Virginia
Virginia Age Verification Law: Two Separate Statutes, One Lobbying Push
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 13, 2026). · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Virginia has two entirely separate age-verification statutes, passed in different years by different bills, that some news coverage blends together. The 2023 law requiring adult websites to verify visitors are 18 or older remains in force and unchallenged. The 2025 law limiting minors' social media use was blocked by a federal judge in February 2026 and remains enjoined on appeal.
Information last verified on 2026-09-02. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Two Statutes, Not One: Why Virginia's Law Isn't Singular
Virginia is the cluster's clearest example of two genuinely independent age-verification statutes rather than one bill split into two chapters. Georgia's two regimes came from a single 2024 bill. Virginia's came from two different bills in two different legislative sessions addressing two different subjects: a 2023 harmful-to-minors civil-liability statute, and a 2025 amendment to the state's consumer-data-privacy law aimed at social media. Search demand for "Virginia age verification law repeal" and headlines about a "court blocking Virginia's age verification law" almost always describe the second statute, not the first, and conflating the two produces a genuinely wrong answer about which one is currently enforceable.
| Adult content (§ 8.01-40.5) | Social media (SB 854 / VCDPA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | SB 1515 (2023) | SB 854 (2025) |
| Effective date | July 1, 2023 | Set for January 1, 2026; enjoined Feb. 27, 2026 |
| What it covers | Sites where more than 33.33% of content is material harmful to minors | Age determination and a 1-hour daily cap for social media users under 16 |
| Enforcement mechanism | Private civil liability (damages plus attorney fees) | Would have been state-level, if in effect |
| Litigation status | Unchallenged; subject of a 2026 industry repeal request, not a lawsuit | Preliminarily enjoined, NetChoice v. Jones; renewed stay denied Aug. 24, 2026; merits appeal pending, argument set Oct. 28, 2026 |
The Adult-Content Law: In Force Since 2023
Virginia Code section 8.01-40.5, enacted through 2023's Senate Bill 1515, requires a commercial entity that knowingly or intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on a website where a "substantial portion," more than 33.33 percent, of the content is such material, to verify that anyone accessing it is 18 or older. Acceptable verification methods include a commercially available database regularly used by businesses or government for age-and-identity verification, or another commercially reasonable method. The statute exempts interactive computer service providers and users from liability under subsection D.

Unlike most of its peer states, Virginia enforces this requirement through private civil liability rather than a state agency's fixed penalty schedule: a covered site that fails to verify can be sued for damages resulting from a minor's access, plus reasonable attorney fees and costs, rather than facing a per-violation fine from the Attorney General the way Georgia, Florida, Missouri, and Ohio's statutes work. The law took effect July 1, 2023. Pornhub blocked Virginia visitors ahead of that date rather than build a compliant verification system, and no lawsuit against the statute itself has surfaced in more than three years it has been in force.
The Social-Media Law: Preliminarily Enjoined
Senate Bill 854, from the 2025 session, amended the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act to require social media platforms to use "commercially reasonable methods" to determine whether a user is under 16, and to limit such minors to one hour of daily platform use unless a parent or guardian verifiably consents to a higher limit.
NetChoice sued in NetChoice v. Jones in the Eastern District of Virginia. U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles granted a preliminary injunction on February 27, 2026, finding the law was not narrowly tailored: it would have required all users, including adults, to verify their age before accessing constitutionally protected speech, and it could bar minors from more than an hour of otherwise-lawful content, so it failed strict scrutiny despite Virginia's compelling interest in protecting youth mental health. Attorney General Jay Jones filed a notice of appeal to the 4th Circuit on March 3, 2026, and Virginia's opening brief was filed April 15, 2026. Virginia twice asked the appeals court to let it enforce the law while that appeal proceeds, and lost both times: the court denied a first stay motion on April 10, 2026 because Virginia had not sought a stay in the district court first, and denied its renewed stay motion on August 24, 2026, in an order entered at the direction of Judge DeAndrea Gist Benjamin with the concurrence of Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, with Judge Roger Gregory voting to grant it. The merits appeal itself is still pending; the court has scheduled oral argument for October 28, 2026 in Richmond. The social-media law has never actually been enforced.
The 2026 Pornhub Letter: Lobbying for Repeal, Not a Lawsuit
On July 28, 2026, Pornhub sent a letter to more than 300 lawmakers in more than a dozen states, Governor Spanberger and Attorney General Jay Jones among them, describing age-verification laws like Virginia's 2023 statute as "performative, ineffective, and unenforceable" and asking officials to pursue repeal through their legislatures. Virginia was one recipient of a national mailing rather than its sole target, so the letter says less about Virginia in particular than a Virginia-only framing suggests. That is a request directed at elected officials, not a court filing. No repeal bill has passed as of this writing, and Virginia Code section 8.01-40.5 remains in force. This letter and its subject matter are entirely separate from the NetChoice v. Jones litigation described above, which concerns the different, 2025 social-media statute.
What This Means If You Live in Virginia or Run a Website There
If you operate a commercial site where more than a third of the content is material harmful to minors, Virginia's age-verification requirement under section 8.01-40.5 has applied since 2023 and remains enforceable through private civil suits; it has not been repealed or blocked, despite the 2026 lobbying letter asking for its repeal. If you operate a social media platform, the age-determination and screen-time requirements under SB 854 remain blocked by a federal injunction while Virginia's appeal is pending, so they are not currently enforceable. For how Virginia regulates personal data more broadly, see Virginia data privacy laws.

