New York Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties

Quick Answer
New York is a one-party consent state. You can legally record phone calls and in-person conversations as long as you are a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant. Eavesdropping, which means recording without any party's consent, is a Class E felony under New York Penal Law Article 250.
| Key Point | Answer |
|---|---|
| Consent Type | One-Party |
| Can you record your own calls? | Yes |
| Must you inform others? | No |
| Primary Statute | N.Y. Penal Law 250.00, 250.05 |
| Criminal Penalty | Class E Felony (up to 4 years in prison) |
| Civil Damages | Actual damages + punitive damages |
| Evidence Suppression | CPLR 4506 |
Our recommended Digital Voice Recorder.
Understanding New York's Recording Laws
The Legal Foundation
New York's wiretapping and electronic surveillance laws are found in Article 250 of the New York Penal Law (Offenses Against the Right to Privacy). The key statutes governing recording in New York are:
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.00 defines wiretapping, mechanical overhearing, and eavesdropping
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.05 makes eavesdropping a Class E felony
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.10 criminalizes possession of eavesdropping devices (Class A misdemeanor)
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.15 makes failure to report wiretapping a Class B misdemeanor
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.45 covers unlawful surveillance in the second degree
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.50 covers unlawful surveillance in the first degree
These statutes have remained largely unchanged since their original enactment, though the legislature has added sections addressing modern surveillance technology over the years.
Key Definitions Under New York Law
Understanding New York's recording laws requires knowing the precise definitions from Section 250.00:
"Wiretapping" means the intentional overhearing or recording of a telephonic or telegraphic communication by a person other than the sender or receiver, without the consent of either the sender or receiver, by means of any instrument, device, or equipment.
"Mechanical overhearing of a conversation" means the intentional overhearing or recording of a conversation or discussion, without the consent of at least one party, by a person not present, by means of any instrument, device, or equipment.
"Intercepting or accessing of an electronic communication" means the intentional acquiring, receiving, collecting, overhearing, or recording of an electronic communication, without the consent of the sender or intended receiver.
"Eavesdropping" means unlawfully engaging in wiretapping, mechanical overhearing of a conversation, or intercepting or accessing electronic communications.
The word "unlawfully" in the statute means not specifically authorized under Article 700 or 705 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which govern court-authorized wiretap warrants.
One-Party vs. Two-Party Consent Explained
New York requires consent of at least one party to record conversations. In practice, this means:
- You can record any conversation you are participating in
- You can record phone calls you are a party to
- You cannot record conversations where you are not a participant (that is eavesdropping)
- You do not need to tell the other person you are recording
In contrast, two-party (or all-party) consent states like California require everyone in the conversation to agree to be recorded.
Proposed Legislation: Could New York Become a Two-Party Consent State?
Two bills introduced in the 2025 New York State Senate legislative session could change these rules:
Senate Bill S5077 would amend the definition of "wiretapping" under Section 250.00 to require the consent of all persons involved in a conversation for recording to be legal.
Senate Bill S5070 would require that anyone recording a conversation where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy must state their intentions to use a recording device so all parties know the device is being used.
Both bills were sponsored by Senator Griffo and have been reintroduced across multiple legislative sessions without passing. As of early 2026, both remain in committee and New York continues to operate as a one-party consent state. If either bill were to pass, it would represent a significant shift in New York recording law.
Recording Phone Calls in New York

Can You Record Phone Calls in New York?
Yes. Under N.Y. Penal Law 250.00, you can record any phone call you are participating in without informing the other party. This applies to:
- Landline calls
- Cell phone calls
- VoIP calls (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, etc.)
- Video calls with audio
The statute focuses on whether a party to the communication consents. As a participant, your own knowledge that the call is being recorded satisfies the one-party consent requirement.
