Maryland
How Long Is a Life Sentence in Maryland? (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Maryland, a life sentence for first-degree murder under Md. Criminal Law Code Section 2-201 carries parole eligibility after 15 years. Since a 2021 law change, the Maryland Parole Commission's decision on a lifer's release is final — the governor no longer has veto power. Life without parole under Section 2-204 bars parole entirely; only executive clemency can secure release.
This article was last reviewed and updated on March 17, 2026. All statutes, case law, sentencing data, and legislative developments have been verified against current Maryland government sources.
In Maryland, a life sentence does not necessarily mean dying in prison. For first-degree murder, a life sentence carries parole eligibility after serving 15 to 20 years, depending on the circumstances and the date of sentencing. However, life without parole (LWOP) means exactly what it says — no possibility of release except through gubernatorial clemency.
Maryland's sentencing landscape has undergone sweeping changes over the past decade. The state abolished the death penalty in 2013, and in April 2025, Governor Moore signed the Second Look Act into law — one of the most significant resentencing reforms in the country. That law allows people convicted of offenses committed between ages 18 and 25, and not serving life without parole, a sexual-offense conviction, or a conviction for killing a first responder, to seek resentencing after 20 years, potentially affecting approximately 600 people currently serving long sentences.
Understanding what a life sentence means in Maryland requires examining specific statutes, the state's parole framework, the abolition of capital punishment, and the transformative new resentencing law.
Maryland Life Sentence Statutes
Maryland's criminal code defines murder, its degrees, and their penalties across several key statutes.
First-Degree Murder (Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-201): First-degree murder includes all premeditated, deliberate killings and murders committed by lying in wait, by poison, or during the perpetration of certain felonies (including arson, burglary, carjacking, kidnapping, robbery, and sexual offenses). First-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
Life Without Parole (Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-204): LWOP may be imposed for first-degree murder when the state gives proper notice and proves aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. This became the maximum possible sentence in Maryland after the death penalty was abolished in 2013.
Second-Degree Murder (Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-304): Second-degree murder is defined as all murder that is not first-degree murder. It carries a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison. Second-degree murder is not a life offense, but a 40-year sentence can function as a de facto life sentence depending on the defendant's age.
Felony Murder: Maryland recognizes the felony murder doctrine. A killing that occurs during the commission of a qualifying felony can result in a first-degree murder conviction — and a life sentence — even if the defendant did not intend to kill anyone.
Parole Eligibility
Maryland uses both determinate and indeterminate sentences. For life sentences, the framework depends on whether parole was included as a possibility at sentencing.

Life With Parole
A person sentenced to life with the possibility of parole for first-degree murder becomes eligible for parole consideration after serving 15 years. This does not guarantee release. It means the person can appear before the Maryland Parole Commission for a suitability hearing.
In practice, many life-sentenced individuals serve well beyond 15 years before being granted parole — if they are granted parole at all. The average time served before parole for a life sentence in Maryland is approximately 20 years.
The Parole Process
The Maryland Parole Commission evaluates parole applications based on institutional behavior, program participation, risk assessment, the nature of the offense, victim impact, and the proposed reentry plan.
For life-sentenced individuals, a parole recommendation by the commission was historically subject to the Governor's approval, and some Maryland governors were reluctant to approve parole for lifers, effectively converting life-with-parole sentences into life-without-parole outcomes through executive inaction. That changed with SB 202 (2021): after Governor Hogan vetoed the bill, the legislature overrode the veto in December 2021, removing the governor's approval requirement. Since then, the Maryland Parole Commission's decision is final for people serving life sentences.
Life Without Parole
LWOP means the person will never become eligible for parole. The only paths to release are a commutation of sentence by the governor or a successful legal challenge resulting in resentencing.
Since the abolition of the death penalty, LWOP has served as the maximum possible penalty in Maryland. It is reserved for the most aggravated first-degree murder cases.
| Offense | Sentence | Parole Eligibility |
|---|---|---|
| First-degree murder | Life | After 15 years |
| First-degree murder (aggravated) | Life without parole | None |
| Second-degree murder | Up to 40 years | Varies by sentence |
| Felony murder | Life | After 15 years |
The Second Look Act (2025) — Maryland's Landmark Resentencing Law
In April 2025, Governor Wes Moore signed the Second Look Act into law, marking one of the most significant criminal justice reforms in Maryland history. The law recognizes what neuroscience has established: the human brain, particularly the prefrontal cortex governing impulse control and decision-making, does not fully develop until the mid-twenties.
