Hawaii
Hawaii OVUII Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Hawaii the drunk-driving offense is called operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant (OVUII), and Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-61 makes it unlawful to drive with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or more. A first OVUII carries three mandatory items: a 14-hour rehabilitation program, a license revocation of one year to 18 months, and an ignition interlock device. On top of those, the court imposes any one or more of 72 hours of community service, 48 hours to five days in jail, or a $250 to $1,000 fine.
This guide is part of our DUI Laws by State series.
What counts as an OVUII in Hawaii
Hawaii's core impaired-driving statute, HRS 291E-61, defines OVUII two ways. A person commits the offense by operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs in an amount sufficient to impair the ability to drive, or by operating a vehicle with a BAC of 0.08 percent or more measured within three hours of driving. Because the impairment branch does not require a specific number, a driver below 0.08 can still be convicted if the State proves impairment. Commercial drivers face a 0.04 percent limit, and drivers under 21 fall under the zero-tolerance rule in HRS 291E-64, which bars operating after consuming a measurable amount of alcohol. The 0.08 figure is the federal benchmark adopted by every state except Utah, which uses 0.05 percent, as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration describes. A reading of 0.15 percent or more is treated as highly intoxicated and raises the mandatory minimums on a first offense.
First-offense OVUII penalties in Hawaii (jail, fines, suspension)
A first OVUII is a petty misdemeanor. Under HRS 291E-61, three items are mandatory on a first offense: a 14-hour minimum substance abuse rehabilitation program, a license revocation of not less than one year and not more than 18 months, and installation of an ignition interlock device on any vehicle the person operates during the revocation period.
The jail, community service, and fine are not a package. Subsection (b)(1)(D) directs the court to impose any one or more of the following: 72 hours of community service work; no less than 48 hours and no more than five days of imprisonment; or a fine of no less than $250 and no more than $1,000. A defendant can therefore leave court with a fine and no jail, or with community service and no fine.
A first offender who was a highly intoxicated driver, meaning a measured alcohol concentration of 0.15 or more, is sentenced under subsection (b)(4) to an additional mandatory 48 consecutive hours of imprisonment and an additional mandatory six-month revocation, and the revocation may not be less than 18 months. That added jail time has no community service alternative. Surcharges for the neurotrauma and trauma-system special funds are added on top of the base fine.

| First-offense item | Hawaii rule (statute) |
|---|---|
| Offense level | Petty misdemeanor (HRS 291E-61) |
| Jail, community service, or fine | Any one or more of: 72 hours community service; 48 hours to 5 days jail; $250 to $1,000 fine (HRS 291E-61(b)(1)(D)) |
| Surcharges | $25 neurotrauma special fund, plus up to $25 trauma system special fund if the court orders it |
| License revocation | 1 year to 18 months |
| Ignition interlock | Required during the revocation period |
| Rehabilitation | 14-hour minimum program |
| BAC 0.15 or more (first offense) | Added 48 consecutive hours of jail and an added 6-month revocation; revocation no less than 18 months (HRS 291E-61(b)(4)) |
| Look-back period | 10 years |
| Refusal revocation | 2 years (first refusal, HRS 291E-41) |
Watch out: The ADLRO administrative revocation and the criminal OVUII case run on separate tracks. You can resolve or beat the criminal charge and still lose your license through the ADLRO, and you generally must request an administrative hearing within a few days of arrest to contest it.
Ignition interlock requirements in Hawaii
Hawaii's ignition interlock rules are among the strictest in the country. Under HRS 291E-61, a first offender's sentence includes installation of an ignition interlock device on any vehicle the person operates during the revocation period. In practice, a first offender who wants to keep driving applies for an ignition interlock permit and installs the device during the revocation period, which runs one year to 18 months. That is not always the full term. Under HRS 291E-61(b)(6), a first offender who was not given an additional revocation period for a highly intoxicated reading or for carrying a passenger under 15 may move for early termination of the revocation after actually keeping the device on every vehicle for a continuous six months and then a further three continuous months without a violation. The motion must include a certified court abstract and a certified statement from the director of transportation, and the court may still decline if it finds that continued interlock use would further the person's rehabilitation or compliance. The device requires a breath sample before the engine starts and at random intervals while driving, and the driver pays for installation, monthly monitoring, and removal. For second and later offenses the interlock term scales up with the longer revocation periods, and a driver under a lifetime revocation must follow a separate ignition interlock permit process before driving again.