Recording Calls Across State Lines
If you are in New York calling someone in a two-party consent state, the stricter law typically applies. States requiring all-party consent include:
- California
- Connecticut (nearby)
- Florida
- Illinois
- Maryland
- Massachusetts (nearby)
- Montana
- Nevada (for phone calls)
- New Hampshire (nearby)
- Pennsylvania (nearby)
- Washington
Best practice: New York borders several two-party consent states, including Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. When calling someone in these states, consider informing the other party or getting explicit consent to avoid potential liability under that state's law.
Business Call Recording
New York businesses can record calls for quality assurance, training, or compliance purposes. While not legally required under New York's one-party consent law, many businesses choose to provide notice as a best practice. Consent can be obtained through:
- A recorded announcement before the call begins ("This call may be recorded for quality assurance")
- Verbal consent from the other party
- A periodic beep tone during the call
Businesses should also be aware that federal regulations from the FCC may impose additional notice requirements for certain types of calls.
Recording In-Person Conversations
When Is It Legal?
Under New York's "mechanical overhearing" definition, you need consent from at least one party to record in-person conversations. As a participant, you provide that consent by your own awareness of the recording.
You can legally record in-person conversations in New York when:
- You are participating in the conversation
- You are in a public place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy
- You have consent from at least one party to the conversation
New York courts have held that individuals who talk in a manner where a non-participating third party may freely overhear the conversation have no reasonable expectation of privacy. This means conversations in public places, restaurants, or open office areas may not receive the same protections as private discussions.
When Is It Illegal?
Recording becomes illegal in New York when:
- You are not a party to the conversation and do not have consent from any participant
- You are eavesdropping on someone else's private conversation
- You are using illegally obtained recordings for any purpose
- You are recording in a location where parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy and you are not a participant
What About Recording in Your Own Home?
You can record conversations in your own home if you are a participant. However, you cannot:
- Plant a hidden device and leave the room to record others without being present
- Record guests in areas with heightened privacy expectations (bathrooms, guest bedrooms)
- Record intimate activities without consent (covered by N.Y. Penal Law 250.45, unlawful surveillance)

New York Video Recording Laws

Public Spaces
New York has no general prohibition on video recording in public spaces. You can:
- Film on public streets, parks, and sidewalks
- Record public meetings and government proceedings
- Use dashcams in your vehicle
- Film public protests or demonstrations
The First Amendment and New York Civil Rights Law protect the right to record in public, provided you are not trespassing or interfering with others.
Private Property and Privacy
On private property, the property owner sets the rules. New York also has specific statutes that prohibit:
- Unlawful surveillance in the second degree (N.Y. Penal Law 250.45) covers filming someone in a bedroom, bathroom, or other private location without consent. This is a Class E felony with up to 4 years in prison.
- Unlawful surveillance in the first degree (N.Y. Penal Law 250.50) applies when a person has a prior conviction for unlawful surveillance within 10 years. This is a Class D felony with up to 7 years in prison and mandatory sex offender registration.
- Dissemination of unlawful surveillance images is separately criminalized.
If you are recording someone's likeness for business purposes, you should ensure that you gain proper consent by having them fill out a photo or video consent form.
Recording in the Workplace
Employee Electronic Monitoring Notice (Labor Law 203-c)
Since May 7, 2022, New York Labor Law Section 203-c requires all private employers in New York to provide written notice to new employees upon hiring if the employer monitors telephone conversations, email, or internet usage. Employers must also post this notice in a conspicuous location visible to all employees.
Violations carry fines of up to $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $3,000 for third and subsequent violations.
Can Your Employer Record You?
New York employers can generally record in common work areas where employees do not have a privacy expectation. However, employers cannot record in:
- Bathrooms
- Locker rooms
- Changing areas
Employers must also comply with the Labor Law 203-c notice requirements described above.
Can You Record Your Employer?
Yes. As a one-party consent state, you can record conversations with your boss, HR representatives, coworkers, or anyone else at work as long as you are part of the conversation. This can be valuable for:
- Documenting harassment or discrimination
- Recording performance reviews
- Protecting yourself in employment disputes
- Preserving important verbal instructions
Important note about company policy: Your employer may have internal policies against recording in the workplace. While recording is legal under New York state law, violating a company policy could result in discipline, including termination.
