Idaho
Idaho Court Records: How to Search the iCourt Portal and How Sealing Works
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 10, 2026). · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Idaho searches district and magistrate court records through one statewide tool, the iCourt Portal, built on the Odyssey case management system. The public tier needs no registration; a more detailed extended-access tier is reserved for law enforcement and other authorized officials.
Information last verified on 2026-08-10. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This guide is part of a broader look at court records by state; for the mechanics of federal versus state versus county searches generally, see how to look up court records and are court records public.
The iCourt Portal: Idaho's Statewide Case Search
The iCourt Portal, linked from the Idaho Supreme Court's isc.idaho.gov, is described on the court's own site as the way to "search District & Magistrate Cases" and "find trial court case information" statewide. Search options include Smart Search by record number, party name, or other identifiers, plus advanced filters by case type, case status, filing date, judicial officer, or protection order. The public tier is free and does not require registration. A separate extended-access tier shows more case detail and is limited to law enforcement and other officials who register and are authorized for it; ordinary members of the public use the standard search tier only.
What's Public and What's Restricted
Idaho Court Administrative Rule 32 (ICAR 32) governs public access and states that "the public has a right to access the judicial department's declarations of law and public policy, and to access the records of all proceedings open to the public." Public by default: case indexes and new filings, chronological case summaries, court calendars and dockets, minutes, orders, opinions, findings, and judgments, transcripts and recordings of public trials, pleadings, motions, affidavits, and other filed documents, and admitted evidence. Confidential or sealed by default: pre-trial risk assessments, presentence investigation reports, unreturned search or arrest warrants, grand jury records and juror identities, juvenile Child Protective Act records, adoption records, termination-of-parental-rights files, guardianship and conservatorship filings, child custody, support, and paternity records, personnel records, and attorney-misconduct allegations. ICAR 32 also permits remote access generally but bars bulk distribution of electronic court data without court approval, except for scholarly, journalistic, political, governmental, or research purposes.

Effective September 24, 2025, the courts changed how sealed records display in iCourt. Case events tied to a record sealed under ICAR 32 no longer appear through the public portal, courthouse kiosks, extended-access accounts, or the attorney-of-record portal. The order that sealed the case, however, stays publicly accessible even though the underlying case events do not.
Sealing and Expungement in Idaho
Idaho treats sealing and expungement as two different things at two different levels. Sealing under ICAR 32 operates at the court-file level, restricting public visibility of a case in the way described above. Expungement is narrower and is administered by the Idaho State Police under Idaho Code section 67-3004(10); it removes fingerprint and criminal-history records and generally applies to arrests where no charges were filed within a year, or to acquittals and dismissals, and it may result in the related court file also being sealed as part of the same process.
A third remedy sits between those two, and it matters most on a court-records page because it changes what the public file shows. Idaho Code section 67-3004(11) lets a person arrested for, prosecuted for, or convicted of a misdemeanor, other than the thirteen assaultive or violent misdemeanors the statute lists in subsection (11)(b), or of felony possession of a controlled substance under section 37-2732(a), (c), or (e), petition the court to have the record shielded from disclosure under rules adopted by the Idaho Supreme Court. The listed exclusions are assault, battery, domestic battery, second-degree stalking, violation of a protection or no-contact order, telephone harassment, vehicular manslaughter, excessive driving under the influence, domestic assault, battery upon law enforcement, injury to children, sexual battery, and indecent exposure.
The petition cannot be filed earlier than five years after the sentence is complete, counting all ordered probation, parole, fines, and restitution, and through that period the petitioner must stay free of new felony or misdemeanor convictions, pending cases, and restraining orders. The court sets a hearing and notifies the prosecuting attorney, who in turn gives any readily identifiable victim the notice the Idaho Constitution requires. If the court finds the petitioner has been held accountable and that shielding would not compromise public safety or the safety of any victim, it orders the case records in the court's custody shielded and unavailable for public viewing, and notifies the Idaho State Police, which then makes the related investigatory reports and fingerprint records unavailable to the public as well.
Shielding is not erasure, and the statute is explicit about its limits. Law enforcement, prosecutors, and court officers keep access; the court keeps a non-public index of the shielding; a subsequent felony conviction requires revocation on the prosecutor's request and a subsequent misdemeanor conviction allows it; and a person may have only one petition granted in a lifetime. Within those limits, subsection (11)(d) provides that the proceedings are deemed never to have occurred and the petitioner may answer inquiries accordingly, other than in a judicial proceeding or as part of peace-officer licensing.
Idaho still has no broad statute expunging convictions themselves. Section 67-3004(11) reaches only the misdemeanors and drug-possession felonies it names, so a conviction outside those categories generally stays on the record indefinitely. For eligibility and the filing process, see Idaho expungement laws, which this page does not duplicate.
Practical Search Tips and Certified Copies
Smart Search on iCourt works by record number, party name, or other identifiers, with filters for case type, status, filing date, judicial officer, or protection order, so a case-number search is generally the most reliable way to confirm you have the right person. For a certified copy of a filing, contact the clerk of the district court where the case is located, since fee schedules and procedures are set at the court level.

Using Idaho Court Records the Right Way
iCourt's public tier is built for checking your own case, confirming a hearing date, or general research, not for screening a tenant, applicant, or date. Under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, criminal convictions are exempt from the seven-year reporting-window limit that applies to arrests and most civil judgments, meaning a conviction can appear on a consumer report indefinitely; only an Idaho sealing, shielding, or expungement action removes it from a compliant background report. The FTC's 2023 settlement with TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate, over marketing public-records reports for tenant and employee screening without following federal background-check law, underscores the risk of using a court records portal for screening decisions outside an FCRA-compliant process.
Disclaimer
This article explains how Idaho court records are organized and searched. It is general legal information, not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for a licensed legal or background-screening professional. Portal features and fees change without notice; verify current details directly with the Idaho Supreme Court or the specific district court. Consult an Idaho-licensed attorney for advice about a specific case.

