EnglishEspañol
Massachusetts flag

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Name Change Laws: Petitions Are Now Impounded by Default

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 11, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 11, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Massachusetts Name Change Laws: Petitions Are Now Impounded by Default

Frequently Asked Questions

Is my Massachusetts name change public record?

As of November 25, 2025, no, not by default. Petitions filed on or after that date are impounded, meaning sealed from public inspection, unless the court orders otherwise for good cause or you request access.

Do I still have to publish a newspaper notice in Massachusetts?

Not by default. As of the November 25, 2025 amendment, the court may require publication only for good cause shown. Before that date, the statute required notice except for good cause shown.

How much does a Massachusetts name change cost?

Court fees are $165, made up of a $150 filing fee and a $15 surcharge, rising to $180 if the court orders notice and a $15 citation issues. If the court orders published notice, the newspaper's publication charge is separate and is paid by the petitioner, so a published case costs more than $180 in total.

What standard applies to changing a child's name in Massachusetts?

The best interests of the child. Massachusetts appellate courts have held that the adult public-interest language in G.L. c.210 §12 does not displace the best interests standard for a child's surname, and judges weigh factors set out in Jones v. Roe, 33 Mass. App. Ct. 660, 664 (1992).

Can I choose my surname when I get married in Massachusetts?

Yes. Under G.L. c.46 §1D, each spouse can adopt either party's surname, keep their own, or hyphenate, through the marriage-license process, without a separate court filing.

How do I get my maiden name back after divorce in Massachusetts?

Ask the court granting the divorce under G.L. c.208 §23. It is discretionary, not automatic.

Was Massachusetts name-change law different before November 2025?

Yes. G.L. c.210 §13 previously required public notice except for good cause shown, and the amendment flipped that default and added automatic impoundment of the case record. The probation-commissioner report was not repealed: amended §13(a) still requires the court to request a report from the commissioner of probation before decreeing a change of name.

Updates

Corrected the standard for changing a child's name to the best interests of the child under Massachusetts appellate law, added the required minor forms and the notarized assent for a minor 12 or older, clarified that newspaper publication costs are paid by the petitioner on top of the $180 in court fees, confirmed the correct adult form as CJP 27, and corrected the statement implying the probation-commissioner report was repealed.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Sources and References

  1. Massachusetts General Laws, c.210 §12, Petition for Change of Name(malegislature.gov).gov
  2. Massachusetts General Laws, c.210 §13, Notice; Impoundment of Records (as amended eff. 2025-11-25)(malegislature.gov).gov
  3. Massachusetts General Laws, c.208 §23, Resumption of Maiden or Former Name(malegislature.gov).gov
  4. Massachusetts General Laws, c.46 §1D, Surname Following Marriage(malegislature.gov).gov
  5. Mass.gov, Court Filing Fees and Payment Information(mass.gov).gov
  6. Uniform Probate and Family Court Practice XXXV: Change of Name Actions (amended eff. 2026-01-06)(mass.gov)
  7. Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Filing Fees (change of name: $150 petition + $15 surcharge; citations $15; petitioner pays publication costs)(mass.gov)
  8. Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Forms for Adoption and Name Change (CJP 27, CJP 25, CJP 30, CJP 34)(mass.gov)
  9. Petition of Two Minors for Change of Name, 65 Mass. App. Ct. 850, 856 (2006) (best interests standard governs a child's surname change)(courtlistener.com)
  10. Cormier v. Quist, 77 Mass. App. Ct. 914, 915 (2010) (restating the best interests standard and the Jones v. Roe factors)(courtlistener.com)
Share: