202(a) reaches knowingly providing or distributing false CMI with the intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal infringement. Section 1202(b) reaches intentionally removing or altering CMI, knowing or having reasonable grounds to know that doing so will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement. Willfulness enters only at the criminal stage, in the separate 17 U.S.C. § 1204: where the violation is willful and for commercial advantage or private financial gain, a first offense carries a fine of up to $500,000, imprisonment of up to five years, or both.
Civil statutory damages for willful infringement can reach $150,000 per work under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2).
Other DMCA Takedown Processes
AWS | Cloudflare | Discord | Etsy | Facebook | Google | YouTube | TikTok | Twitter | Wikipedia | XVideos
Need to generate a compliant DMCA notice? Use the free DMCA Takedown Notice Generator.
Frequently Asked Questions
What email address do I use to file a DMCA notice with AWS?
Send your DMCA notice to trustandsafety@support.aws.com. Write your entire notice in the plain-text body of the email. AWS's trust and safety team will not open attachments under any circumstances, so do not attach PDFs or screenshots.
Does the AWS Acceptable Use Policy ban copyright infringement?
Not in those words. The AWS Acceptable Use Policy, last updated July 1, 2021, lists six prohibited categories and does not mention copyright, intellectual property, the DMCA, or repeat infringers anywhere. Infringement falls under its general prohibition on violating the rights of others. AWS's copyright-specific language and its designated copyright agent appear in the separate AWS Site Terms, and its repeat-infringer policy appears in its DMCA guidance on AWS re:Post.
How long does it take AWS to respond to a DMCA notice?
AWS does not publish a specific response time, but is legally required to act 'expeditiously' under Section 512 of the DMCA. In practice, you should receive an automated acknowledgment quickly and expect AWS to contact its customer within a few business days for clear-cut infringement cases.
Can AWS delete infringing content directly from a customer's server?
Usually not directly. AWS provides infrastructure to its customers, and the content lives on the customer's allocated servers, so AWS's published process is to contact its customer and direct them to remove or disable the infringing material. AWS does describe removing or disabling access to content itself, and its counter-notice guidance refers to restoring content that AWS removed or disabled. AWS also states that it terminates the accounts of repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances, and it may suspend an account for serious Acceptable Use Policy violations.
What should I do if AWS does not act on my DMCA notice?
First, confirm your notice contained all required elements under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3). If it was complete and AWS has not acted, you may follow up by replying to your acknowledgment email. You may also consider contacting the website owner directly, or consulting an intellectual property attorney about escalating to litigation against the infringer.
How do I know if a website is actually hosted on AWS?
Run a DNS lookup on the domain to find its IP address, then check that IP against AWS's publicly published IP ranges at ip-ranges.amazonaws.com/ip-ranges.json. Domains ending in .amazonaws.com or .cloudfront.net are definitively on AWS. A WHOIS lookup on the IP address may also return Amazon Technologies Inc. as the registrant.
Updates
Corrected where AWS actually publishes its copyright rules: the Acceptable Use Policy does not mention copyright, so the article now sources AWS's intellectual property commitment and copyright agent to the AWS Site Terms and its repeat-infringer policy to AWS's DMCA guidance. Added the counter-notice jurisdiction statement for filers located outside the United States, which AWS requires instead of the domestic version and which the article had omitted. Clarified that AWS routes takedowns through its customer but can also remove or disable access to content itself, and that the AWS abuse form accepts DMCA complaints alongside the abuse email. Also made the criminal-penalty citations precise, pointing the prison term to 18 U.S.C. 2319, the fine to 18 U.S.C. 3571, and the copyright-management-information penalties to 17 U.S.C. 1204.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 17
§ 1202Integrity of copyright management informationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
No person shall knowingly and with the intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal infringement— provide copyright management information that is false, or distribute or import for distribution copyright management information that is false. No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law— intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information, distribute or import for distribution copyright management information knowing that the copyright management information has been removed or altered without authority of the copyright owner or the law, or distribute, import for distribution, or publicly perform works, copies of works, or phonorecords, knowing that copyright management information has been removed or altered without authority of the copyright owner or the law, knowing, or, with respect to civil remedies under section 1203, having reasonable grounds to know, that it will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of any right under this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 370 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stevens v. Corelogic, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2018, 899 F.3d 666)“…copyright management information removed, in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202 (b)(1)-(3). We affirm the grant of sum…”
- Zalewski v. Cicero Builder Dev., Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2014, 754 F.3d 95)“…ving] or alter[ing] any copyright management information.” 17 U.S.C. § 1202 (b). In his original complaint, Zalew…”