Last updated: 2026-08-10. Portal facts and fees reflect their published status as of August 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a free statewide Idaho court records search?
Yes. The iCourt Portal's public tier is free and requires no registration, covering district and magistrate court cases statewide by Smart Search or advanced filters.
What is the difference between the public and extended-access tiers of iCourt?
The public tier gives ordinary users free access to standard case information. The extended-access tier shows more case detail and is restricted to law enforcement and other officials who register and are authorized for it.
What kinds of Idaho court records are confidential by default?
Under Idaho Court Administrative Rule 32, records such as presentence investigation reports, unreturned warrants, grand jury materials, juvenile records, adoption records, termination-of-parental-rights files, and guardianship or custody filings are confidential by default.
What happened to sealed records on iCourt in 2025?
Effective September 24, 2025, case events tied to a record sealed under ICAR 32 stopped displaying in the public iCourt portal, courthouse kiosks, extended-access accounts, and the attorney portal. The order that sealed the case remains publicly accessible.
What is the difference between sealing, shielding, and expungement in Idaho?
Sealing under ICAR 32 restricts public visibility of a court case file. Expungement, administered by the Idaho State Police under Idaho Code section 67-3004(10), removes fingerprint and criminal-history records, mainly for arrests not charged within a year or for acquittals and dismissals. Shielding, under Idaho Code section 67-3004(11), is a court process that makes the case records unavailable for public viewing. Idaho has no broad statute expunging convictions.
Who can petition to have an Idaho record shielded from disclosure?
Under Idaho Code section 67-3004(11), a person arrested for, prosecuted for, or convicted of a misdemeanor other than the thirteen assaultive or violent misdemeanors the statute lists, or of felony possession of a controlled substance under section 37-2732(a), (c), or (e), may petition the sentencing court. The petition cannot be filed until five years after the sentence, including probation, parole, fines, and restitution, is complete, and the petitioner must have no new convictions, pending cases, or restraining orders. Only one petition may be granted in a person's lifetime.
Can I use an Idaho court records search to screen a tenant or job applicant?
Not on its own. A do-it-yourself search is not built for that purpose, and convictions do not age off a report under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Screening for housing or employment should go through an FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agency.
Updates
Added Idaho Code 67-3004(11), the court petition to have a qualifying misdemeanor or felony drug-possession record shielded from public disclosure five years after the sentence is complete, alongside the existing Idaho State Police expungement.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Idaho Code
§ 74-104Records exempt from disclosure — Exemptions in federal or state law — Court files of judicial proceedings — office of administrative hearings — judicial councilIn force
74-104. Records exempt from disclosure — Exemptions in federal or state law — Court files of judicial proceedings — office of administrative hearings — judicial council.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 67-3004Fingerprinting and identification — shielding of records from disclosureIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
67-3004. Fingerprinting and identification — shielding of records from disclosure. (1) The bureau shall: (a) Obtain and file fingerprints, physical descriptions and any other available identifying data on persons who have been arrested or served a criminal summons in this state for a retainable…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Oldenburg (Idaho Supreme Court 2023, 538 P.3d 1054)“…district court to seal the criminal court file pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-3004(10). The State did not contest the moti…”
- State v. McDay (Idaho Supreme Court 2018, 164 Idaho 526)“…y's request because his criminal cases were "dismissed" and Idaho Code section 67-3004(10) required that he be "acquitted." In…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Expungement Laws: Set-Aside, Record Sealing, and Your Options in 2026, Idaho Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681cRequirements relating to information contained in consumer reportsIn forcecited in 54 of our articles
Except as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 383 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (2017) addressed the FACTA truncation rule in 1681c(g) and affirmed dismissal for lack of Article III standing, treating material risk of harm as a fact question. Edward Seamans v. Temple University (2014) held the seven-year window in 1681c(a)(4) is extended for an education loan only until that loan is repaid.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2017, 872 F.3d 114)✓A shopper sued two stores whose receipts printed the first six digits of his credit card number; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of standing, seeing no clear error in the finding that those digits show only the card issuer, not a material risk of identity theft.
- Edward Seamans v. Temple University (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2014, 744 F.3d 853)✓A defaulted university loan kept appearing on a borrower's credit reports after he repaid it because the school never reported the delinquency date; the Third Circuit held the Higher Education Act suspends section 1681c(a)(4)'s aging-off rule only until repayment.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 660 F.3d 1055)✓A debt buyer offered to settle health club debts over seven years old, saying that if it was reporting the account the bureaus would be told it was settled; the Ninth Circuit, treating those debts as unreportable under section 1681c(a)(4), called that implication misleading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Louisiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Courts homepage (iCourt Portal link)(isc.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Court Administrative Rule 32, Public Access to Court Records(isc.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho State Bar, Message From the Courts Regarding iCourt Update Effective 9/24(isb.idaho.gov).gov
- Cornell Legal Information Institute, 15 U.S.C. 1681c, Requirements relating to information contained in consumer reports(law.cornell.edu)
- Federal Trade Commission, FTC Says TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate Deceived Users About Background Report Accuracy, Violated FCRA(ftc.gov).gov
- Idaho Code section 67-3004, Fingerprinting and identification; shielding of records from disclosure(legislature.idaho.gov)