Idaho
Idaho Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 15 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Idaho's lemon law, codified at Idaho Code § 48-903, protects buyers and lessees of new motor vehicles under 12,000 pounds. A vehicle qualifies when the same defect persists after four or more repair attempts, or the vehicle sits out of service for 30 or more cumulative business days, within two years or 24,000 miles. The manufacturer must then refund or replace the vehicle, but the consumer can reject any replacement offer and require a refund instead.
Idaho's lemon law gives consumers strong protections when a new vehicle turns out to be defective. Formally called the Motor Vehicle Warranties Act, this statute is found in Idaho Code §§ 48-901 through 48-913. If a manufacturer or its authorized dealers cannot fix a covered defect after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the manufacturer must provide a full refund or a comparable replacement vehicle. Under Idaho Code § 48-903, the manufacturer selects the remedy, but the consumer may reject any offered replacement and require a refund instead.
This guide covers every section of Idaho's lemon law, including which vehicles qualify, how the repair attempt presumption works, available remedies, the arbitration process, and deadlines for filing a claim.
What Vehicles Does Idaho's Lemon Law Cover
Under Idaho Code § 48-901, the lemon law applies to specific types of motor vehicles purchased or leased in Idaho. Understanding which vehicles qualify is the first step in evaluating a potential claim.

Covered Vehicle Types
- New passenger cars: Sedans, coupes, hatchbacks, and similar vehicles
- Trucks and SUVs: Pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles under 12,000 pounds gross weight
- Vans and minivans: Including passenger and cargo configurations under weight limits
- Electric and hybrid vehicles: EVs and hybrids qualify under the same rules as gasoline-powered vehicles, as long as they are new and under 12,000 pounds
- Leased vehicles: Consumer leases exceeding four months
- Transferred vehicles: Vehicles transferred to a new owner during the warranty period, as long as the transfer is not for resale
Vehicles Not Covered
- Motorcycles: Excluded under the definition in Idaho Code § 49-107
- Farm tractors: Excluded under Idaho Code § 49-114
- Trailers: Excluded under Idaho Code § 49-121
- Vehicles over 12,000 pounds: Heavy trucks and large commercial vehicles
- Used vehicles sold without manufacturer warranty: Vehicles no longer covered by the original warranty
- Vehicles purchased for resale: Dealer inventory and wholesale purchases
Who Qualifies as a Consumer
Idaho law defines a "consumer" as the purchaser or lessee of a new motor vehicle used for personal, business, family, or household purposes. This definition also extends to any person who receives the vehicle through a transfer during the warranty period, provided the transfer is not for resale or sublease.
How the Lemon Law Presumption Works
Idaho Code § 48-903 creates a legal presumption that shifts the burden to the manufacturer once certain thresholds are met. When the presumption applies, the manufacturer must prove the vehicle does not qualify for relief.
Conditions That Trigger the Presumption
| Condition | Requirement | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Same defect repaired repeatedly | 4 or more repair attempts | Within warranty, 2 years from delivery, or 24,000 miles (whichever is earliest) |
| Safety defect (brakes or steering) | 1 or more repair attempts for complete failure | Within warranty, 2 years from delivery, or 24,000 miles (whichever is earliest) |
| Vehicle out of service for repairs | 30 or more cumulative business days | Within warranty, 2 years from delivery, or 24,000 miles (whichever is earliest) |
The safety defect threshold is notably consumer-friendly. If the braking or steering system has a complete failure that is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, only one repair attempt is needed to trigger the presumption.
Repairs Continue Even After the Warranty Expires
Idaho law does not let a manufacturer run out the clock mid-repair. Under Idaho Code § 48-902, if a nonconformity is reported to the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer within the warranty term, 2 years from delivery, or 24,000 miles, whichever is earliest, the manufacturer must still complete the repair even after that warranty term, mileage limit, or 2-year period has expired. This does not extend the reporting deadline itself, only the manufacturer's duty to finish repairs it was notified about on time.
What Counts as a Covered Defect
The defect or condition must "impair the use or market value" of the vehicle. Common qualifying defects include:
- Engine or transmission failures
- Brake system malfunctions
- Steering system problems
- Electrical system failures affecting vehicle operation
- Persistent check engine or warning lights tied to a real malfunction
- Air conditioning or heating system defects
- Water leaks causing interior damage
- Battery or drivetrain failures in electric vehicles
Cosmetic issues that do not affect use or market value generally do not qualify.
Written Notice Requirement
Before the presumption can apply against a manufacturer, the consumer must provide prior written notification about the defect to the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized dealer. If the consumer gives notice to the dealer, the dealer must forward it to the manufacturer by certified mail with return receipt requested.