- Fischer v. Forrest (District Court, S.D. Illinois 2018, 286 F. Supp. 3d 590)“…udgment to Defendants on Fischer's claims under the DMCA, 17 U.S.C. § 1202 . Obj. at 6-8. Fischer argues that Bru…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Is a DMCA Takedown? Complete Guide
§ 1204Criminal offenses and penaltiesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person who violates section 1201 or 1202 willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain— shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for the first offense; and shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, for any subsequent offense. Subsection (a) shall not apply to a nonprofit library, archives, educational institution, or public broadcasting entity (as defined under section 118(f)). No criminal proceeding shall be brought under this section unless such proceeding is commenced within 5 years after the cause of action arose.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Jeffrey Reichert (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2014, 747 F.3d 445)“…willfully” and for commercial or private financial gain. 17 U.S.C. § 1204 (a). Reichert was prosecuted under th…”
- United States v. Wittich (District Court, E.D. Louisiana 2014, 54 F. Supp. 3d 613)“…(1)). . Id. (citing 17 U.S.C. § 1201 (a)(2)(A), 17 U.S.C. § 1204 (a)(1)). . Id. (citing 17 U.…”
- Green v. U.S. Dep't of Justice (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2019, 392 F. Supp. 3d 68)“…al liability under the DMCA's criminal offense provision, 17 U.S.C. § 1204 . Id. ¶¶ 86-87, 109-10 . Specif…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 504Remedies for infringement: Damages and profitsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided by this title, an infringer of copyright is liable for either— the copyright owner’s actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer, as provided by subsection (b); or statutory damages, as provided by subsection (c). The copyright owner is entitled to recover the actual damages suffered by him or her as a result of the infringement, and any profits of the infringer that are attributable to the infringement and are not taken into account in computing the actual damages. In establishing the infringer’s profits, the copyright owner is required to present proof only of the infringer’s gross revenue, and the infringer is required to prove his or her deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the copyrighted work.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,114 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 471 U.S. 539)“…oldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U. S. 390, 406 (1940). Cf. 17 U. S. C. § 504 (b) (the infringer is required to prove…”
- Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 514)“…Bouchat sought damages from the Ravens and NFLP pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(a)(1), which renders an infringer liabl…”
- Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2013, 731 F.3d 303)“…judgment on the issue of his entitlement to damages under 17 U.S.C. § 504 (b). For the reasons set forth below, w…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: AI Copyright Law in the United States (2026 Guide), Is AI-Generated Code Copyright Infringement? (2026), How to File a DMCA Takedown on Discord (2026 Guide)
§ 506Criminal offensesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed— for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain; by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180–day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement of a copyright.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 190 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dowling v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 473 U.S. 207)“…4 ; nine counts of copyright infringement, in violation of 17 U. S. C. § 506 (a); and three counts of mail fraud, in…”
- United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. Banks (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2006, 451 F.3d 189)“…One, Two, and Three); one count of copyright infringement, 17 U.S.C. § 506 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319 (b)(1) (Co…”
- United States v. Coleman (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2010, 609 F.3d 699)“…n violation of the Criminal Copyright Infringement Statute, 17 U.S.C. § 506(A). See United States v. Coleman, No. 1…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Wikipedia (2026 Guide), DMCA Takedown on Twitter/X: What to Know (2026 Guide)
§ 512Limitations on liability relating to material onlineIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the provider’s transmitting, routing, or providing connections for, material through a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider, or by reason of the intermediate and transient storage of that material in the course of such transmitting, routing, or providing connections, if— the transmission of the material was initiated by or at the direction of a person other than the service provider; the transmission, routing, provision of connections, or storage is carried out through an automatic technical process without selection of the material by the service provider; the service provider does not select the recipients of the material except as an automatic response to the request of another person; no copy of the material made by the service provider in the course of such intermediate or transient storage is maintained on the system or network in a manner ordinarily accessible to anyone other than anticipated recipients, and no such copy is maintained on the system or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 451 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Ninth Circuit rulings map the DMCA safe harbors. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC (2013) held Veoh met 512(c) and read right and ability to control as requiring substantial influence over users. Ellison v. Robertson (2004) held a jury could find AOL had not reasonably implemented a repeat-infringer policy under 512(i).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2001, 239 F.3d 1004)✓A file-sharing service argued the DMCA safe harbor limited its contributory and vicarious liability for users trading MP3s; the Ninth Circuit declined to hold that section 512 never protects secondary infringers, but found serious questions about Napster's eligibility.