Who Is Eligible
The Second Look Act allows people who were between ages 18 and 25 when they committed their offense to petition the court for resentencing after serving at least 20 years in prison. The law excludes people serving life without parole, people convicted of a sexual offense, and people convicted of killing a first responder acting in the line of duty.
Approximately 600 people currently serving sentences in Maryland are estimated to be eligible under the new law, net of those exclusions. This includes individuals serving life sentences and other lengthy terms for offenses committed during young adulthood.
How It Works
Under the Second Look Act, eligible individuals can file a petition with the original sentencing court. The court then conducts a hearing and considers several factors:
- The person's age at the time of the offense and the role that youth played in the criminal conduct
- Evidence of rehabilitation and personal growth during incarceration
- Institutional behavior, programming, and educational achievements
- The impact on victims and their families
- Whether the person poses a risk to public safety
- Any other information the court deems relevant
The court has discretion to reduce the sentence, impose a new sentence, or leave the original sentence in place.
Why It Matters
The Second Look Act builds on a growing body of reform legislation across the country that recognizes youth as a mitigating factor in sentencing — not just for juveniles, but for young adults up to age 25. Maryland joins a small but growing number of jurisdictions that have extended this principle beyond the traditional juvenile cutoff of 18. The Sentencing Project's report A Matter of Life documents the national scope of life imprisonment and the impact of reforms like the Second Look Act.
The law does not guarantee release for anyone. It provides an opportunity for judicial review — a "second look" at whether a sentence imposed decades ago still serves the interests of justice given the person's demonstrated growth and change.
Supporters of the law, including public defenders and criminal justice reform advocates, argued that many people serving lengthy sentences for offenses committed in their late teens and early twenties are fundamentally different people after 20 years of incarceration. Opponents raised concerns about the impact on victims and the potential for violent offenders to be released.
Abolition of the Death Penalty
Maryland's path to abolishing the death penalty was a gradual process shaped by legal challenges, a governor's moratorium, a state commission's findings, and legislative action.
The Final Years of Capital Punishment
Maryland carried out its last execution on December 5, 2005, when Wesley Eugene Baker was put to death by lethal injection at the Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center in Baltimore. Baker had been convicted of the 1991 murder of Jane Tyson during a robbery in a shopping center parking lot.
Baker's execution was the fifth and final execution in Maryland since the state reinstated the death penalty in 1978.
Governor's Moratorium and the Commission
In 2006, Governor Robert Ehrlich imposed a moratorium on executions while procedural issues with lethal injection were being reviewed. His successor, Governor Martin O'Malley, maintained and expanded the moratorium.
In 2008, the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment released its findings. The commission concluded that the death penalty in Maryland was applied with significant racial and geographic disparities. Cases involving white victims were significantly more likely to result in a death sentence than cases involving Black victims. The jurisdiction where the crime occurred also played a disproportionate role in whether the death penalty was sought.
These findings bolstered the case for abolition.
Legislative Abolition (2013)
On May 2, 2013, Governor O'Malley signed Chapter 156 of the Acts of 2013, abolishing the death penalty in Maryland. The law took effect on October 1, 2013, making Maryland the 18th state to abolish capital punishment.
The abolition was prospective — it applied to future cases. However, five men remained on death row at the time the law was signed.
The Five Death Row Inmates
Governor O'Malley subsequently commuted the sentences of all five remaining death row inmates to life without the possibility of parole. Those individuals are:
- Heath Burch — convicted of murder in Dorchester County
- Jody Lee Miles — convicted of murder in Prince George's County
- Vernon Evans — convicted of two murders in Baltimore County
- Anthony Grandison — convicted of two murders in Baltimore County
- John Thanos — (deceased prior to commutation; had previously waived appeals)
The commutations ensured that no one remained under a sentence of death in Maryland, but they also meant that these individuals would spend the rest of their lives in prison without the possibility of parole.
2024 Attempt to Reinstate the Death Penalty
In 2024, House Bill 87 (HB 87) was introduced in the Maryland General Assembly seeking to reinstate the death penalty for certain categories of murder, including the killing of law enforcement officers. The bill did not advance out of committee and did not pass.
The failed reinstatement attempt reflected a national pattern: while some states that have abolished the death penalty periodically see legislative attempts to bring it back, none have successfully done so.
Adnan Syed — Maryland's Most Famous Case
No discussion of Maryland's criminal justice system would be complete without addressing the case of Adnan Syed, which became one of the most widely known criminal cases in American history through the podcast Serial.
The Case
In 2000, Adnan Syed was convicted of the 1999 murder of his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, a fellow student at Woodlawn High School in Baltimore County. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years. Syed was 17 at the time of the crime and maintained his innocence throughout his incarceration.
