West Virginia
West Virginia Police Body Camera Laws: FOIA & Public Access
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

West Virginia has no statute requiring police to wear body cameras or governing when the public can get a copy of footage. Whether an agency uses cameras, and how it responds to a records request for them, runs through the state's general Freedom of Information Act.
This guide is part of our Police Bodycam Laws by State series.
Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses West Virginia law governing police body cameras: the absence of a body-camera-specific statute, the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act framework that governs footage requests, and how that framework has played out in a real case. It does not address a civilian's right to record law enforcement, which is covered separately in our guide to recording laws.
Does West Virginia require police to wear body cameras?
No. West Virginia has no statute requiring any law enforcement agency to equip its officers with body cameras, and no statute setting statewide rules for when a camera must be recording. Adoption, funding, and activation policy are decided by each city, county, or state agency on its own. The West Virginia State Police, the state's largest law enforcement agency, has expanded body camera use across its detachments as a matter of internal policy, not a legislative mandate. Municipal departments have moved at different speeds: Charleston's police department used grant funding to add roughly 90 body cameras and later authorized a contract extension with Motorola Solutions for up to 180 cameras running through 2028. Neither West Virginia's 2023, 2024, 2025, nor 2026 regular legislative sessions produced a bill requiring statewide bodycam adoption. The closest recent legislative activity, a 2025 measure known as Senate Bill 688, addressed law enforcement use of facial recognition and artificial intelligence surveillance tools, not body-worn cameras specifically.

Is West Virginia bodycam footage a public record?
Whether a member of the public can obtain body camera footage is not addressed by a bodycam-specific statute. It runs through the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq. Under § 29B-1-1, public records are presumed open unless a specific statutory exemption applies, and West Virginia courts have held that FOIA's disclosure provisions are to be liberally construed while its exemptions are construed narrowly. Video captured by a police department is a public record for FOIA purposes, but agencies routinely invoke the law-enforcement investigatory-records exemption at W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4(a)(4), which lets a custodian withhold "records of law-enforcement agencies that deal with the detection and investigation of crime" along with internal law-enforcement records maintained for internal use. That exemption is not automatic or unlimited in theory, but the statute itself sets no clock for when investigatory footage becomes disclosable, unlike some other states' bodycam-specific laws.
How do you request bodycam footage under West Virginia's FOIA?
A written request goes to the custodian of the agency that holds the recording, typically the department's own records officer. Under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3(d), the custodian must respond as soon as practicable, but no later than five days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, either producing the record or stating in writing the specific exemption relied on to deny it. Copying fees are limited to the agency's actual reproduction cost under § 29B-1-3(e); that subsection does not let a custodian bill a requester for staff search time or labor spent locating the footage. A requester whose FOIA request is denied can pursue injunctive or declaratory relief in the circuit court of the county where the record is kept, under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-5, and a court can order production of improperly withheld records.
| Question | West Virginia rule |
|---|---|
| Statewide camera mandate | No |
| Governing access statute | General FOIA, W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq. (no bodycam-specific law) |
| Standard response deadline | 5 days, excluding weekends and legal holidays (§ 29B-1-3(d)) |
| Most-used withholding ground | Law-enforcement investigatory-records exemption (§ 29B-1-4(a)(4)) |
| Retention period | Set by each agency; no statewide statutory schedule |
| Court remedy for denial | Circuit court injunctive or declaratory relief (§ 29B-1-5) |
Edmond Exline and the limits of West Virginia's FOIA exemption
On February 12, 2023, West Virginia State Police Trooper Thomas Ellis responded to a report of an intoxicated man walking along Interstate 81 in Martinsburg. Ellis drew his weapon on 45-year-old Edmond Exline without apparent justification, then pursued him across the interstate and tased him three times. Backup troopers Abraham Bean and Brandon Mason arrived believing, based on unclear radio traffic, that Ellis had been shot. That misunderstanding led them to strike Exline with a flashlight and deliver additional compliance strikes. Exline died at the scene; an autopsy attributed his death to multiple blunt force injuries, multiple taser discharges, psychiatric illness with agitation, and heart disease.
Body camera footage existed from both Ellis's and Bean's cameras, but initial FOIA requests for the video were denied while the case remained under investigation, the kind of denial § 29B-1-4(a)(4) is commonly used to support. The footage stayed out of public view for roughly a year and a half. It surfaced only in July 2024, after attorney John-Mark Atkinson, representing Exline's estate, released it following a $1 million settlement of the family's wrongful-death and excessive-force lawsuit against the State Police. An internal State Police investigation later sustained findings against Ellis for unnecessary force and interfering with citizens' rights, while complaints against Bean and Mason were not sustained given their belief that Ellis had been shot. The FBI and a Berkeley County grand jury separately declined to bring criminal charges. The case illustrates how West Virginia's investigatory-records exemption can keep bodycam footage confidential for well over a year, with civil litigation, rather than the FOIA request itself, ultimately producing the release.
Is it illegal to record police in West Virginia?
That is a separate question from the one this page addresses. West Virginia generally recognizes a person's right to record an on-duty officer performing public duties in a public place. For a full explanation of that right and how it differs from the rules on police-generated bodycam footage discussed here, see Is It Illegal to Record Someone?
More West Virginia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does West Virginia require police officers to wear body cameras?
No. West Virginia has no statute mandating body cameras for any law enforcement agency. Adoption and activation rules are set locally by each department, and no bill enacted through the 2026 legislative session has changed that.
Is police bodycam footage a public record in West Virginia?
It can be, but there is no bodycam-specific access statute. Requests run through the general Freedom of Information Act, W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq., and agencies often invoke the law-enforcement investigatory-records exemption while a case is open.
How long does a West Virginia agency have to respond to a FOIA request for bodycam footage?