This written notice step is mandatory. Without it, the presumption does not apply, even if the repair attempt thresholds have been met.
Consumer Remedies Under Idaho's Lemon Law
When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon, Idaho Code § 48-903 sets out the mandatory remedies. The manufacturer must either replace the vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle or accept return and provide a full refund. The statute gives the manufacturer the initial choice between those two options. However, if the manufacturer offers a replacement vehicle, the consumer has the right to reject it and require a refund instead.
Option 1: Full Refund (Buyback)
If a refund is provided, the manufacturer must pay:
- Full purchase price: Up to 105% of the manufacturer's suggested retail price
- Trade-in value: The value of any vehicle traded in at purchase
- Manufacturer-installed options: Cost of all factory options
- Dealer-installed options: Options installed within 30 days of delivery (subject to the 105% cap)
- Sales and excise tax: Proportional tax refund
- License and registration fees: All DMV costs
- Towing expenses: Costs incurred because of warranty repairs
- Rental vehicle expenses: Costs incurred while the vehicle was out of service
Usage Deduction: The manufacturer may subtract a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle. Idaho law provides a specific formula:
Usage Deduction = (Purchase Price x Miles at Arbitration Hearing) / 120,000
For example, if a vehicle costs $40,000 and the consumer has driven 10,000 miles at the time of the arbitration hearing, the usage deduction would be approximately $3,333.
Option 2: Replacement Vehicle
If the manufacturer offers a replacement, key rules apply:
- The replacement must be a comparable motor vehicle
- The replacement must come with a full manufacturer warranty
- All incidental costs (tax, registration, towing, rental) must be reimbursed
- The consumer can reject the replacement and demand a refund instead
Refund Distribution
Refunds must be paid to both the consumer and any lienholder (such as a bank or credit union) as their interests appear on the records of the Idaho Transportation Department's Division of Motor Vehicles.
Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a Lemon Law Claim
Successfully pursuing a lemon law claim in Idaho requires careful documentation and strict adherence to the proper sequence of steps.
Step 1: Document Everything From the Start
Good documentation is the foundation of any lemon law claim. Keep the following records:
- All repair orders and invoices showing dates and descriptions of work
- A written log of every date your vehicle was in the shop
- Descriptions of the symptoms you experienced, with dates
- All letters, emails, and other correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Photos or videos of the defect when possible
- Notes from phone calls, including the name of the person you spoke with
Step 2: Send Written Notice to the Manufacturer
Idaho law requires written notification before the lemon law presumption applies. Your notice should include:
- Your full name and contact information
- Vehicle details: year, make, model, and vehicle identification number (VIN)
- A clear description of the nonconformity or defect
- A summary of all repair attempts with dates
- Your requested remedy (refund or replacement)
Send this notice by certified mail with return receipt requested. Keep a copy for your records.
Step 3: Allow the Manufacturer a Reasonable Opportunity to Repair
The manufacturer must receive at least one opportunity to attempt repair after written notice. Continue to bring the vehicle in for repairs as needed and document each visit.
Step 4: Participate in the Manufacturer's Arbitration Program
Under Idaho Code § 48-906, if the manufacturer has established a certified informal dispute settlement mechanism, the consumer must use it before filing a lawsuit. Most major manufacturers participate in programs like the BBB AUTO LINE or the National Center for Dispute Settlement.
Step 5: File a Civil Lawsuit if Necessary
If arbitration does not resolve your claim to your satisfaction, you may file a civil action in Idaho district court under Idaho Code § 48-909. The court can award costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney's fees.
Filing a Complaint With the Attorney General
You can also file a consumer complaint with the Idaho Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division. While the Attorney General cannot represent you as your private attorney, the office can investigate patterns of manufacturer misconduct and take enforcement action. Lemon law violations are treated as violations of Idaho's Consumer Protection Act.
The Arbitration Process Explained
Arbitration plays a central role in Idaho's lemon law framework. Here is what to expect.
How Arbitration Works
Under Idaho Code § 48-906, any manufacturer doing business in Idaho must operate or participate in an informal dispute settlement mechanism that complies with federal regulations under 16 CFR Part 703.
- You may present evidence, testimony, and documentation
- You can inform the arbitrator about recent repair attempts
- The manufacturer must provide any relevant technical service bulletins that apply to your defect
- A written decision must be issued in a timely manner
Are Arbitration Decisions Binding
Under Idaho Code § 48-907, arbitration decisions are nonbinding on both parties unless they agree otherwise. Either party may remove the decision to district court for a trial de novo (a brand-new trial). A manufacturer that wants to appeal must file within 30 days of receiving the decision.
