Utah
Utah Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Utah's Protection of Public Employees Act, codified at Utah Code 67-21-3, prohibits public employers from retaliating against employees who report waste, fraud, law violations, or abuse of authority in good faith. The law covers workers at state agencies, counties, cities, and school districts.
Overview of Utah Whistleblower Laws
Utah is an employment-at-will state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any reason or no reason. However, both statutory and common law protections create important exceptions for workers who report illegal activity or refuse to participate in unlawful conduct.
The primary whistleblower statute in Utah is the Protection of Public Employees Act (Utah Code Chapter 67-21), which covers public sector employees. Several additional statutes address specific types of retaliation in areas like discrimination and workplace safety. Utah also recognizes a common law public policy exception that provides some protection for private sector workers.
Federal whistleblower laws also apply to all Utah employees and provide additional layers of protection. For a complete overview, see our guide to Federal Whistleblower Laws.
Common Law Protections for Whistleblowers
Utah courts recognize a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Under this exception, employers cannot discharge employees for reasons that violate clearly established public policy. Courts look to statutes, constitutional provisions, and prior judicial decisions to identify relevant public policies.

Utah's common law protections generally cover employees who:
- Exercise a legal right or privilege (such as filing a workers' compensation claim or collecting minimum wage)
- Refuse to carry out illegal activities
- Carry out a public obligation (such as serving on a jury)
One important limitation applies to employees who report illegal activities: Utah courts have held that common law protection only applies when the report is made to public officials, not to internal supervisors. Employees who report wrongdoing only to their employer may not be covered under this exception.
The statute of limitations for common law retaliatory discharge claims in Utah is four years from the retaliatory action.
Utah Protection of Public Employees Act
The Utah Protection of Public Employees Act, codified at Utah Code Chapter 67-21, is the state's primary whistleblower protection statute.
Who Is Protected
The Act covers employees of state agencies, counties, cities, school districts, and other political subdivisions. It applies to all public sector employees in Utah.
Protected Activities
Under Utah Code 67-21-3, employers cannot take adverse action against a public employee for:
- Reporting in good faith the waste or misuse of public funds, property, or manpower
- Reporting a violation or suspected violation of a federal, state, or local law, rule, or regulation
- Reporting gross mismanagement, abuse of authority, or unethical conduct by a government employer
- Participating in or providing information in an investigation, hearing, court proceeding, legislative inquiry, or administrative review held by a public body
- Objecting to or refusing to carry out a directive that violates state or federal law, rule, or regulation
Reporting Requirements
To qualify for protection, employees must generally communicate their concerns in good faith to a person in authority over the individual alleged to have engaged in the wrongful conduct, or to the Attorney General's Office, law enforcement, or another appropriate authority. The Act encourages employees to first attempt to resolve concerns through internal channels before making external reports.
Employer Prohibitions
In addition to prohibiting retaliation, the Act also bars employers from adopting rules or policies that prevent employees from documenting waste, violations of law, mismanagement, abuse of authority, or unethical conduct.
Remedies
Employees who prevail under the Protection of Public Employees Act may recover:
- Reinstatement to the former position at the same level
- Payment of back wages
- Reinstatement of full fringe benefits and seniority rights
- Actual damages
- Reasonable attorney's fees and witness fees (if the court determines the award is appropriate)
- If the retaliation involved denial of a promotion, the employee may be awarded the pay increase they would have received
Filing Process
A state employee covered by the Protection of Public Employees Act must choose between two mutually exclusive paths: filing a grievance with the Career Service Review Office, or bringing a civil action directly in court within 180 days after the violation. Choosing one path waives the right to pursue the other over the same facts. Higher-education employees must exhaust their institution's independent personnel board before suing (Utah Code 67-21-3.7); a political subdivision may adopt such a board (67-21-3.6), and where it has, its employees must exhaust that process first. After exhaustion, the employee has 180 days to file a civil action. There is no three-year deadline under this Act; 180 days is the controlling statute of limitations.
Utah False Claims Act
Utah has enacted a limited False Claims Act (Utah Code 26-20-9.5 et seq.) that targets fraud involving medical benefits. However, this statute is narrower than the false claims laws in many other states.
Key Limitations
Utah's False Claims Act does not include a qui tam provision. This means private individuals cannot file lawsuits on behalf of the state to recover fraudulently obtained funds. Only the state itself may bring civil lawsuits under the Act. Whistleblowers who discover fraud against the state of Utah cannot receive financial rewards under state law.
Federal Alternative
While Utah does not offer a state-level qui tam remedy, whistleblowers who discover fraud against the federal government (including federal funds administered by Utah) can still file qui tam lawsuits under the federal False Claims Act. The federal law provides for whistleblower awards of 15% to 30% of recovered funds.