Generally five days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3(d).
Can West Virginia police withhold bodycam footage during an investigation?
Often yes. W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4(a)(4) lets a custodian withhold records tied to a law-enforcement investigation, as happened with footage of Edmond Exline's 2023 death, which was not released until after a 2024 civil settlement.
What can I do if a West Virginia agency denies my bodycam footage request?
A requester can seek injunctive or declaratory relief in circuit court under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-5, which can order production of improperly withheld records.
Does West Virginia set a specific body camera retention period?
Not by statute. West Virginia has no statewide law setting a minimum retention period for bodycam video; individual agencies, including the State Police, set their own schedules.
Is it illegal to record on-duty police in West Virginia?
No, recording an on-duty officer performing public duties in a public place is generally protected. That is a separate question from public access to police-recorded bodycam footage covered on this page.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the pinpoint citation for West Virginia's 5-day FOIA response deadline (from subsection (a), the general right-to-inspect clause, to subsection (d), where the deadline is actually set) and the actual-cost fee cap (to subsection (e)) across all four places this appeared on the page.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 29B-1-3Inspection and copying of public record; requests of Freedom of Information Act requests registry.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Every person has a right to inspect or copy any public record of a public body in this state, except as otherwise expressly provided by section four of this article. (b) A request to inspect or copy any public record of a public body shall be made directly to the custodian of such public record. (c) The custodian of any public records, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute, shall furnish proper and reasonable opportunities for inspection and examination of the records in his or her office and reasonable facilities for making memoranda or abstracts therefrom, during the usual business hours, to all persons having occasion to make examination of them. The custodian of the records may make reasonable rules and regulations necessary for the protection of the records and to prevent interference with the regular discharge of his or her duties. If the records requested exist in magnetic, electronic or computer form, the custodian of the records shall make copies available on magnetic or electronic media, if so requested. (d) All requests for information must state with reasonable specificity the information sought.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John Crandell, III v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2023)“…ect[] and examin[e]” the documents that he sought. W. Va. Code Ann. § 29B-1-3(c). And the record does not reveal…”
- Crandell v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 2020)“…g Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. W.Va. Code § 29B-1-3.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Requests and Fees (2026)
§ 29B-1-4Exemptions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) There is a presumption of public accessibility to all public records, subject only to the following categories of information which are specifically exempt from disclosure under this article: (1) Trade secrets, as used in this section, which may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is not patented which is known only to certain individuals within a commercial concern who are using it to fabricate, produce, or compound an article or trade or a service or to locate minerals or other substances, having commercial value, and which gives its users an opportunity to obtain business advantage over competitors; (2) Information of a personal nature such as that kept in a personal, medical, or similar file, if the public disclosure of the information would constitute an unreasonable invasion of privacy, unless the public interest by clear and convincing evidence requires disclosure in this particular instance: Provided, That this article does not preclude an individual from inspecting or copying his or her own personal, medical, or similar file; (3) Test…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stoneman v. Bear (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2022)“…l to obtain the videotape under FOIA. The court held under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4(a)(19), the applicable West Virginia F…”
- Elswick v. Johnson (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2020)“…the request for information was denied under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4(a)(4) because the inv…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Police Report: How to Get a Crash Report, Incident Report, or Body Camera Footage
§ 29B-1-1Declaration of policy.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
Pursuant to the fundamental philosophy of the American Constitutional form of representative government which holds to the principle that government is the servant of the people, and not the master of them, it is hereby declared to be the public policy of the State of West Virginia that all persons are, unless otherwise expressly provided by law, entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those who represent them as public officials and employees. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments of government they have created. To that end, the provisions of this article shall be liberally construed with the view of carrying out the above declaration of public policy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Brothers Construction Company of Ohio, Incorporated, United States of America v. Tri-State Asphalt Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2000, 219 F.3d 300)“…irginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), see W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 to -7 (Michie 1998), and obtained an au…”
- Better Government Bureau, Inc. v. McGraw (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1997, 106 F.3d 582)“…General under the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act, W. Va.Code §§ 29B-1-1 to 29B-1-7. The Attorney General assert…”
- United States v. Brothers Const (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2000)“…er the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), see W. Va. Code§ 29B-1-1 to -7 (Michie 1998), and obtained an au…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Public Records Laws by State: FOIA Guide for All 50 States (2026)
§ 29B-1-5Enforcement.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Any person denied the right to inspect the public record of a public body may institute proceedings for injunctive or declaratory relief in the circuit court in the county where the public record is kept. (2) In any suit filed under subsection one of this section, the court has jurisdiction to enjoin the custodian or public body from withholding records and to order the production of any records improperly withheld from the person seeking disclosure. The court shall determine the matter de novo and the burden is on the public body to sustain its action. The court, on its own motion, may view the documents in controversy in camera before reaching a decision. Any custodian of any public records of the public body found to be in noncompliance with the order of the court to produce the documents or disclose the information sought, may be punished as being in contempt of court. (3) Except as to causes the court considers of greater importance, proceedings arising under subsection one of this section shall be assigned for hearing and trial at the earliest practicable date.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Crandell v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 2020)“…ract claim and the Freedom of Information Act claim under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-5. Discovery was completed by the pa…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1, West Virginia Freedom of Information Act, declaration of policy(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4, exemptions from disclosure, including the law-enforcement investigatory records exemption(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3, procedure for requesting records, response deadline and fees(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 29B-1-5, court remedies for denial of inspection(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Open Government Guide: West Virginia(rcfp.org)
- WCHS-TV, Body cam footage released after man dies in W.Va. State Police custody along I-81(wchstv.com)
- WCHS-TV, Internal report cites trooper for unnecessary force in man's death on I-81 in Martinsburg(wchstv.com)