Treble Damages for Bad Faith Appeals
Idaho Code § 48-908 provides powerful protection for consumers. If a court determines that a manufacturer removed an arbitration decision in bad faith, by asserting a frivolous claim or defense, or by taking an unfounded position solely to delay recovery, the court must award the consumer three times the actual damages, plus costs and attorney's fees.
This treble damages provision discourages manufacturers from using appeals as a delay tactic.
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise several affirmative defenses under Idaho Code § 48-903 to avoid lemon law liability.
| Defense | Manufacturer's Argument | How Consumers Can Respond |
|---|---|---|
| No substantial impairment | Defect does not impair use or market value | Document how the defect affects daily driving and resale value |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | Owner caused the defect through misuse | Provide complete maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | Aftermarket parts caused the issue | Show the defect existed before modifications or is unrelated |
| No written notice | Consumer did not notify the manufacturer | Provide copies of certified mail receipts |
| Insufficient repair attempts | Manufacturer was not given a reasonable chance | Present the full repair history with dates, mileage, and outcomes |
Leased Vehicle Rights Under Idaho's Lemon Law
Idaho Code § 48-904 guarantees that consumers who lease new vehicles have the same rights as purchasers, with a few differences.
What Lessees Can Recover
If a leased vehicle qualifies as a lemon, the manufacturer must refund:
- All lease payments made by the consumer
- Any deposit paid at lease signing
- Sales tax and registration fees
- Early termination costs owed to the lessor
- Towing and rental vehicle expenses
For leased vehicles, the usage deduction works differently: the refund is reduced by the lease payments the consumer already made up to the refund award date, not by the 120,000-mile purchase-price formula that applies to purchased vehicles.
Important Difference for Lessees
Lessees are entitled to a refund only. They cannot demand a replacement vehicle. The leased vehicle is returned to the manufacturer, and the lease is terminated after all charges are settled.
Lessor Rights
The motor vehicle lessor (the leasing company) is entitled to receive any lease amounts still owed that the consumer has not yet paid.
Resale of Returned Lemon Vehicles
Under Idaho Code § 48-905, Idaho regulates what happens to vehicles returned under the lemon law.
If a vehicle was returned because of a complete failure of the braking or steering system that was likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, and the failure has not been corrected by the manufacturer, that vehicle may not be resold in Idaho. This rule protects future buyers from unknowingly purchasing a vehicle with a life-threatening defect.
For other returned lemon vehicles where the defect has been repaired, the manufacturer must comply with applicable disclosure requirements before reselling or re-leasing the vehicle.
Used Vehicle Protections
Idaho's lemon law is designed for new vehicles. However, used vehicle buyers may have other legal options.
Remaining Manufacturer Warranty
If you buy a used vehicle that is still covered by the original manufacturer's warranty, you may qualify for lemon law protection. The key requirement is that the vehicle was transferred to you during the warranty period and not for resale purposes.
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301) is the federal backstop for vehicle warranty disputes. It applies to any consumer product sold with a written warranty, including both new and used vehicles. Under Magnuson-Moss, a manufacturer that fails to honor its written warranty may be liable for damages, costs, and attorney's fees in federal court. This federal remedy works alongside Idaho's state lemon law and can be pursued at the same time.
Idaho Consumer Protection Act
Used vehicle buyers may also have remedies under Idaho's general Consumer Protection Act if the seller engaged in deceptive or fraudulent sales practices.
Statute of Limitations and Deadlines
Understanding filing deadlines is critical. Missing a deadline can forfeit your rights entirely.
Under Idaho Code § 48-910, these deadlines apply:
- Primary period: Claims must be filed within 3 years of the original delivery date
- Post-arbitration appeal: If you participated in arbitration and are unhappy with the result, you must file an appeal within 3 months of the final arbitration decision
- Tolling provisions: Deadlines are extended during war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disasters when repair services are unavailable
Relationship to Other Remedies
Idaho Code § 48-911 clarifies that the lemon law does not limit any other rights or remedies available to consumers under other state or federal laws. You can pursue multiple legal theories at the same time.
Dealer Liability
Under Idaho Code § 48-913, the lemon law does not create liability for dealers, except for written express warranties that the dealer makes separately from the manufacturer's warranty. In most cases, lemon law claims are directed at the manufacturer, not the dealership.
However, if a dealer makes specific written promises about a vehicle's condition that go beyond the manufacturer's warranty, those promises can be enforced under this statute.