Disclaimer
This article provides general information about Virginia's age-verification statutes. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The social-media law's appeal remains open and its outcome could change the enforceable status described above; verify current status with the Virginia Attorney General's office, the 4th Circuit's docket, or a licensed Virginia attorney before relying on anything here for a specific situation.
Related Articles
- Age Verification Laws by State
- Georgia Age Verification Law
- Florida Age Verification Law
- Virginia Data Privacy Laws

Last updated: 2026-09-02.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Virginia's age-verification law for adult sites still in effect?
Yes. Virginia Code section 8.01-40.5 has required adult-content sites to verify visitors are 18 or older since July 1, 2023, and no lawsuit against it has been found in this research.
Has Virginia repealed its age-verification law?
No. As of this writing, Pornhub has lobbied Virginia's governor and attorney general to seek repeal of the 2023 adult-content law, but no repeal bill has passed. That is separate from a different, 2025 social-media statute that a federal court has enjoined.
Is Virginia's social-media age-verification law currently enforced?
No. A federal judge preliminarily enjoined it on February 27, 2026, in NetChoice v. Jones, and the 4th Circuit denied Virginia's renewed request to lift that injunction during the appeal on August 24, 2026. The merits appeal is still pending, with oral argument scheduled for October 28, 2026.
What is the difference between Virginia's two age-verification laws?
Virginia Code section 8.01-40.5 (2023, Senate Bill 1515) covers adult-content websites and is enforced through private civil liability. Senate Bill 854 (2025) amended the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act to add social-media age-determination and screen-time rules for minors, and it remains enjoined.
Why is Pornhub lobbying to repeal Virginia's age-verification law?
Pornhub sent Virginia's governor and attorney general a July 28, 2026 letter, part of a mass mailing to more than 300 lawmakers in more than a dozen states, calling age-verification laws like Virginia's 2023 statute 'performative, ineffective, and unenforceable' and asking officials to pursue repeal. That is advocacy directed at lawmakers, not a court case, and no repeal bill has passed.
Can Virginia's social-media law still take effect?
Possibly. The preliminary injunction blocks enforcement while Virginia's appeal to the 4th Circuit is pending, and the appeals court refused on August 24, 2026 to lift it in the meantime. If Virginia wins the merits appeal, argument on which is set for October 28, 2026, the law could become enforceable.
Updates
Updated the social media case: the Fourth Circuit denied Virginia's renewed request to lift the injunction on August 24, 2026 and set oral argument for October 28, 2026; also corrected the adult-content threshold to more than 33 and one-third percent and noted that Pornhub's July 28 letter went to more than 300 lawmakers nationwide.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Virginia, Title 8.01: Civil Remedies and Procedure
§ 8.01-40.5Publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the InternetIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. For the purposes of this section: "Interactive computer service" means the same as that term is defined in § 8.01-49.1. "Material harmful to minors" means any description or representation of nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse when it (i) appeals to the prurient, shameful, or morbid interest of minors; (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors; and (iii) is, when taken as a whole, lacking in serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. "Sexual conduct" means the same as that term is defined in § 18.2-390. “Substantial portion” means more than 33 and one-third percent of total material on a website that meets the definition of material harmful to minors. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Also relied on in: Age Verification Laws by State (2026): The 27-State Table, Debunked, Virginia Pornography Laws (2026): Legal for Adults, AV Required for Sites
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Va. Code Ann. 8.01-40.5, Publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the Internet(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Mercury, "Ahead of new age verification law, Pornhub blocks access in Virginia" (Jun. 29, 2023)(virginiamercury.com)
- Axios Richmond, "Virginia, Pornhub, and the block: age-verification and VPN searches" (Jul. 30, 2026)(axios.com)
- DLA Piper Privacy Matters, "Virginia's social media time-limit law for minors blocked: key takeaways"(privacymatters.dlapiper.com)
- Hunton Andrews Kurth, "Virginia appeals preliminary injunction barring enforcement of age-based restrictions on social media use"(hunton.com)
- MediaPost, "Tech industry battles Virginia over social media time limits"(mediapost.com)
- Order denying renewed motion for stay of preliminary injunction pending appeal, NetChoice v. Jones, No. 26-1252 (4th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026)(storage.courtlistener.com)
- Fourth Circuit docket, NetChoice v. Jay Jones, No. 26-1252 (stay denials Apr. 10 and Aug. 24, 2026; oral argument calendared Oct. 28, 2026)(courtlistener.com)
- Chron, "Texas internet safety law pushes users to shady porn sites, Pornhub says" (Aug. 3, 2026), on the July 28 letter to more than 300 lawmakers(chron.com)