Serial and National Attention
In 2014, journalist Sarah Koenig launched the podcast Serial, which reexamined the evidence against Syed in painstaking detail over 12 episodes. The podcast became a cultural phenomenon — it was downloaded more than 300 million times and is widely credited with launching the true crime podcast genre.
Serial raised significant questions about the reliability of the cell tower evidence used at trial, the credibility of the prosecution's key witness (Jay Wilds), and the effectiveness of Syed's trial attorney (Cristina Gutierrez, who was later disbarred for mishandling client funds).
The Conviction Is Vacated
On September 19, 2022, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Melissa Phinn vacated Syed's conviction after a motion filed by the Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office under a Maryland law allowing prosecutors to reopen cases when new evidence emerges.
The motion cited two alternative suspects who were never adequately investigated and reliability concerns about key evidence. Syed was released after spending 23 years in prison.
In October 2022, prosecutors dropped all charges against Syed, formally ending the case. The decision was controversial — the Lee family challenged the procedural aspects of the vacatur in court. The Maryland Supreme Court ultimately addressed the procedural questions, and the charges remained dropped.
Significance
The Syed case highlighted multiple issues in Maryland's criminal justice system: the reliability of cell phone location evidence, the consequences of ineffective assistance of counsel, and the power of prosecutorial review to correct potential wrongful convictions. It remains one of the most closely followed criminal cases of the 21st century.
Notable Maryland Cases
Lee Boyd Malvo — The D.C. Sniper
Lee Boyd Malvo was 17 years old in 2002 when he and John Allen Muhammad carried out the D.C. sniper attacks, killing 10 people and terrorizing the Washington metropolitan area for three weeks. Malvo was convicted in Virginia and sentenced to life without parole.
Although the attacks occurred primarily in Maryland and Virginia, Malvo's case became relevant to Maryland's sentencing framework through the broader national discussion about juvenile sentencing. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), Malvo's LWOP sentences were subject to review under the principle that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional.
The Annapolis Capital Gazette Shooting (2018)
In June 2018, Jarrod Ramos entered the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis and killed five journalists. He was found criminally responsible in 2021 and sentenced to five consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole. The case was notable as one of the deadliest attacks on journalists in American history.
Juvenile Sentencing in Maryland
Maryland's approach to juvenile life sentences has evolved in response to U.S. Supreme Court rulings and state legislative action.
The Constitutional Framework
The U.S. Supreme Court established critical limits on juvenile sentencing:
- Graham v. Florida (2010): Banned life without parole for juvenile non-homicide offenders
- Miller v. Alabama (2012): Banned mandatory life without parole for all juveniles
- Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016): Made the Miller ruling retroactive
Maryland has implemented these rulings, ensuring that juveniles convicted of murder receive individualized sentencing hearings rather than automatic LWOP sentences.
Current Practice
Under Maryland law, juveniles charged with serious offenses can be tried as adults through the waiver process. If convicted of first-degree murder as an adult, a juvenile can receive a life sentence, but mandatory LWOP is unconstitutional. The sentencing court must consider the defendant's youth, maturity, family and home environment, the circumstances of the offense, and the potential for rehabilitation.
The Second Look Act of 2025, while focused on young adults ages 18-25, complements the existing juvenile sentencing framework by recognizing that the developmental factors associated with youth extend beyond the age of 18.
Racial Disparities in Maryland Sentencing
The Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment's findings about racial disparities were not limited to the death penalty. Broader patterns of racial inequality have been documented throughout Maryland's criminal justice system.
Studies have shown that Black defendants in Maryland are more likely to be charged with first-degree murder (rather than lesser offenses), more likely to receive life sentences, and less likely to be granted parole than white defendants charged with comparable offenses. Baltimore City, which has a predominantly Black population, has historically had some of the highest incarceration rates in the state. The Sentencing Project's national research on life imprisonment identifies Maryland among the states with notable racial disparities in who receives life sentences.
These disparities were a driving force behind both the abolition of the death penalty and the passage of the Second Look Act. Advocates argued that resentencing review provides an opportunity to address sentences that may have been influenced by systemic racial bias.
The racial dimensions of Maryland sentencing continue to shape legislative debate, with reform advocates pushing for additional measures to address disparities in charging, sentencing, and parole decisions.
Historical Context
Maryland's life sentencing history reflects a state that has moved from maintaining capital punishment to becoming a leader in criminal justice reform.
Colonial Era to 1900: Maryland, like most states, used the death penalty extensively. Crimes punishable by death expanded and contracted over time.
1978 — Death Penalty Reinstated: After the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated existing death penalty statutes nationwide in Furman v. Georgia (1972), Maryland enacted a new capital punishment law in 1978 with revised procedures. The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services maintains current data on the state's incarcerated population.