License revocation and the administrative (ADLRO) process in Hawaii
Hawaii runs two revocation tracks at once. The administrative track is handled by the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office (ADLRO), part of the state Judiciary, which acts on the arrest itself, independent of the criminal court outcome. The arresting officer issues a notice of administrative revocation that also serves as a temporary permit, and the driver may request a hearing to contest the revocation within the short statutory window. A first administrative revocation for failing the test runs at least one year. The criminal case under HRS 291E-61 carries its own court-ordered revocation of one year to 18 months. To reinstate, a driver must serve the revocation, complete the rehabilitation program, satisfy the interlock requirement, and pay reinstatement fees.
Repeat offenses and the Hawaii look-back period
Hawaii counts prior OVUII convictions within a 10-year look-back window, so penalties climb sharply for offenses inside that period. A second OVUII within 10 years carries five to 30 days of jail or no less than 240 hours of community service, a $1,000 to $3,000 fine, a 36-hour minimum treatment program, and a two-to-three-year revocation under HRS 291E-61. The felony threshold sits at the third offense: a person who has two or more prior OVUII convictions within 10 years, or a prior felony OVUII, commits habitually operating a vehicle under the influence under HRS 291E-61.5, a Class C felony. The sentence is either an indeterminate five-year term of imprisonment or five years of probation with at least 10 days in jail, a $2,000 to $5,000 fine, and a three-to-five-year revocation with an interlock. If the driver was highly intoxicated at 0.15 or more, HRS 291E-61.5(d) makes habitual OVUII a Class B felony instead, carrying either an indeterminate 10-year term of imprisonment or five years of probation with permanent license revocation, no less than 18 months of imprisonment, and a fine of $5,000 to $25,000. Under both subsections, a vehicle owned and operated by the offender is subject to forfeiture under HRS chapter 712A. An OVUII that causes serious injury or death can be charged as negligent injury or negligent homicide regardless of offense number.

Watch out: Refusing the chemical test does not protect your license. A first refusal triggers a two-year administrative revocation under HRS 291E-41, longer than the one-year revocation for failing the test, and the refusal can be used against you in the criminal case.
Refusing a breath or blood test in Hawaii
Hawaii's implied consent law, in HRS 291E-11, provides that by driving in the state you have agreed to a breath, blood, or urine test if lawfully arrested for OVUII. Refusing the test carries its own administrative sanction under HRS 291E-41: a two-year license revocation for a first refusal, four years for a second within 10 years, and longer for further refusals. Because the refusal revocation is longer than the revocation for failing the test, refusing usually makes the license consequences worse, not better. During a refusal-based revocation, a driver who wants to drive must use an ignition interlock permit. The driver may contest the refusal revocation through the ADLRO hearing process within the statutory deadline.
Can you expunge or seal an OVUII in Hawaii
Hawaii does not allow expungement of an adult OVUII conviction. Under HRS 831-3.2, expungement is generally limited to arrests that did not lead to a conviction, so a dismissal or acquittal can be expunged but a conviction cannot. The state Attorney General's Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center, which processes expungement applications, applies the same rule to OVUII. The narrow statutory exception is for an underage offender convicted under HRS 291E-64 (operating after consuming a measurable amount of alcohol while under 21), which is expungement-eligible; an adult first OVUII conviction under HRS 291E-61 is not. A felony habitual OVUII under HRS 291E-61.5 is likewise not eligible.
What to do after an OVUII arrest in Hawaii
A Hawaii OVUII creates two matters at once: a criminal case in the District Court and an administrative case at the ADLRO. The deadlines are short, so a common first step is to request an ADLRO hearing within the statutory window after arrest, because missing it generally means the administrative revocation takes effect automatically. The criminal case proceeds on its own schedule from arraignment through resolution. General information cannot tell you how your case will come out, since the outcome depends on the facts, the evidence, and your record. Many people consult a licensed Hawaii OVUII attorney to understand the charge, the ADLRO deadline, and the options for both the criminal case and the license case. Keep the arrest paperwork, the notice of administrative revocation, and any test results in a safe place.