- Ellison v. Robertson (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 357 F.3d 1072)✓AOL changed the email address for copyright notices without forwarding old mail, so an author's infringement notice went unread; the Ninth Circuit held a jury could find AOL had not reasonably implemented a repeat-infringer policy under section 512(i).
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 508 F.3d 1146)“…title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), 17 U.S.C. § 512 . Congress enacted title II of the DMCA…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Cloudflare (2026 Guide), How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), Legal Copyright Disclaimers: What Disclaimers are Needed on my Website
United States Code Title 18
§ 2319Criminal infringement of a copyrightIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Any person who violates section 506(a) (relating to criminal offenses) of title 17 shall be punished as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (d) and such penalties shall be in addition to any other provisions of title 17 or any other law. Any person who commits an offense under section 506(a)(1)(A) of title 17 — shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $2,500; shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense is a felony and is a second or subsequent offense under subsection (a); and shall be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, in any other case.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 114 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dowling v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 473 U.S. 207)“…ion to any other provisions of Title 17 or any other law,” 18 U. S. C. § 2319 (a), Congress “implicitly” approved the…”
- United States v. Chalupnik (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2008, 514 F.3d 748)“…ight infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 506 (a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319 (b)(3). The district court sentenced Ch…”
- United States v. Barbara Gottesman (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1984, 724 F.2d 1517)“…endments, the Piracy and Counterfeiting Amendments of 1982, 18 U.S.C. § 2319 , preclude the application of section 2…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3571Sentence of fineIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
A defendant who has been found guilty of an offense may be sentenced to pay a fine. Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, an individual who has been found guilty of an offense may be fined not more than the greatest of— the amount specified in the law setting forth the offense; the applicable amount under subsection (d) of this section; for a felony, not more than $250,000; for a misdemeanor resulting in death, not more than $250,000; for a Class A misdemeanor that does not result in death, not more than $100,000; for a Class B or C misdemeanor that does not result in death, not more than $5,000; or for an infraction, not more than $5,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 400 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Southern Union Co. v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2012, 567 U.S. 343)“…at. Ann. §13:1E–99.89(f) (West Supp. 2012). 4 See, e.g., 18 U. S. C. §3571(d) (fine “not more than the greater of…”
- United States v. McNair (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 1152)“…ts or retirement. In calculating Swann’s fine under 18 U.S.C. § 3571(d),118 the PSI stated the “gross loss”…”
- United States v. Coplan (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2012, 703 F.3d 46)“…ne greater than the default statutory máximums provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3571 (d). Id. at 175 (“[I]t is the clear…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Does a Criminal Fine Mean, and Who Paid the Largest One in US History?, Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 17 U.S.C. § 512: Limitations on Liability Relating to Material Online(law.cornell.edu)
- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act(copyright.gov).gov
- Section 512 of Title 17: Resources on Online Service Provider Safe Harbors(copyright.gov).gov
- Submit a DMCA Notice to AWS (includes AWS's repeat infringer policy)(repost.aws)
- Provide a Counter-Notice to a DMCA Notice(repost.aws)
- AWS Acceptable Use Policy (last updated July 1, 2021)(aws.amazon.com)
- AWS Site Terms: Copyright Complaints and Designated Copyright Agent(aws.amazon.com)
- AWS Report Abusive Activity Form(support.aws.amazon.com)
- How Do I Report Abuse of AWS Resources? (abuse form as a primary report method; DMCA listed among handled abuse types)(repost.aws)
- AWS IP Address Ranges(docs.aws.amazon.com)
- 17 U.S.C. § 506: Criminal Offenses(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 2319: Criminal Infringement of a Copyright (penalties)(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3571: Sentence of Fine(law.cornell.edu)
- 17 U.S.C. § 1202: Integrity of Copyright Management Information(law.cornell.edu)
- 17 U.S.C. § 1204: Criminal Offenses and Penalties (CMI violations)(law.cornell.edu)
- 17 U.S.C. § 504: Remedies for Infringement: Damages and Profits(law.cornell.edu)