1994 — Kirk Bloodsworth Exonerated: Kirk Bloodsworth became the first death row inmate in the United States exonerated through DNA evidence. Convicted of the rape and murder of a nine-year-old girl in 1985, Bloodsworth spent nearly nine years in prison, including two on death row, before DNA testing proved his innocence. His case became a landmark in the innocence movement and strengthened arguments for abolishing the death penalty in Maryland. The Death Penalty Information Center's Maryland page documents the full history of capital punishment in the state.
2005 — Last Execution: Wesley Baker was executed by lethal injection on December 5, 2005.
2013 — Death Penalty Abolished: Chapter 156 of the Acts of 2013 ended capital punishment in Maryland.
2022 — Adnan Syed Released: The vacatur of Syed's conviction drew global attention to Maryland's criminal justice system.
2025 — Second Look Act: Governor Moore signed the Second Look Act, creating a resentencing pathway for people convicted of crimes committed between ages 18 and 25.
Maryland Life Sentence at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Standard life sentence (1st-degree murder) | Life with parole eligibility after 15 years |
| Second-degree murder | Up to 40 years |
| LWOP available | Yes (aggravated first-degree murder under § 2-204) |
| Death penalty | Abolished in 2013 (Chapter 156) |
| Last execution | Wesley Baker, December 5, 2005 |
| Former death row inmates | 5 — all commuted to LWOP |
| Second Look Act (2025) | Ages 18-25 at offense; eligible after 20 years served |
| Estimated affected by Second Look Act | ~600 people |
| JLWOP | Not mandatory; individualized hearing required |
| Parole board | Maryland Parole Commission |
| Governor approval for lifer parole | No — Maryland Parole Commission's decision is final (since Dec. 2021, SB 202 veto override) |
| Key exoneration | Kirk Bloodsworth (1993, first DNA death row exoneration) |
Recent Legislative Changes
| Year | Change |
|---|---|
| 2025 | Second Look Act signed — resentencing for offenses committed ages 18-25 after 20 years served |
| 2024 | HB 87 to reinstate death penalty introduced; did not pass |
| 2022 | Adnan Syed's conviction vacated; charges dropped after 23 years |
| 2021 | SB 202 veto override removes the governor's approval requirement for parole of life-sentenced inmates |
| 2013 | Death penalty abolished (Chapter 156, Acts of 2013) |
| 2013 | Governor O'Malley commutes all 5 death row sentences to LWOP |
| 2005 | Last execution: Wesley Baker (lethal injection) |
| 1993 | Kirk Bloodsworth exonerated — first DNA death row exoneration in U.S. history |
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is a life sentence in Maryland?
A life sentence for first-degree murder in Maryland carries parole eligibility after serving 15 years. However, parole is not guaranteed — the Maryland Parole Commission reviews each case, and since a 2021 law change, the Commission's decision is final without the governor's approval. Many people serve 20 years or more before being granted parole, and some are never released.
Does Maryland have the death penalty?
No. Maryland abolished the death penalty on May 2, 2013, when Governor Martin O'Malley signed Chapter 156 of the Acts of 2013 into law. The last execution in Maryland was Wesley Baker on December 5, 2005. The five inmates who were on death row at the time of abolition had their sentences commuted to life without parole.
What is Maryland's Second Look Act?
The Second Look Act, signed into law in April 2025 by Governor Wes Moore, allows people who committed their offense between ages 18 and 25 to petition for resentencing after serving at least 20 years in prison, excluding those serving life without parole, convicted of a sexual offense, or convicted of killing a first responder in the line of duty. Approximately 600 people are estimated to be eligible, net of those exclusions. The court considers rehabilitation, institutional behavior, age at offense, victim impact, and public safety before deciding whether to modify the sentence.
What happened with Adnan Syed's case in Maryland?
Adnan Syed was convicted of first-degree murder in 2000 and sentenced to life plus 30 years for the killing of Hae Min Lee. His case became globally famous through the Serial podcast in 2014. In September 2022, a Baltimore judge vacated his conviction after prosecutors identified alternative suspects and reliability concerns with key evidence. Syed was released after 23 years. Prosecutors dropped all charges in October 2022.
Can juveniles get life without parole in Maryland?
Mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional under Miller v. Alabama (2012). In Maryland, juveniles tried as adults for murder can receive life sentences, but the court must conduct an individualized hearing considering the defendant's youth, maturity, home environment, and potential for rehabilitation before imposing any sentence.
What is life without parole in Maryland?