More Hawaii Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the BAC limit in Hawaii?
The per se limit is 0.08 percent BAC under HRS 291E-61. Commercial drivers are limited to 0.04 percent, and drivers under 21 face a zero-tolerance rule under HRS 291E-64 that bars driving after consuming any measurable amount of alcohol.
How long do you lose your license for a first OVUII in Hawaii?
A first OVUII conviction carries a license revocation of one year to 18 months under HRS 291E-61. The ADLRO administrative revocation for failing the test runs at least one year, and it applies separately from the criminal case.
Is a first OVUII a felony in Hawaii?
No. A first OVUII is a petty misdemeanor. OVUII becomes a Class C felony on the third offense within 10 years under HRS 291E-61.5 (habitual OVUII), or a Class B felony if the driver was highly intoxicated at 0.15 or more, and an OVUII that causes serious injury or death can be charged as a felony regardless of offense number.
Do you need an interlock for a first OVUII in Hawaii?
Yes. HRS 291E-61 requires an ignition interlock device on any vehicle a first offender drives during the revocation period. A first offender who wants to keep driving applies for an ignition interlock permit and installs the device during the one-year to 18-month revocation. Under HRS 291E-61(b)(6), a first offender who received no additional revocation period may move for early termination after six continuous months with the device plus three further months without a violation.
What happens if you refuse a breathalyzer in Hawaii?
Under implied consent, refusing the chemical test triggers a two-year administrative license revocation for a first refusal under HRS 291E-41, longer than the one-year revocation for failing the test. The refusal can also be used as evidence in the criminal case.
How long does an OVUII stay on your record in Hawaii?
An OVUII conviction stays on your criminal record permanently because Hawaii does not allow expungement of adult OVUII convictions. For enhancement, a prior OVUII counts for 10 years under Hawaii's look-back period.
Can you get an OVUII expunged in Hawaii?
Generally no. Hawaii limits expungement under HRS 831-3.2 to non-conviction arrests, so a dismissed OVUII can be expunged but a conviction cannot. The narrow exception is an underage conviction under HRS 291E-64, not an adult first OVUII under HRS 291E-61.
What is the look-back period for OVUII in Hawaii?
Hawaii uses a 10-year look-back period. Prior OVUII convictions within 10 years escalate a later offense to second offender status and, at the third offense, to a Class C felony under HRS 291E-61.5.
Facing a warrant, DUI, or criminal charge in Hawaii? Get a free case review
An active warrant or a criminal charge like DUI puts your freedom, license, and record at risk, and deadlines to act, like challenging a license suspension or resolving a warrant before an arrest, can be just days away. Get a free, confidential review from a Hawaii criminal defense attorney. Acting quickly protects your options.
Updates
Corrected the first-offense penalties to show that Hawaii imposes the jail, community service, and fine as alternatives rather than all together, added the missing 0.15 BAC and habitual-offender enhancements including the Class B felony tier and vehicle forfeiture, noted the six-month ignition interlock early-termination route, and repaired a broken statute link.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the second-offense community-service option from an 'up to 240 hours' ceiling to the statute's actual floor of no less than 240 hours (HRS 291E-61(b)(2)(D)(i)).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 291E: USE OF INTOXICANTS WHILE OPERATING A VEHICLE
§ 291E-61Operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicantIn force
(a) A person commits the offense of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant if the person operates or assumes actual physical control of a vehicle: (1) While under the influence of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty; (2) While under the influence of any drug that impairs the person's ability to operate the vehicle in a careful and prudent manner; (3) With .08 or more grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath; or (4) With .08 or more grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of blood. (b) [Repeal and reenactment on June 30, 2028.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 244 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii courts have construed how HRS 291E-61 must be charged. State v. Wheeler (2009) held operation on a public way, street, road, or highway is an essential element the charge must allege, and State v. Nesmith (2012) held an (a)(1) charge must allege mens rea while (a)(3) is absolute liability.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Wheeler (Hawaii Supreme Court 2009, 121 Haw. 383)✓Wheeler was orally charged with OVUII after a speeding stop, but the charge never said he drove on a public road; the court held that operating a vehicle on a public way, street, road, or highway is an essential element of the HRS 291E-61 offense.