More Idaho Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts does Idaho require before a vehicle qualifies as a lemon?
Under Idaho Code § 48-903, a vehicle may qualify as a lemon after four or more repair attempts for the same defect, or one repair attempt for a complete failure of the braking or steering system likely to cause death or serious bodily injury. The vehicle also qualifies if it has been out of service for 30 or more cumulative business days for warranty repairs. These conditions must occur within the express warranty term, two years from delivery, or 24,000 miles, whichever comes first.
Does Idaho's lemon law cover used cars?
Idaho's Motor Vehicle Warranties Act specifically covers new vehicles. However, if you purchase a used vehicle still covered by the original manufacturer's warranty, you may have lemon law protection for defects that occur during that warranty period. The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and Idaho's Consumer Protection Act may also provide remedies for used vehicle buyers.
Does Idaho's lemon law cover electric vehicles and hybrids?
Yes. Idaho's lemon law covers any new motor vehicle under 12,000 pounds purchased or leased for personal, business, family, or household use. This includes electric vehicles and hybrids. Common EV-specific defects like battery failures, drivetrain malfunctions, and charging system problems can all qualify as covered nonconformities if they impair the vehicle's use or market value.
Who decides whether I get a refund or a replacement vehicle in Idaho?
Under Idaho Code § 48-903, the manufacturer has the initial choice between providing a refund or a comparable replacement vehicle. However, if the manufacturer offers a replacement, you have the right to reject it and require a refund instead. You cannot be forced to accept a replacement vehicle you do not want.
What is the maximum refund I can receive under Idaho's lemon law?
The maximum refund is capped at 105% of the manufacturer's suggested retail price, including all manufacturer-installed options and dealer-installed options added within 30 days of delivery. The manufacturer will also refund sales tax, registration fees, and towing and rental expenses. A usage deduction is subtracted based on the formula: (purchase price x miles driven) divided by 120,000.
Do I need a lawyer to file an Idaho lemon law claim?
You are not required to hire a lawyer, but legal representation can improve your chances of a favorable outcome. Idaho Code § 48-909 allows the court to award reasonable attorney's fees to a consumer who wins a civil action. Many lemon law attorneys offer free initial consultations and work on a contingency basis, meaning you pay nothing unless you win.
What happens if the manufacturer appeals the arbitration decision in bad faith?
Under Idaho Code § 48-908, if the court finds that a manufacturer removed an arbitration decision in bad faith, asserted a frivolous claim or defense, or took an unfounded position solely to delay recovery, the court must award the consumer treble damages (three times the actual damages), plus costs and attorney's fees.
Can a lemon vehicle be resold in Idaho?
It depends on the defect. Under Idaho Code § 48-905, if a vehicle was returned because of a complete failure of the braking or steering system likely to cause death or serious bodily injury and that failure has not been repaired, the vehicle cannot be resold in Idaho. For other returned lemon vehicles where the defect has been corrected, resale is permitted with proper disclosure.
Updates
Removed an inaccurate claim that Idaho extends lemon law repair rights to three years from delivery; the statute's real rule is that a manufacturer must finish repairing a defect reported within the normal 2-year/24,000-mile window even if that window expires before the repair is done.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Idaho Code
§ 48-903Manufacturer’s duty to refund or replaceIn force
48-903. Manufacturer’s duty to refund or replace. (1) If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which impairs the use or market value of the motor…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-901Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:In force
48-901. Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: (1) "Consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than for purposes of resale or sublease, of a new motor vehicle used for personal business use, personal, family or household purposes, or a person…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-904Manufacturer’s duty to consumers with leased vehicles. A consumer who leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights against the manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a new motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the manufacturer must accept return of the consumer’s leased vehicle pursuant to section 48-903, Idaho Code, then the consumer lessee is not entitled to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled only to a refund as provided in this section. In such a case, the consumer’s leased vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer’s written lease with the motor vehicle lessor must be terminated after all charges are settled. The manufacturer shall provide the consumer with a full refund of all costs and charges described below less a reasonable allowance for use. The manufacturer shall provide to the consumer a refund of the pro rata amount of any down payment paid by the consumer on the written lease. The pro rata amount of such a refund shall be the amount of the down payment divided by the number of months of the lease agreement and that amount multiplied by the number of months remaining after the date of the arbitration. The manufacturer shall also refund to the consumer amounts identified as additional charges set forth in section 48-903, Idaho Code, if actually paid by the consumer. The reasonable allowance for use shall be the lease payments made by the consumer until the time of the award of a refund. The manufacturer shall provide the motor vehicle lessor or its assignee with a full refund of the early termination charges plus the residual value of the vehicle, as specified in the lease agreement. The amount of any refund by the manufacturer to the consumer for the pro rata portion of the down payment plus the amount of the refund to the motor vehicle lessor or its assignee by the manufacturer shall not exceed one hundred five percent (105%) of the vehicle’s original manufacturer’s suggested retail priceIn force
48-904. Manufacturer’s duty to consumers with leased vehicles. A consumer who leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights against the manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a new motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the manufacturer must accept return of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-905Resale or re-lease of returned motor vehicleIn force