NLRB protections: The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that employees' recordings of workplace conversations may be protected under the National Labor Relations Act when the recordings relate to protected concerted activity, such as documenting unsafe working conditions or organizing efforts. In such cases, employer policies banning recording may be unenforceable.
Recording Police and Government Officials
Can You Record Police Officers in New York?
Yes. The First Amendment protects your right to record law enforcement officers performing their duties in public. This right has been recognized by federal courts, including in the Second Circuit, which covers New York. You can:
- Film traffic stops (including your own)
- Record arrests happening in public
- Document interactions with police officers
- Livestream police encounters
Important limitations:
- Do not interfere with police operations
- Do not trespass to get a better angle
- Follow lawful orders to step back (within reason)
- Do not physically obstruct officers in the performance of their duties
Recording Government Meetings
New York's Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law 100 et seq.) requires most government meetings to be open to the public. Recording of open meetings is generally permitted. You can record:
- City council meetings
- County legislature meetings
- School board meetings
- State legislative proceedings
- Public hearings
Government bodies may adopt reasonable rules about the placement of recording equipment, but they generally cannot prohibit recording altogether.

Specific Recording Situations in New York
Can I Record My Landlord in New York?
Yes, if you are part of the conversation. Recording interactions with landlords can help document:
- Verbal agreements about repairs or maintenance
- Harassment or illegal entry
- Disputes about lease terms
- Evidence for tenant rights cases (New York has strong tenant protections under the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act)
Can I Record My Doctor in New York?
Yes, you can record medical appointments you attend. This can be helpful for:
- Remembering complex medical instructions or treatment plans
- Documenting informed consent discussions
- Having an accurate record of diagnoses
- Sharing information with family caregivers
Note that healthcare providers may have their own policies about recording. While you have the legal right to record under one-party consent, a provider could potentially refuse to continue treatment if you decline to stop recording.
Can I Record ACS (Administration for Children's Services) Workers?
Yes. ACS workers are government employees, and you can record your interactions with them as long as you are a participant in the conversation. These recordings can serve as important documentation during investigations or case proceedings.
Can I Record My Ex-Spouse or Co-Parent?
Yes, during conversations you are part of. This is common in custody disputes. However:
- Do not record your children's private conversations without being present as a participant
- Do not use children to secretly record the other parent
- Consider how recordings may be perceived by New York family courts
- Recordings obtained legally are generally admissible in family court proceedings
Can I Use a Dashcam in New York?
Yes. Dashcams are legal in New York. There are no specific statutes restricting their use, but you should:
- Mount the camera so it does not obstruct your view of the road
- Be aware that audio recording follows one-party consent rules
- Know that dashcam footage can be valuable evidence in accident or insurance claims
AI Recording and Transcription Tools in New York
The growing use of AI-powered meeting assistants and transcription tools raises new questions under New York recording law. In December 2025, the New York City Bar Association issued Formal Opinion 2025-6 addressing the ethical implications of using AI to record, transcribe, and summarize conversations.
While the opinion focused on attorney ethics, its guidance is relevant for all New York residents using AI recording tools:
- One-party consent still applies. If you are a participant, you can use AI tools to record and transcribe the conversation without informing others.
- Consider data security. AI transcription services may store recordings on third-party servers. Understand where your data goes and how long it is retained.
- Review AI-generated transcripts for accuracy. AI transcription is not perfect, and errors in automated transcripts could be problematic if the transcript is later used as evidence.
- Workplace AI tools that record calls (such as meeting bots or transcription features in Zoom or Teams) may trigger employer notice requirements under Labor Law 203-c.
Using Recordings as Evidence in New York Courts
Are Recordings Admissible in Court?