- State v. Jess (Hawaii Supreme Court 2008, 117 Haw. 381)“…ity advanced a due process rule "that a charge . . . under HRS § 291E-61 rests on aggravating circumstances that…”
- State v. Nesmith (Hawaii Supreme Court 2012, 127 Haw. 48)✓Nesmith and Yamamoto were charged with OVUII with no allegation of a guilty state of mind; the court held that a charge under HRS 291E-61(a)(1) must allege mens rea, while subsection (a)(3), the .08 breath provision, is an absolute liability offense needing none.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 291E-61.5Habitually operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicantIn force
(a) A person commits the offense of habitually operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant if: (1) The person is a habitual operator of a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant; and (2) The person operates or assumes actual physical control of a vehicle: (A) While under the influence of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty; (B) While under the influence of any drug that impairs the person's ability to operate the vehicle in a careful and prudent manner; (C) With .08 or more grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath; or (D) With .08 or more grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of blood. (b) Habitually operating a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant is a class C felony. (c) [Repeal and reenactment on June 30, 2028.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ruggiero (Hawaii Supreme Court 2007, 114 Haw. 227)“…vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant," codified at HRS § 291E-61.5. [13] The Senate expressly indicated…”
- State v. Davis. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2014, 133 Haw. 102)“…hicle under the influence of an intoxicant, in violation of HRS § 291E-61.5 (2007), 9 and in Count II of operating…”
- State v. Domingues (Hawaii Supreme Court 2005, 106 Haw. 480)“…ecodified HRS § 291E-61(b)(4) as a "separate offense" under HRS § 291E-61.5, entitled "[h]abitually operating a veh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 291E-64Operating a vehicle after consuming a measurable amount of alcohol; persons under the age of twenty-oneIn force
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person under the age of twenty-one years to operate any vehicle with a measurable amount of alcohol. A law enforcement officer may arrest a person under this section when the officer has probable cause to believe the arrested person is under the age of twenty-one and had been operating a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway or on or in the waters of the State with a measurable amount of alcohol. (b) A person who violates this section shall be sentenced as follows: (1) For a first violation or any violation not preceded within a five-year period by a prior alcohol enforcement contact: (A) The court shall impose: (i) A requirement that the person and, if the person is under the age of eighteen, the person's parent or guardian attend an alcohol abuse education and counseling program for not more than ten hours; and (ii) A one hundred eighty-day prompt suspension of license and privilege to operate a vehicle with absolute prohibition from operating a vehicle during the suspension period, or in the case of a person eighteen years of age or older, the court may impose, in lieu of the one hundred eighty-day prompt suspension of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Okada (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2007, 113 Haw. 363)“…and driving whether or not the underage person is impaired, HRS 291E-64. COL 6. When both forms are read at the…”
- State v. Yong Shik Won (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2014, 134 Haw. 59)“…alcohol while under the age of twenty-one, in violation of HRS § 291E-64 (2007). Our analysis in this case is li…”
- State v. Hosaka. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2020, 148 Haw. 252)“…s for a refusal by a person under twenty-one arrested under HRS § 291E-64 (2007) (operating a vehicle after consu…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 291E-41Effective date, conditions, and period of administrative revocation; criteriaIn force
(a) Unless an administrative revocation is reversed or the temporary permit is extended by the director, administrative revocation shall become effective on the day specified in the notice of administrative revocation. Except as provided in section 291E-44.5, no license to operate a vehicle shall be restored under any circumstances during the administrative revocation period. Upon completion of the administrative revocation period, the respondent may reapply and be reissued a license pursuant to section 291E-45. (b) Except as provided in paragraphs (4)(A)(ii) and (5) and in section 291E-44.5, the respondent shall keep an ignition interlock device installed and operating in all vehicles operated by the respondent during the revocation period. Except as provided in section 291E-5, installation and maintenance of the ignition interlock device shall be at the respondent's expense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Yong Shik Won (Hawaii Supreme Court 2015, 137 Haw. 330)“…e process applicable to all persons arrested for OVUII. HRS § 291E-41(d) (Supp. 2010); see generally HRS Chap…”