48-905. Resale or re-lease of returned motor vehicle. (1) If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of section 48-903, Idaho Code, or a similar statute of another state, whether as the result of a legal action or as the result of an informal dispute settlement proceeding, it may not…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-906Alternative dispute settlement mechanismIn force
48-906. Alternative dispute settlement mechanism. (1) Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering into franchise agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this state, or offering express warranties on its motor vehicles sold or distributed for sale in this state shall operate, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-907Effect and admissibility of decision by informal dispute settlement mechanism. The decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism required by this chapter is nonbinding on the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Any party, upon application, may remove the decision to district court for a trial de novo. If the manufacturer is aggrieved by the decision of the informal dispute settlement mechanism, an application to remove the decision must be filed in the district court within thirtyIn force
48-907. Effect and admissibility of decision by informal dispute settlement mechanism. The decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism required by this chapter is nonbinding on the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-908Treble damages for bad faith appeal of decision. If the district court finds that a party has removed a decision of an informal dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous and costly to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position solely to delay recovery by the other party, then the court shall award to the prevailing party threeIn force
48-908. Treble damages for bad faith appeal of decision. If the district court finds that a party has removed a decision of an informal dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous and costly to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-909Civil remedy. Any consumer injured by a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action to enforce this chapter and recover costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in the civil action. However, the provisions of this section do not include recovery of attorney’s fees previously incurred in the course of informal dispute resolution. In addition to the remedies provided herein, the attorney general may, when in the public interest, bring an action pursuant to the Idaho consumer protection act, chapter 6, title 48, Idaho Code, against any manufacturer for violation of this chapter. For purposes of such action, violations of this chapter shall be deemed to be violations of Idaho’s consumer protection act. In any such action, the attorney general and district court shall have the same authority as is granted the attorney general and district court under the Idaho consumer protection actIn force
48-909. Civil remedy. Any consumer injured by a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action to enforce this chapter and recover costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in the civil action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 48-910Limitation on actions. A civil action brought under this chapter must be commenced within threeIn force
48-910. Limitation on actions. A civil action brought under this chapter must be commenced within three (3) years of the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, except that if the consumer applies to an informal dispute settlement mechanism within three (3) years of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
United States Code Title 15
§ 2301DefinitionsIn forcecited in 39 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter: The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,671 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (1986) held that except where Magnuson-Moss expressly prescribes a rule, the Act applies state written and implied warranty law, citing Section 2301(7)'s definition of implied warranty as one arising under state law. Birdsong v. Apple (2009) dismissed Act claims once the state warranty claims failed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000)✓Ford owners sought nationwide classes over transmissions that slipped from park into reverse; reading Section 2301(7) and (6), the D.C. Circuit held Magnuson-Moss applies state warranty law except where the Act expressly prescribes a rule, and vacated class certification.
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 590 F.3d 955)✓iPod buyers alleged the player risked hearing loss; because Section 2301(7) ties implied warranty to state law, the Ninth Circuit treated the Magnuson-Moss claim as standing or falling with the California warranty claims and affirmed dismissal once those failed.
- Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 377 F.3d 1034)“…gnizable under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. This consumer dis…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Washington Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Florida Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Idaho Motor Vehicle Warranties Act - Full Chapter Text(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-901 - Definitions(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-903 - Manufacturer Duty to Refund or Replace(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-904 - Leased Vehicle Rights(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-905 - Resale or Re-Lease of Returned Motor Vehicle(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-906 - Informal Dispute Settlement Mechanism(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-907 - Effect of Dispute Settlement Decision(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-908 - Treble Damages for Bad Faith Appeal(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-909 - Civil Remedy(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code § 48-910 - Limitation on Actions(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Attorney General Consumer Protection Division(ag.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Attorney General Lemon Law Guide (PDF)(ag.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Transportation Department - Division of Motor Vehicles(itd.idaho.gov).gov
- Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act(ftc.gov).gov
- NHTSA Vehicle Complaints and Recalls(nhtsa.gov).gov