Life without parole (LWOP) in Maryland means the person will never be eligible for parole. LWOP can be imposed for aggravated first-degree murder under Md. Criminal Law Code Section 2-204. Since the death penalty was abolished in 2013, LWOP is the maximum possible sentence in Maryland. The only way to be released from LWOP is through executive clemency from the governor or a successful legal appeal.
Who was the last person executed in Maryland?
Wesley Eugene Baker was the last person executed in Maryland on December 5, 2005, by lethal injection. Baker had been convicted of the 1991 murder of Jane Tyson during a robbery. Maryland abolished the death penalty in 2013, and no further executions will take place.
Updates
Corrected an outdated claim that the governor must approve parole for every Maryland lifer: a 2021 law change (SB 202, enacted by veto override) made the Maryland Parole Commission's decision final. Also added the Second Look Act's statutory exclusions (life-without-parole sentences, sexual offenses, killing a first responder) to the eligibility description.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article
§ 2-201In force
§2–201. (a) A murder is in the first degree if it is: (1) a deliberate, premeditated, and willful killing; (2) committed by lying in wait; (3) committed by poison; or (4) committed in the perpetration of or an attempt to perpetrate: (i) arson in the first degree; (ii) burning a barn, stable, tobacco house, warehouse, or other outbuilding that: 1. is not parcel to a dwelling; and 2. contains cattle, goods, wares, merchandise, horses, grain, hay, or tobacco; (iii) burglary in the first, second, or third degree; (iv) carjacking or armed carjacking; (v) escape in the first degree from a State correctional facility or a local correctional facility; (vi) kidnapping under § 3–502 or § 3–503(a)(2) of this article; (vii) mayhem; (viii) rape; (ix) robbery under § 3–402 or § 3–403 of this article; (x) sexual offense in the first or second degree; (xi) sodomy as that crime existed before October 1, 2020; or (xii) a violation of § 4–503 of this article concerning destructive devices.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lopez v. State (Court of Appeals of Maryland 2018, 458 Md. 164)“…and one count of robbery.1 On January 4, 2013, 1 See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 2-201 (Murder in the First Degree); Md. Code…”
- Handy v. State (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2011, 201 Md. App. 521)“…erate, premeditated, and willful killing.” See Md.Code Ann., Crim. Law, § 2-201(a) (2002). In Mitchell v. State,…”
- State v. Jones (Court of Appeals of Maryland 2017, 451 Md. 680)“…offenses as a predicate for first-degree felony murder. See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 2-201(a)(4) (2002, 2012 Repl. Vol., 2016 Supp…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2-204In force
§2–204. (a) A murder that is not in the first degree under § 2–201 of this subtitle is in the second degree. (b) A person who commits a murder in the second degree is guilty of a felony and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 40 years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jones v. State (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland 2015, 222 Md. App. 600)“…s not in the first degree . . . is in the second degree.”4 Md. Code Crim. Law § 2-204(a) (2002, 2012 Repl. Vol.) (“CL”). Alt…”
- United States v. Martinez-Amaya (District Court, District of Columbia 2013, 986 F. Supp. 2d 39)“…d degree.” Hook v. State, 553 A.2d 233, 234–35 (Md. 1989); Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 2-204 (West 2002 & Supp.). Second degree mur…”
- Chartis Property Casualty Co. v. Huguely (District Court, D. Maryland 2017, 243 F. Supp. 3d 615)“…nt to the conduct underlying Defendant’s conduct. Compare Md.Code Ann., Criminal Law § 2-204 (West 2002), with Va.Code Ann. § 18.2…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2-304In force
§2–304. (a) If the State gave notice under § 2–203(1) of this title, the court shall conduct a separate sentencing proceeding as soon as practicable after the defendant is found guilty of murder in the first degree to determine whether the defendant shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole or to imprisonment for life. (b) (1) A determination by a jury to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole must be unanimous. (2) If the jury finds that a sentence of imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole shall be imposed, the court shall impose a sentence of imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole. (3) If, within a reasonable time, the jury is unable to agree to imposition of a sentence of imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole, the court shall impose a sentence of imprisonment for life.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mgaleg.maryland.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morrison v. State (Court of Appeals of Maryland 2025)“…posed in accordance with Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 2- 304. Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 2-304(b)(1) provides that “[a] determination…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-201(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-204(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Md. Criminal Law Code § 2-304(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- Maryland Parole Commission(dpscs.maryland.gov).gov
- Second Look Act(mgaleg.maryland.gov).gov
- *A Matter of Life*(sentencingproject.org)
- *Miller v. Alabama* (2012)(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services(dpscs.maryland.gov).gov
- Death Penalty Information Center's Maryland page(deathpenaltyinfo.org)