- Freitas v. Administrative Director of the Courts (Hawaii Supreme Court 2005, 108 Haw. 31)“…ement contact, as defined in HRS § 291E-1. 5. Pursuant to HRS § 291E-41 [ [7] ], the period of revocation that…”
- Dunaway v. Administrative Director of the Courts (Hawaii Supreme Court 2005, 108 Haw. 78)“…ng to take a blood alcohol or breath test. See HRS §§ 291E-41(d), (e) (Supp.2004) and 291E-44(a)(2)(B…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 831: UNIFORM ACT ON STATUS OF CONVICTED PERSONS
§ 831-3.2Expungement ordersIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) The attorney general, or the attorney general's duly authorized representative within the department of the attorney general, upon written application from a person arrested for, or charged with but not convicted of a crime, or found eligible for redress under chapter 661B, shall issue an expungement order annulling, canceling, and rescinding the record of arrest; provided that an expungement order shall not be issued: (1) In the case of an arrest for a felony or misdemeanor where conviction has not been obtained because of bail forfeiture; (2) For a period of five years after arrest or citation in the case of a petty misdemeanor or violation where conviction has not been obtained because of a bail forfeiture; (3) In the case of an arrest of any person for any offense where conviction has not been obtained because the person has rendered prosecution impossible by absenting oneself from the jurisdiction; (4) In the case of a person who was involuntarily hospitalized pursuant to section 706-607, or who was acquitted or had charges dismissed pursuant to chapter 704 due to a physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect; and (5) For a period of one year upon discharge of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Barker v. Young (2023) held that under HRS 831-3.2(a) a person arrested for a crime but convicted only of a violation is eligible for arrest record expungement, because a violation is not a crime. State v. Sarmiento (2024) applied the section to hold that this power rests with the attorney general, not the circuit court.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Barker v. Young. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2023, 153 Haw. 144)✓Barker was arrested for harassment, a petty misdemeanor, but convicted only of disorderly conduct as a violation; the court held he remained eligible for arrest record expungement under HRS 831-3.2(a) because a violation is not a crime.
- State v. Rogan. S.Ct. Opinion, filed 06/05/2018 [ada], 142 Haw. 412. Petition for Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus, filed 12/29/2017. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2025)“…ised Statutes (HRS) § 831-3.2(f) (2014 & Supp. 2024). HRS § 831-3.2(f) recognizes privacy and restorative…”
- State v. Sarmiento (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2024, 155 Haw. 224)✓After his convictions were vacated and the case dismissed, Sarmiento asked the circuit court to expunge his arrest record; the court held HRS 831-3.2 vests that power in the attorney general and gives a circuit court no authority to order expungement.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Expungement Laws: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 831-3.2 and the HCJDC Process, Hawaii Court Records: How to Search eCourt Kokua and How Sealing Works
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-61, OVUII offense, 0.08% per se limit, and first-offense penalties (jail, fine, revocation, interlock, 14-hour program)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-61.5, habitual OVUII (third offense within 10 years, Class C felony)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-41, administrative license revocation for refusing the chemical test(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-64, under-21 zero-tolerance (operating after consuming a measurable amount of alcohol)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii State Judiciary, Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office (ADLRO)(courts.state.hi.us).gov
- Hawaii Attorney General, Criminal Justice Data Center, expungement eligibility (HRS 831-3.2)(ag.hawaii.gov).gov
- NHTSA, drunk driving and the 0.08% federal BAC standard(nhtsa.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 291E-1, definition of "highly intoxicated driver" (.15 or more grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or per 210 liters of breath)(capitol.hawaii.gov)
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 831-3.2, expungement orders (the statute the page cites for expungement eligibility)(capitol.hawaii.gov)