Additional Whistleblower Protections
Several other Utah statutes provide whistleblower protections in specific employment contexts.
Anti-Discrimination Protections
Under Utah Code 34A-5-102 and 34A-5-106, employers cannot retaliate against individuals who:
- Oppose discriminatory practices prohibited under the Utah Antidiscrimination Act
- File a charge or complaint under the statute
- Testify or participate in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing
Utah law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, pregnancy, childbirth, pregnancy-related conditions, age (40 and older), religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, and gender identity.
Complaints must be filed with the Utah Labor Commission, Antidiscrimination and Labor Division (UALD) within 180 days of the retaliatory action. Remedies include reinstatement, back pay and benefits, attorney's fees, and legal costs. In compensation-related cases, the employee may receive an additional amount equal to the back pay. The employer may also be ordered to cease discriminatory or prohibited employment practices.
Occupational Safety and Health
Under Utah Code 34A-6-203, employers cannot retaliate against employees who:
- File a complaint related to workplace safety
- Institute or participate in proceedings under the occupational safety statute
- Testify or intend to testify in safety proceedings
- Exercise rights under the statute on behalf of themselves or others
Complaints must be filed with the Utah Labor Commission, Division of Occupational Safety and Health (UOSH) within 30 days of the retaliatory action. This is one of the shortest deadlines under Utah law. Remedies include a cease and desist order, reinstatement with back pay, and other appropriate relief.
Payment of Wages
Under Utah Code 34-28-19, employers cannot discharge, demote, alter terms of employment, or retaliate against employees who:
- File a complaint or testify in proceedings related to wage enforcement
- Intend to file a complaint or testify in wage proceedings
- Are believed by the employer to potentially file a complaint or testify
Complaints are filed with the Utah Labor Commission, Antidiscrimination and Labor Division. Remedies include a cease and desist order and payment of lost wages and benefits.
Employment of Minors
Under Utah Code 34-23-402, employers cannot discharge or threaten employees who testify or intend to testify in investigations or proceedings related to the employment of minors. A violation is a class B misdemeanor, rising to a class A misdemeanor if the employer has a prior conviction under this statute and a third-degree felony if the employer has two or more prior convictions.
How to File a Whistleblower Complaint in Utah
Reporting to Public Bodies
Public employees should first attempt to report concerns through internal channels by communicating with a person in authority. If internal reporting does not resolve the issue, employees may report to the Attorney General's Office, law enforcement, or another appropriate authority.
Filing with the Utah Labor Commission
For discrimination-related retaliation, contact the Utah Labor Commission, Antidiscrimination and Labor Division (UALD) at (801) 530-6801. Complaints must be filed within 180 days.
For workplace safety retaliation, contact the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (UOSH) at (801) 530-6494 or (801) 530-6437. Complaints must be filed within 30 days.
Filing with the Career Service Review Office
Career service state employees may grieve retaliation under the Protection of Public Employees Act through the Career Service Review Office, but this is an exclusive election: choosing the CSRO grievance path waives the right to bring a civil action over the same facts, and vice versa. Political-subdivision and higher-education employees do not use the CSRO; where their institution has an independent personnel board (mandatory for higher education, optional for political subdivisions), they must exhaust that process before filing suit.
Filing a Civil Lawsuit
For common law retaliatory discharge claims, lawsuits must be filed within four years. A Protection of Public Employees Act claim must be filed within 180 days of the violation (or within 180 days of exhausting administrative remedies for political-subdivision and higher-education employees). Other statutory claims carry their own deadlines, such as the 180-day UALD discrimination window and the 30-day UOSH safety-complaint window noted above.
Practical Tips for Utah Whistleblowers
- Make reports to public officials rather than only to internal supervisors, as common law protection may not cover internal-only reports.
- Document all reports in writing and keep copies.
- Be aware of the 30-day deadline for workplace safety complaints, which is extremely short.
- Consult with an employment attorney who has experience with Utah whistleblower cases.
- Federal whistleblower protections may provide additional remedies beyond what state law offers, especially since Utah does not have a state-level qui tam provision.
More Utah Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Utah's Protection of Public Employees Act cover private sector workers?
No. The Protection of Public Employees Act (Utah Code 67-21) only covers employees of state and local government entities. Private sector employees must rely on Utah's common law public policy exception or federal whistleblower protections.
Can I file a qui tam (False Claims Act) lawsuit in Utah?
No. Utah's False Claims Act does not include a qui tam provision, so private citizens cannot file state-level false claims lawsuits or receive state whistleblower awards. However, you can file a federal qui tam lawsuit if the fraud involves federal funds.
How long do I have to file a whistleblower retaliation claim in Utah?
The deadline depends on the type of claim. Common law claims must be filed within four years. A Protection of Public Employees Act claim must be filed within 180 days of the violation. Discrimination complaints filed with the UALD must be submitted within 180 days, and workplace safety complaints with UOSH must be filed within just 30 days.
Do I have to report internally first before I am protected as a whistleblower in Utah?
Under the Protection of Public Employees Act, employees are encouraged to first report concerns to a person in authority within their organization. For common law claims, Utah courts have held that reports must be made to public officials (not just internal supervisors) to qualify for protection.
What remedies are available to Utah public employee whistleblowers?
Public employees who prevail under the Protection of Public Employees Act can recover reinstatement to their former position, back wages, fringe benefits and seniority rights, actual damages, and reasonable attorney's fees. If the retaliation involved a denied promotion, the employee may also receive the pay increase they would have earned.
Updates
Corrected the Protection of Public Employees Act filing deadline from an incorrect three years to the statute's actual 180 days, and clarified that a Career Service Review Office grievance and a direct civil lawsuit are mutually exclusive options for state employees.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed an invented '$500 per violation' penalty figure for the child-labor retaliation statute; Utah Code 34-23-402's linked text sets only criminal classifications (class B misdemeanor, escalating to class A misdemeanor and third-degree felony for repeat violations), with no dollar fine amount.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Utah Code, Title 34: Labor in General
§ 34-23-402Violation -- Criminal penalty.In force
(1) (a) The commission may prosecute a misdemeanor criminal action in the name of the state. (b) The county attorney, district attorney, or attorney general shall provide assistance in prosecutions under this section at the request of the commission. (2) A person, whether individually or as an officer, agent, or employee of any person, firm, or corporation, violates this section by: (a) knowingly employing a minor or permitting a minor to work in a repeated violation of this chapter; (b) refusing or knowingly neglecting to furnish to the commission, any information requested by the commission under this chapter; (c) refusing access to that person's place of business or employment to the commission or the commission's authorized representative when access has been requested in conjunction with an investigation related to this section; (d) hindering the commission or the commission's authorized representative in the securing of any information authorized by this section; (e) refusing or knowingly omitting or neglecting to keep any of the records required by this chapter; (f) knowingly making a false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
§ 34-28-19Retaliation prohibited -- Administrative process -- Enforcement -- Rulemaking.In force
(1) (a) An employer violates this chapter if the employer takes an action described in Subsection (1)(b) against an employee because: (i) the employee files a complaint or testifies in a proceeding relative to the enforcement of this chapter; (ii) the employee is going to file a complaint or testify in a proceeding relative to the enforcement of this chapter; or (iii) the employer believes that the employee may file a complaint or testify in any proceeding relative to the enforcement of this chapter. (b) Subsection (1)(a) applies to the following actions of an employer: (i) the discharge of an employee; (ii) the demotion of an employee; or (iii) any other form of retaliation against an employee in the terms, privileges, or conditions of employment. (2) (a) An employee claiming to be aggrieved by an action of the employer in violation of Subsection (1) may file with the division a request for agency action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Parkdale Care Center v. Frandsen (Court of Appeals of Utah 1992, 194 Utah Adv. Rep. 28)“…and 29,1989. They alleged their *991 dismissals violated Utah Code Ann. § 34-28-19 (1) (Supp.1991), which prohibits an emp…”
- Hull v. ConvergeOne, Inc. (District Court, D. Minnesota 2021)“…ore dismissed with prejudice. 2. Retaliation – Utah Code Ann. § 34-28-19 As noted, Hull…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Utah Code, Title 34A: Utah Labor Code
§ 34A-5-102Definitions -- Unincorporated entities -- Joint employers -- Franchisors.In force
(1) As used in this chapter: (a) "Affiliate" means the same as that term is defined in Section 16-6a-102. (b) "Apprenticeship" means a program for the training of apprentices including a program providing the training of those persons defined as apprentices by Section 35A-6-102. (c) "Bona fide occupational qualification" means a characteristic applying to an employee that: (i) is necessary to the operation; or (ii) is the essence of the employee's employer's business. (d) "Court" means a court with jurisdiction under Title 78A, Judiciary and Judicial Administration. (e) "Director" means the director of the division. (f) "Disability" means a physical or mental disability as defined and covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12102. (g) "Division" means the Division of Antidiscrimination and Labor. (h) "Employee" means a person applying with or employed by an employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Christensen v. Labor Commission (Utah Supreme Court 2025, 2025 UT 55)“…ause the employee opposed a prohibited employment practice, UTAH CODE §§ 34A-5-102(1)(y), -106-(1)(a)(i) (emphasis added),…”