Recordings made legally under New York's one-party consent law are generally admissible as evidence in court. However, courts will evaluate:
- Authentication requires proving the recording is genuine and has not been altered
- Relevance means the recording must relate to a matter at issue in the case
- Hearsay rules may exclude certain recorded statements, though many exceptions apply
- Prejudicial vs. probative value considers whether the recording would unfairly influence the jury
Evidence Suppression Under CPLR 4506
CPLR Section 4506 provides that evidence obtained through illegal eavesdropping is generally inadmissible in any trial, hearing, or proceeding. This exclusionary rule applies to both criminal and civil cases and covers recordings made by any individual, not just law enforcement.
However, there is an important exception: illegally obtained recordings are admissible in proceedings against the person who committed the eavesdropping. This means if someone illegally records you, that recording can be used as evidence against them.
An aggrieved party can file a motion to suppress eavesdropping evidence before trial. The motion must be made before the judge who issued the eavesdropping warrant (if one was issued) or before a Supreme Court justice in the judicial district where the case is pending.
Criminal Cases vs. Civil Cases
- Criminal cases: Illegally obtained recordings are inadmissible and may result in criminal charges against the person who made the recording
- Civil cases: The same exclusionary rules under CPLR 4506 apply, and courts can suppress illegally obtained evidence on motion
- Family court: Legally obtained recordings are generally admissible in custody, divorce, and family offense proceedings
Penalties for Illegal Recording in New York

Criminal Penalties
New York treats eavesdropping and unlawful surveillance as serious offenses. Penalties vary based on the specific violation:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Eavesdropping (250.05) | Class E Felony | 1.5 to 4 years in prison |
| Possession of eavesdropping devices (250.10) | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail |
| Failure to report wiretapping (250.15) | Class B Misdemeanor | Up to 90 days in jail |
| Unlawful surveillance, 2nd degree (250.45) | Class E Felony | 1.5 to 4 years in prison; fines up to $5,000 |
| Unlawful surveillance, 1st degree (250.50) | Class D Felony | 2.3 to 7 years in prison; sex offender registration required |
For Class E felonies (eavesdropping and second-degree unlawful surveillance), a first-time offender faces an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of 4 years. Courts may impose an alternative definite sentence of 1 year or less if an indeterminate sentence would be unduly harsh.
Second felony offenders face a minimum of 1.5 to 2 years and a maximum of 3.5 to 4 years for a Class E felony.
Civil Liability
Victims of illegal recording in New York may bring civil lawsuits seeking:
- Actual damages (lost wages, emotional distress, reputational harm)
- Punitive damages for willful or egregious violations
- Attorney's fees and court costs
- Injunctive relief (court orders to stop recording, delete recordings, or prevent distribution)
The statute of limitations for civil claims related to unlawful recording varies depending on the specific cause of action. Consulting with an attorney about filing deadlines is important if you believe you have been illegally recorded.
Federal Laws That May Also Apply
In addition to New York state law, federal statutes may apply to recording situations:
- The Federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2511) is a one-party consent law at the federal level, consistent with New York's approach
- The Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. 2701) covers unauthorized access to stored electronic communications
- The National Labor Relations Act may protect employee recordings related to protected concerted activity, even where employer policies prohibit recording
When both federal and state law apply, the stricter standard governs.
More New York Laws
Sources and References
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.00 - Eavesdropping Definitions(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.05 - Eavesdropping(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.45 - Unlawful Surveillance Second Degree(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- N.Y. Penal Law 250.50 - Unlawful Surveillance First Degree(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- Senate Bill S5077 (2025) - Two-Party Consent Proposal(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- Senate Bill S5070 (2025) - Recording Notice Requirement Proposal(www.nysenate.gov).gov
- New York Open Meetings Law(www.dos.ny.gov).gov
- New York Labor Law 203-c - Employee Privacy Protection(law.justia.com)
- CPLR 4506 - Eavesdropping Evidence Admissibility(law.justia.com)
- NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-6 - AI Recording Ethics(www.nycbar.org)