- Gottling v. P.R. Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2002, 456 Utah Adv. Rep. 14)“…loyer of fifteen or more employees (large employers). See Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-102(8)(a)(iv) (defining “employer” for the…”
- Viktron/Lika v. Labor Commission (Court of Appeals of Utah 2001, 436 Utah Adv. Rep. 44)“…ected opposition" for purposes of a retaliation claim under Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-102(17), -106 (Supp.2000), of the Utah Anti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 34A-5-106Discriminatory or prohibited employment practices -- Permitted practices.In force
(1) It is a discriminatory or prohibited employment practice to take an action described in Subsections (1)(a) through (g). (a) (i) An employer may not refuse to hire, promote, discharge, demote, or terminate a person, or to retaliate against, harass, or discriminate in matters of compensation or in terms, privileges, and conditions of employment against a person otherwise qualified, because of: (A) race; (B) color; (C) sex; (D) pregnancy, childbirth, or pregnancy-related conditions; (E) age, if the individual is 40 years of age or older; (F) religion; (G) national origin; (H) disability; (I) sexual orientation; or (J) gender identity. (ii) A person may not be considered "otherwise qualified," unless that person possesses the following required by an employer for any particular job, job classification, or position: (A) education; (B) training; (C) ability, with or without reasonable accommodation; (D) moral character; (E) integrity; (F) disposition to work; (G) adherence to reasonable rules and regulations; and (H) other job related qualifications required by an employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carter v. Labor Commission Appeals Board (Court of Appeals of Utah 2006, 566 Utah Adv. Rep. 27)“…n of Utah Code section 84A-5-106(1)(a)()(C) of the Act. See Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106(1)(a)()(C) (2005) ("An employer may not…”
- Buckner v. Kennard (Utah Supreme Court 2004, 508 Utah Adv. Rep. 26)“…idiscrimination Act prohibits certain employment practices. Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106 (2001). However, the exclusive remedy f…”
- Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc. (Utah Supreme Court 2006, 565 Utah Adv. Rep. 15)“…national origin, sex, religion, pregnancy, or disability, Utah Code Ann. § 34A-5-106 (2005) (prohibiting employers from maki…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 34A-6-203Discharge or retaliation against employee prohibited.In force
(1) A person may not discharge or in any way retaliate against an employee because the employee: (a) files a complaint or institutes or causes to be instituted a proceeding under or related to this chapter; (b) testifies or is about to testify in any proceeding under or related to this chapter; or (c) exercises a right granted by this chapter on behalf of the employee or others. (2) (a) An employee who believes that the employee has been discharged or otherwise retaliated against by any person in violation of this section may, within 30 days after the violation occurs, file a complaint with the division alleging discharge or retaliation in violation of this section. (b) (i) Upon receipt of the complaint, the division shall cause an investigation to be made. (ii) The division may employ investigators as necessary to carry out the purpose of this Subsection (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Graham v. Albertsons (Utah Supreme Court 2020, 2020 UT 15)“…ating against an employee for filing a UOSHA complaint. See UTAH CODE § 34A-6-203. ¶3 The Division found Albertson‘s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Utah Code, Title 67: State Officers and Employees
§ 67-21-3Reporting of governmental waste or violations of law -- Employer action -- Exceptions.In force
(1) (a) An employer may not take retaliatory action against an employee because the employee, or a person authorized to act on behalf of the employee, communicates in good faith: (i) the waste or misuse of public funds, property, or manpower; (ii) a violation or suspected violation of a law, rule, or regulation adopted under the law of this state, a political subdivision of this state, or any recognized entity of the United States; or (iii) as it relates to a state government employer: (A) gross mismanagement; (B) abuse of authority; or (C) unethical conduct.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hall v. Utah State Department of Corrections (Utah Supreme Court 2001, 419 Utah Adv. Rep. 16)“…ion or suspected violation of a law, rule, or regulation." Utah Code Ann. § 67-21-3 (1)(a). As its primary mechanism of enf…”
- Peterson v. Browning (Utah Supreme Court 1992, 187 Utah Adv. Rep. 3)“…ted States, " the Utah Protection of Public Employees Act, Utah Code Ann. § 67-21-3 (1) (emphasis added), discussed supra…”
- Zimmerman v. Univ. of Utah & Dr. William McMahon (Utah Supreme Court 2018, 417 P.3d 78)“…others) arising under the Utah Constitution and the UPPEA, Utah Code section 67-21-3. We state the facts of relevance to her…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Utah Protection of Public Employees Act (Utah Code Chapter 67-21)(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 67-21-3 - Reporting of governmental waste or violations(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-5-102 - Antidiscrimination Act definitions(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-5-106 - Discriminatory and prohibited employment practices(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34A-6-203 - Occupational Safety and Health protections(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-28-19 - Payment of Wages retaliation protections(le.utah.gov).gov
- Utah Code 34-23-402 - Employment of Minors(le.utah.gov).gov